Search the Community

Authors Stasiak M , Witek P, Adamska-Fita E, Lewiński A Received 27 December 2023 Accepted for publication 20 March 2024 Published 8 April 2024 Volume 2024:16 Pages 35—42 DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S453105 Checked for plagiarism Yes Review by Single anonymous peer review Peer reviewer comments 2 Editor who approved publication: Dr Hemalkumar B Mehta Download Article [PDF] Magdalena Stasiak,1 Przemysław Witek,2 Emilia Adamska-Fita,1 Andrzej Lewiński1,3 1Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital—Research Institute, Lodz, Poland; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Medical University of Warsaw; Mazovian Brodnowski Hospital, Warszawa, Poland; 3Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland Correspondence: Magdalena Stasiak, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital—Research Institute, 281/289 Rzgowska Street, Lodz, 93-338, Poland, Tel +48502049292, Fax +48422711140, Email mstasiak33@gmail.com Abstract: Cushing’s disease (CD) is the most common cause of endogenous hypercortisolism. Osilodrostat was demonstrated to be efficient in treating CD, and the mean average dose required for CD control was < 11 mg/day. Potential differences in osilodrostat treatment between cortisol-producing adenoma (CPA) and CD have not been reported. The aim of this study was to present two patients with CPA in whom significant differences in the response to therapy compared to CD were found. We demonstrated a case of inverse response of cortisol levels with adrenal tumor progression during the initial dose escalation (Case 1). Simultaneously, severe exaggeration of hypercortisolism symptoms and life-threatening hypokalemia occurred. A further rapid dose increase resulted in the first noticeable cortisol response at a dose of 20 mg/day, and a full response at a dose of 45 mg/day. We also present a case that was initially resistant to therapy (Case 2). The doses required to achieve the first response and the full response were the same as those for Case 1. Our study demonstrated that osilodrostat therapy in patients with CPA may require a different approach than that in CD, with higher doses, faster dose escalation, and a possible initial inverse response or lack of response. Keywords: osilodrostat, adrenal adenoma, hypercortisolism, ACTH-independent, adverse events, hypokalemia Introduction Chronic persistent hypercortisolism is a life-threatening condition that requires effective treatment. Untreated exposure to excessive cortisol secretion leads to severely increased morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular diseases, thromboembolic events, sepsis, visceral obesity, impairment of glucose metabolism, and dyslipidaea, as well as musculoskeletal disorders, such as myopathy, osteoporosis, and skeletal fractures. Moreover, neuropsychiatric disorders, such as impairment of cognitive function, depression, or mania, as well as impairment of reproductive function can frequently occur.1,2 Cushing’s disease (CD) – a disorder caused by a pituitary adenoma secreting adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) – is the most common cause of hypercortisolism. Cushing’s syndrome (CS) includes all other causes of cortisol excess, including ectopic ACTH production as well as direct cortisol overproduction by adrenal adenoma (cortisol-producing adenoma [CPA]) or adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). Approximately 10% of hypercortisolism cases result from CPA. The first line therapy is a surgical resection of the tumor, which is the source of hormone excess. However, in many patients surgery is not fully efficient and other therapies are required to reduce cortisol levels. Additionally, due to severe cardiovascular complications and unstable DM, the surgical approach sometimes entails unacceptable risk and it is frequently postponed until cortisol levels are lowered. Pharmacotherapy with steroidogenesis inhibitors reduces cortisol levels and improves the symptoms of hypercortisolism.1,2 As CD is the most common cause of cortisol excess, most studies have focused on the efficacy and safety of novel steroidogenesis inhibitors, including patients with CD only.3–6 This is exactly the case with osilodrostat – a new potent inhibitor of 11β-hydroxylase.3–6 More data are available for metyrapone efficacy and safety in CSA,7 as the drug has been available much longer than osilodrostat. A study by Detomas et al, which reported results of comparison of efficacy of metyrapone and osilodrostat, included 4 patients with adrenal CS, among whom one CPA patient was treated with osilodrostat.8 Osilodrostat is approved in the United States to treat CD in patients in whom pituitary surgery was not curative or is contraindicated.9 In Poland, osilodrostat therapy is available for patients with all kinds of endogenous hypercortisolism not curative with other approaches, within a national program of emergency access to drug technologies.10 Reports on osilodrostat application in CPA are highly valuable as data on potential differences in the treatment regimens between CD and CPA are scarce. Here, we present two patients with CPA in whom the response and doses of osilodrostat were different from those reported in patients with CD. The main purpose of this study was to demonstrate that the efficacy of osilodrostat in CPA is high, although initial resistance to treatment or even deterioration of hypercortisolism can occur during the application of lower doses of the drug. Materials and Methods Study Design and Patients We retrospectively analyzed medical files of two consecutive patients with CPA treated with osilodrostat. The analysis included medical history, laboratory and imaging results as well as a detailed reports of adverse events. Laboratory and Imaging Procedures Serum cortisol and ACTH levels were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) using a Cobas e601 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). UFC excretion was measured by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) using an Abbott Architect ci4100 analyzer (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA). Cross-reactivity with 11-deoxycortisol for this method is very low (2.1% according to the manufacturer’s data). Potassium levels were measured by ion-selective electrode potentiometry using a Beckman Coulter DxC 700 AU Chemistry Analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Computed tomography (CT) imaging was performed using a Philips Ingenuity Core 128 system (Philips, the Netherlands). Ethics Procedures Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this paper. The approval of Institutional Ethics Committee was obtained to publish the case details (approval code KB 33/2023). Presentation of the Cases Case 1 A 51-year-old female was referred to our department in November 2021 because of CPA, disqualified from surgery because of severe hypertension with a poor response to antihypertensive therapy and uncontrolled DM despite high doses of insulin. Additionally, the patient presented with hyperlipidemia and severe obesity (BMI=50.7 kg/m2), gastritis, depression, and osteoarthritis. On admission, she complained of a tendency to gain weight, fragile skin that bruised easily, difficulty with wound healing, susceptibility to infections, and insomnia. Physical examination revealed a moon face with plethora, a buffalo hump, central obesity with proximal muscle atrophy, and purple abdominal striae. The CPA diagnosis was initially made two years earlier, but the patient did not qualify for surgery due to a hypertensive crisis. Soon after this episode, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic began, and the patient was afraid of visiting any medical center because her son had died of COVID-19. Therefore, she was referred to our center for life-threatening hypercortisolism two years later. At the time of admission, computed tomography (CT) imaging revealed a right adrenal tumor of 34x24x37mm, with a basal density of 21 HU and a contrast washout rate typical for adenomas (83%). The size and CT characteristics were identical as they were two years earlier. High serum cortisol levels, undetectable ACTH concentrations, and a lack of physiological diurnal rhythm of cortisol secretion were observed (Table 1). Urinary free cortisol (UFC) excretion was 310 µg/24 h, with an upper normal limit (UNL) of 176 µg/24 h. No cortisol suppression was achieved in high-dose dexamethasone suppression test (DST) (Table 1). Other adrenal-related hormonal parameters were within normal ranges, with values as follows: DHEA-S 42.68 µg/dl, aldosterone 3.24 ng/mL, and renin 59.14 µIU/mL. Table 1 Laboratory Results Before Osilodrostat Therapy – Case 1 Due to multiple severe systemic complications, including uncontrolled hypertension, decompensated DM, and cardiac insufficiency, treatment with osilodrostat was introduced for life-saving pre-surgical management. Osilodrostat was started at a dose of 1 mg twice daily and gradually increased to 6 mg per day with actually an inverse response of serum cortisol level. The late-night cortisol level increased from 16 µg/dl to 25 µg/dl. As the full effect of the osilodrostat dose can occur even after a few weeks, the patient was discharged from hospital and instructed to contact her attending doctor immediately if any health deterioration was noticed. In the case of improvement in the patient’s condition, the next hospitalization was planned 3 weeks later. After three weeks of no contact with the patient, she was readmitted to our department with life-threatening escalation of hypercortisolism, severe hypokalemia, and further deterioration of hypertension, DM, cardiac insufficiency, dyspnea, and significant edemas, including facial edema. Treatments of hypertension, cardiac insufficiency, and DM were intensified, as presented in Table 2. Despite active potassium supplementation, life-threatening hypokalemia of 2.1 mmol/l occurred. Previously observed depression was exaggerated with severe anxiety and fear of death. The dose of osilodrostat was increased to 8 mg/day, and after three days of treatment a further elevation of serum cortisol was found, with an increase in UFC up to 9 × UNL (1546.2 µg/24 h). Due to an entirely unexpected inverse cortisol response, CT imaging was performed and revealed progression of the adenoma size to 39 × 36 × 40 mm, with a slight increase in density up to 27 HU as compared to the previous CT scan performed a month earlier (Figure 1). Table 2 Changes in the Most Important Parameters During Osilodrostat Therapy – Case 1 Figure 1 Progression of the adrenal adenoma size during the initial doses of osilodrostat: (a) CT scan directly before osilodrostat therapy – solid nodule 34x24x37 mm, basal density 21 HU; (b) CT scan during treatment with 8 mg of osilodrostat daily – solid nodule 39x36x40 mm, basal density of 27 HU. Considering the extremely high risk associated with such a rapid cortisol increase and related complications, decision of fast osilodrostat dose escalation was made. The dose was increased by 5 mg every other day, up to 45 mg per day, and, finally, a gradual decrease in the cortisol level (Table 2) was achieved, with UFC normalization to 168 µg/24 h. During dose escalation, no deterioration in the adverse effects (AEs) of osilodrostat was observed. Conversely, hypokalemia gradually improved despite a simultaneous reduction in potassium supplementation (Table 2). Facial edema decreased and the level of anxiety improved significantly. The course of hypertension severity as well as a summary of the main parameters controlled during treatment and the medications used are presented in Table 2. As soon as the cortisol level normalized, the patient was referred for surgery and underwent right adrenalectomy without any complications. Histopathology results confirmed a benign adenoma of the right adrenal gland (encapsulated, well-circumscribed tumor consisting of lipid-rich cells with small and uniform nuclei, mostly with eosinophilic intracytoplasmic inclusions). After surgery, hydrocortisone replacement therapy was administered. A few days after surgery, blood pressure and glucose levels gradually decreased, and the patient required reduction of antihypertensive and antidiabetic medications. After 22 months of follow-up, the patient’s general condition is good with no signs of recurrence. Antidepressant treatment is no longer required in this patient. Body mass index was significantly reduced to 40 kg/m2. The antihypertensive medication was completely discontinued, and the glucose level is controlled only with metformin. The patient still requires hydrocortisone substitution at a dose of 30 mg/day. Case 2 A 39-year-old female was referred to our department in November 2022 with a diagnosis of CPA and unstable hypertension, for which surgery was contraindicated. The patient was unsuccessfully treated with triple antihypertensive therapy (telmisartan 40 mg/day, nebivolol 5 mg/day, and lercanidipine 20 mg/day). The patient reported weight gain, muscle weakness, acne, fragile skin that bruised easily, and secondary amenorrhea. Other comorbidities included gastritis, hypercholesterolemia, and osteoporosis. Physical examination revealed typical signs of Cushing’s syndrome, such as abnormal fat distribution, particularly in the abdomen and supraclavicular fossae, proximal muscle atrophy, moon face, and multiple hematomas. A lack of a serum cortisol diurnal rhythm with high late-night serum cortisol and undetectable ACTH levels was found (Table 3). The short DST revealed no cortisol suppression (Table 3), and the UFC result was 725 µg/24 h, which exceeded the UNL more than four times. The serum levels of renin, aldosterone, and 24-h urine fractionated metanephrines were within the normal ranges. Computed tomography imaging revealed a left adrenal gland tumor measuring 25 × 26 × 22 mm, with a basal density of 32 HU and a washout rate typical for adenoma (76%). Table 3 Laboratory Results Before Osilodrostat Therapy – Case 2 Osilodrostat therapy was administered for preoperative management. The initial daily dose was 2 mg/day, increased gradually by 2 mg every day with no serum cortisol response (late night cortisol levels 15.8–18.5 µg/dl) and no AEs of the drug (Table 4). After the daily dose of osilodrostat reached 10 mg, it was escalated by 5 mg every other day, initially with no serum cortisol reduction. The dose was increased to 45 mg daily (with the lowest detected late-night serum cortisol of 9.6 µg/dl) (Table 4). Table 4 Changes in the Most Important Parameters During Osilodrostat Therapy – Case 2 After a week of administration of 45 mg daily, UFC normalization was achieved. Despite rapid dose escalation, no AEs were observed during the entire therapy period. Potassium levels were normal without any supplementation (the lowest detected serum potassium level was 3.9 mmol/l; all other results were over 4.0 mmol/l) (Table 4). After UFC normalization, left adrenalectomy was performed without complications. Histopathological examination revealed benign adrenal adenoma. Antihypertensive therapy was reduced only to 2.5 mg of nebivolol daily. The patient’s general condition improved significantly. Currently, hydrocortisone replacement therapy is administered at a dose of 15 mg/day. Discussion Osilodrostat is a novel potent steroidogenesis inhibitor whose efficacy and safety have been thoroughly analyzed in clinical trials of patients with CD, the most common cause of endogenous hypercortisolism. No clinical trial of osilodrostat therapy in CPA has been performed, as this disease constitutes only 10% of all cases of endogenous hypercortisolism. Moreover, osilodrostat is not approved by the FDA for hypercortisolism conditions other than CD.9 Therefore, data on potential differences in the treatment regimen are lacking. During the course of already reported trials in CD, osilodrostat doses were escalated slowly, every 2–3 weeks,3,5,6 with an excellent response to quite low doses of the drug.3–6 In the LINC 2 extension study the median average dose was 10.6 mg/day,5 while in the LINC 3 extension study and the LINC 4 study it was 7.4 mg/day and 6.9 mg/day, respectively.4,6 In most cases, a significant decrease of hypercortisolism was reported with the low doses of osilodrostat (4 or 10 mg/day). Moreover, some patients received 1 mg/day or even 1 mg every other day, with a good response.6 Even in rare cases of CD in whom initial short-term etomidate therapy was given at the beginning of osilodrostat therapy, due to highly severe life-threatening symptoms of hypercortisolism, the final effective dose of osilodrostat was much lower than that in our patients with CPA (25 mg/day vs 45 mg/day) and no increase of cortisol level was observed.11 It should be underlined that many cases of adrenal insufficiency during osilodrostat therapy in patients with CD have been reported,3–6,12,13 and – therefore – low initial dose with slow gradual dose escalation is recommended in patients with CD.1,6,13 In the cases presented here, CPA led to severe hypercortisolism, the complications of which constituted contraindications for surgery. Therefore, osilodrostat therapy was introduced as a presurgical treatment. In Case 1, the therapy was started at low doses according to the approved product characteristics.14 Due to the severity of hypertension, which was uncontrolled despite of active antihypertensive therapy, as well as to unstable DM, the doses were increased faster than recommended. Surprisingly, we immediately observed a gradual increase in hypercortisolism, in both serum cortisol levels and the UFC, with simultaneous burst of complications related to both hypercortisolism itself and 11β-hydroxylase inhibition. Life-threatening episodes of hypertensive crisis responded poorly to standard therapies. Severe exaggeration of cardiac insufficiency could probably be related to these episodes as well as to deep hypokalemia, which occurred despite potassium supplementation. Hypokalemia is a typical complication of treatment with 11β-hydroxylase inhibitors due to the accumulation of adrenal hormone precursors. However, Patient 1 required much higher doses of potassium supplementation, both parenteral and oral, than ever described during osilodrostat therapy.3–6,13 The dose of 20 mg/day of osilodrostat was the first one which led to noticeable cortisol reduction and a decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) to below 170 mmHg. Surprisingly, instead of the expected deterioration of hypokalemia, parenteral potassium administration could be stopped with an osilodrostat dose of 20 mg/day and oral supplementation was gradually reduced simultaneously with osilodrostat dose escalation. The reason why such severe hypokalemia occurred with low doses of osilodrostat and did not deteriorate further seems complex. One possible reason is the administration of high doses of potassium-saving antihypertensive drugs such as spironolactone and the angiotensin II receptor antagonist telmisartan. Additionally, one can consider other possible mechanisms, such as downregulation of the receptors of deoxycorticosterone (DOC) or other adrenal hormone precursors. However, this hypothesis requires further research and confirmation. Such an improvement of the potassium level during osilodrostat dose escalation was previously demonstrated in a patient with CD.11 Interestingly, in our Patient 2, no potassium supplementation was required during the whole time of osilodrostat therapy, although the doses were increased intensively up to the finally effective dose, which was the same (45 mg/day) as for Patient 1. In Patient 2, no actual response to doses lower than 20 mg/day was observed. UFC normalization was achieved after a week of administration of 45 mg/day, five weeks from the beginning of therapy. Although UFC normalization is not always required in pre-surgical treatment, clinical symptoms significantly improved in our patients only after the UFC upper normal level was achieved. The present paper is one of only a few reports focused on osilodrostat therapy in CPA, and the only one presenting a different therapy course as compared to patients with CD. No case of CPA resistance to low doses of osilodrostat has been described. It should be underlined that in our report “low doses” of osilodrostat were higher than the average mean doses of osilodrostat used in clinical trials in patients with CD.3–6 Therefore, they should not generally be considered low but only much lower than those which were effective in our patients. Malik and Ben-Shlomo presented a case of CPA treated with osilodrostat, with an immediate decrease in cortisol level at 4 mg/day and adrenal insufficiency symptoms after dose escalation to 8 mg/day.15 Similar to our two cases, their patient was a middle-aged female with normal results of all other adrenal parameters, such as renin, angiotensin, or metanephrine levels. However, a CT scan was not performed (or presented), while magnetic resonance imaging revealed an indeterminate adrenal gland mass without a typical contrast phase/out-of-phase dropout for adenoma.15 Therefore, different morphology of cortisol-secreting adrenal tumor can potentially be considered a reason of the different response to treatment. Tanaka et al performed a multicenter study on the efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in Japanese patients with non-CD Cushing’s syndrome.16 Five patients with CPA were included in the study, and none of them required osilodrostat doses higher than 10 mg/day to achieve UFC normalization. However, most of the patients presented by Tanaka et al were previously treated with metyrapone,16 whereas both of our patients were treatment-naive. Previous metyrapone therapy may be considered as a potential reason of better response to osilodrostat. This hypothesis was confirmed in the quoted study by Tanaka et al, who demonstrated that at week 12 the median percent changes in the mUFC values were higher in patients previously treated with metyrapone (–98.97%) than in treatment-naive cases (–86.65%).16 Detomas et al performed a comparison of efficacy and safety of osilodrostat and metyrapone, with one CPA patients included in a group treated with osilodrostat, however no data on a dose required for a disease control are available separately for this particular patient.8 To the best of our knowledge, no more CPA cases have been described and therefore no further comparison is available. Higher doses of osilodrostat were administered to a group of seven patients with hypercortisolism due to adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) presented by Tabarin et al.17 A full control of hypercortisolism was achieved in one patient for each dose of 4, 8, 10, and 20 mg/day, and in three patients treated with 40 mg/day.17 These patients, however received other therapies including mitotane and chemotherapy, which can significantly modify the response to osilodrostat. Several authors have reported the phenomenon of a partial or total loss of response to osilodrostat.5,16,17 In such cases, a response to treatment was initially achieved and then lost during treatment with the same dose. A further increase in osilodrostat dose usually resulted in the response resumption.5,16,17 Such a situation could not be suspected in either of our cases. The presented cases provide a novel insight into modalities of treatment with osilodrostat in patients with CPA and demonstrate for the first time that an inverse cortisol response is possible in CPA cases, especially those with a higher CT density of adrenal adenoma. Such a situation should not be considered a contraindication to dose escalation. Conversely, the dose should be increased more intensively so as to achieve the initial efficacy threshold, which was 20 mg/day in both of our patients. The fully efficient dose that allowed UFC normalization was more than twice as high (45 mg/day in both cases). A similar approach should be applied in patients who do not respond to lower doses, such as Patient 2. The safety of osilodrostat therapy is strictly individual and not dose dependent in patients with CPA. Adverse events, including hypokalemia, severe hypertension, and edema, can be of life-threatening severity or may not occur regardless of the dose. Moreover, AEs of high severity may decrease with osilodrostat dose escalation. Our study demonstrated that osilodrostat is efficient and can be used in patients with CPA as a pre-surgical therapy if surgery is contraindicated due to hypercortisolism complications. Our study presented two cases of CPA treated with osilodrostat, and a small size of our group is the main limitation of this report. Future research is required to confirm our observations. Conclusion In some patients with CPA, the doses of osilodrostat required for disease control can be much higher than those previously reported. Acceleration of the dose increase can be fast, and the risk of overdosing, adrenal insufficiency, and later necessity of dose reduction seem to be much lower than it could be expected. Low initial doses (<20 mg/day in our study) can be entirely ineffective or can even cause exacerbation of hypercortisolism, whereas high doses (45 mg/day in the present study) are efficient in pre-surgery UFC normalization. AEs associated with osilodrostat can be rapid, with severe hypokalemia despite active potassium supplementation, or may not occur even if high doses of osilodrostat are applied. Therefore, close monitoring for potential AEs is necessary. Acknowledgments The abstract included some parts of this paper was presented at the European Congress of Endocrinology ECE2023 as a rapid communication. The abstract was published in the Endocrine Abstracts Vol. 90 [https://www.endocrine-abstracts.org/ea/0090/]. Funding The publication of this report was financially supported by the statutory funds of the Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital – Research Institute, Lodz, Poland. Disclosure Professor Przemysław Witek reports personal fees from Investigator in the clinical trials paid by Novartis and Recordati Rare Diseases, outside the submitted work; lectures fees from Recordati Rare Diseases, Strongbridge, IPSEN. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work. References 1. Fleseriu M, Auchus R, Bancos I, et al. Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing’s disease: a guideline update. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9(12):847–875. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00235-7 2. Pivonello R, Isidori AM, De Martino MC, et al. Complications of Cushing’s syndrome: state of the art. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(7):611–629. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(16)00086-3 3. Pivonello R, Fleseriu M, Newell-Price J, et al. Efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in patients with Cushing’s disease (LINC 3): a multicentre Phase III study with a double-blind, randomised withdrawal phase. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8(9):48–761. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30240-0 4. Fleseriu M, Newell-Price J, Pivonello R, et al. Long-term outcomes of osilodrostat in Cushing’s disease: LINC 3 study extension. Eur J Endocrinol. 2022;187(4):531–541. doi:10.1530/EJE-22-0317 5. Fleseriu M, Biller BMK, Bertherat J, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in Cushing’s disease: final results from a Phase II study with an optional extension phase (LINC 2). Pituitary. 2022;25(6):959–970. doi:10.1007/s11102-022-01280-6 6. Gadelha M, Bex M, Feelders RA, et al. Randomized trial of osilodrostat for the treatment of Cushing disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(7):e2882–e2895. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgac178 7. Daniel E, Aylwin S, Mustafa O, et al. Effectiveness of metyrapone in treating cushing’s syndrome: a retrospective multicenter study in 195 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(11):4146–4154. doi:10.1210/jc.2015-2616 8. Detomas M, Altieri B, Deutschbein T, et al. Metyrapone versus osilodrostat in the short-term therapy of endogenous cushing’s syndrome: results from a single center cohort study. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:903545. doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.903545 9. U.S. food and drug administration home page. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-new-treatment-adults-cushings-disease. Accessed March 22, 2023. 10. Agency for health technology assessment and tariff system home page. Available from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwj6ypGbsfT9AhUMzYsKHTgAD2EQFnoECA8QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fbipold.aotm.gov.pl%2Fassets%2Ffiles%2Fwykaz_tli%2FRAPORTY%2F2020_010.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3P2Q85gwi3JcxKkW3uxfOb. Accessed March 22, 2022. 11. Dzialach L, Sobolewska J, Respondek W, et al. Cushing’s syndrome: a combined treatment with etomidate and osilodrostat in severe life-threatening hypercortisolemia. Hormones. 2022;21(4):735–742. doi:10.1007/s42000-022-00397-4 12. Ekladios C, Khoury J, Mehr S, et al. Osilodrostat-induced adrenal insufficiency in a patient with Cushing’s disease. Clin Case Rep. 2022;10(11):e6607. doi:10.1002/ccr3.6607 13. Fleseriu M, Biller BMK. Treatment of Cushing’s syndrome with osilodrostat: practical applications of recent studies with case examples. Pituitary. 2022;25(6):795–809. doi:10.1007/s11102-022-01268-2 14. Summary of product characteristics. Available from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwim1_KdsvT9AhVq-ioKHUZKAc4QFnoECA4QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ema.europa.eu%2Fen%2Fdocuments%2Fproduct-information%2Fisturisa-epar-product-information_pl.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0S8nayCTdqNh1LsEcXVLEu. Accessed March 24, 2023. 15. Malik RB, Ben-Shlomo A. Adrenal cushing’s syndrome treated with preoperative osilodrostat and adrenalectomy. AACE Clin Case Rep. 2022;8(6):267–270. doi:10.1016/j.aace.2022.10.001 16. Tanaka T, Satoh F, Ujihara M, et al. A multicenter, Phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of osilodrostat, a new 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor, in Japanese patients with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome other than Cushing’s disease. Endocr J. 2020;67(8):841–852. doi:10.1507/endocrj.EJ19-0617 17. Tabarin A, Haissaguerre M, Lassole H, et al. Efficacy and tolerance of osilodrostat in patients with Cushing’s syndrome due to adrenocortical carcinomas. Eur J Endocrinol. 2022;186(2):K1–K4. doi:10.1530/EJE-21-1008 © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms. Download Article [PDF]

Corcept Therapeutics Incorporated (NASDAQ: CORT), a commercial-stage company engaged in the discovery and development of medications to treat severe endocrinologic, oncologic, metabolic and neurologic disorders by modulating the effects of the hormone cortisol, today announced completion of enrollment in GRADIENT, a Phase 3 trial of its proprietary selective cortisol modulator relacorilant in patients with Cushing’s syndrome (hypercortisolism) caused by an adrenal adenoma or adrenal hyperplasia. “Hypercortisolism with adrenal etiology affects many patients and is associated with serious cardiometabolic comorbidities, including hypertension and hyperglycemia, and increased risk of premature death,” said Bill Guyer, PharmD, Corcept’s Chief Development Officer. “GRADIENT is the first prospective placebo-controlled study to be conducted exclusively in these patients with Cushing’s syndrome. We expect data from GRADIENT in the fourth quarter of this year.” GRADIENT is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at sites in the United States, Europe and Israel. One-hundred thirty-seven patients were randomized 1:1 to receive relacorilant or placebo for 22 weeks. Primary endpoints are improvement in glucose metabolism and hypertension. About Cushing’s Syndrome (Hypercortisolism) Cushing’s syndrome is caused by excessive activity of the hormone cortisol. Endogenous Cushing’s syndrome is an orphan disease that most often affects adults aged 20-50. Symptoms vary, but most patients experience one or more of the following manifestations: high blood sugar, diabetes, high blood pressure, upper-body obesity, rounded face, increased fat around the neck, thinning arms and legs, severe fatigue and weak muscles. Irritability, anxiety, cognitive disturbances and depression are also common. Cushing’s syndrome can affect every organ system and can be lethal if not treated effectively. About Relacorilant Relacorilant is a selective cortisol modulator that binds to the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), but does not bind to the body's other hormone receptors. Corcept is studying relacorilant in a variety of serious disorders, including ovarian, adrenal and prostate cancer and Cushing’s syndrome. Relacorilant is proprietary to Corcept and is protected by composition of matter, method of use and other patents. Relacorilant has orphan drug designation in the United States and the European Union for the treatment of Cushing’s syndrome. About Corcept Therapeutics For over 25 years, Corcept’s focus on cortisol modulation and its potential to treat patients across a wide variety of serious disorders has led to the discovery of more than 1,000 proprietary selective cortisol modulators. Corcept’s advanced clinical trials are being conducted in patients with hypercortisolism, solid tumors, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and liver disease (NASH). In February 2012, the company introduced Korlym, the first medication approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Corcept is headquartered in Menlo Park, California. For more information, visit Corcept.com. Forward-Looking Statements Statements in this press release, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements based on our current plans and expectations that are subject to risks and uncertainties that might cause our actual results to differ materially from those such statements express or imply. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, our ability to operate our business; risks related to the study and development of Korlym as well as relacorilant, miricorilant, dazucorilant and our other product candidates, including their clinical attributes, regulatory approvals, mandates, oversight and other requirements; and the scope and protective power of our intellectual property. These and other risks are set forth in our SEC filings, which are available at our website and the SEC’s website. In this press release, forward-looking statements include those concerning the development of relacorilant as a treatment for Cushing’s syndrome, and design, timing and expectations regarding our GRADIENT trial. We disclaim any intention or duty to update forward-looking statements made in this press release. From https://finance.yahoo.com/news/corcept-completes-enrollment-phase-3-120000179.html

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features and treatment options for pediatric adrenal incidentalomas(AIs) to guide the diagnosis and treatment of these tumors. Methods The clinical data of AI patients admitted to our hospital between December 2016 and December 2022 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into neonatal and nonneonatal groups according to their age at the time of the initial consultation. Results In the neonatal group, 13 patients were observed and followed up, and the masses completely disappeared in 8 patients and were significantly reduced in size in 5 patients compared with the previous findings. Four patients ultimately underwent surgery, and the postoperative pathological diagnosis was neuroblastoma in three patients and teratoma in one patient. In the nonneonatal group, there were 18 cases of benign tumors, including 9 cases of ganglioneuroma, 2 cases of adrenocortical adenoma, 2 cases of adrenal cyst, 2 cases of teratoma, 1 case of pheochromocytoma, 1 case of nerve sheath tumor, and 1 case of adrenal hemorrhage; and 20 cases of malignant tumors, including 10 cases of neuroblastoma, 9 cases of ganglioneuroblastoma, and 1 case of adrenocortical carcinoma. Conclusions Neuroblastoma is the most common type of nonneonatal AI, and detailed laboratory investigations and imaging studies are recommended for aggressive evaluation and treatment in this population. The rate of spontaneous regression of AI is high in neonates, and close observation is feasible if the tumor is small, confined to the adrenal gland and has no distant metastasis. Peer Review reports Background The incidence of adrenal incidentaloma (AI) is increasing due to the increased frequency of imaging and improved imaging sensitivity [1]. AI is relatively common in adults, and several organizations, such as the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American Association of Endocrine Surgeons and the European Society Endocrinology, have proposed specific protocols to guide the evaluation, treatment, and follow-up management of AI in adults [2]. Although AI, a nonfunctioning adrenocortical adenoma, is most common in adults, neuroblastoma is the most common incidental tumor of the adrenal gland in children. In addition, in the neonatal period, which is a more complex stage of childhood, the biology of adrenal masses found in this age group is also more specific, and the nature of these masses can range from spontaneous regression to rapid progression to aggressive disease with metastatic dissemination and even death. Given that AI is the most common malignant tumor, the management of AI in children cannot be simply based on the measurements used in adult AI. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of pediatric AI patients in a single center to investigate the clinical characteristics and management of AI in children. Methods A total of 66 children with adrenal tumors were diagnosed and treated at the Department of Urology of the Children’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from December 2016 to December 2022. A total of 55 cases were detected during physical examination, or the patients were diagnosed and received treatment for diseases other than adrenal disease after excluding adrenal tumors detected due to typical clinical manifestations or signs such as centripetal obesity and precocious puberty. Research protocols involving human materials were approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Children’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. All clinical information, radiological diagnosis, laboratory test results, intervention results, and follow-up data were collected from the department’s database. All the children underwent ultrasonography and CT scanning, and 11 children underwent MRI. In addition to routine tests such as blood routine and biochemical indexes, the examination and evaluation of adrenal endocrine hormones and tumor markers included (1) plasma cortisol and ACTH levels, (2) plasma catecholamine and metabolite determination, (3) plasma renin and plasma aldosterone, (4) urinary vanillylmandelic acid/homovanillic acid(VMA/HVA), and (5) AFP, CEA, NSE, and CA19-9. Five patients underwent a low-dose dexamethasone suppression test. Seventeen of the 55 patients were treated with watch-waiting therapy, 4 of the 17 ultimately underwent surgery, 4 of the 38 patients underwent tumor biopsy, and 34 underwent adrenalectomy. The data were analyzed using Graph Pad Prism 8. The measurement data are expressed as ‾x ± sd. The maximum diameter of the tumors, age of the patients with benign and malignant tumors, and maximum diameter of the tumors between the laparoscopic surgery group and the open surgery group were compared using paired t tests, and the percentages of the count data were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results In this study, all patients were divided into two groups according to their age at the time of consultation: the neonate group and the nonneonate group. Neonate group: There were 7 male and 10 female patients, 7 of whom were diagnosed via prenatal examination and 10 of whom were diagnosed after birth. Five patients were diagnosed with lesions on the left side, 12 patients were diagnosed with lesions on the right side, and the maximal diameters of the masses ranged from 16 to 48 mm. The characteristics of the AIs in the neonate group are presented in Table 1. Table 1 Characteristics of AI in the neonates group Full size table Among the 17 patients, 8 had cystic masses with a maximum diameter of 16∼48 mm, 5 had cystic-solid masses with a maximum diameter of 33∼39 mm, and 4 had solid masses with a maximum diameter of 18∼45 mm. Two patients with solid adrenal gland masses suggested by CT scan had obvious elevations in serum NSE and maximum diameters of 44 and 45 mm, respectively. These patients underwent adrenal tumor resection, and the pathology diagnosed that they had neuroblastomas(NB). In one patient, the right adrenal gland was 26 × 24 × 27 mm in size with slightly elevated echogenicity at 38 weeks after delivery, and the mass increased to a size of 40 × 39 × 29 mm according to the 1-month postnatal review. MRI suggested that the adrenal gland tumor was associated with liver metastasis, and the pathology of the tumor suggested that it was NB associated with liver metastasis after surgical resection (stage 4 S, FH). One child was found to have 25 × 24 × 14 mm cystic echoes in the left adrenal region during an obstetric examination, and ultrasound revealed 18 × 11 mm cystic solid echoes 5 days after birth. Ultrasound revealed 24 × 15 mm cystic solid echoes at 2 months. Serum NSE and urinary VMA were normal, and the tumor was excised due to the request of the parents. Pathology suggested a teratoma in the postoperative period. A total of 13 children did not receive surgical treatment or regular review via ultrasound, serum NSE or urine VMA. The follow-up time ranged from 1 to 31 months, with a mean of 9.04 ± 7.61 months. Eight patients had complete swelling, and 5 patients were significantly younger than the previous patients. Nonneonate group: There were 24 male and 14 female patients in the nonneonate group; 24 patients had lesions on the left side, 14 patients had lesions on the right side, and the maximal diameters of the masses ranged from 17 to 131 mm. Most of these tumors were found during routine physical examinations or incidentally during examinations performed for various complaints, such as gastrointestinal symptoms, respiratory symptoms, or other related conditions. As shown in Table 2, abdominal pain was the most common risk factor (44.7%) for clinical onset, followed by routine physical examination and examination for respiratory symptoms. Table 2 Clinical presentations leading to discovery of AI in non-neonate group Full size table Among the 38 patients, 10 had NBs with maximum diameters ranging from 20 to 131 mm, 9 had ganglion cell neuroblastomas with maximum diameters ranging from 33.6 to 92 mm, 9 had ganglion cell neuromas with maximum diameters ranging from 33 to 62 mm, 2 had adrenal adenomas with maximum diameters ranging from 17 to 70 mm, 1 had a cortical carcinoma with a maximum diameter of 72 mm, 2 had adrenal cysts with maximum diameters ranging from 26 to 29 mm, 2 had mature teratomas with maximum diameters of 34 and 40 mm, 1 had a pheochromocytoma with a diameter of 29 mm, 1 had a nerve sheath tumor with a diameter of 29 mm, and 1 patient with postoperative pathological confirmation of partial hemorrhagic necrosis of the adrenal gland had focal calcification with a maximum diameter of 25 mm (Table 3). Table 3 Distribution of different pathologies among AI with various sizes in non-neonate group Full size table The mean age of children with malignant tumors was significantly lower than that of children with benign tumors (57.95 ± 37.20 months vs. 105.0 ± 23.85 months; t = 4.582, P < 0.0001). The maximum diameter of malignant tumors ranged from 20 to 131 mm, while that of benign tumors ranged from 17 to 72 mm, and the maximum diameter of malignant tumors was significantly greater than that of benign tumors (65.15 ± 27.61 mm v 37.59 ± 12.98 mm; t = 3.863, P = 0.0004). Four biopsies, 5 laparoscopic adrenal tumor resections and 11 open adrenal tumor resections were performed for malignant tumors, and 16 laparoscopic adrenal tumor resections and 2 open procedures were performed for benign tumors. The maximum diameter of the tumors ranged from 17 to 62 mm in 21 children who underwent laparoscopic surgery and from 34 to 99 mm in 13 children who underwent open resection; there was a statistically significant difference in the maximum diameter of the tumors between the laparoscopic surgery group and the open surgery group (35.63 ± 10.36 mm v 66.42 ± 20.60 mm; t = 5.798, P < 0.0001). Of the 42 children with definitive pathologic diagnoses at surgery, 23 had malignant tumors, and 19 had benign tumors. There were 15 malignant tumors with calcification on imaging and 5 benign tumors. The percentage of malignant tumors with calcifications in was significantly greater than that of benign tumors (65.22% v 26.32%; P = 0.0157). In the present study, all the children underwent CT, and 31 patients had postoperative pathological confirmation of NB. A total of 26 patients were considered to have neurogenic tumors according to preoperative CT, for a diagnostic compliance rate of 83.97%. Three children were considered to have cortical adenomas by preoperative CT, and 1 was ultimately diagnosed by postoperative pathology, for a diagnostic compliance rate of 33.33%. For 4 patients with teratomas and adrenal cysts, the CT findings were consistent with the postoperative pathology. According to our research, NB 9-110HU, GNB 15-39HU, GB 19-38HU, ACA 8HU, adrenal cyst 8HU, and cellular achwannoma 17HU. Discussion According to the clinical practice guidelines developed by the European Society of Endocrinology and European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors, AI is an adrenal mass incidentally detected on imaging not performed for a suspected adrenal disease [3]. The prevalence of AI is approximately 4%, and the incidence increases with age [4]. Most adult AIs are nonfunctioning benign adrenal adenomas (up to 75%), while others include functioning adrenal adenomas, pheochromocytomas, and adrenocortical carcinomas [5]. In contrast to the disease spectrum of adult AI cases, NB is the most common tumor type among children with AI, and benign cortical adenomas, which account for the vast majority of adult AI, accounting for less than 0.5% of cases in children [6]. According to several guidelines, urgent assessment of an AI is recommended in children because of a greater likelihood of malignancy [3, 7]. When an adult patient is initially diagnosed with AI, it should be clear whether the lesion is malignant and functional. In several studies, the use of noncontrast CT has been recommended as the initial imaging method for adrenal incidentaloma; a CT attenuation value ≤ 10 HU is used as the diagnostic criterion for benign adenomas; and these methods have a specificity of 71-79% and a sensitivity of 96-98% [8, 9]. A CT scan of tumors with diameters greater than 4 to 6 cm, irregular margins or heterogeneity, a CT attenuation value greater than 10 HU, or a relative contrast enhancement washout of less than 40% 10 or 15 min after administration of contrast media on enhanced CT is considered to indicate potential malignancy [7]. As the most common AI in children, NB often appears as a soft tissue mass with uneven density on CT, often accompanied by high-density calcified shadows, low-density cystic lesions or necrotic areas. CT scans can easily identify more typical NBs, and for those AIs that do not show typical calcified shadows on CT, it is sometimes difficult to differentiate neurogenic tumors from adenomas. In these patients, except for the 1 patient with adrenal cysts who had a CT value of 8 HU, very few of the remaining AI patients had a CT value less than 10 HU. Therefore, the CT value cannot be used simply as a criterion for determining the benign or malignant nature of AI, and additional imaging examinations, such as CT enhancement, MRI, and FDG-PET if necessary, should be performed immediately for AI in children. Initial hormonal testing is also needed for functional assessment, and aldosterone secretion should also be assessed when the patient is hypertensive or hypokalemic [7]. Patients with AI who are not suitable for surgery should be observed during the follow-up period, and if abnormal adrenal secretion is detected or suggestive of malignancy during this period, prompt adrenal tumor resection is needed. For adult patients with AI, laparoscopic adrenal tumor resection is one of the most effective treatments that has comparative advantages in terms of hospitalization time and postoperative recovery speed; however, there is still some controversy over whether to perform laparoscopic surgery for some malignant tumors with large diameters, especially adrenocortical carcinomas, and some studies have shown that patients who undergo laparoscopic surgery are more prone to peritoneal seeding of tumors [10]. The maximum diameter of an adult AI is a predictor of malignancy, and a study by the National Italian Study Group on Adrenal Tumors, which included 887 AIs, showed that adrenocortical carcinoma was significantly correlated with the size of the mass, and the sensitivity of detecting adrenocortical carcinoma with a threshold of 4 cm was 93% [11]. According to the National Institutes of Health, patients with tumors larger than 6 cm should undergo surgical treatment, while patients with tumors smaller than 4 cm should closely monitored; for patients with tumors between 4 and 6 cm, the choice of whether to be monitored or surgically treated can be based on other indicators, such as imaging [12]. A diameter of 4 cm is not the initial threshold for determining the benign or malignant nature of a mass in children. In a study of 26 children with AI, Masiakos et al. reported that 9 of 18 benign lesions had a maximal diameter less than 5 cm, 4 of 8 malignant lesions had a maximal diameters less than 5 cm, and 2 had a diameter less than 3 cm. The mean maximal diameter of benign lesions was 4.2 ± 1.7 cm, whereas the mean maximum diameter of malignant lesions was 5.1 ± 2.3 cm. There was no statistically significant difference between the two comparisons; therefore, this study concluded that children with AI diameters less than 5 cm cannot be treated expectantly [6]. Additionally, this study revealed that malignant lesions occurred significantly more frequently than benign lesions in younger children (mean age 1.7 ± 1.8 years v 7.8 ± 5.9 years; P = 0.02). In the nonneonatal group of this study, 20 patients with malignant tumors had maximum diameters ranging from 20 to 131 mm, 10 had malignant tumors larger than 60 mm, and 3 had tumors smaller than 40 cm; 18 patients with benign tumors had maximum diameters ranging from 17 to 70 mm, 5 had diameters ranging from 40 to 60 mm, and 5 had diameters larger than 60 mm. Therefore, it is not recommended to use the size of the largest diameter of the tumor to decide whether to wait and observe or intervene surgically for children with AI. Instead, it is necessary to consider the age of the child; laboratory test results, such as whether the tumor indices are elevated or not; whether the tumor has an endocrine function; etc.; and imaging test results to make comprehensive judgments and decisions. Preoperative aggressive evaluation and prompt surgical treatment are recommended for nonneonatal pediatric AI patients. Adrenal hematoma and NBs are the most common types of adrenal area masses in children, while pheochromocytoma, adrenal cyst, and teratoma are rarer masses [13]. In clinical practice, adrenal hematoma and NB are sometimes difficult to differentiate, especially when adrenal masses are found during the prenatal examination and neonatal period, and such children need to be managed with caution. The Children’s Oncology Group (COG ANBL00B1) implemented the watchful waiting treatment for children under 6 months of age with a solid adrenal mass < 3.1 cm in diameter (or a cystic mass < 5 cm) without evidence of distant metastasis, and if there is a > 50% increase in the adrenal mass volume, there is no return to the baseline VMA or HVA levels, or if there is a > 50% increase in the urinary VMA/HVA ratio or an inversion, surgical resection should be performed [14]. Eighty-three children in this study underwent expectant observation, 16 of whom ultimately underwent surgical resection (8 with INSS stage 1 NB, 1 with INSS stage 2B, 1 with INSS stage 4 S, 2 with low-grade adrenocortical neoplasm, 2 with adrenal hemorrhage, and 2 with extralobar pulmonary sequestration). Most of the children who were observed had a reduced adrenal mass volume. Of the 56 patients who completed the final 90 weeks of expectant observation, 27 (48%) had no residual mass, 13 (23%) had a residual mass volume of 0–1 ml, 8 (14%) had a mass volume of 1–2 ml, and 8 (14%) had a volume of > 2 ml; ultimately, 71% of the residual masses had a volume ≤ 1 ml and 86% had a residual volume ≤ 2 ml. In this study, a total of 16 patients were included in the watchful waiting treatment group; 3 patients underwent surgical treatment during the follow-up period, and 13 patients ultimately completed watchful waiting treatment. After 1–31 months of follow-up, 8 patients’ swelling completely disappeared, and 5 patients’ swelling significantly decreased. After strict screening for indications and thorough follow-up review, AIs in the neonatal period can be subjected to watchful waiting treatment, and satisfactory results can be achieved. For benign adrenal tumors, laparoscopic surgery is superior to open surgery in terms of successful resection, whereas the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery for AI with preoperative suspicion of malignancy is controversial. The European Cooperative Study Group for Pediatric Rare Tumors recommends that minimally invasive surgery be considered only for early childhood tumors and should be limited to small, localized tumors; additionally, imaging should suggest no invasion of surrounding tissue structures or lymph nodes; and this strategy requires surgeons with extensive experience in oncologic and adrenal surgery [15]. NB is the most common pediatric AI, and open tumor resection remains the mainstay of treatment. For small, early tumors without evidence of invasion on preoperative examination, laparoscopic resection may be considered if the principles of oncologic surgery can be adhered to. If the patient responds to chemotherapy, the decision to perform laparoscopic tumor resection can also be re-evaluated after chemotherapy. According to the current study, the recurrence and mortality rates of laparoscopic surgery are comparable to those of open surgery [16, 17]. The relative contraindications for laparoscopic NB resection include a tumor diameter greater than 6 cm, venous dilatation, and the involvement of adjacent organs or blood vessels [18]. Patients who undergo open adrenalectomy have higher overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates than patients who undergo laparoscopic adrenalectomy [19]. Open adrenalectomy remains the gold standard for surgical resection of adrenocortical carcinoma, whereas laparoscopic adrenalectomy should be reserved for highly selected patients and performed by surgeons with appropriate expertise [20]. Cortical tumors are particularly rare among children with AIs and are sometimes not clearly distinguishable from neurogenic tumors on preoperative imaging; in such patients, the presence of subclinical Cushing’s syndrome needs to be carefully evaluated preoperatively; otherwise, a perioperative adrenal crisis may occur [21]. In patients in whom the possibility of an adrenocortical tumor was considered preoperatively, the assessment for subclinical Cushing’s syndrome mainly involved assessing the serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate level and performing an overnight dexamethasone suppression test. A procedure for evaluating pediatric AI is shown in Fig. 1. Imaging is the first step in the evaluation of AI in children. CT can be used to clarify the nature of most tumors. MRI can be used to evaluate imaging risk factors (IDRFs) for NB. Bone marrow cytomorphology is recommended for all children with AI, along with microscopic residual neuroblastoma testing and further bone scanning if the bone marrow examination is positive. In addition, serum tumor marker levels and other relevant tests should be performed, and hormone levels should be evaluated. If adrenal adenomas cannot be completely excluded during the preoperative examination, a 1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test should be performed to exclude subclinical Cushing’s syndrome. In patients with hypertensive hypokalemia, the presence of aldosteronism should be evaluated by testing plasma aldosterone concentrations and plasma renin activity. Adrenal masses found in the neonatal period can be observed if the tumor is small, confined to the adrenal gland and shows no evidence of distant metastasis, while tumors that increase significantly in size during the follow-up period or that are associated with persistently elevated tumor markers require aggressive surgical treatment. Fig. 1 Algorithm for the evaluation and management of a pediatric adrenal incidentaloma. *DST overnight :20µg/kg dexamethasoneweight ˂40 kg,1 mg dexamethasone if ≥ 40 kg. CT = computed tomographic;MRI = magnetic resonance imaging;NSE = neuron-specific enolase;AFP = alpha-fetoprotein;CEA = carcinoembryonic antigen;CA19-9 = cancerantigen19-9;ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone;PAC = plasma aldosterone concentration; PRA = plasma renin activity;DST = dexamethasone suppression test Full size image Data availability The datasets analyzed during the current study are not public, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Abbreviations CT: computed tomographic MRI: magnetic resonance imaging ACTH: adrenocorticotropic hormone VMA: vanillylmandelic acid HVA: homovanillic Acid AFP: alpha-fetoprotein CEA: carcinoembryonic antigen NSE: neuron-specific enolase CA19-9: cancerantigen19-9 FH: favorable histology HU: Hounsfiled Unit COG: Children’s Oncology Group INSS: International Neuroblastoma Staging System References Barzon L, Sonino N, Fallo F, Palu G, Boscaro M. Prevalence and natural history of adrenal incidentalomas. Eur J Endocrinol. 2003;149(4):273–85. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Maas M, Nassiri N, Bhanvadia S, Carmichael JD, Duddalwar V, Daneshmand S. Discrepancies in the recommendedmanagement of adrenalincidentalomas by variousguidelines. J Urol. 2021;205(1):52–9. Article PubMed Google Scholar Fassnacht M, Tsagarakis S, Terzolo M, et al. European Society of Endocrinology clinical practice guidelines on the management of adrenal incidentalomas, in collaboration with the European network for the study of adrenal tumors. Eur J Endocrinol. 2023;189(1):G1–42. Article PubMed Google Scholar Young WFJr. Clinical practice. The incidentally discovered adrenal mass. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(6):601–10. Article Google Scholar Rowe NE, Kumar R, Schieda N, et al. Diagnosis, management, and follow-up of the incidentallydiscoveredadrenalmass: CUAguidelineendorsed by the AUA. J Urol. 2023;210(4):590–9. Article PubMed Google Scholar Masiakos PT, Gerstle JT, Cheang T, Viero S, Kim PC, Wales P. Is surgery necessary for incidentally discovered adrenal masses in children?J. Pediatr Surg. 2004;39(5):754–8. Article Google Scholar Lee JM, Kim MK, Ko SH et al. Clinical guidelines for the management of adrenal incidentaloma. Endocrinol Metab. 2017;32(2). Terzolo M, Stigliano A, Chiodini I, et al. AME position statement on adrenal incidentaloma. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164(6):851–70. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Boland GW, Blake MA, Hahn PF, Mayo-Smith WW. Incidental adrenal lesions: principles, techniques, and algorithms for imaging characterization. Radiology. 2008;249(3):756–75. Article PubMed Google Scholar Payabyab EC, Balasubramaniam S, Edgerly M, et al. Adrenocortical cancer: a molecularlycomplexdiseasewheresurgerymatters. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(20):4989–5000. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Angeli A, Osella G, Alì A, Terzolo M. Adrenal incidentaloma: an overview of clinical and epidemiological data from the National Italian Study Group. Horm Res. 1997;47(4–6):279–83. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Grumbach MM, Biller BM, Braunstein GD, et al. Management of the clinically inapparent adrenal mass (incidentaloma). Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(5):424–9. Article PubMed Google Scholar Zhang K, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Chao M. A retrospective analysis of the clinical characteristics of 207 hospitalized children with adrenal masses. Front Pediatr. 2023;11:1215095. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Nuchtern JG, London WB, Barnewolt CE, et al. A prospective study of expectant observation as primary therapy for neuroblastoma in young infants: a Children‘s oncology group study. Ann Surg. 2012;256(4):573–80. Article PubMed Google Scholar Virgone C, Roganovic J, Vorwerk P, et al. Adrenocortical tumours in children and adolescents: the EXPeRT/PARTNER diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021;68(suppl 4):e29025. Article PubMed Google Scholar Chang S, Lin Y, Yang S, et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic resection of abdominal neuroblastoma without image-defined risk factors: a single-center experience. World J Surg Oncol. 2023;21(1):113. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Zenitani M, Yoshida M, Matsumoto S, et al. Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic tumor resection in children with abdominal neuroblastomas. Pediatr Surg Int. 2023;39(1):91. Article PubMed Google Scholar International Pediatric Endosurgery Group. IPEG guidelines for the surgical treatment of adrenal masses in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010;20(2):vii–ix. Google Scholar Nakanishi H, Miangul S, Wang R, et al. Open versuslaparoscopicsurgery in the management of adrenocorticalcarcinoma: a systematicreview and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;30(2):994–1005. Article PubMed Google Scholar Gaillard M, Razafinimanana M, Challine A, et al. Laparoscopic or openadrenalectomy for stage I-IIadrenocorticalcarcinoma: a retrospectivestudy. J Clin Med. 2023;12(11):3698. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Utsumi T, Iijima S, Sugizaki Y, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumors with endocrine activity: perioperative management pathways for reduced complications and improved outcomes. Int J Urol. 2023;30(10):818–26. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Download references Acknowledgements We would like to express our deepest gratitude to all the patients and their parents who participated in this study. Their patience and cooperation were instrumental to the success of this research. We thank our colleagues in the Department of Radiology for their invaluable contributions in diagnosing and monitoring the progression of adrenal incidentalomas. We sincerely appreciate the hard work of the pathologists in diagnosing and classifying tumors, which laid the foundation for our study. Finally, we would like to thank our institution for providing the necessary resources and an enabling environment to conduct this research. Funding Not applicable. Author information Authors and Affiliations Department of Urology, Children’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 72 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, China Xiaojiang Zhu, Saisai Liu, Yimin Yuan, Nannan Gu, Jintong Sha, Yunfei Guo & Yongji Deng Contributions X.J.Z. and Y.J.D designed the study; S.S.L., Y.M.Y., N.N.G., and J.T.S. carried out the study and collected important data; X.J.Z. analysed data and wrote the manuscript; Y.F.G. and Y.J.D.gave us a lot of very good advices and technical support; All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Corresponding author Correspondence to Yongji Deng. Ethics declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate Ethics approval for this study was granted by the Ethics Committee of Children’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Informed written consent was obtained from all the guardians of the children and we co-signed the informed consent form with their parents before the study. We confirmed that all methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Conflict of interest There are no conflicts of interest. Additional information Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Reprints and permissions From https://bmcpediatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12887-024-04673-7

Abstract Acromegaly is very uncommon, as is non-iatrogenic Cushing syndrome; we discuss a patient who was found to have both a pituitary adenoma causing acromegaly and a cortisol-producing adrenal adenoma causing Cushing syndrome within 1 year. She was a healthy, 44-year-old woman who presented with visual changes and was found to have bitemporal hemianopsia and a 3.3-cm pituitary mass along with central hypogonadism, central hypothyroidism, and suppressed adrenocorticotropin and discrepant cortisol. After transsphenoidal resection she had declining, but persistently elevated, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), raising concern for persistent acromegaly. She also was experiencing several cushingoid symptoms and was found to have elevated salivary and urinary cortisol. An abdominal computed tomography scan showed a 3.1-cm adrenal adenoma, and she subsequently underwent adrenalectomy. Following adrenalectomy, her cortisol levels normalized, and her IGF-1, growth hormone, and oral glucose tolerance test showed substantial improvement consistent with previous reports linking hypercortisolism and elevated IGF-1 levels. Combinations of pituitary and adrenal disease are seen in a handful of genetic syndromes; however, her clinical presentation and genetics do not fit with known syndromes. This case describes two rare endocrine tumors in one patient and associated limitations of routine laboratory testing. acromegaly, adrenal Cushing syndrome, IGF monitoring Issue Section: Case Report Introduction Acromegaly resulting from a pituitary adenoma is a very uncommon occurrence, with roughly 30 to 70 individuals affected per million people [1]. Cushing syndrome from an adrenal adenoma is even rarer, with approximately 0.6 individuals affected per million people [2]. Based on these statistics, the chances of both co-occurring in an individual patient would be astronomically low; however, several genetic syndromes can link these 2 diseases, including multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4, Carney complex, and McCune-Albright syndrome. In addition to the challenge of diagnosing both conditions simultaneously, the presence of both causes a laboratory dilemma. Biochemical control following treatment of a somatotroph adenoma is characterized by growth hormone (GH) suppression during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and normalization of age-adjusted insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels [3]. There is limited information on how hypercortisolism affects these tests, but there are some study data that suggest patients with Cushing syndrome have elevated IGF-1 compared to controls [4, 5]. Patients with multiorgan endocrine involvement need to be monitored for confounders in laboratory testing. Case Presentation A 44-year-old woman presented to her optometrist for progressive blurring of vision and was found to have bitemporal hemianopsia. Her medical history consisted of only mild hypertension for which she was not taking any medications. She reported no contributory family history. A pituitary magnetic resonance imaging scan was obtained showing a 2.1 × 2.5 × 3.3-cm macroadenoma with invasion into the right cavernous sinus, and with upward displacement and flattening of the optic chiasm (Fig. 1). Figure 1. Open in new tabDownload slide Initial magnetic resonance imaging scan of the pituitary showing a large 2.1 × 2.5 × 3.3-cm macroadenoma with invasion into the right cavernous sinus and with upward displacement and flattening of the optic chiasm. A, Sagittal view. B, Coronal view. She had significant elevation of IGF-1 to 610 ng/mL (79.7 nmol/L) (49-240 ng/mL; 12.3-31.4 nmol/L), with an elevated GH level of 23 ng/mL (23 μg/L) (0.01-3.61 ng/mL; 0.01-3.61 μg/L) consistent with acromegaly. She also had coexisting pituitary deficiencies including hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and central hypothyroidism (Table 1, column 2). Morning adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) was low at less than 5.0 pg/mL (<1.1 pmol/L) (7.2-63 pg/mL; 1.6-13.9 pmol/L) on multiple occasions with morning cortisol within normal limits at 18 μg/dL (497 nmol/L) (4-23 μg/dL; 111-1630 nmol/L). When the patient was seen by endocrinology she confirmed several symptoms and signs consistent with acromegaly including amenorrhea, arthralgias, skin tags, coarsening facial features, increased teeth spacing, hair thinning, increased ring and shoe size, hair loss, and new prediabetes. She also reported a 30-pound weight gain, but lost most of this weight by following an intensive weight-loss program consisting of a restrictive diet. Her menstrual periods ceased only 2 months prior to presentation. She associated most of her symptoms to changes in her routine and stressors during the COVID-19 pandemic and did not seek medical evaluation early for these symptoms. Due to uncertainty regarding her low ACTH level in conjunction with normal cortisol levels, she was started on perioperative glucocorticoids as well as thyroid replacement. She underwent a transsphenoidal resection of her pituitary macroadenoma, and the surgical pathology revealed a sparsely granulated somatotroph adenoma that was PIT1 positive, GH weakly positive, keratin cAM 5.2 positive, Ki67 index 1.2%, and was negative for prolactin, ACTH, and TPIT. She had repeat laboratory tests after a hydrocortisone taper was completed (see Table 1, column 3). Table 1. Pituitary laboratory values before intervention, 6 weeks after pituitary resection, and 4 weeks after adrenalectomy (6 months after pituitary resection) Parameter Initial labs 6 weeks post pituitary resection 4 weeks post adrenalectomy* Reference range (non-pregnant premenopausal females) ACTH < 5.0 pg/mL (1.1 pmol/L) < 5.0 pg/mL (1.1 pmol/L) < 5.0 pg/mL (1.1 pmol/L) 7.2-63 pg/mL (1.6-13.9 pmol/L) Serum AM Cortisol 18 μg/dL (497 nmol/L) 16 μg/dL (443 nmol/L) <1 μg/dL (27.6 nmol/L) 4-23 μg/dL (111-1630 nmol/L) LH <0.3 mIU/mL (0.3 IU/L) <0.3 mIU/mL (0.3 IU/L) 6.3 mIU/mL (6.3 IU/L) 0.5-76.3 mIU/mL (0.5-76.3 IU/L) FSH <0.3 mIU/mL (0.3 IU/L) <0.3 mIU/mL (0.3 IU/L) 1.8 mIU/mL (1.8 IU/L) 1.5-33.4 mIU/mL (1.5-33.4 IU/L) Estradiol <12 pg/mL (44 pmol/L) <12 pg/mL (44 pmol/L) 40 pg/mL (146.8 pmol/L) 17-200 pg/mL (62.4-734 pmol/L) GH 23 ng/mL (23 μg/L) 1.81 ng/mL (1.81 μg/L) 0.88 ng/mL (0.88 μg/L) 0.01-3.61 ng/mL (0.01-3.61 μg/L) OGTT GH 0.49 ng/mL (0.49 μg/L) 0.2 ng/mL (0.2 μg/L) 0.01-0.4 ng/mL ** (0.01-0.4 μg/L) IGF 1 610 ng/mL (79.7 nmol/L) 385 ng/mL (50.3 nmol/L) 290 ng/mL (37.9 nmol/L) 49-240 ng/mL (12.3-31.4 nmol/L) Prolactin 9.1 ng/mL (9.1 μg/L) 3.9 ng/mL (3.9 μg/L) 2.8-29.2 ng/mL (2.8-29.2 μg/L) TSH 1.69 mIU/L (1.69 μIU/mL) 0.29 mIU/L (0.29 μIU/mL) 0.05 mIU/L (0.05 μIU/mL) 0.47-4.68 mIU/L (0.47-4.68 μIU/mL) T4, free 0.7 ng/dL (9.0 pmol/L) 0.8 ng/dL (10.3 pmol/L) 1.5 ng/dL (19.4 pmol/L) 0.8-2.2 ng/dL (10.3-28.4 pmol/L) Abnormal values are shown in bold font. Values in parenthesis are International System of Units (SI). Abbreviations: ACTH, Adrenocorticotropic hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; FSH, follicular stimulating hormone; GH, growth hormone; IGF, insulin like growth factor; TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone; T4, thyroxine. *6 months post pituitary resection. **2 hours following glucose load. Open in new tab Her IGF-1 had improved to 385 ng/mL (50.3 nmol/L) (49-240 ng/mL; 12.3-31.4 nmol/L) but it was still elevated, her gonadotropins were still undetectable, and her ACTH was still suppressed with normal morning cortisol levels. She also had a robust response on an ACTH stimulation test. A 3-month postoperative pituitary magnetic resonance imaging scan showed a lobular, hypoenhancing soft tissue in the dorsal aspect of the sella concerning for possible residual tumor. By this time, her most recent IGF-1 was still elevated at 427 ng/mL (55.8 nmol/L). Her 2-hour OGTT using ultrasensitive GH suppressed partially from 1.01 ng/mL (1.01 μg/L) to 0.49 ng/mL (0.49 μg/L) (0.01-0.4 ng/mL; 0.01-0.4 μg/L 2 hours following glucose load) (Table 2). She continued to complain of symptoms such as weight gain, poor sleep, and facial and ankle swelling. Testing for hypercortisolism was finally undertaken and was consistent with Cushing syndrome with midnight salivary cortisol elevated more than 4 times the upper limit of normal on 3 successive tests: 730 ng/dL, 502 ng/dL, 404 ng/dL (2012 nmol/L, 1384 nmol/L, 1114 nmol/L] (<100 ng/dL; < 276 nmol/L). She was also found to have elevated 24-hour urinary free cortisol of 817 μg/24 hours (2254 nmol/day) (3.5-45 μg/24 hours; 9.7-124.2 nmol/day) (Table 3). Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate was low at less than 5 μg/dL (0.13 μmol/L) (75-410 μg/dL; 1.95-10.66 μmol/L). Table 2. Oral glucose tolerance tests performed 3 months post transsphenoidal surgery and 6 weeks post adrenalectomy (6 months post transsphenoidal surgery) Post pituitary resection (3 mo) Post adrenalectomy (6 weeks)* Glucose GH Glucose GH Initial 107 mg/dL (5.93 mmol/L) 1.01 ng/mL (1.01 μg/L) 79 mg/dL (4.38 mmol/L) 0.88 ng/mL (0.88 μg/L) 30 min 129 mg/dL (7.16 mmol/L) 0.34 ng/mL (0.34 μg/L) 60 min 164 mg/dL (9.16 mmol/L) 0.29 ng/mL (0.29 μg/L) 90 min 165 mg/dL (9.16 mmol/L) 0.21 ng/mL (0.2 μg/L) 120 min 149 mg/dL (8.27 mmol/L) 0.49 ng/mL (0.49 μg/L) 142 mg/dL (7.88 mmol/L) 0.20 ng/mL (0.20 μg/L) Reference GH 2 hours after glucose load 0.01 -0.4 ng/mL (0.01 -0.4 μg/L). Abnormal values are shown in bold font. Values in parenthesis are International System of Units (SI). Abbreviations: GH, Growth Hormone. *6 months post pituitary resection. Open in new tab Table 3. Initial testing for hypercortisolism Parameter Value Reference range Midnight salivary cortisol 730 ng/dL (2012 nmol/L) 502 ng/dL (1384 nmol/L) 404 ng/dL (1114 nmol/L) <100 ng/dL (276 nmol/L) 24-h urine free cortisol 817 mcg/24 h (2254 nmol/day) 3.5-45 mcg/24 h (9.7-124.2 nmol/day) DHEA sulfate <5 μg/dL (0.13 μmol/L) 75-410 μg/dL (1.95-10.66 μmol/L) Abnormal values are shown in bold font. Values in parenthesis are International System of Units (SI). Abbreviations: DHEA, Dehydroepiandrosterone. Open in new tab A computerized tomography scan of the abdomen was obtained showing a 3.1-cm, lipid-rich left adrenal adenoma (5 Hounsfield units), which confirmed the likely source of her coexisting adrenal Cushing syndrome (Fig. 2). Figure 2. Open in new tabDownload slide Computed tomography of the abdomen showing a 3.1-cm, lipid-rich adrenal adenoma (5 Hounsfield units). A, Axial view. B, Coronal view. Treatment The patient underwent laparoscopic left adrenalectomy with pathology consistent with adrenal adenoma. Outcome and Follow-up In the following weeks after surgery, the patient reported considerable symptomatic improvement including better sleep, improved ankle swelling, and weight loss. To our astonishment, follow-up laboratory tests in the following months showed recovery of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis (see Table 1, column 4), with return of menses, and improvement in the IGF-1 level to normal levels, and successful suppression of GH level on a 2-hour OGTT: 0.88 ng/mL to 0.20 ng/mL (0.88 μg/L to 0.20 μg/L). This was consistent with biochemical remission of acromegaly (see Table 2). Despite hydrocortisone wean attempts, the patient's hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis has not recovered fully to date. However, there is promising early detection of the ACTH level, which is no longer suppressed. The patient did undergo genetic testing and is heterozygous for a variant of unknown significance detected in the PTCH1 gene, which has no established connection to the development of acromegaly or adrenal Cushing syndrome. Discussion The definition of biochemical control of acromegaly after resection has been redefined over time [6]. Broadly, it is defined as GH suppression during an OGTT and normalization of age-adjusted IGF-1 level 3 to 6 months postoperatively [6, 7]. However, it has been estimated that up to 30% of patients could have discrepant results between IGF-1 and GH levels. Suppression was traditionally defined as GH nadir of less than 1.0 ng/mL (<1.0 μg/L) after OGTT, but now with ultrasensitive assays, the consensus for suppression is a GH level of less than 0.4 ng/mL (<0.04 μg/L) [6]. There was also a retrospective study of postsurgical patients with a mean follow-up of 39 months that suggests a 3-month IGF-1 level less than 1.25 times the upper limit of normal is associated with long-term remission [3]. There are also other factors that can affect GH and IGF-1 levels, such as pregnancy, diabetes, oral estrogen (not transdermal estrogen), and critical illness [7]. There is limited literature on the effects of hypercortisolism on IGF-1 levels, but higher IGF-1 levels were identified in patients with Cushing syndrome as early as 1993 [4]. There was also a retrospective case-control study, published in 2019, measuring preoperative and postoperative IGF-1 levels in Cushing disease patients to matched controls that found a significantly higher proportion of Cushing patients with elevated serum IGF-1 above the reference range compared to controls [5]. In addition, among the patients who achieved remission of their Cushing, IGF-1 levels decreased significantly postoperatively. Though this study did not involve acromegaly patients and included patients with pituitary Cushing disease rather than adrenal Cushing syndrome, we observed in our case a similar phenomenon by which the IGF-1 normalized after cure of the overt hypercortisolism. This is a rare case, but similar cases have been reported, the most similar of which was published in 2011 and detailed the presentation of a patient with acromegaly who was found to have hypercortisolism from an adrenal adenoma 6 years after the resection of her pituitary adenoma. The authors reported that, post adrenalectomy, the patient needed significantly less pegvisomant for biochemical control of her acromegaly [8]. Our case is different in that our patient had overt Cushing syndrome, whereas this patient had mild autonomous cortisol secretion. Because of suppressed ACTH and the focus on GH excess in association with a macroadenoma, we did not initially look for cortisol excess as a cause of our patient’s symptoms. Also, because most visits were conducted by televideo during this time, and there were still COVID restrictions and more limited access in the health care setting, not all clinical features were immediately evident, and in addition, the overlap of symptoms for these 2 different conditions made the diagnosis challenging. During our patient’s workup, genetic testing was completed to identify a unifying genetic syndrome explaining the co-occurrence of 2 different endocrine tumors. Here genes were analyzed using next-generation sequencing and Sanger sequencing. During analysis, the coding domains and a portion of flanking regions were searched; notably, the promotor genes and a portion of the untranslated regions were not reported. The only remarkable finding in her genes was PTCH1, a variant of unknown significance that has no reported relationships to acromegaly or Cushing syndrome. The known syndrome that overlaps the most with her disease would be MEN1 syndrome. Most defects in the MEN1 gene would have been caught with this approach to analysis; however, a portion of the promoter and untranslated genes was not reported. Genes in these regions may be responsible for 5% to 25% of MEN1 gene dysfunction [9]. However, she had no evidence of primary hyperparathyroidism, which has a high penetrance in MEN1 and is most often the first presentation in MEN1 (>93% penetrance and first manifestation in >67%) [10]. Carney complex is another disease process that could be considered, but our patient did not have primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease. McCune-Albright syndrome is unlikely given that she had no fibrous dysplasia of bone or café au lait skin macules on examination. This case raises the question of whether we should be actively searching for additional endocrine abnormalities in patients diagnosed with one endocrine problem. We believe that actively searching for other endocrine abnormalities should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. While identifying other abnormalities early could be lifesaving in a subset of cases, it comes at a cost. Endocrine testing in patients with dysfunction of another endocrine organ may be difficult to interpret, and false positives could result in unnecessary invasive testing. Given the questionable net benefit, each patient should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. As genetic testing continues to improve, we suspect there may be additional subsets of patients who warrant further evaluation. Overall, this case serves as a reminder that we should keep a high index of suspicion for concomitant endocrine abnormalities and in those cases our gold-standard testing may be insufficient. Learning Points In patients with rare endocrine tumors, consider a genetic endocrine syndrome, as other endocrine tumors are more common in these patients than in the general population. Gold-standard testing can be undermined by metabolic or physiologic abnormalities. While televideo visits are a tremendous asset to medicine, at times the lack of a comprehensive physical exam can limit appropriate evaluation. Contributors All authors made individual contributions to authorship. S.S.W., N.C., and K.B. were involved in the diagnosis and management of this case and text editing. J.G. and S.S.W. were involved in manuscript preparation and submission. J.G. was involved in table and figure preparation. All authors reviewed and approved the final draft. Funding No public or commercial funding. Disclosures The authors do not have any conflicts of interest. Informed Patient Consent for Publication Signed informed consent obtained directly from the patient. Data Availability Statement Original data generated and analyzed for this case report are included in this published article. The laboratory that performed the genetic testing described (Ambry Genetics) deposits variant-level data to ClinVar (http://www.clinvar.com/), a public repository that aggregates information about human genomic variation. Abbreviations ACTH adrenocorticotropin GH growth hormone IGF-1 insulin-like growth factor 1 MEN1 multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 OGTT oral glucose tolerance test Author notes Jacob Gabbay and Samantha Steinmetz-Wood contributed equally to this work. © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. From https://academic.oup.com/jcemcr/article/2/1/luad145/7479271?login=false

Abstract Background There is an increasing number of cases of aldosterone- and cortisol-producing adenomas (A/CPAs) reported in the context of primary aldosteronism (PA). Most of these patients have PA complicated with subclinical Cushing's syndrome; cases of apparent Cushing's syndrome (CS) complicated with aldosteronism are less reported. However, Co-secretory tumors were present in the right adrenal gland, a cortisol-secreting adenoma and an aldosterone-producing nodule (APN) were present in the left adrenal gland, and aldosterone-producing micronodules (APMs) were present in both adrenal glands, which has not been reported. Here, we report such a case, offering profound insight into the diversity of clinical and pathological features of this disease. Case presentation The case was a 45-year-old female from the adrenal disease diagnosis and treatment centre in West China Hospital of Sichuan University. The patient presented with hypertension, moon-shaped face, central obesity, fat accumulation on the back of the neck, disappearance of cortisol circadian rhythm, ACTH < 5 ng/L, failed elevated cortisol inhibition by dexamethasone, orthostatic aldosterone/renin activity > 30 (ng/dL)/(ng/mL/h), and plasma aldosterone concentration > 10 ng/dL after saline infusion testing. Based on the above, she was diagnosed with non-ACTH-dependent CS complicated with PA. Adrenal vein sampling showed no lateralization for cortisol and aldosterone secretion in the bilateral adrenal glands. The left adrenocortical adenoma was removed by robot-assisted laparoscopic resection. However, hypertension, fatigue and weight gain were not alleviated after surgery; additionally, purple striae appeared in the lower abdomen, groin area and inner thigh, accompanied by systemic joint pain. One month later, the right adrenocortical adenoma was also removed. CYP11B1 were expressed in the bilateral adrenocortical adenomas, and CYP11B2 was also expressed in the right adrenocortical adenomas. APN existed in the left adrenal gland and APMs in the adrenal cortex adjacent to bilateral adrenocortical adenomas. After another surgery, her serum cortisol and plasma aldosterone returned to normal ranges, except for slightly higher ACTH. Conclusions This case suggests that it is necessary to assess the presence of PA, even in CS with apparent symptoms. As patients with CS and PA may have more complicated adrenal lesions, more data are required for diagnosis. Peer Review reports Background Because both adrenal Cushing's syndrome and primary aldosteronism (PA) can manifest as adrenocortical adenomas, it is difficult to distinguish between them on the sole basis of adrenal computed tomography (CT). There may also be multiple adenomas with different functions in the same adrenal gland [1], which also leads to the difficulty in the interpretation of adrenal vein blood collection results. With the increased reports on cases of PA complicated with subclinical Cushing's syndrome in clinical practice, increasing attention is being given to the screening of PA complicated with subclinical Cushing's syndrome. However, PA screening may be ignored in the diagnosis and treatment of adrenal Cushing's syndrome. Although it has been reported that PA with a diameter > 2 cm may be complicated with aldosterone- and cortisol-producing adenomas (A/CPAs) [2], cases of apparent Cushing's syndrome complicated with PA are less well known. Recently, Y. Fushimi et al. [3] reported a case of apparent Cushing's syndrome complicated with PA. The cortisol-producing enzyme cytochrome P450 (CYP) 11B1 was diffusely expressed in the adenoma, but based on staining, the aldosterone synthase CYP11B2 was significantly expressed in the adjacent adrenal cortex. This finding indicated that aldosterone-producing micronodules (APMs) in the adjacent adrenal cortex may be the pathological basis of PA. Here, a case of bilateral co-secretory lesions presenting with coexisting Cushing syndrome and primary aldosteronism detected by AVS and confirmed by immunohistochemical analysis after surgical resection is reported. Moreover, APMs were found in the adrenal cortex adjacent to bilateral adrenocortical adenomas; an aldosterone-producing nodule was detected adjacent to the unilateral adenoma. Case presentation A 45-year-old female patient was admitted to the adrenal disease diagnosis and treatment centre in West China Hospital of Sichuan University due to "increased blood pressure, weight gain for one year and facial oedema for half a year". After nifedipine controlled-release tablets 30 mg daily and terazosin 2 mg daily were applied, the blood pressure of this patient was still as high as 179/113 mmHg. She had no family history of endocrine disease or malignant tumour. Her body mass index (BMI) was 25.6 kg/m2 at admission, with a moon-shaped face, fat accumulation on the back of the neck and thin skin. Hormonal, glucose, renal function, lipid, and blood electrolyte tests were completed, and the physiological rhythm of cortisol had disappeared. Aldosterone-renin-angiotensin system (RAAS) results showed a significant decrease in renin activity and a significantly higher aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) (as provided in Table 1). Dynamic testing for hormones was conducted, and the results were as follows: (i) in terms of the saline infusion test (SIT) in supine position, the before and after aldosterone level was 17.03 ng/dL and 15.45 ng/dL, respectively; (ii) in terms of the captopril challenge test (CCT), the before and after aldosterone level was 18.49 ng/dl and 15.25 ng/mL, respectively, with an inhibition rate of 17.52%; (iii) in terms of the standard low-dose dexamethasone suppression test, the before and after serum cortisol level was 467.9 nmol/L and 786.3 nmol/L, respectively; the before and after 24-h urine free cortisol (24-h UFC) level was 332.3 µg/24 and 480.4 µg/24, respectively. An enhanced CT scan revealed adenoma lesions in both adrenal glands (Fig. 1a and b). Bone mineral density measurement with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry indicated osteoporosis. Chest CT showed old fractures of the 9th rib on the left side and the 2nd rib on the right side. Table 1 Peripheral blood laboratory data for this case Full size table Fig. 1 Adrenal CT of the patient: A nodule with a size of approximately 1.6 × 1.5 cm was found in the left adrenal gland, and a nodule with a size of approximately 2.2 × 1.8 cm was found in the right adrenal gland. Irregular mild to moderate enhancement was on enhanced CT, and the surrounding fat gap was clear Full size image Based on the above clinical features, the patient was diagnosed with "non-ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome complicated with PA". To assess lateralization, adrenal vein sampling (AVS) stimulated by ACTH was performed after obtaining informed consent. The results showed no lateralization of cortisol and aldosterone secretion (Table 2). Table 2 Results of AVS Full size table After communicating with the patient, the left adrenocortical adenoma was first removed by robot-assisted laparoscopic resection; the thickened adrenal cortex near the left adrenocortical adenoma was also resected during the surgery. The pathological report revealed adrenocortical adenoma, the Weiss score was 1, and immunohistochemistry showed weak CYP11B1 expression in the adenoma and positive CYP11B2 expression in an adjacent nodule. Hypertension was not alleviated after surgery. One month later, purple lines appeared on both sides of the lower abdomen, groin area and inner thigh, accompanied by weight gain, apparent systemic joint pain and fatigue in both lower limbs. The patient was readmitted to the hospital, and examination revealed orthostatic ALD at 11.99 ng/dL, PRA at 0.08 ng/mL/h, angiotensin II at 39.38 ng/L (reference range: 55.3–115.3 ng/L) and ARR at 149.88 (ng/dL)/(ng/mL/h). In addition, ACTH was 2.37 ng/L, serum cortisol was 352.30–353.50–283.90 nmol/L at 8 h-16 h-24 h, 24-h UFC was 112.8 µg, and serum cortisol was 342.10 nmol/L in the morning after the 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test. Enhanced CT of the kidneys and adrenal glands showed no solid nodules or masses in the left adrenal gland, though a nodule with a size of approximately 2.2*1.8 cm was detected in the right adrenal gland. Enhanced CT showed irregular mild to moderate enhancement. Therefore, the diagnosis was still "non-ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome complicated with PA". Subsequently, the right adrenocortical adenoma and the thickened adrenal cortex near the right adrenocortical adenoma were removed by robot-assisted laparoscopic resection. The pathological report indicated adrenocortical adenoma, and immunohistochemistry showed diffuse homogeneous expression of CYP11B1 and CYP11B2. Antibodies against CYP11B1 (MABS502) and CYP11B1 (MABS1251) were purchased from the Millipore Corporation. There were APMs in the adrenal cortex adjacent to the bilateral cortical adenomas. The fluorescence staining image of the left cortical adenoma is shown in Fig. 2. The immunohistochemistry image of the left adrenal gland is given in Fig. 3 and that of the right adrenal gland in Fig. 4. The immunofluorescence method used in this study was indirect immunofluorescence double staining procedure. Paraffin-embedded human adrenal tissues were prepared using heat-induced epitope retrieval after deparaffinization. Tissue sections were blocked with 5% goat serum in PBS, pH 7.4, containing 0.5% SDS, for 1 h. The slides were incubated with individual primary antibodies at 4℃ overnight, followed by incubation with Alexa Fluor 488-, and Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated secondary antibodies specific to the species of the primary antibodies with DAPI for immunofluorescence staining. Antibodies used included anti-CYP11B1 (Millipore, Cat. No. MABS502, 1:100), anti-CYP11B2(Millipore, Cat. No. MABS1251, 1:100), Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-rat IgG secondary antibody (CYP11B1; Green) and Alexa Fluor 647-conjugated anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (CYP11B2; Red). Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Fig. 2 Routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunofluorescence of the left adrenocortical adenoma (green represents expression of CYP11B1 and red that of CYP11B2). This adrenocortical adenoma and the surrounding cortex was cut into three parts. A and C show the overall appearance of the resected portion, with a nodule adjacent to the adenoma. B shows a neoplastic lesion formed by clear cells (aldosterone-producing cell) within nodules, lacking a fibrous envelope. C clearly shows the weak and diffuse expression of CYP11B1 in adrenocortical adenoma and CYP11B2 expression in a nodule in the cortex adjacent to the adenoma. D shows local enlargement of the aldosterone-producing nodule and three aldosterone-producing micronodules adjacent to it Full size image Fig. 3 Resected adrenocortical adenoma and part of the adrenal cortex on the left side. A shows expression of Aldosterone-producing micronodule CYP11B2 in the cortex adjacent to the adenoma. B shows an aldosterone-producing nodule with a diameter of approximately 2 mm. C shows weak positive expression of CYP11B1 in the adenoma and D negative expression of CYP11B1 in the aldosterone-producing nodule Full size image Fig. 4 Resected adrenocortical adenoma and part of the adrenal cortex on the right side. A and B show several Aldosterone-producing micronodules (positive expression of CYP11B2) in the cortex adjacent to the adenoma. C shows diffuse expression of CYP11B1 in the adenoma. D shows diffuse expression of CYP11B2 in the adenoma Full size image The Cushing's syndrome in this patient disappeared after surgery, and glucocorticoids were discontinued after 15 months according to medical advice. Follow-up was conducted for half a year after drug discontinuance, and the patient had no fatigue or dizziness; she was satisfied with the outcomes. Her systolic and diastolic blood pressure remained at 100–120 mmHg and 70–80 mmHg, respectively. During the most recent re-examination, the following results were obtained: (1) orthostatic ALD of 19.1 ng/dL and orthostatic renin concentration of 12.59 µIU/mL, with an aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) of 1.52; (2) PTC at 8 AM of 247 nmol/L, ACTH of 93.55 ng/L and 24-h UFC of 26.8 µg; (3) parathyroid hormone of 3.86 pmol/L; (4) 25-OH-VitD of 119.5 nmol/L; (5) serum creatinine of 60 µmol/L; (6) serum sodium of 140.4 nmol/L, serum potassium of 3.87 mmol/L and serum calcium of 2.27 mmol/L. Discussion and conclusions Adrenal Cushing's syndrome is caused by excessive autonomic secretion of cortisol induced by adrenal cortical tumours or adrenal cortical hyperplasia; primary aldosteronism (PA) is caused by excessive autonomic secretion of aldosterone induced by adrenal cortical tumours or adrenal cortical hyperplasia. More adverse symptoms occur if aldosterone and cortisol-producing adenomas are present. Specifically, (1) it is more difficult to control hypertension; (2) the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events would increase [4]; (3) glucose intolerance and other metabolic complications would be aggravated [5, 6]; (4) patients would be prone towards osteoporosis [7, 8]; (5) adrenal vein sampling results may be misinterpreted [9]; and (6) adrenal insufficiency may occur after surgery. Therefore, it is of great clinical significance to avoid missed diagnosis of A/CPAs. Despite many reports on A/CPAs, the majority of these patients may have subclinical Cushing's syndrome (SCS), and cases of apparent Cushing's syndrome complicated with PA are rarely reported. In the present case, the clinical manifestation of Cushing's syndrome were more apparent, and it would be appropriate to call it cortisol-aldosterone cosecretoma. Naoyoshi Onoda et al. [10] reported a case of Cushing's syndrome caused by a left adrenocortical adenoma (30 mm in diameter) and PA caused by a right adrenocortical adenoma (20 mm in diameter), and Fushimi et al. [3] reported a case of right A/CPA (25 mm*22 mm in size). Interestingly, in the present report, the patient had bilateral A/CPAs, and the clinical manifestations of Cushing's syndrome became more apparent after unilateral resection was performed. Similar to the above two cases, APMs were found in the adrenal cortex adjacent to the A/CPAs, but aldosterone-producing nodules were found near the cortisol-producing adenoma on the left side. The biochemical phenotype of APM-inducing autonomic aldosterone secretion has not been clarified. APMs can also be found in the adrenal tissue of 30% of individuals with normal blood pressure [11] and surrounding areas of APA [12, 13]. APMs do not express CYP11B1 or CYP17A1, which are necessary for the generation of cortisol [12, 14]. In our patient, the aldosterone-producing nodule in the left adrenal gland may have developed from APM. More than one-third of APMs carry known mutations in CACNA1D and ATP1A1, promoting the generation of aldosterone [14, 15]. Unfortunately, we did not perform whole-exome sequencing on the DNA of the peripheral blood and adenoma tissues of this patient. Due to the existence of APMs adjacent to the adenoma, it remains unclear whether there is a risk of the relapse of PA in these cases after resection of adrenal the adenoma. Therefore, it was necessary to conduct medical follow-up for this patient. Remi Goupil et al. performed AVS on 8 patients with cortisol-producing adenoma (CPA), and the results showed that cortisol on the CPA side was higher than that on the contralateral side (median, 6.7 times [range: 2.4–27.2]); P = 0.012]) [16]. There was no significant difference in bilateral cortisol and aldosterone concentrations after AVS in this patient, which is consistent with bilateral A/CPA. Although immunohistochemical results revealed weak expression of CYP11B1 for the first time, expression of cortisol in bilateral adrenal venous blood samples increased significantly after ACTH stimulation. Hence, cortisol was over-synthesized on both sides, and bilateral A/CPAs was definitively diagnosed. In summary, this case highlights the need for A/CPA screening. The complicated pathological features of these cases impose challenges to our understanding of this disease. Due to the presence of APMs in the adrenal cortex near bilateral adrenocortical adenomas, more clinical data are required to identify whether the disease might relapse after simple resection of the adenoma in these patients. Therefore, further medical follow-up of these patient is needed. Availability of data and materials Not applicable. Abbreviations CS: Cushing's syndrome PA: Primary aldosteronism ACTH: Adrenocorticotropic hormone UFC: Urinary free cortisol AVS: Adrenal vein sampling A/CPA: Aldosterone-and cortisol producing adenoma APN: Aldosterone-producing nodules APM: Aldosterone-producing micronodule CYP: Cytochrome P450 CT: Computed tomography PAC: Plasma aldosterone concentration PRA: Plasma renin activity ARR: Aldosterone /renin ratio References Stenman A, Shabo I, Ramström A, Zedenius J, Juhlin CC: Synchronous aldosterone- and cortisol-producing adrenocortical adenomas diagnosed using CYP11B immunohistochemistry. SAGE open medical case reports. 2019, 7:2050313x19883770. Hiraishi K, Yoshimoto T, Tsuchiya K, Minami I, Doi M, Izumiyama H, Sasano H, Hirata YJ. Clinicopathological features of primary aldosteronism associated with subclinical Cushing’s syndrome. Endocr J. 2011;58(7):543–51. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Fushimi Y, Tatsumi F, Sanada J, Shimoda M, Kamei S, Nakanishi S, Kaku K, Mune T, Kaneto H. Concurrence of overt Cushing’s syndrome and primary aldosteronism accompanied by aldosterone-producing cell cluster in adjacent adrenal cortex: case report. BMC Endocr Disord. 2021;21(1):163. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Araujo-Castro M, BengoaRojano N, FernándezArgüeso M, Pascual-Corrales E, Jiménez Mendiguchía L. García Cano AMCardiometabolic risk in patients with primary aldosteronism and autonomous cortisol secretion. Case-control study. Med Clin (Barc). 2021;157(10):473–9. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Petramala L, Olmati F, Concistrè A, Russo R, Mezzadri M, Soldini M, De Vincentis G, Iannucci G, De Toma G, Letizia C. Cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors in patients with subclinical Cushing. Endocrine. 2020;70(1):150–63. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Akehi Y, Yanase T, Motonaga R, Umakoshi H, Tsuiki M, Takeda Y, Yoneda T, Kurihara I, Itoh H, Katabami T, et al. High Prevalence of Diabetes in Patients With Primary Aldosteronism (PA) Associated With Subclinical Hypercortisolism and Prediabetes More Prevalent in Bilateral Than Unilateral PA: A Large Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(5):938–45. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Shi S, Lu C, Tian H, Ren Y, Chen T. Primary Aldosteronism and Bone Metabolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:574151. Article PubMed Google Scholar Petramala L, Zinnamosca L, Settevendemmie A, Marinelli C, Nardi M, Concistrè A, Corpaci F, Tonnarini G, De Toma G, Letizia C. Bone and mineral metabolism in patients with primary aldosteronism. Int J Endocrinol. 2014;2014:836529. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Späth M, Korovkin S, Antke C, Anlauf M, Willenberg HS. Aldosterone- and cortisol-co-secreting adrenal tumors: the lost subtype of primary aldosteronism. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164(4):447–55. Article PubMed Google Scholar Onoda N, Ishikawa T, Nishio K, Tahara H, Inaba M, Wakasa K, Sumi T, Yamazaki T, Shigematsu K, Hirakawa K. Cushing’s syndrome by left adrenocortical adenoma synchronously associated with primary aldosteronism by right adrenocortical adenoma: report of a case. Endocr J. 2009;56(3):495–502. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Williams T, Gomez-Sanchez C, Rainey W, Giordano T, Lam A, Marker A, Mete O, Yamazaki Y, Zerbini M, Beuschlein F, et al. International Histopathology Consensus for Unilateral Primary Aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(1):42–54. Article PubMed Google Scholar Nishimoto K, Tomlins SA, Kuick R, Cani AK, Giordano TJ, Hovelson DH, Liu CJ, Sanjanwala AR, Edwards MA, Gomez-Sanchez CE, et al. Aldosterone-stimulating somatic gene mutations are common in normal adrenal glands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(33):E4591-4599. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Omata K, Anand SK, Hovelson DH, Liu CJ, Yamazaki Y, Nakamura Y, Ito S, Satoh F, Sasano H, Rainey WE, et al. Aldosterone-producing cell clusters frequently harbor somatic mutations and accumulate with age in normal adrenals. J Endocr Soc. 2017;1(7):787–99. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Omata K, Tomlins SA, Rainey WE. Aldosterone-producing cell clusters in normal and pathological States. Horm Metab Res. 2017;49(12):951–6. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Lalli E, Barhanin J, Zennaro MC, Warth R. Local Control of Aldosterone Production and Primary Aldosteronism. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2016;27(3):123–31. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Goupil R, Wolley M, Ahmed AH, Gordon RD, Stowasser M. Does concomitant autonomous adrenal cortisol overproduction have the potential to confound the interpretation of adrenal venous sampling in primary aldosteronism? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2015;83(4):456–61. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Download references Acknowledgements Not applicable Funding This study was supported by the Discipline Excellence Development 1.3.5 Project of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (No. ZYGD18022). Author information Authors and Affiliations Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Adrenal Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China Hongjiao Gao, Yan Ren, Tao Chen & Haoming Tian Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University (The First People’s Hospital of Zunyi), Zunyi, Guizhou, China Hongjiao Gao Institute of Clinical Pathology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China Li Li & Fei Chen Contributions HG, TC researched data and/or wrote the manuscript. LL, FC contributed to immumohistochemical staining. HT, TC, YR contributed to discussion. All authors have read and approved the manuscript. Corresponding authors Correspondence to Tao Chen or Haoming Tian. Ethics declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal. Competing interests We do not have any potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article. Additional information Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Reprints and Permissions Cite this article Gao, H., Li, L., Chen, F. et al. Bilateral co-secretory lesions presenting with coexisting Cushing syndrome and primary aldosteronism: a case report. BMC Endocr Disord 23, 263 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01454-8 Download citation Received08 April 2022 Accepted24 August 2023 Published29 November 2023 DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01454-8 Share this article Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Get shareable link Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative Keywords Cushing’s syndrome Primary aldosteronism Adrenal vein sampling Immunohistochemistry Aldosterone-producing cell cluster Download PDF Sections Figures References Abstract Background Case presentation Discussion and conclusions Availability of data and materials Abbreviations References Acknowledgements Funding Author information Ethics declarations Additional information Rights and permissions About this article From https://bmcendocrdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12902-023-01454-8

Abstract Cushing's syndrome is a rare cause of myocardial infarction and heart failure. Herein, we report a female patient who presented acute myocardial infarction and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The patient was found to have hypercortisolism secondary to adrenocortical adenoma and responded well to therapy. This case underlines the effects of hypercortisolism on the cardiovascular system. The clinical presentation of this patient is unique because non-atherosclerotic myocardial infarction is rarely reported in Cushing's syndrome patients. Introduction Cushing's syndrome is an endocrine condition associated with excessive secretion of cortisol. Hypertension, vascular atherosclerosis, and chronic cardiac remodelling and dysfunction are commonly recognized cardiovascular complications in Cushing's syndrome patients.1 Herein, we report a rare case of Cushing's syndrome patient with a primary diagnosis of non-atherosclerotic myocardial infarction and heart failure (HF). Case Report A 61-year-old female with a past medical history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was admitted with sudden onset chest pain on 6 February 2018. Electrocardiogram showed ST-segment elevation in leads V3–V5. Blood biochemical results of 1 h after the onset of chest pain: cardiac troponin I (cTnI) 0.06 ug/L↑, creatine kinase (CK) 63 U/L, creatine phosphokinase-MB (CK-MB) 22 U/L, aspartate transferase (AST) 19 U/L, and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) 482 U/L. Myocardial injury markers were markedly elevated at the time point of 18 h after onset: cTnI 13.9 ug/L↑, CK 613 U/L↑, CK-MB 102 U/L↑, AST 112 U/L↑, and LDH 833 U/L↑. Due to the acute ECG changes and elevated myocardial injury markers, the patient was preliminarily diagnosed as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and underwent coronary angiography, which showed no stenosis, occlusion or dissection of coronary arteries (Figure 1). Echocardiography showed enlarged left atrial dimension (LAD, 55 mm) and left ventricular end diastolic dimension (LVDd, 57 mm), and reduced ejection fraction (EF, 33%). The patient was treated for STEMI and HF, and was started on aspirin, statin, diuretic of furosemide and spirolactone, metoprolol, and Sacubitril/valsartan (SV, initiated June, 2020). The patient was strictly adherent to the medication prescribed (Table 1). Figure 1 Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Coronary angiogram demonstrating no significant obstruction in coronary artery circulation. Table 1. Echocardiography results 2020-06-22 2020-09-02 2021-03-29 2021-06-02 2021-09-01 2021-10-22 2021-12-21 LAD (mm) 55 55 46 52 47 44 41 LVDd (mm) 57 57 53 55 54 51 55 IVS (mm) 10 10 11 10 10 10 11 LVPW (mm) 11 11 11 10 11 9 10 EF (%) 33 30 31 39 47 49 52.5 EF, ejection fraction; IVS, interventricular septum; LAD, left atrium dimension; LVDd, left ventricular end diastolic dimension; LVPW, left ventricular posterior wall. However, the patient's condition was not improved despite optimized medication. On 26 January 2021, the patient was re-admitted with recurrent chest distress and oedema, with new symptoms of facial plethora, centripetal obesity, and hyperglycaemia (Figure S1). Abdominal CT scan showed a right adrenal adenoma (Figure 2). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed enlarged LVDd (62 mm), and reduced EF, with delayed myocardial enhancement and evidence of myocardial fibrosis and fatty deposits (Figure 3). Laboratory findings showed hypokalaemia: potassium 3.0 mmol/L, elevated serum cortisol level, low plasma ACTH level, and positive 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test. Based on the above findings, the patient was diagnosed with Cushing's syndrome and started treatment with the glucocorticoid receptor inhibitor mifepristone on 5 February 2021. Figure 2 Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Abdominal CT scan showed adrenal adenoma at the right. Figure 3 Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging revealed enlarged LVDd, reduced EF, with delayed myocardial enhancement, evidence of myocardial fibrosis and fatty deposits. With mifepristone added to the previous medical therapy (aspirin, statin, sacubitril/valsartan, metoprolol and diuretic of furosemide and spirolactone, and mifepristone), the patient's condition and cardiac function improved, and echocardiography (21 December 2021) showed increased EF (52.5%). The patient underwent partial adrenalectomy on 22 December 2021. Postoperative pathology confirmed adrenal cortical adenoma. At last follow-up on 29 May 2023, the patient showed marked improvement in face and body shape, with no complaints of chest distress or oedema (Figure S2). Discussion In this case, the patient was first evaluated for STEMI due to her symptoms of chest pain, and the elevated ST-segment on ECG, along with the moderately elevated troponin I and other cardiac enzyme levels. However, coronary atherosclerotic heart disease was ruled out by the normal cardiac catheterization. We presume that a possible reason for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) might be vasospastic angina due to abnormal hormone levels with Cushing's syndrome, leading to increased excessive myocardial metabolic demand and relative myocardial hypoxia, which eventually induced myocardial infarction. Although coronary atherosclerotic heart disease is the main cause of AMI, many non-atherosclerotic processes can lead to an imbalance between decreased coronary blood flow and increased myocardial metabolic demand. To date, non-atherosclerotic myocardial infarction has rarely been reported in Cushing's syndrome patients. Vieira JT et al. reported that a patient with Cushing's disease was considered to have spontaneous coronary artery dissection, which is a rare reason for AMI.2 Cushing's syndrome is associated with an increased risk of cardiac failure,3 with both structural alterations and functional impairment. In our case, the patient's CMR imaging showed typical features of cardiac geometry, function, and fibrosis, in accordance with previous reports.4 The underlying mechanisms may be the enhanced responsiveness to angiotensin II and activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor in direct response to cortisol excess.5 Our patient responded well to the therapy of conventional anti-HF medication of sacubitril/valsartan, metoprolol, and diuretic, once mifepristone was added. This favourable response to the pharmacological regimen supports the benefits of the agents for the normalization of excess cortisol. This case indicates that early diagnosis and effective treatment of Cushing's syndrome may be crucial in preventing irreversible cardiac dysfunction secondary to cardiovascular events and heart failure. Acknowledgements This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81900409 and 82172182) and the PLA Youth Training Project for Medical Science (19QNP037). Conflict of interest The authors declares that there is no conflict of interest. From https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ehf2.14548

Ball-and-stick model of the cortisol (hydrocortisone) molecule. Credit: Public Domain A first-of-its kind hormone replacement therapy that more closely replicates the natural circadian and ultradian rhythms of our hormones has shown to improve symptoms in patients with adrenal conditions. Results from the University of Bristol-led clinical trial are published today in the Journal of Internal Medicine. Low levels of a key hormone called cortisol is typically a result of conditions such as Addison's and congenital adrenal hyperplasia. The hormone regulates a range of vital processes, from cognitive processes such as memory formation, metabolism and immune responses, through to blood pressure and blood sugar levels. When low, it can trigger symptoms of debilitating fatigue, nausea, muscle weakness, dangerously low blood pressure and depression. Although rare, these adrenal conditions require lifelong daily hydrocortisone replacement therapy. Although existing oral hormone replacement treatment can restore cortisol levels, it is still associated with an impaired quality of life for patients. Scientists believe this is because the current treatment does not mimic the body's normal physiological timing, missing cortisol's anticipatory rise and lacking its underlying ultradian and circadian rhythms. The new "pulsatility" therapy, the culmination of ten years' research by the Bristol team, is designed to deliver standard hydrocortisone replacement to patients via a pump which replicates more closely cortisol's natural rhythmic secretion pattern. The pulsatile subcutaneous pump has now revealed promising results in its first clinical trial. Twenty participants aged 18 to 64 years with adrenal insufficiency conditions were assessed during the double-blinded PULSES six-week trial and treated with usual dose hydrocortisone replacement therapy administered either via the pump or the standard three times daily oral treatment. While only psychological and metabolic symptoms were assessed during the trial, results revealed the pump therapy decreased fatigue by approximately 10%, improved mood and increased patient energy levels by 30% first thing in the morning—a key time frame when many patients struggle. Patient MRI scans also revealed alteration in the way that the brain processes emotional information. Dr. Georgina Russell, Honorary Lecturer at the University's Bristol Medical School, and the lead author, explained, "Patients on cortisol replacement therapy often have side effects which makes it difficult for them to lead normal lives. We hope this new therapy will offer greater hope for the thousands of people living with hormone insufficiency conditions." Stafford Lightman, a neuroendocrinology expert and Professor of Medicine at Bristol Medical School: Translational Health Sciences (THS), and the study's joint lead author, added, "Besides reduction in dosage, cortisol replacement has remained unchanged for many decades. It is widely recognized that current replacement therapy is unphysiological due to its lack of pre-awakening surge, ultradian rhythmicity, and post dose supraphysiological peaks. The new therapy clearly shows that the timing of cortisol delivery- in line with the body's own rhythmic pattern of cortisol secretion—is important for normal cognition and behavior. "Our findings support the administration of hormone therapy that mimics natural physiology, and is one of the first major advances in adrenal insufficiency treatment to date." Joe Miles, a participant on the PULSES trial, explained, "The Crono P pump has been life-changing. I noticed a very quick improvement compared to tablets when I was on the PULSES study. I went from feeling tired all the time to having sudden energy. "When the PULSES study ended and I had to return the pump, I simply couldn't cope with going back to how I used to be, so I made it my mission to write to as many doctors to have it prescribed privately. "I've now been on it for six years and have introduced a number of other people with Addison's disease to the pump, and all of them have said it's life changing. Some have gone from being seriously ill to feeling better than they have done for years." Dr. Russell said, "Approximately 1% of the UK population is taking steroids at any moment in time; these individuals can experience debilitating psychological side effects. This trial has shown that even at physiological levels, brain functioning is disrupted and that we need to explore not only the dose but the pattern of steroids delivery when considering any type of steroid treatment." More information: Ultradian hydrocortisone replacement alters neuronal processing, emotional ambiguity, affect and fatigue in adrenal insufficiency: The PULSES trial, Journal of Internal Medicine (2023). DOI: 10.1111/joim.13721 Journal information: Journal of Internal Medicine Provided by University of Bristol From https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-10-first-of-its-kind-hormone-treatment-patient.html

Jessica Rotham, National Center for Health Research What is it? Cushing’s syndrome is a condition you probably have never heard of, but for those who have it, the symptoms can be quite scary. Worse still, getting it diagnosed can take a while. Cushing’s syndrome occurs when the tissues of the body are exposed to high levels of cortisol for an extended amount of time. Cortisol is the hormone the body produces to help you in times of stress. It is good to have cortisol at normal levels, but when those levels get too high it causes health problems. Although cortisol is related to stress, there is no evidence that Cushing’s syndrome is directly or indirectly caused by stress. Cushing’s syndrome is considered rare, but that may be because it is under-reported. As a result, we don’t have good estimates for how many people have it, which is why the estimates for the actual number of cases vary so much–from 5 to 28 million people.[1] The most common age group that Cushing’s affects are those 20 to 50 years old. It is thought that obesity, type 2 diabetes, and high blood pressure may increase your risk of developing this syndrome.[2] What causes Cushing’s Syndrome? Cushing’s syndrome is caused by high cortisol levels. Cushing’s disease is a specific form of Cushing’s syndrome. People with Cushing’s disease have high levels of cortisol because they have a non-cancerous (benign) tumor in the pituitary gland. The tumor releases adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH), which causes the adrenal glands to produce excessive cortisol. Cushing’s syndrome that is not Cushing’s disease can be also caused by high cortisol levels that result from tumors in other parts of the body. One of the causes is “ectopic ACTH syndrome.” This means that the hormone-releasing tumor is growing in an abnormal place, such as the lungs or elsewhere. The tumors can be benign, but most frequently they are cancerous. Other causes of Cushing’s syndrome are benign tumors on the adrenal gland (adrenal adenomas) and less commonly, cancerous adrenal tumors (adrenocortical carcinomas). Both secrete cortisol, causing cortisol levels to get too high. In some cases, a person can develop Cushing’s syndrome from taking steroid medications, such as prednisone. These drugs, known as corticosteroids, mimic the cortisol produced by the body. People who have Cushing’s syndrome from steroid medications do not develop a tumor.[3] What are the signs and symptoms of Cushing’s Syndrome? The appearance of people with Cushing’s syndrome starts to change as cortisol levels build up. Regardless of what kind of tumor they have or where the tumor is located, people tend to put on weight in the upper body and abdomen, with their arms and legs remaining thin; their face grows rounder (“moon face”); they develop fat around the neck; and purple or pink stretch marks appear on the abdomen, thighs, buttocks or arms. Individuals with the syndrome usually experience one or more of the following symptoms: fatigue, muscle weakness, high glucose levels, anxiety, depression, and high blood pressure. Women are more likely than men to develop Cushing’s syndrome, and when they do they may have excess hair growth, irregular or absent periods, and decreased fertility.[4] Why is Cushing’s Syndrome so frequently misdiagnosed? These symptoms seem distinctive, yet it is often difficult for those with Cushing’s syndrome to get an accurate diagnosis. Why? While Cushing’s is relatively rare, the signs and symptoms are common to many other diseases. For instance, females with excess hair growth, irregular or absent periods, decreased fertility, and high glucose levels could have polycystic ovarian syndrome, a disease that affects many more women than Cushing’s. Also, people with metabolism problems (metabolic syndrome), who are at higher than average risk for diabetes and heart disease, also tend to have abdominal fat, high glucose levels and high blood pressure.[5] Problems in testing for Cushing’s When Cushing’s syndrome is suspected, a test is given to measure cortisol in the urine. This test measures the amount of free or unbound cortisol filtered by the kidneys and then released over a 24 hour period through the urine. Since the amount of urinary free cortisol (UFC) can vary a lot from one test to another—even in people who don’t have Cushing’s—experts recommend that the test be repeated 3 times. A diagnosis of Cushing’s is given when a person’s UFC level is 4 times the upper limit of normal. One study found this test to be highly accurate, with a sensitivity of 95% (meaning that 95% of people who have the disease will be correctly diagnosed by this test) and a specificity of 98% (meaning that 98% of people who do not have the disease will have a test score confirming that).[6] However, a more 2010 study estimated the sensitivity as only between 45%-71%, but with 100% specificity.[7] This means that the test is very accurate at telling people who don’t have Cushing’s that they don’t have it, but not so good at identifying the people who really do have Cushing’s. The authors that have analyzed these studies advise that patients use the UFC test together with other tests to confirm the diagnosis, but not as the initial screening test.[8] Other common tests that may be used to diagnose Cushing’s syndrome are: 1) the midnight plasma cortisol and late-night salivary cortisol measurements, and 2) the low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (LDDST). The first test measures the amount of cortisol levels in the blood and saliva at night. For most people, their cortisol levels drop at night, but people with Cushing’s syndrome have cortisol levels that remain high all night. In the LDDST, dexamethasone is given to stop the production of ACTH. Since ACTH produces cortisol, people who don’t have Cushing’s syndrome will get lower cortisol levels in the blood and urine. If after giving dexamethasone, the person’s cortisol levels remain high, then they are diagnosed with Cushing’s.[9] Even when these tests, alone or in combination, are used to diagnose Cushing’s, they don’t explain the cause. They also don’t distinguish between Cushing’s syndrome, and something called pseudo-Cushing state. Pseudo-Cushing state Some people have an abnormal amount of cortisol that is caused by something unrelated to Cushing’s syndrome such as polycystic ovarian syndrome, depression, pregnancy, and obesity. This is called pseudo-Cushing state. Their high levels of cortisol and resulting Cushing-like symptoms can be reversed by treating whatever disease is causing the abnormal cortisol levels. In their study, Dr. Giacomo Tirabassi and colleagues recommend using the desmopressin (DDAVP) test to differentiate between pseudo-Cushing state and Cushing’s. The DDAVP test is especially helpful in people who, after being given dexamethasone to stop cortisol production, continue to have moderate levels of urinary free cortisol (UFC) and midnight serum cortisol.[10] An additional test that is often used to determine if one has pseudo-Cushing state or Cushing’s syndrome is the dexamethasone-corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) test. Patients are injected with a hormone that causes cortisol to be produced while also being given another hormone to stop cortisol from being produced. This combination of hormones should make the patient have low cortisol levels, and this is what happens in people with pseudo-Cushing state. People with Cushing’s syndrome, however, will still have high levels of cortisol after being given this combination of hormones.[11] How can Cushing’s be treated? Perhaps because Cushing’s is rare or under-diagnosed, few treatments are available. There are several medications that are typically the first line of treatment. None of the medications can cure Cushing’s, so they are usually taken until other treatments are given to cure Cushing’s, and only after that if the other treatment fails. The most common treatment for Cushing’s disease is transsphenoidal surgery, which requires the surgeon to reach the pituitary gland through the nostril or upper lip and remove the tumor. Radiation may also be used instead of surgery to shrink the tumor. In patients whose Cushing’s is caused by ectopic ACTH syndrome, all cancerous cells need to be wiped out through surgery, chemotherapy, radiation or a variety of other methods, depending on the location of the tumor. Surgery is also recommended for adrenal tumors. If Cushing’s syndrome is being caused by corticosteroid (steroid medications) usage, the treatment is to stop or lower your dosage.[12] Medications to control Cushing’s (before treatment or if treatment fails) According to a 2014 study in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, almost no new treatment options have been introduced in the last decade. Researchers and doctors have focused most of their efforts on improving existing treatments aimed at curing Cushing’s. Unfortunately, medications used to control Cushing’s prior to treatment and when treatment fails are not very effective. Many of the medications approved by the FDA for Cushing’s syndrome and Cushing’s disease, such as pasireotide, metyrapone, and mitotane, have not been extensively studied. The research presented to the FDA by the makers of these three drugs did not even make clear what an optimal dose was.[13] In another 2014 study, published in Clinical Epidemiology, researchers examined these three same drugs, along with ten others, and found that only pasireotide had moderate evidence to support its approval. The other drugs, many of which are not FDA approved for Cushing’s patients, had little or no available evidence to show that they work.[14] They can be sold, however, because the FDA has approved them for other diseases. Unfortunately, that means that neither the FDA nor anyone else has proven the drugs are safe or effective for Cushing patients. Pasireotide, the one medication with moderate evidence supporting its approval, caused hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) in 75% of patients who participated in the main study for the medication’s approval for Cushing’s. As a result of developing hyperglycemia, almost half (46%) of the participants had to go on blood-sugar lowering medications. The drug was approved by the FDA for Cushing’s anyway because of the lack of other effective treatments. Other treatments used for Cushing’s have other risks. Ketoconazole, believed to be the most commonly prescribed medications for Cushing’s syndrome, has a black box warning due to its effect on the liver that can lead to a liver transplant or death. Other side effects include: headache, nausea, irregular periods, impotence, and decreased libido. Metyrapone can cause acne, hirsutism, and hypertension. Mitotane can cause neurological and gastrointestinal symptoms such as dizziness, nausea, and diarrhea and can cause an abortion in pregnant women.[15] So, what should you do if you suspect you have Cushing’s Syndrome? Cushing’s syndrome is a serious disease that needs to be treated, but there are treatment options available for you if you are diagnosed with the disease. If the symptoms in this article sound familiar, it’s time for you to go see your doctor. Make an appointment with your general practitioner, and explain your symptoms to him or her. You will most likely be referred to an endocrinologist, who will be able to better understand your symptoms and recommend an appropriate course of action. All articles are reviewed and approved by Dr. Diana Zuckerman and other senior staff. Nieman, Lynette K. Epidemiology and clinical manifestations of Cushing’s syndrome, 2014. UpToDate: Wolters Kluwer Health Cushing’s syndrome/ disease, 2013. American Association of Neurological Surgeons. http://www.aans.org/Patient Information/Conditions and Treatments/Cushings Disease.aspx Cushing’s syndrome, 2012. National Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases: National Institutes of Health. http://endocrine.niddk.nih.gov/pubs/cushings/cushings.aspx#treatment Cushing’s syndrome, 2012. National Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases: National Institutes of Health. http://endocrine.niddk.nih.gov/pubs/cushings/cushings.aspx#treatment Cushing’s syndrome, 2012. National Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases: National Institutes of Health. http://endocrine.niddk.nih.gov/pubs/cushings/cushings.aspx#treatment Newell-Price, John, Peter Trainer, Michael Besser and Ashley Grossman. The diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome and pseudo-Cushing’s states, 1998. Endocrine Reviews: Endocrine Society Carroll, TB and JW Findling. The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome, 2010. Reviews in Endocrinology and Metabolic Disorders: Springer Ifedayo, AO and AF Olufemi. Urinary free cortisol in the diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome: How useful?, 2013. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice: Medknow. Cushing’s syndrome, 2012. National Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases: National Institutes of Health. http://endocrine.niddk.nih.gov/pubs/cushings/cushings.aspx#treatment Tirabassi, Giacomo, Emanuela Faloia, Roberta Papa, Giorgio Furlani, Marco Boscaro, and Giorgio Arnaldi. Use of the Desmopressin test in the differential diagnosis of pseudo-Cushing state from Cushing’s disease, 2013. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism: Endocrine Society. Cushing’s syndrome, 2012. National Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases: National Institutes of Health. http://endocrine.niddk.nih.gov/pubs/cushings/cushings.aspx#treatment Cushing’s syndrome, 2012. National Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases: National Institutes of Health. http://endocrine.niddk.nih.gov/pubs/cushings/cushings.aspx#treatment Tirabassi, Giacomo, Emanuela Faloia, Roberta Papa, Giorgio Furlani, Marco Boscaro, and Giorgio Arnaldi. Use of the Desmopressin test in the differential diagnosis of pseudo-Cushing state from Cushing’s disease, 2013. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism: Endocrine Society. Galdelha, Monica R. and Leonardo Vieira Neto. Efficacy of medical treatment in Cushing’s disease: a systematic review, 2014. Clinical Endocrinology: John Wiley & Sons. Adler, Gail. Cushing syndrome treatment & management, 2014. MedScape: WebMD. Adapted from https://www.center4research.org/cushings-syndrome-frequent-misdiagnosis/?fbclid=IwAR1lfJPilmaTl1BhR-Esi69eU7Xjm3RlO4f8lmFBIviCtHHXmVoyRxOlJqE

Adrenal incidentalomas (AI) are associated with an increased risk of cardiometabolic complications due to adrenal hyperfunction. Obtaining accurate prevalence estimates of distinct types of functioning AIs is crucial for efficient resource allocation and effective management strategies. For a study, researchers sought to ascertain the prevalence of various forms of autonomous hormone secretion in individuals diagnosed with adrenal incidentaloma, including autonomous/possible autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS), primary aldosteronism (PA), pheochromocytoma (PHEO), and Cushing syndrome (CS). A comprehensive and systematic search was conducted across multiple databases (PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science) up to February 2022. Among the 1,661 publications initially screened at the title and abstract levels, 161 articles underwent full-text examination, and ultimately, 36 studies were included for analysis. Three independent reviewers meticulously extracted clinical data from these selected studies. The overarching prevalence of functioning adrenal incidentalomas was 27.5% (95% CI 23.0, 32.5). The highest prevalence was observed for ACS/possible ACS, with a rate of 11.7% (95% CI 8.6, 15.7), followed by PA at 4.4% (95% CI 3.1, 6.2). Subgroup analysis unveiled a greater prevalence of PA in patients from Asian regions than those from Europe/America. Conversely, the prevalence of ACS/possible ACS was comparatively lower in Asian countries. Meta-regression analysis elucidated that the proportion of female patients influenced the prevalence of ACS/possible ACS, while PA prevalence positively correlated with the proportion of patients with hypertension and the publication year. PHEO and CS demonstrated prevalences of 3.8% (95% CI 2.8, 5.0) and 3.1% (95% CI 2.3, 4.3), respectively. The comprehensive meta-analysis offered valuable insights into the prevalence rates of diverse types of functioning adrenal incidentalomas and identified influential factors contributing to heterogeneity in these estimates. The findings contributed significantly to understanding clinical implications and aided in devising effective management strategies for individuals diagnosed with these adrenal disorders. Source: academic.oup.com/jcem/article-abstract/108/7/1813/7015785?redirectedFrom=fulltext

Introduction to Endocrinology Endocrinology is a medical specialty that focuses on the diagnosis and treatment of diseases related to hormones. Endocrinologists are experts in managing and treating diseases related to the endocrine system, which includes the thyroid, pituitary, adrenal glands, and pancreas. Endocrinologists are trained to diagnose and treat conditions such as diabetes, thyroid disorders, pituitary disorders, and other conditions related to hormones. Endocrinologists also specialize in reproductive health and fertility issues, including PCOS. Endocrinology is a complex field that requires a deep understanding of the endocrine system and its role in regulating the body’s hormones. Endocrinologists must be able to interpret laboratory tests and understand the underlying causes of endocrine disorders. They must also be able to develop individualized treatment plans to address the specific needs of each patient. Diagnosing PCOS and Diabetes Endocrinologists are experts in diagnosing and managing PCOS and diabetes. PCOS is a hormonal disorder that affects the ovaries, and it is characterized by irregular menstrual cycles, excess facial and body hair, and infertility. To diagnose PCOS, an endocrinologist will perform a physical exam and order laboratory tests to measure hormone levels. The endocrinologist will also ask the patient about her symptoms and family history to determine if PCOS is the cause. Diabetes is a chronic condition that affects the body’s ability to process sugar. To diagnose diabetes, an endocrinologist will perform a physical exam and order laboratory tests to measure blood sugar levels. The endocrinologist may also order imaging tests to check for signs of diabetes-related complications. Treating PCOS and Diabetes Once the endocrinologist has diagnosed PCOS or diabetes, they will develop an individualized treatment plan to address the patient’s specific needs. For PCOS, the endocrinologist may recommend lifestyle changes such as weight loss, exercise, and dietary changes to help manage symptoms. The endocrinologist may also prescribe medications to regulate hormone levels and improve fertility. For diabetes, the endocrinologist may recommend lifestyle changes such as weight loss, exercise, and dietary changes to help manage blood sugar levels. The endocrinologist may also prescribe medications to help regulate blood sugar levels. In addition, the endocrinologist may recommend regular check-ups to monitor the patient’s progress and to adjust the treatment plan if needed. Conclusion Endocrinology plays an important role in managing PCOS and diabetes. Endocrinologists are experts in diagnosing and treating these conditions, and they are trained to develop individualized treatment plans that address the specific needs of each patient. By working with an endocrinologist, patients can get the help they need to manage their PCOS or diabetes and achieve their health goals. Endocrinology is a complex field that requires a deep understanding of the endocrine system and its role in regulating the body’s hormones. An endocrinologist can help patients with PCOS and diabetes manage their conditions and achieve their health goals. By working with an endocrinologist, patients can get the help they need to manage their PCOS or diabetes and achieve their health goals. From https://www.diabetesincontrol.com/the-role-of-endocrinology-in-managing-polycystic-ovary-syndrome-and-diabetes/

Abstract Cushing’s syndrome with concurrent primary aldosteronism (PA) is a rare presentation, and establishing an early diagnosis is imperative to preventing morbidity and long-term sequelae. The diagnosis is established by sequential lab work, showing an elevated cortisol and aldosterone level. Taking the above into consideration, it is evident that repeatedly negative results on all three tests can present an extremely challenging case. In this report, we discuss a female who presented with an adrenal incidentaloma and features suggestive of primary hyperaldosteronism as well as Cushing’s syndrome but no elevations in serum, urine, or salivary cortisol. In this study, we present a 37-year-old female with resistant hypertension and tachycardia. She had several features suggestive of Cushing’s syndrome including resistant hypertension, proximal muscle weakness, weight gain, easy bruising, hair loss, and a history of tachycardia and chest pain. Examination revealed an obese female with thin silvery abdominal striae. The patient’s labs revealed normal serum cortisol, urine-free cortisol (UFC), late-night salivary cortisol, and a normal dexamethasone suppression test. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a right adrenal mass measuring 2.1 x 1.5 x 2.5 cm. Due to a high index of suspicion, adrenal venous sampling was performed, which revealed high levels of cortisol and aldosterone in the right vein, confirming the diagnosis. The patient subsequently underwent a right adrenalectomy. She developed hypotension post-op, leading to the diagnosis of glucocorticoid-remediable aldosteronism. Introduction Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the excess production of aldosterone by the adrenal glands, despite a low serum renin level. The presentation of hyperaldosteronism can be vague and include symptoms such as muscle weakness, fatigue, headaches, numbness, and cramps. More specific findings include resistant hypertension, low serum potassium, and metabolic alkalosis. The etiologies are variable and can include an adrenal adenoma (Conn syndrome) or bilateral adrenal hyperplasia [1]. Cushing’s syndrome is also caused by excess hormone secretion by the adrenal glands. The etiologies include a primary adrenal adenoma, hyperplasia, carcinoma, or exogenous corticosteroid use. It can also be caused by an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting pituitary adenoma or as a result of paraneoplastic ACTH secretion. The clinical presentation is highly variable and leads to difficulties in establishing a diagnosis. The concurrent existence of primary hyperaldosteronism and Cushing’s syndrome creates additional hindrances in diagnosis, yet further obscured in a patient with a repeatedly negative workup for both conditions. Case Presentation A 37-year-old female presented to her primary care physician with complaints of proximal muscle weakness, tachycardia, and chest pain. Repeated blood pressure readings revealed that she was hypertensive, and she was started on amlodipine and benazepril, which elevated her blood pressure further. A computed tomography (CT) scan (Figure 1) of the abdomen was performed due to resistant hypertension, which revealed an adrenal incidentaloma (right adrenal gland measuring 2.1 x 1.5 x 2.5 cm). Precontract density was 5 Hounsfield units, and a 15-minute delayed washout showed 11 Hounsfield units for a 72% washout. She was thus referred to endocrinology. Figure 1: Abdominal CT scan showing a nodule in the right adrenal gland measuring 2.1 x 1.5 x 2.5 cm She presented to the endocrinology clinic on March 12, 2021. A thorough physical examination was performed, which revealed a well-appearing obese female (BMI of 38.86 kg/m2) with no acute distress. Her blood pressure was 144/108 mmHg, her pulse was 95, and she was afebrile. Thin silvery striations were present on the abdomen, and alopecia was present on the crown. A review of all other systems was unremarkable. A detailed family history revealed early-onset hypertension in her brother (age: 35 years) and her mother (age: 30 years). Personal history included elevated anxiety, weight gain, headaches (frontal band distribution), increased thirst, easy bruising as well as delayed clearance of bruises, and proximal muscle weakness presenting as difficulty in climbing stairs and inability to lift heavy objects. She reported no change in menstrual cycles. There was no history of exogenous corticosteroid use. Serum biochemistries were sent (Table 1), which showed normal levels of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), creatinine, liver function tests, and serum electrolytes. However, mildly elevated aldosterone (23 ng/dl), mild hypokalemia (3.3 mEq/L), and suppressed ACTH and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) sulfate were discovered. The aldosterone to renin ratio was also elevated at 59.9 on spironolactone and was 71.4 three months later when spironolactone was discontinued. These findings lead to a preliminary diagnosis of primary hyperaldosteronism. Test Result Calcium 9.1 mmol/L Sodium 137 mmol/L Potassium 4.1 mmol/L Chloride 106 mmol/L CO2 27 BUN 15 mmol/L Glucose 95 mmol/L Creatinine 1.1 μmol/L AST 24 U/L ALT 20 U/L Albumin 4.4 g/L Total protein 7.0 g/L Total bilirubin 0.4 μmol/L Alkaline phosphatase 40 U/L Renin 0.44 Table 1: Patient serum biochemistries BUN: Blood urea nitrogen; AST: Aspartate transaminase; ALT: Alanine transaminase. A workup for elevated cortisol was also performed as the patient was phenotypically Cushingoid, and the following biochemistries were sent sequentially: serum cortisol, 24-hour urine-free cortisol (UFC), salivary cortisol, and a low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (Table 2). The bloodwork was hence nonconfirmatory. Endocrine workup Serum cortisol 4.5 mcg/dL Urine-free cortisol 1.57 g/24 h Salivary cortisol <0.03 μg/dL Dexamethasone suppression test 1.5 mcg/dL Aldosterone <4.0 Table 2: Patient follow-up bloodwork Despite a repeatedly negative workup for Cushing's syndrome, adrenal venous sampling was performed due to a high index of suspicion. The results revealed an inferior vena cava (IVC) cortisol of 20, left adrenal venous (LAV) cortisol of 81, and right adrenal vein (RAV) cortisol of 1280. The results of the IVC aldosterone were 24, LAV aldosterone was 660 and RAV aldosterone was 1500. The elevated levels of cortisol in the RAV were in complete contradiction to the aforementioned workup. A diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome and concurrent PA was determined. Adrenal veinous sampling was instrumental in establishing the diagnosis but was equivocal and did not lateralize aldosterone and cortisol excess. However, the amount of aldosterone and cortisol were both significantly higher on the right side. After a panel discussion with doctors from several disciplines, a laparoscopic adrenalectomy was planned. The procedure was successful, and the patient was initially showing clinical improvement. The specimen was sent for pathological evaluation and revealed an adrenal cortical adenoma. After initial improvement, the patient developed hypotension, which was likely due to adrenal insufficiency. The patient was supplemented with 1-mg dexamethasone tablets, which stabilized her condition, and a diagnosis of glucocorticoid-remediable-aldosteronism was made. Based on a strong family history of early onset-resistant hypertension, a genetic component was suspected. Several genes associated with PA with autosomal dominant inheritance have been identified [2], such as CYP11B2, CLCN2, KCNJ5, CACNA1D, and CACNA1H. The patient was offered genetic testing but was unable to follow through due to financial reasons. Discussion This patient presented as an extremely rare example of PA and Cushing’s syndrome, with negative serum cortisol, 24-hour UFC, late-night salivary cortisol, and a dexamethasone suppression test. Despite repeatedly negative lab results, the patient presented with a markedly elevated cortisol on adrenal venous sampling. In our literature search, we found an instance of a patient with several negative UFCs [3]; however, to the best of our knowledge, there have been no reported instances of a completely negative workup in a patient who is positive for Cushing’s syndrome. In fact, in the practice guidelines published by the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism [4], it is recommended that patients with a suspected diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome or an adrenal incidentaloma and two concordant negative test results need not undergo further investigations. One proposed mechanism for the misleading workup could be assay interference. Interference occurs when a substance or process falsely alters an assay result [5]. This can lead to incorrect diagnosis and subsequent treatment and poses a threat to the patient. Another suggested mechanism causing false negative test results could be the hook effect [6]. The hook effect is described as a phenomenon that leads to falsely low results due to the presence of excessive analyte. In a study by Friedman et al. [7], it was noted that patients with “episodic Cushing’s syndrome” or those with mild symptoms had a negative workup. The study recommended serial monitoring for the disease. The interesting fact is that our patient had several features suggestive of active Cushing’s syndrome, and the hypotension seen postoperatively was a testament to the fact that there was in fact a cortisol excess, which led to adrenal insufficiency. In light of the above, a consistently negative workup is perplexing. Zhang et al. suggested performing a low-dose dexamethasone suppression test in individuals presenting with PA, prior to adrenal vein sampling (AVS) and surgery due to the high prevalence of Cushing’s syndrome in patients with PA [8]. A positive test result can lead to a straightforward diagnosis; however, in this rare case where the patient had severe negative tests, it can present as a challenge in diagnosis and treatment. Conclusions The presence of PA and concurrent Cushing’s syndrome can present as a diagnostic challenge. It is recommended to follow up on the signs of Cushing's syndrome with preliminary tests and to presume its absence if two concordant tests are negative. Our patient, however, was an exceptional case. This case highlighted the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for patients presenting with several signs and symptoms of the disease and a negative workup. More attention should be paid to the patient's history, and a thorough physical examination should be conducted. In those with an uncertain diagnosis, adrenal venous sampling can provide a clearer picture and lead to a more accurate understanding of the case. References Reincke M, Bancos I, Mulatero P, Scholl UI, Stowasser M, Williams TA: Diagnosis and treatment of primary aldosteronism. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021, 9:876-92. 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00210-2 Dutta RK, Söderkvist P, Gimm O: Genetics of primary hyperaldosteronism. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2016, 23:R437-54. 10.1530/ERC-16-0055 Moloney KJ, Mercado JU, Ludlam WH, Broyles FE: Diagnosis of Cushing's disease in a patient with consistently normal urinary free cortisol levels: a case report. Clin Case Rep. 2016, 4:1181-3. 10.1002/ccr3.647 Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, Stewart PM, Montori VM: The diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008, 93:1526-40. 10.1210/jc.2008-0125 Dimeski G: Interference testing. Clin Biochem Rev. 2008, 29:S43-8. The hook effect. (2014). Accessed: June 19, 2023: https://www.aacc.org/science-and-research/clinical-chemistry-trainee-council/trainee-council-in-english/pearls-of-lab.... Friedman TC, Ghods DE, Shahinian HK, et al.: High prevalence of normal tests assessing hypercortisolism in subjects with mild and episodic Cushing's syndrome suggests that the paradigm for diagnosis and exclusion of Cushing's syndrome requires multiple testing. Horm Metab Res. 2010, 42:874-81. 10.1055/s-0030-1263128 Zhang Y, Tan J, Yang Q, et al.: Primary aldosteronism concurrent with subclinical Cushing's syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep. 2020, 14:32. 10.1186/s13256-020-2353-8 From https://www.cureus.com/articles/170896-rare-challenges-in-diagnosing-cushings-syndrome-and-primary-aldosteronism-a-case-report-of-a-female-with-a-negative-workup#!/

Abstract Background: Cushing syndrome (CS) is a rare disease caused by excess cortisol levels with high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Hypertension in CS promotes hypercortisolism-associated cardiovascular events. Adipose tissue is a highly plastic tissue with most cell types strongly affected by the excess cortisol exposure. We hypothesized that the molecular and cellular changes of periadrenal adipose tissue in response to cortisol excess impact systemic blood pressure levels in patients with CS. Methods: We investigated gene expression signatures in periadrenal adipose tissue from patients with adrenal CS collected during adrenal surgery. Results: During active CS we observed a downregulation of gene programs associated with inflammation in periadrenal adipose tissue. In addition, we observed a clustering of the patients based on tissue gene expression profiles into 2 groups according to blood pressure levels (CS low blood pressure and CS high blood pressure). The 2 clusters showed significant differences in gene expression pattens of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system. Renin was the strongest regulated gene compared with control patients and its expression correlated with increased blood pressure observed in our patients with CS. In the CS high blood pressure group, systemic renin plasma levels were suppressed indicative of an abnormal blood pressure associated with periadrenal adipose tissue renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system activation. Conclusions: Here, we show for the first time a relevant association of the local renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system and systemic blood pressure levels in patients with CS. Patients from the CS high blood pressure group still had increased blood pressure levels after 6 months in remission, highlighting the importance of local tissue effects on long-term systemic effects observed in CS. Footnotes *U. Stifel and F. Vogel contributed equally. For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page xxx. Supplemental Material is available at https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21185. Correspondence to: Martin Reincke, Department of Medicine IV, University Hospital, LMU Munich, GermanyEmail martin.reincke@med.uni-muenchen.de Jan Tuckermann, Institute of Comparative Molecular Endocrinology (CME), Ulm University, GermanyEmail jan.tuckermann@uni-ulm.de eLetters eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate. Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page. From https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.123.21185

Abstract Introduction and importance Pheochromocytoma and Cushing's syndrome are rare endocrine conditions caused by tumors in the adrenal gland. These conditions are classified under Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia (MEN) syndrome, characterized by the development of multiple tumors in the endocrine system. However, diagnosing these conditions can be challenging as they often lack clear symptoms, requiring careful evaluation, monitoring, and treatment to prevent complications. Case presentation A 23-year-old male recently presented with right-sided abdominal fullness and lipoma-like masses on the torso. Over a span of six months, the abdominal mass nearly doubled in size, accompanied by elevated levels of catecholamines, cortisol, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and calcitonin. Surprisingly, the patient remained asymptomatic despite these abnormal lab values. CT imaging revealed a substantial increase in the size of the mass in the right adrenal gland, from 6 × 7 cm to approximately 11.2 × 10.2 × 9 cm. Clinical discussion Pheochromocytoma secretes catecholamines and often leads to hypertension and related symptoms. Interestingly, most individuals with pheochromocytoma do not exhibit obvious symptoms, necessitating blood and urine tests, along with imaging studies, for accurate diagnosis. The size of the tumor does not necessarily indicate the severity of symptoms. MEN-2, a genetic syndrome, is characterized by pheochromocytoma, medullary thyroid carcinoma, and hyperparathyroidism. Additionally, methods for diagnosing Cushing's syndrome, caused by excess cortisol production, are discussed. Conclusion Early diagnosis and genetic counseling are crucial in preventing complications associated with these conditions. By identifying them, appropriate treatment can be ensured for positive outcomes of patients and their families. Previous article in issue Next article in issue Keywords Pheochromocytoma Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia (MEN) syndrome Cushing's syndrome Rare Case Report Abbreviations CT computed tomography MRI Magnetic resonance imaging USG Ultrasonography 131I-MIBG iodine 131 labeled meta-iodobenzylganidine RAAS Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system 1. Introduction Pheochromocytoma are catecholamine secreting tumors of chromaffin cells of adrenal medulla. It can be found anywhere in the body, with the majority being intra-abdominal and those other than adrenal medulla are referred to as paragangliomas [1,2]. Pheochromocytoma typically secretes norepinephrine and epinephrine, with norepinephrine being the primary catecholamine. However, some tumors may only secrete one of the two, and rarely, some may secrete dopamine or dopa [3]. Vast majority >90 % of adrenal neoplasms are benign non-functional adenomas [4].About 10 % of pheochromocytomas are malignant and 10 % of cases are found on both sides. Additionally, approximately 40 % of pheochromocytomas are caused by genetic factors and can be associated with inherited syndromes [5]. Pheochromocytoma is found to be associated with MEN-2. MEN-2 is a hereditary genetic condition that is caused by a de novo mutation in the RET gene. It is inherited in an autosomal dominant fashion and is mainly characterized by medullary thyroid carcinoma, pheochromocytoma and parathyroid adenoma or hyperplasia [6]. MEN syndrome can be MEN-1, MEN-2A and MEN-2B. MEN-1 is characterized by pituitary tumors (prolactin or growth hormone), pancreatic endocrine tumors and parathyroid adenomas. Additionally, other tumors such as foregut carcinoids, adrenocortical adenomas, meningioma, lipomas, angiofibromas and collagenomas may also occur in MEN-1. MEN-2A is characterized by medullary thyroid carcinoma, pheochromocytoma, and parathyroid adenoma/hyperplasia; it can also be associated with cutaneous lichen amyloidosis and Hirschsprung disease. On the other hand, MEN-2B is characterized by familial medullary thyroid cancer, pheochromocytoma, mucosal neuromas, gastrointestinal tract issues, musculoskeletal and spinal problems. [7]. Cushing syndrome results from hypercortisolism and is characterized by hypertension, weight gain, easy bruising, and central obesity [4]. Cushing's disease refers to ACTH-dependent cortisol excess caused by a pituitary adenoma, while ACTH-independent cortisol excess due to non-pituitary causes such as excess use of glucocorticoids, adrenal adenoma, hyperplasia, or carcinoma is referred to as Cushing syndrome [8]. This case report has been written according to the SCARE checklist [9]. 2. Case presentation A 23-year-old male presented to our surgery department with the chief complaint of right sided abdominal fullness for six months. According to the patient a mass was incidentally reported six months back while he was under-evaluation for mild trauma due to road traffic accident. Six months back, the mass was approximately 6 × 7 cm, while at the time of presentation to our department the mass was approximately 11.2 × 10.2 × 9 cm (CT abdomen) which was globular in shape, had regular margin, and moved with respiration. He had no history of hypertension, headache, palpitation, sweating, pallor, recent weight loss, abdominal pain, psychological disturbance, dizziness, loss of consciousness, dark color urine, burning micturition, had normal bowel and bladder habit. Past history and family history were insignificant. He was not under any long-term medication and no known drug allergies. He occasionally smokes and consumes alcohol. On physical examination at the time of presentation, multiple soft, mobile, painless, subcutaneous nodules like lipoma were present over the torso. His height was 176.8 cm, weight 68 kg, BMI 21.8 kg/m2 (body mass index). He had blood pressure of 110/70 mm of Hg taken in left arm at sitting position, heart rate of 62 beats/min, respiratory rate of 24/min, temperature of 96.6 °F, SPO2 of 98 % at right hand. A mass was palpable on the right side of abdomen, otherwise abdomen was soft, non-tender, normal bowel sound was present. Chest, cardiac and neurologic examinations were all normal. Initial laboratory evaluation revealed 24 h. urine metanephrine of 5415 μg/24 h (normal: 25–312 μg/24 h.); 24 h. urine VMA of 32.2 mg/24 h. (normal: <13.60 mg/24 h.); serum cortisol of 535.16 nmol/l after overnight low dose dexamethasone(1 mg) suppression test (normal: <50 nmol/l);24 h. Urine free cortisol of 526.61 nmol/24 h. (normal: 30–145 nmol/24 h) PTH(intact) of 89.2 pg./ml (normal: 15–65 pg./ml); serum calcitonin of 15.2 pg./ml (normal: ≤8.4 pg./ml); serum CEA of 4.72 ng/ml (normal: 0.0–4.4 ng/ml); serum DHEA of 1.19 ng/ml (normal: 1.7–6.1 ng/ml). Baseline investigation: Hematology, urine routine/microscopic, electrolytes were within the normal range. Additional laboratory findings were as in the Table 1. Table 1. Lab evaluation Result Reference Unit Metanephrine, urine 24 h 5415 25–312 μg/24 h VMA, urine 24 h 32.2 <13.60 mg/24 h VMA, urine 12.88 – ng/l Cortisol, serum, overnight DST 535.16 <50 nmol/l Cortisol, urine 24 h 526.61 30–145 nmol/24 h ACTH, complete 28.3 7.2–63.3 pg/ml DHEA, serum 1.19 1.7–6.1 ng/ml CEA, serum 4.72 0.0–4.4 ng/ml Phosphorus, serum 3.0 2.5–4.5 mg/dl Albumin, serum 5.2 3.5–5.2 g/dl Calcitonin, serum 15.2 ≤8.4 pg/ml Calcium, serum 8.94 8.6–10.0 mg/dl PTH (intact) 89.2 15–65 pg/ml aldosterone 8.7 7.0–30 g/dl Plasma rennin activity 1.42 0.10–6.56 ng/ml/h Aldosterone-rennin ratio 6.13 ≤20 Creatinine, urine 36 – mg/dl DST - dexamethasone suppression test; VMA - vanilmandelic acid; ACTH - adrenocorticotropic hormone; DHEA - dehydroepiandrosterone; CEA - carcino-embryonic-antigen; PTH - parathyroid hormone. 2.1. USG abdomen USG abdomen (Fig. 1, Fig. 2) showed well defined mixed echoic area in Right adrenal region measuring 12.7 × 10.7 cm in size. There was presence of internal vascularity with multiple foci of cystic compound. The lesion displaced the right kidney inferiorly. Download : Download high-res image (102KB) Download : Download full-size image Fig. 1. USG abdomen. Download : Download high-res image (106KB) Download : Download full-size image Fig. 2. USG abdomen. 2.2. Plane and contrast CT scan of abdomen Plane and contrast CT scan of Abdomen (Fig. 3) showed approximately 11.2 × 10.2 × 9 cm sized, relatively well defined heterogeneous soft tissue density lesion with well-defined enhancing wall in right adrenal region. Non-enhancing areas were noted within the mass suggestive of necrosis. Few calcific foci were noted within the mass with no obvious hemorrhagic component. The lesion showed heterogeneous enhancement post contrast image. Download : Download high-res image (192KB) Download : Download full-size image Fig. 3. CT abdomen. After all the workup patient was given diagnosis of right sided Pheochromocytoma associated with MEN syndrome, with ACTH-independent Cushing's syndrome and right adrenalectomy was performed. 2.3. Pathology report 2.3.1. Gross descriptions The specimen was globular mass measuring 14.5 × 10 cm, with smooth outer surface. On sectioning, the mass was well circumscribed, soft and yellow-brown, predominantly solid with cyst formation. The size of cyst ranges from 0.3 to 3.5 cm in diameter. Areas of hemorrhages were noted. 2.3.2. Microscopic description Section showed tumor cells arranged in well-defined nests (Zellballen), alveolar and diffuse pattern with intervening fibrovascular stroma. The cells were intermediate to large sized, polygonal with finely granular amphophilic cytoplasm. The nuclei showed mild to moderate pleomorphism and were round to ovoid, with prominent nuclei noted. No capsular invasion, vascular invasion and necrosis. Areas of hemorrhage were seen. Mitosis 0–1/10 high power field was noted (Figs. 4 and 5). Download : Download high-res image (1MB) Download : Download full-size image Fig.a Diffuse Zellbalen pattern with intervening fibrous stroma. Fig.b Mild to moderate pleomorphic nuclei with abundant hemorrhage. Fig.c Low power field with intact capsule. Download : Download high-res image (352KB) Download : Download full-size image Figs. 4 and 5. Fig. 4 Intra-operative resection of tumor; Fig. 5 tumor after resection. 3. Discussion In Pheochromocytoma activation of the alpha-one adrenergic receptor by catecholamine in the vascular bed causes vasoconstriction and leads to a rise in blood pressure. Similarly, activation of the beta-one receptor in the heart enhances the chronotropic and inotropic effect of the myocardium, leading to an increase in heart rate and cardiac output. In addition, activation of the beta-one receptor in the juxtaglomerular cells of the kidney activates the RAAS system. These receptor activation result in cardiovascular and sympathetic changes, such as hypertension, palpitation, headache, sweating, trembling, and anxiety [10]. In Pheochromocytoma, the patient may have a 10-fold increase in plasma catecholamines, but the hemodynamic response can still fall within the normal range due to desensitization of the cardiovascular system. When catecholamine levels are elevated for a prolonged period, the alpha-one receptors in blood vessels may be down-regulated, making norepinephrine unresponsive in raising peripheral vascular resistance, which can lead to normal blood pressure. Similarly, a marked decrease in beta-one receptors in the heart could explain the normal heart rate, which was observed in our asymptomatic patient with Pheochromocytoma [11]. Sometimes in asymptomatic patients, the size of the tumor tends to be larger than in those with hyperfunctioning tumors [12]. However, medical interventions such as surgery, anesthesia induction, intravenous urography contrast, or manipulation of the tumor can trigger adrenergic and hypertensive crises, so biopsy is usually contraindicated in pheochromocytoma [13]. The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma is typically based on measuring plasma and urinary levels of catecholamines and their derivatives such as metanephrine and vanillylmandelic acid. The most reliable test is the measurement of urinary metanephrine as its excretion levels are relatively higher [13,14]. The combination of 131I-MIBG scintigraphy along with diagnostic urinary and blood tests can further enhance the sensitivity of the test. Specifically, the urinary normetanephrine test is considered the most sensitive single test for detecting Pheochromocytoma [15,16]. In addition to a 24-h urine test and blood test, if the lab results are positive for Pheochromocytoma or paragangliomas, further diagnostic tests may be recommended, such as a CT scan, MRI, m-iodobenzylganidine (MIBG) imaging, or positron emission tomography (PET) [16,17]. In our patient 24 h. urine metanephrine of 5415 μg/24 h (normal: 25–312 μg/24 h.); 24 h. urine VMA of 32.2 mg/24 h. (normal: <13.60 mg/24 h.) and imaging confirmation of right adrenal mass lead to the diagnosis of right sided pheochromocytoma. Our patient with pheochromocytoma was tested for parathyroid hormone and calcitonin due to the association of pheochromocytoma with MEN-2 [18]. MEN-2 can be diagnosed biochemically by measuring the baseline levels of calcitonin, parathyroid hormone and serum calcium along with blood tests for catecholamines and their metabolites to detect pheochromocytoma [19]. In our patient, multiple soft, mobile, painless, subcutaneous nodules like lipoma were present over the torso(MEN-1) and high levels of parathyroid hormone and calcitonin were detected(MEN-2). These findings can be correlated with MEN syndrome. USG of the neck revealed no abnormalities of thyroid and parathyroid gland in our patient so prophylactic thyroidectomy was not done, instead he was counseled for follow up if any symptoms or thyroid swelling appears. The diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome typically involves measuring the levels of 24-h urine free cortisol and assessing the suppression of cortisol in response to a 1 mg overnight dexamethasone test. If cortisol levels remain elevated despite the test, the next step is to measure serum ACTH levels. If ACTH levels are suppressed, it suggests an ACTH-independent cause of Cushing's syndrome, while elevated ACTH levels suggest an ACTH-dependent cause. Further evaluation may include a CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis to identify potential ectopic sources, as well as an MRI of the pituitary gland [8]. Our patient had a high level of 24 h. urine free cortisol of 526.61 nmol/24 h (reference range: 30–145 nmol/24 h) and serum cortisol of 535.16 nmol/L(reference range: <50 nmol/L) after overnight 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test, but normal level of ACTH of 28.3 pg./ml (reference range: 7.2–63.1 ng/ml), this suggests the diagnosis of ACTH independent Cushing's syndrome. 4. Conclusion Large Pheochromocytoma patients can be asymptomatic and can present in association with other endocrine disorders. So proper evaluation is necessary to find out associated conditions and manage accordingly to prevent the possible outcomes. Patient consent Written, informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of the report. Ethical approval It is exempted at my institution. We don't need to take approval from ethical committee for case report. Funding N/A. Author contribution Conceptualization: Sanjit Kumar Shah. Clinical diagnosis and patient management: Mahipendra Tiwari. Microscopic slide preparation: Sneh Acharya. Writing original draft: Sanjit Kumar Shah and Avish Shah. All authors were involved in reviewing, editing, supervision and in preparing the final manuscript. Guarantor Guarantor: Sanjit Kumar Shah Email: sanjitshah023@gmail.com Conflict of interest statement N/A. References [1] P.J. Klingler, T.P. Fox, D.M. Menke, J.M. Knudsen, J.T. Fulmer Pheochromocytoma in an incidentally discovered asymptomatic cystic adrenal mass Mayo Clin. Proc., 75 (5) (2000), pp. 517-520, 10.4065/75.5.517 View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar [2] K. Salmenkivi, J. Arola, R. Voutilainen, et al. Inhibin/activin betaB-subunit expression in pheochromocytomas favors benign diagnosis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 86 (5) (2001), pp. 2231-2235, 10.1210/jcem.86.5.7446 View article View in ScopusGoogle Scholar [3] W.M. Manger, R.W. Gifford Pheochromocytoma J. Clin. Hypertens (Greenwich)., 4 (1) (2002), pp. 62-72, 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2002.01452.x View PDF This article is free to access. Google Scholar [4] S.R. Pingle, F. Jalil, D. Millar, C.D. Malchoff, B.T. Ristau Isolated DHEAS production by an adrenal neoplasm: clinical, biochemical and pathologic characteristics Urol. Case Rep., 31 (2020), Article 101148 Published 2020 Feb 26 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101148 Published 2020 Feb 26 View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar [5] I. Jandou, A. Moataz, M. Dakir, A. Debbagh, R. Aboutaieb Malignant pheochromocytoma: a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma Int. J. Surg. Case Rep., 83 (2021), Article 106009, 10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106009 View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar [6] L. Canu, G. Parenti, G. De Filpo, M. Mannelli Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas as causes of endocrine hypertension Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne)., 10 (2019), p. 333 Published 2019 Jun 4 https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00333 Published 2019 Jun 4 View in ScopusGoogle Scholar [7] G.G. Callender, T.A. Rich, N.D. Perrier Multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes Surg. Clin. North Am., 88 (4) (2008), p. 863 viii https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2008.05.001 viii View PDFView articleView in ScopusGoogle Scholar [8] R. Pivonello, M. De Leo, A. Cozzolino, A. Colao The treatment of Cushing’s disease Endocr. Rev., 36 (4) (2015), pp. 385-486, 10.1210/er.2013-1048 View article View in ScopusGoogle Scholar [9] R.A. Agha, T. Franchi, C. Sohrab, G. Mathew, A. Kirwan, A. Thomas, et al. The SCARE 2020 guideline: updating consensus Surgical Case Report (SCARE) guidelines Int. J. Surg., 84 (1) (2020), pp. 226-230 View PDFView articleCrossRefView in ScopusGoogle Scholar [10] L. Canu, G. Parenti, G. De Filpo, M. Mannelli Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas as causes of endocrine hypertension Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne)., 10 (2019), p. 333 Published 2019 Jun 4 https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00333 Published 2019 Jun 4 View in ScopusGoogle Scholar [11] E. Bravo, F. Fouad-Tarazi, G. Rossi, et al. A reevaluation of the hemodynamics of pheochromocytoma Hypertension., 15 (2 Suppl) (1990), pp. I128-I131, 10.1161/01.hyp.15.2_suppl.i128 View article Google Scholar [12] M.A. Blake, S.K. Krishnamoorthy, G.W. Boland, et al. Low-density pheochromocytoma on CT: a mimicker of adrenal adenoma AJR Am. J. Roentgenol., 181 (6) (2003), pp. 1663-1668, 10.2214/ajr.181.6.1811663 View article View in ScopusGoogle Scholar [13] R. Yu, A. Pitts, M. Wei Small pheochromocytomas: significance, diagnosis, and outcome J. Clin. Hypertens (Greenwich)., 14 (5) (2012), pp. 307-315, 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00604.x View PDF This article is free to access. View in ScopusGoogle Scholar [14] F. Zoghbi, C. Landault, N. Salmon, J.C. Legrand Les catécholamines et leurs dérivés dans l’exploration du phéochromocytome [Catecholamines and their derivatives in the study of pheochromocytoma] Ann. Med. Interne (Paris)., 134 (3) (1983), pp. 230-232 View in ScopusGoogle Scholar [15] U. Guller, J. Turek, S. Eubanks, E.R. Delong, D. Oertli, J.M. Feldman Detecting pheochromocytoma: defining the most sensitive test Ann. Surg., 243 (1) (2006), pp. 102-107, 10.1097/01.sla.0000193833.51108.24 View article View in ScopusGoogle Scholar [16] G. Eisenhofer, M. Peitzsch Laboratory evaluation of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma Clin. Chem., 60 (12) (2014), pp. 1486-1499, 10.1373/clinchem.2014.224832 View PDF This article is free to access. View in ScopusGoogle Scholar [17] H.P. Neumann, D.P. Berger, G. Sigmund, et al. Pheochromocytomas, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, and von Hippel-Lindau disease [published correction appears in N Engl J Med 1994 Dec 1;331(22):1535] N. Engl. J. Med., 329 (21) (1993), pp. 1531-1538, 10.1056/NEJM199311183292103 View article View in ScopusGoogle Scholar [18] V. Amodru, D. Taieb, C. Guerin, et al. MEN2-related pheochromocytoma: current state of knowledge, specific characteristics in MEN2B, and perspectives [published correction appears in endocrine. 2020 Jun 2;:] [published correction appears in endocrine. 2020 Jul 14;:] Endocrine, 69 (3) (2020), pp. 496-503, 10.1007/s12020-020-02332-2 View article View in ScopusGoogle Scholar [19] C.J. Lips, J.W. Höppener, B.P. Van Nesselrooij, R.B. Van der Luijt Counselling in multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes: from individual experience to general guidelines J. Intern. Med., 257 (1) (2005), pp. 69-77, 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01429.x View PDF This article is free to access. View in ScopusGoogle Scholar From https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210261223005370

Nearly one-third of women with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome and normal bone mineral density have a low trabecular bone score, according to study data. “A large proportion of patients had degraded microarchitecture despite normal BMD,” Hiya Boro, DM, MD, MBBS, consultant in endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism at Aadhar Health Institute in India, and colleagues wrote. “The risk of fracture may be underestimated if BMD alone is measured. Hence, trabecular bone score should be added as a routine complementary tool in the assessment of bone health in patients with Cushing’s syndrome.” Data were derived from Boro H, et al. Clin Endocrinol. 2023;doi:10.1111/cen.14944. Researchers conducted a cross-sectional study at a single center in India from March 2018 to August 2019. The study included 40 women with overt endogenous Cushing’s syndrome and 40 healthy sex-matched controls. Seum and salivary cortisol and plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) were measured. Participants were considered ACTH independent if they had a level of less than 2.2 pmol/L. Areal BMD was measured at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip and distal one-third of the nondominant distal radius. Low BMD for age was defined as a z score of less than –2. Trabecular bone score was measured at the lumbar spine. Fully degraded microarchitecture was defined as a trabecular bone score of 1.2 or lower and partial degradation was a trabecular bone score of 1.21 to 1.34. Of the 40 women with Cushing’s syndrome, 32 were ACTH-dependent and the other eight were ACTH independent. Of the independent group, seven had adrenal adenoma and one had adrenocortical carcinoma. Women with Cushing’s syndrome had lower BMD at the lumbar spine (0.812 g/cm2 vs. 0.97 g/cm2; P < .001), femoral neck (0.651 g/cm2 vs. 0.773 g/cm2; P < .001) and total hip (0.799 g/cm2 vs. 0.9 g/cm2; P < .001) than the control group. “No significant difference was noted in the distal radius BMD,” the researchers wrote. “This may be explained by the fact that cortisol excess predominantly affects trabecular rather than cortical bone.” Absolute trabecular bone score was lower in the Cushing’s syndrome group compared with controls (1.2 vs. 1.361; P < .001). Based on trabecular bone score, 42.5% of women with Cushing’s syndrome had fully degraded bone microarchitecture, 45% had partially degraded microarchitecture and 12.5% had normal microarchitecture. “In our study, 32.5% of patients had normal BMD with low trabecular bone score, thus highlighting the fact that patients may have normal BMD despite degraded microarchitecture,” the researchers wrote. “As such, assessment of BMD alone may underestimate the risk of fractures in patients with Cushing’s syndrome.” From https://www.healio.com/news/endocrinology/20230809/bmd-may-underestimate-bone-deterioration-for-women-with-endogenous-cushings-syndrome

Abstract Background The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is challenging; however, through the clinical picture and the search for secondary causes of osteoporosis, it was possible to reach the diagnosis of the case reported. There was an independent, symptomatic ACTH hypercortisolism manifested by typical phenotypic changes, severe secondary osteoporosis and arterial hypertension in a young patient. Case presentation A 20-year-old Brazilian man with low back pain for 8 months. Radiographs showed fragility fractures in the thoracolumbar spine, and bone densitometry showed osteoporosis, especially when evaluating the Z Score (− 5.6 in the lumbar spine). On physical examination, there were wide violaceous streaks on the upper limbs and abdomen, plethora and fat increase in the temporal facial region, hump, ecchymosis on limbs, hypotrophy of arms and thighs, central obesity and kyphoscoliosis. His blood pressure was 150 × 90 mmHg. Cortisol after 1 mg of dexamethasone (24.1 µg/dL) and after Liddle 1 (28 µg/dL) were not suppressed, despite normal cortisoluria. Tomography showed bilateral adrenal nodules with more severe characteristics. Unfortunately, through the catheterization of adrenal veins, it was not possible to differentiate the nodules due to the achievement of cortisol levels that exceeded the upper limit of the dilution method. Among the hypotheses for the differential diagnosis of bilateral adrenal hyperplasia are primary bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia, McCune–Albright syndrome and isolated bilateral primary pigmented nodular hyperplasia or associated with Carney’s complex. In this case, primary pigmented nodular hyperplasia or carcinoma became important etiological hypotheses when comparing the epidemiology in a young man and the clinical-laboratory-imaging findings of the differential diagnoses. After 6 months of drug inhibition of steroidogenesis, blood pressure control and anti-osteoporotic therapy, the levels and deleterious metabolic effects of hypercortisolism, which could also impair adrenalectomy in the short and long term, were reduced. Left adrenalectomy was chosen, given the possibility of malignancy in a young patient and to avoid unnecessary definitive surgical adrenal insufficiency if the adrenalectomy was bilateral. Anatomopathology of the left gland revealed expansion of the zona fasciculate with multiple nonencapsulated nodules. Conclusion The early identification of Cushing’s syndrome, with measures based on the assessment of risks and benefits, remains the best way to prevent its progression and reduce the morbidity of the condition. Despite the unavailability of genetic analysis for a precise etiological definition, it is possible to take efficient measures to avoid future damage. Peer Review reports Background Cushing’s syndrome may be exogenous or endogenous and, in this case, can be ACTH-dependent or independent. In the case reported, there was an independent, symptomatic ACTH hypercortisolism manifested by typical phenotypic changes, severe secondary osteoporosis and arterial hypertension in a young patient. Osteoporosis secondary to hypercortisolism occurs due to chronic reduction in bone formation, loss of osteocytes and increased reabsorption caused by intense binding of cortisol to glucocorticoid receptors present in bone cells [1]. In addition, excess cortisol impairs vitamin D metabolism and reduces endogenous parathyroid hormone secretion, intestinal calcium reabsorption, growth hormone release, and lean body mass [2]. Subclinical Cushing disease occurs in up to 11% of individuals diagnosed with early-onset osteoporosis and 0.5–1% of hypertension patients. [3] A cross-sectional study published in 2023 revealed a prevalence of 81.5% bone loss in 19 patients with Cushing’s syndrome [2]. The prevalence of osteopenia ranges from 60 to 80%, and the prevalence of osteoporosis ranges from 30 to 65% in patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Additionally, the incidence of fragility fractures ranges from 30 to 50% in these patients [4] and is considered the main cause of morbidity affecting the quality of life. The diagnosis is challenging, given the presence of confounding factors; however, through the clinical picture and the search for secondary causes of osteoporosis, it was possible to reach a syndromic diagnosis. Early identification of this syndrome, with measures based on the assessment of risks and benefits, remains the best way to prevent progression and reduce morbidity related to this disease [2]. Case presentation A 20-year-old Brazilian male patient reported low back pain that had evolved for 8 months, with no related trauma. He sought emergency care and performed spinal radiographs on this occasion (03/2019). Due to the several alterations observed in the images, he was referred to the Orthopedics Service of the Hospital of Federal University of Juiz de Fora, which prescribed orthopedic braces, indicated physical therapy and was referred again to the Osteometabolic Diseases outpatient clinic of the Endocrinology and Rheumatology Services of the Hospital of Federal University of Juiz de Fora on 10/2019. The radiographs showed a marked reduction in the density of bone structures, scoliotic deviation with convexity toward the left and reduction in the height of the lumbar vertebrae, with partial collapses of the vertebral bodies at the level of T12, L1, L2, L3 and L5, with recent collapses in T12 and L1, suggesting bone fragility fractures. The same can be seen in posterior magnetic resonance imaging (Fig. 1). Fig. 1 Radiography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of lumbosacral spine in profile Full size image Bone scintigraphy on 08/2019 did not reveal hyper flow or anomalous hyperemia in the topography of the thoracolumbar spine, and in the later images of the exam, there was a greater relative uptake of the tracer in the lumbar spine (vertebrae T10–T12, L2–L4), of nonspecific aspect, questioning the presence of osteoarticular processes or ankylosing spondylitis. It was also observed in the bone densitometry requested in October 2019, performed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), low bone mineral density (BMD) in the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total femur, when comparing the results to evaluating the Z Score (Table 1). Table 1 Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Full size table Thus, the diagnosis of osteoporosis was established, and treatment with vitamin D 7000 IU per week was started due to vitamin D3 insufficiency associated with the bisphosphonate alendronate 70 mg, also weekly. The patient had a past pathological history of fully treated syphilis (2018) and perianal condyloma with a surgical resection on 09/2017 and 02/2018. In the family history, it was reported that a maternal uncle died of systemic sclerosis. In the social context, the young person denied drinking alcohol and previous or current smoking. On physical examination, there were no lentiginous skin areas or blue nevi; however, wide violet streaks were observed on the upper limbs and abdomen, with plethora and increased fat in the temporal facial region and hump (Fig. 2a, b), limb ecchymosis, hypotrophy of the arms and thighs, central obesity and kyphoscoliosis. Systemic blood pressure (sitting) was 150 × 90 mmHg, BMI was 26.09 kg/m2, and waist circumference was 99 cm, with no reported reduction in height, maintained at 1.55 m. Fig. 2 Changes in the physical examination. a Violet streaks on the upper limbs, b Violet streaks on abdomen Full size image An investigation of secondary causes for osteoporosis was initiated, with the following laboratory test results (Table 2). Table 2 Laboratory tests Full size table Computed tomography of the abdomen with adrenal protocol performed on 08/13/2020 characterized isodense nodular formation in the body of the left adrenal and in the lateral portion of the right adrenal, measuring 1.5 cm and 0.6 cm, respectively. The lesions had attenuation of approximately 30 HU, showing enhancement by intravenous contrast, with an indeterminate washout pattern in the late phase after contrast (< 60%) (Fig. 3). Fig. 3 Computed tomography abdomen with adrenal protocol Full size image After contact with the interventional radiology of the Hospital of Federal University of Juiz de Fora, catheterization of adrenal veins was performed on 10/2020; however, it was not possible to perform adequate lesion characterization due to obtaining serum cortisol levels that extrapolated the dilutional upper limit of the method (Table 3). Table 3 Adrenal catheterization Full size table The calculation of the selectivity index was 6.63 (Reference Value (RV) > 3), confirming the good positioning of the catheter within the vessels during the procedure. The calculated lateralization index was 1.1296 (VR < 3), denoting bilateral hormone production. However, as aldosterone was not collected from a peripheral vein, it was not possible to obtain the contralateral rate and define whether there was contralateral suppression of aldosterone production [5]. Due to pending diagnoses for a better therapeutic decision and Cushing’s syndrome in clear evolution and causing organic damage, it was decided, after catheterization, to make changes in the patient’s drug prescription. Ketoconazole 400 mg per day was started, the dose of vitamin D was increased to 14,000 IU per week, and ramipril 5 mg per day was prescribed due to secondary hypertension. In addition, given the severity of osteoporosis, it was decided to replace previously prescribed alendronate with zoledronic acid. Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper abdomen was performed on 06/19/2021, which demonstrated lobulated nodular thickening in the left adrenal gland with areas of decreased signal intensity in the T1 out-phase sequence, denoting the presence of fat, and homogeneous enhancement using contrast, measuring approximately 1.7 × 1.5 × 1.3 cm, suggestive of an adenoma. There was also a small nodular thickening in the lateral arm of the right adrenal, measuring approximately 0.8 × 0.6 cm, which was difficult to characterize due to its small dimensions and nonspecific appearance. PPNAD or carcinoma became an important etiological hypothesis for the case described when comparing the epidemiology in a young man and the clinical-laboratory-imaging findings of the differential diagnoses. According to a dialog with the patient and family, the group of experts opted for unilateral glandular surgical resection on the left side (11/11/2021), where more significant changes were visualized, as there was a possibility of malignancy in a young patient and to avoid a definitive adrenal insufficiency condition because of bilateral adrenalectomy. This would first allow the analysis of the material and follow-up of the evolution of the condition with the permanence of the contralateral gland. In the macroscopic analysis of the adrenalectomy specimen, adrenal tissue weighing 20 g and measuring 9.3 × 5.5 × 2.0 cm was described, completely surrounded by adipose tissue. The gland has a multinodular surface and varies between 0.2 and 1.6 cm in thickness, showing a cortex of 0.1 cm in thickness and a medulla of 1.5 cm in thickness (Fig. 4). Fig. 4 Left adrenal Full size image The microscopic analysis described the expansion of the zona fasciculate, with the formation of multiple nonencapsulated nodules composed of polygonal cells with ample and eosinophilic cytoplasm and frequent depletion of intracytoplasmic lipid content. No areas of necrosis or mitotic activity were observed. The histopathological picture is suggestive of cortical pigmented micronodular hyperplasia of the adrenal gland. For the final etiological definition and an indication of contralateral adrenalectomy, which could be unnecessary and would avoid chronic corticosteroid therapy, or else, it would be necessary to protect the patient from future complications with the maintenance of the disease in the right adrenal gland, it would be essential to search for mutations in the PRKAR1A, PDE11A, PDE8B and PRKACA genes [15]; however, such genetic analysis is not yet widely available, and the impossibility of carrying it out at the local level did not allow a complete conclusion of the case. Discussion Through the clinical picture presented and the research of several secondary causes for osteoporosis, it was possible to arrive at the diagnosis of Cushing syndrome [6]. There was symptomatic independent ACTH hypercortisolism, manifested by typical phenotypic changes, severe secondary osteoporosis, and arterial hypertension in a young patient. The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome is always challenging, given the presence of confounding factors such as the following: Physiological states of hypercortisolism—pseudo Cushing (strenuous exercise, pregnancy, uncontrolled diabetes, sleep apnea, chronic pain, alcohol withdrawal, psychiatric disorders, stress, obesity, glucocorticoid resistance syndromes); Cyclic or mild—subclinical Cushing’s pictures; Frequent and, even unknown, short- and long-term use of corticosteroids under different presentations; Increase in the general population incidence of diabetes and obesity; Screening tests with singularities for collection and individualized for different patient profiles. It is important to note that the basal morning cortisol measurement is not the ideal test to assess hypercortisolism and is better applied to the assessment of adrenal insufficiency. However, the hypercortisolism of the case was unequivocal, and this test was also shown to be altered several times. As no test is 100% accurate, the current guidelines suggest the use of at least two first-line functional tests that focus on different aspects of the pathophysiology of the hypothalamic‒pituitary‒adrenal axis to confirm the hypercortisolism state: 24-hours cortisol, nocturnal salivary cortisol, morning serum cortisol after suppression with 1 mg of dexamethasone or after Liddle 1. Given that night-time salivary cortisol would require hospitalization, the other suggested tests were chosen, which are easier to perform in this context [7, 8]. Subsequently, tests were performed to determine the cause of hypercortisolism, such as serum ACTH levels and adrenal CT. The suppressed ACTH denoted the independence of its action. CT showed bilateral adrenal nodules with more severe features: solid lesion, attenuation > 10 UI on noncontrast images, and contrast washout speed < 60% in 10 minutes. In this case, it is essential to make a broad clinical decision and dialog with the patient to weigh and understand the risks and benefits of surgical treatment [9]. Among the main diagnostic hypotheses for the differential diagnosis of bilateral adrenal hyperplasia are primary bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia, McCune–Albright syndrome (MAS) and bilateral primary pigmented nodular hyperplasia (PPNAD) isolated or associated with Carney’s complex. Another possibility would be bilateral adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent macronodular hyperplasia secondary to long-term adrenal stimulation in patients with Cushing’s disease (ACTH-secreting pituitary tumor) or ectopic ACTH production, but the present case did not present with ACTH elevation. Primary macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (nodules > 1 cm) predominates in women aged 50–60 years and may also be detected in early childhood (before 5 years) in the context of McCune–Albright syndrome. Most cases are considered sporadic; however, there are now several reports of familial cases whose presentation suggests autosomal dominant transmission. Several pathogenic molecular causes were identified in the table, indicating that it is a heterogeneous disease [10]. The pathophysiology occurs through the expression of anomalous ectopic hormone receptors or amplified eutopic receptors in the adrenals. It usually manifests in an insidious and subclinical way, with cortisol secretion mediated through receptors for gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP), vasopressin (ADH), catecholamines, interleukin 1 (IL-1), leptin, luteinizing hormone (LH), serotonin or others. Nodular development is not always synchronous or multiple; thus, hypercortisolism only manifests when there is a considerable increase in the number of adrenocortical cells, with severe steroidogenesis observed by cortisoluria greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal. Patients with mild Cushing’s syndrome should undergo screening protocols to identify aberrant receptors, as this may alter the therapeutic strategy. If there is evidence of abnormal receptors, treatment with beta-blockers is suggested for patients with beta-adrenergic receptors or with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists (and sex steroid replacement) for patients with LH/hCG receptors. In patients in whom aberrant hormone receptors are not present or for whom no specific pharmacological blockade is available or effective, the definitive treatment is bilateral adrenalectomy, which is known to make the patient dependent on chronic corticosteroid therapy [11]. Studies have shown the effectiveness of unilateral surgery in the medium and long term, opting for the resection of the adrenal gland of greater volume and nodularity by CT, regardless of the values obtained by catheterization of adrenal veins, but with the possibility of persistence or recurrence in the contralateral gland. Another possibility would be total unilateral adrenalectomy associated with subtotal contralateral adrenalectomy [12]. In McCune–Albright syndrome (MAS), there are activating mutations in the G-protein GNAS1 gene, generating autonomic hyperfunction of several tissues, endocrine or not, and there may be, for example, a constant stimulus similar to ACTH on the adrenal gland. In this case, pituitary levels of ACTH are suppressed, and adrenal adenomas with Cushing’s syndrome appear. Hypercortisolism may occur as an isolated manifestation of the syndrome or be associated with the triad composed of polyostotic fibrous dysplasia, café au lait spots with irregular borders and gonadal hyperfunction with peripheral precocious puberty. The natural history of Cushing’s syndrome in McCune-Albright syndrome (MAS) is heterogeneous, with some children evolving with spontaneous resolution of hypercortisolism, while others have a more severe condition, eventually requiring bilateral adrenalectomy [13]. PPNAD predominates in females, in people younger than 30 years, multiple and small (< 6 mm) bilateral pigmented nodules (surrounded by atrophied cortex), which can reach 1.5 cm in adulthood, with family genetic inheritance (66%) or sporadic inheritance (33%), and as part of the Carney complex reported in 40% of cases. In 70% of cases, inactivating mutations are identified in the PKA regulatory 1-alpha subunit (PRKAR1A), a tumor suppressor gene [14]. Osteoporosis is often associated with this condition [15]. One test that can distinguish patients with PPNAD from other primary adrenocortical lesions is cortisoluria after sequential suppression with low- and high-dose dexamethasone. In contrast to most patients with primary adrenocortical disease, who demonstrate no change in urinary cortisol, 70% of PPNAD patients have a paradoxical increase in urinary cortisol excretion [16]. The treatment of choice for PPNAD is bilateral adrenalectomy due to the high recurrence rate for primary adrenal disease [17]. Carney complex is a multiple neoplastic syndrome with autosomal dominant transmission, characterized by freckle-like cutaneous hyperpigmentation (lentiginosis), endocrine tumors [(PPNAD), testicular and/or thyroid tumors and acromegaly] and nonendocrine tumors, including cutaneous, cardiac, mammary, and osteochondral myxomas, among others. In the above case, the transthoracic echocardiogram of the patient on 03/18/2021 showed cavities of normal dimensions, preserved systolic and diastolic functions, no valve changes and no lentiginous skin areas and blue nevi, making the diagnosis of the syndrome less likely. The definitive diagnosis of Carney requires two or more main manifestations. Several related clinical components may suggest the diagnosis but not define it. The diagnosis can also be made if a key criterion is present and a first-degree relative has Carney or an inactivating mutation of the gene encoding PRKAR1A [18]. The adenoma is usually small in size (< 3 cm), similar to the nodules in this case; however, it is usually unilateral, with an insidious and mild evolution, especially in adult women over 35 years of age, producing only 1 steroid class. Carcinomas are usually large (> 6 cm), and only 10% are bilateral. They should be suspected mainly when the tumor presents with hypercortisolism associated with hyperandrogenism. They have a bimodal age distribution, with peaks in childhood and adolescence, as well as at the end of life [3]. Conclusion Early identification of Cushing’s syndrome, with measures based on the assessment of risks and benefits, remains the best way to prevent progression and reduce morbidity [2]. After 6 months of drug inhibition of steroidogenesis, blood pressure control and anti-osteoporotic therapy, the objective was to minimize the levels and deleterious metabolic effects of hypercortisolism, which could also harm the surgical procedure in the short and long term through infections, dehiscence, nonimmediate bed mobilization and cardiovascular events. Unilateral adrenalectomy was chosen, given the possibility of malignancy in a young patient and to avoid definitive surgical adrenal insufficiency if the adrenalectomy was bilateral. Despite the unavailability of genetic analysis for a precise etiological definition, it is possible to take efficient measures to avoid unnecessary consequences or damage. Availability of data and materials All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its Additional file 1]. The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the link https://ufjfedubr-my.sharepoint.com/:v:/g/personal/barbara_reis_ufjf_edu_br/EVpIR005sPZGlQvMJhIwSaUB0Hig4KOjhkG4D4cMggUwHA?e=Dk8tng. Abbreviations ACTH: Adrenocorticotropic hormone PPNAD: Bilateral primary pigmented nodular hyperplasia DXA: Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry GIP: Gastric inhibitory peptide GnRH: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone IL-1: Interleukin 1 BMD: Low bone mineral density LH: Luteinizing hormone MAS: McCune–Albright syndrome PRKAR1A: PKA regulatory 1-alpha subunit ADH: Vasopressin References Pedro AO, Plapler PG, Szejnfeld VL. Manual brasileiro de osteoporose: orientações práticas para os profissionais de saúde. 1st ed. São Paulo: Editora Clannad; 2021. ISBN 978-65-89832-00-3. Naguib R, Elkemary EZ, Elsharkawi KM. The severity of bone loss: a comparison between Cushing’s disease and Cushing’s syndrome. J Endocrinol Metab. 2023;13(1):33–8. https://doi.org/10.14740/jem857. Article Google Scholar Vilar L, et al. Endocrinologia Clínica. 6th ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2016. Google Scholar Wang D, Dang CX, Hao YX, Yu X, Liu PF, Li JS. Relationship between osteoporosis and Cushing syndrome based on bioinformatics. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(43): e31283. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Williams TA, Reincke M. Management of Endocrine Disease: diagnosis and management of primary aldosteronism: the Endocrine Society guideline 2016 revisited. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;179(1):R19–29. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-17-0990. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Compston J, Cooper A, Cooper C, Gittoes N, Gregson C, Harvey N, National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG), et al. UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0324-5. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Nieman LK. Diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome in the modern era. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2018;47(2):259–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2018.02.001. Article Google Scholar Herr K, Muglia VF, Koff WJ, Westphalen AC. Imaging of the adrenal gland lesions. Radiol Bras. 2014;47(4):228–39. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2013.1762. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Hsiao HP, Kirschner LS, Bourdeau I, Keil MF, Boikos SA, Verma S, et al. Clinical and genetic heterogeneity, overlap with other tumor syndromes, and atypical glucocorticoid hormone secretion in adrenocorticotropin-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia compared with other adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(8):2930–7. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-0516. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Mircescu H, Jilwan J, N’Diaye N, et al. Are ectopic or abnormal membrane hormone receptors frequently present in adrenal Cushing’s syndrome? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(10):3531–6. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.10.6865. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Miller BS, Auchus RJ. Evaluation and treatment of patients with hypercortisolism: a review. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(12):1152–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3280. Article PubMed Google Scholar Haddad NG, Eugster EA. Peripheral precocious puberty including congenital adrenal hyperplasia: causes, consequences, management and outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;33(3):101273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2019.04.007. Article PubMed Google Scholar Bonnet-Serrano F, Bertherat J. Genetics of tumors of the adrenal cortex. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2018;25(3):R131–52. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-17-0361. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Carney JA, Young WF Jr. Primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease and its associated conditions. Endocrinologist. 1992;2:6. Article Google Scholar Stratakis CA, Sarlis N, Kirschner LS, Carney JA, Doppman JL, Nieman LK, et al. Paradoxical response to dexamethasone in the diagnosis of primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131(8):585–91. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-131-8-199910190-00006. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Powell AC, Stratakis CA, Patronas NJ, Steinberg SM, Batista D, Alexander HR, et al. Operative management of Cushing syndrome secondary to micronodular adrenal hyperplasia. Surgery. 2008;143(6):750–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.022. Article PubMed Google Scholar Almeida MQ, Stratakis CA. Carney complex and other conditions associated with micronodular adrenal hyperplasias. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;24(6):907–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2010.10.006. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Hannah-Shmouni F, Stratakis CA. A gene-based classification of primary adrenocortical hyperplasias. Horm Metab Res. 2020;52(3):133–41. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1107-2972. Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar Download references Acknowledgements Not applicable. Funding Not applicable. Author information Authors and Affiliations Serviço de Endocrinologia, Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil Bárbara Oliveira Reis, Christianne Toledo Sousa Leal, Danielle Guedes Andrade Ezequiel, Ana Carmen dos Santos Ribeiro Simões Juliano, Flávia Lopes de Macedo Veloso, Leila Marcia da Silva, Lize Vargas Ferreira, Mariana Ferreira & Gabriel Zeferino De Oliveira Souza Contributions All the authors contributed to the conception and design of the work and have approved the submitted version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Corresponding author Correspondence to Bárbara Oliveira Reis. Ethics declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Supplementary Information Additional file 1. Surgical removal of adrenal gland. Rights and permissions Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. Reprints and Permissions From https://jmedicalcasereports.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13256-023-03968-0

Abstract Objective To evaluate whether age-related differences exist in clinical characteristics, diagnostic approach and management strategies in patients with Cushing’s syndrome included in the European Registry on Cushing’s Syndrome (ERCUSYN). Design Cohort study. Methods We analyzed 1791 patients with CS, of whom 1234 (69%) had pituitary-dependent CS (PIT-CS), 450 (25%) adrenal-dependent CS (ADR-CS) and 107 (6%) had an ectopic source (ECT-CS). According to the WHO criteria, 1616 patients (90.2%) were classified as younger (<65 years) and 175 (9.8%) as older (>65 years). Results Older patients were more frequently males and had a lower BMI and waist circumference as compared with the younger. Older patients also had a lower prevalence of skin alterations, depression, hair loss, hirsutism and reduced libido, but a higher prevalence of muscle weakness, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, venous thromboembolism and bone fractures than younger patients, regardless of sex (p<0.01 for all comparisons). Measurement of UFC supported the diagnosis of CS less frequently in older patients as compared with the younger (p<0.05). An extra-sellar macroadenoma (macrocorticotropinoma with extrasellar extension) was more common in older PIT-CS patients than in the younger (p<0.01). Older PIT-CS patients more frequently received cortisol-lowering medications and radiotherapy as a first-line treatment, whereas surgery was the preferred approach in the younger (p<0.01 for all comparisons). When transsphenoidal surgery was performed, the remission rate was lower in the elderly as compared with their younger counterpart (p<0.05). Conclusions Older CS patients lack several typical symptoms of hypercortisolism, present with more comorbidities regardless of sex, and are more often conservatively treated. From https://academic.oup.com/ejendo/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/ejendo/lvad008/7030701?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false

Abstract Introduction Hypertension is one of the most common clinical features of patients with overt and subclinical hypercortisolism. Although previous studies have shown the coexistence of autonomous cortisol and aldosterone secretion, it is unclear whether aldosterone plays a role in hypertension among patients with hypercortisolism. Therefore, we examined the associations of plasma aldosterone concentrations (PACs) with hypertension among patients with overt and subclinical hypercortisolism. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients with adrenal tumor and serum cortisol levels after 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test >1.8 µg/dL (50 nmol/L). Using multivariable regression models adjusting for baseline characteristics, we investigated the association of PACs with systolic blood pressure and postoperative improvement of hypertension after the adrenalectomy. Results Among 89 patients enrolled in this study (median age, 51 years), 21 showed clinical signs of Cushing syndrome (overt hypercortisolism) and 68 did not show clinical presentations (subclinical hypercortisolism). We found that higher PACs were significantly associated with elevated systolic blood pressure among patients with subclinical hypercortisolism (adjusted difference [95% CI] = +0.59 [0.19-0.99], P = 0.008) but not among those with overt hypercortisolism. Among 33 patients with subclinical hypercortisolism and hypertension who underwent adrenalectomy, the postoperative improvement of hypertension was significantly associated with higher PACs at baseline (adjusted risk difference [95% CI] = +1.45% [0.35-2.55], P = 0.01). Conclusion These findings indicate that aldosterone may contribute to hypertension among patients with subclinical hypercortisolism. Further multi-institutional and population-based studies are required to validate our findings and examine the clinical effectiveness of the intervention targeting aldosterone for such patients. subclinical hypercortisolism, aldosterone, hypertension, adrenalectomy Issue Section: Clinical Research Article Cortisol production in the adrenal gland is regulated by the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Subclinical hypercortisolism is a status characterized by the alteration of HPA axis secretion without typical signs or symptoms of overt hypercortisolism (eg, moon face, truncal obesity, easy bruising, thin extremities, proximal myopathy, cutaneous purple striae) [1, 2]. Although overt hypercortisolism can be detected by its clinical presentations or severe complications, it is sometimes challenging for clinicians to appropriately diagnose subclinical hypercortisolism because of the absence of such clinical presentations [2]. The 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test (1-mg DST) measures the response of the adrenal glands to ACTH through the HPA axis and therefore has been widely used for screening and diagnosis of subclinical hypercortisolism [1, 3]. The European Society of Endocrinology Guideline has defined a partial suppression of the HPA axis (ie, serum cortisol levels after 1-mg DST [F-DST] > 1.8 µg/dL [50 nmol/L]) without clinical signs of overt cortisol hypersecretion as “possible autonomous cortisol secretion” and recommended screening these patients for metabolic disorders including hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus to offer appropriate treatment of these comorbidities [4]. Hypertension is one of the most common and distinguishing clinical features in patients with subclinical hypercortisolism [2] as well as overt hypercortisolism [5]. Although hypertension can be triggered by excess cortisol levels [5, 6], it is still unclear whether even slightly elevated cortisol levels among individuals with subclinical hypercortisolism contribute to the occurrence of hypertension. This raises another potential mechanism to cause hypertension such as the coexistence of hyperaldosteronism (ie, excess aldosterone that is an essential steroid hormone for sodium reabsorption, water retention, and blood pressure control) [7]. Previous studies have reported that 10% to 20% of primary aldosteronism is accompanied by cortisol-producing adenoma [8-10], and autonomous cortisol secretion was decreased after the resection of the aldosterone-producing adenoma (a subtype of primary aldosteronism) [11]. Furthermore, a previous mass spectrometry-based analysis revealed that cortisol secretion was frequently found in patients with primary aldosteronism [12]. Although these studies have examined cortisol biosynthesis in primary aldosteronism [13], evidence about whether aldosterone plays a role in the occurrence of hypertension among people with subclinical hypercortisolism is limited. To address this knowledge gap, we performed a cohort study examining the association between aldosterone and hypertension among patients with adrenal tumor and F-DST >1.8 µg/dL, stratified by whether patients had clinical signs of Cushing syndrome or not. We first analyzed the cross-sectional association between aldosterone and blood pressure at baseline. Then, we analyzed the longitudinal association between aldosterone at baseline and the improvement rate of hypertension after the adrenalectomy. Last, to further clarify the role of aldosterone in the regulation of blood pressure in subclinical hypercortisolism, we described the difference in aldosterone response to ACTH after the adrenalectomy according to the postoperative improvement of hypertension. Materials and Methods Data Sources and Study Participants A retrospective cohort study was designed to assess the clinical characteristics (focusing on aldosterone) among patients with hypercortisolism at the Yokohama Rosai Hospital from 2008 to 2017. We enrolled 89 patients with adrenal tumor and F-DST > 1.8 µg/dL (50 nmol/L) [3, 4, 14]. We then categorized them into 2 groups: (1) overt hypercortisolism (F-DST > 5.0 µg/dL [138 nmol/L]) and having clinical signs of Cushing syndrome (moon face, central obesity, dorsocervical fat pad [buffalo hump], purple striae, thin skin, easy bruising, and proximal myopathy] [15]) and (2) subclinical hypercortisolism (not having such clinical signs). All patients with overt hypercortisolism in this study showed F-DST > 5.0 µg/dL (138 nmol/L). The study was approved by the research ethics committee of the Yokohama Rosai Hospital, and all participants provided written informed consent. Measurements Demographic characteristics were self-reported, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated using measured weight and height. Systolic blood pressure was measured in the sitting position using a standard upper arm blood pressure monitor after a 5-minute rest in a quiet place [16]. The mean of 2 measurements was recorded. If the measurement was done only once on a given occasion, the level obtained was recorded. When the patients were already taking antihypertensives at enrollment, they were asked to report their blood pressure levels at the diagnosis of hypertension (ie, systolic blood pressure before starting antihypertensives). Blood samples were collected at 8:00 AM after the patient had rested in the supine position for 30 minutes. We measured F (µg/dL, × 27.6 for nmol/L) and ACTH (pg/mL, × 0.220 for pmol/L) using chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay and electrochemiluminescent immunoassay, respectively. Plasma aldosterone concentrations (PACs; ng/dL, × 27.7 for pmol/L) and plasma renin activities (PRAs; ng/mL/h) were measured using radioimmunoassay. Any antihypertensive drugs were replaced with calcium channel antagonists (including dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonists) and/or α blocker several weeks before the measurement of PACs and PRAs according to the clinical guideline of the Japan Endocrine Society [17]. We also measured urine aldosterone (µg/day × 2.77 for nmol/d) and urine cortisol (µg/day, × 2.76 for nmol/d) using radioimmunoassay. The tumor size was estimated using contrast-enhanced thin-section computed tomography scans of the adrenal glands. To evaluate whether the patients had autonomous cortisol secretion, we performed 1-mg DST, in which dexamethasone (1 mg) was administered at 11:00 PM, and blood samples were drawn at 8:00 AM the following morning. F and ACTH were measured in 1-mg DST. The total or partial adrenalectomy was performed in all cases with overt hypercortisolism. For patients with subclinical hypercortisolism, the adrenalectomy was recommended to those who showed F-DST > 5.0 µg/dL (138 nmol/L) accompanying metabolic disorders [3]. It was also recommended to those who were expected to improve their clinical symptoms and/or metabolic disorders by the tumor resection, which included patients with hypertension possibly resulting from autonomous aldosterone secretion as well as autonomous cortisol secretion from the adrenal gland. The adrenalectomy was conducted when patients agreed with the treatment plan through informed consent. To evaluate whether patients had autonomous aldosterone secretion, we used the screening criterion of primary aldosteronism (ie, PAC/PRA ratio; aldosterone-to-renin ratio [ARR] > 20), followed by the confirmatory tests of primary aldosteronism that included the saline infusion test, captopril challenge, and/or furosemide stimulation test [17]. For patients who were considered to receive a benefit by the adrenalectomy and who agreed with the examination, we performed the segment-selective adrenal venous sampling to assess the laterality of hyperaldosteronism [18-20]. First, blood samples were collected from the bilateral central adrenal veins before ACTH stimulation. Then, we collected samples from the superior, lateral, and inferior tributaries of the right central adrenal vein and the superior and lateral tributaries of the left central adrenal vein after ACTH stimulation. Aldosterone excess (ie, hyperaldosteronism) was considered when the effluent aldosterone concentrations were > 250 ng/dL before ACTH stimulation and 1400 ng/dL after ACTH stimulation, respectively [18-20]. We used the absolute value instead of the lateralization index because individuals included in our study had elevated cortisol concentrations given the inclusion criteria (ie, F-DST >1.8 µg/dL [50 nmol/L]). For 9 patients with subclinical hypercortisolism who showed bilateral adrenal nodules, the side of adrenalectomy was determined by the nodule size and the results of adrenal venous sampling (ie, laterality of hyperaldosteronism). The adrenalectomy was conducted when patients agreed with the treatment plan through informed consent. Immunohistochemical evaluation of aldosterone synthase cytochrome P450 (CYP11B2) was conducted for some resected nodules. To evaluate the postoperative cortisol responsiveness to ACTH, we performed an ACTH stimulation test a year after the adrenalectomy, in which blood samples were collected and PAC and F were measured 30 and 60 minutes after ACTH administration. Postoperative improvement of hypertension was defined as blood pressure <140/90 mmHg without antihypertensives or the reduction of the number of antihypertensives to maintain blood pressure <140/90 mmHg after the adrenalectomy. Statistical Analyses We describe the demographic characteristics and endocrine parameters at baseline comparing patients with overt hypercortisolism and those with subclinical hypercortisolism using the Fisher exact test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Second, for each group, we investigated the association between the baseline characteristics and systolic blood pressure using ordinary least-squares regression models. The model included age, sex, BMI, serum potassium levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate, tumor size, and F and PAC at 8:00 AM. Third, we estimated the risk difference and 95% CI of the improvement rate of hypertension after the adrenalectomy according to these baseline characteristics (including systolic blood pressure) using a modified least-squares regression model with a Huber-White robust standard error [21]. Last, to evaluate whether the improvement of hypertension is related to postoperative cortisol and aldosterone secretion, we compared PAC and F responsiveness to ACTH from peripheral blood samples between patients who improved hypertension and those who did not using the Mann-Whitney U test. The longitudinal and postoperative analyses were performed among patients with subclinical hypercortisolism because only 2 cases with overt hypercortisolism failed to show the improvement of hypertension after the adrenalectomy. To assess the robustness of our findings, we conducted the following 2 sensitivity analyses. First, we replaced F at 8:00 AM with F after DST in our regression models. Second, we estimated the risk difference of the improvement rate of hypertension after the adrenalectomy according to the postoperative F and PAC levels after ACTH stimulation, adjusting for the baseline characteristics included in our main model. We also conducted several additional analyses. First, to investigate the relationship of change in PAC after adrenalectomy with the improvement rate of hypertension, we included decrease in PAC between before and after adrenalectomy instead of PAC at baseline in the model. Second, to assess the relationship between aldosterone and hypertension among patients with subclinical hypercortisolism without primary aldosteronism, we reran the analyses excluding patients who met the diagnostic criteria of primary aldosteronism. Third, to understand the overall association, we reran the analyses using all samples as a single group to assess the relationship among people with overall (ie, overt and subclinical) hypercortisolism. Last, we compared PAC and F responsiveness with ACTH during adrenal venous sampling between patients with and without postoperative improvement of hypertension. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata, version 15. Results Among the 89 enrolled patients, 21 showed clinical signs of overt Cushing syndrome and 68 did not. The flow of the study population is shown in Fig. 1. Among 21 patients with overt hypercortisolism, 19 patients had hypertension. All patients underwent adrenalectomy, and 16 patients showed improved hypertension levels after the surgery (1 patient was referred to another hospital; therefore, no information is available). Among 68 patients with subclinical hypercortisolism, 63 had hypertension. After the evaluation of autonomous aldosterone secretion as well as autonomous cortisol secretion, of 33 patients who underwent adrenalectomy, 23 (70%) showed improved hypertension levels after the adrenalectomy (10 patients in the surgery group decided not to undergo adrenalectomy). Patients with subclinical hypercortisolism who underwent adrenalectomy showed lower PRA and higher ARR than those without adrenalectomy (Supplementary Table S1) [22]. Figure 1. Open in new tabDownload slide Enrollment and follow-up of the study population after the adrenalectomy. aThe prevalence of patients with overt hypercortisolism and hypertension among this study population may be higher than in the general population and therefore needs to be carefully interpreted given that the study institute is one of the largest centers for adrenal diseases in Japan. bAll patients in this category showed autonomous cortisol secretion (ie, serum cortisol levels >5.0 µg/dL [138 nmol/L] after a 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test). cOne case underwent adrenalectomy at another hospital and therefore no information was available after the adrenalectomy. dThe adrenalectomy was performed for 33 patients who were expected to improve their clinical symptoms and/or metabolic disorders, including hypertension. This assessment was mainly based on autonomous cortisol secretion evaluated by a 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test, complicated metabolic disorders, and autonomous aldosterone secretion evaluated by adrenal venous sampling for patients who were positive for the screening and confirmatory tests of primary aldosteronism. Details in the assessment can be found in the Methods section or elsewhere [18-20]. Demographic Characteristics and Endocrine Parameters Among Patients With Overt and Subclinical Hypercortisolism The median age (interquartile range) was 51 years (46, 62 years), and 72% were female. Patients with overt hypercortisolism were relatively younger and showed a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate and larger tumor size compared with patients with subclinical hypercortisolism (Table 1). Other demographic characteristics were similar between these groups. Patients with overt hypercortisolism showed higher F with undetected low ACTH, higher F after DST, and higher urine cortisol levels compared with those with subclinical hypercortisolism who instead showed higher PAC and ARR. Among patients with subclinical hypercortisolism, 9/68 (13.2%) showed undetectable ACTH levels and 25/68 (36%) were positive for PA screening criterion (ie, ARR > 20) followed by at least 1 positive confirmatory test. Based on the results of adrenal venous sampling of these cases, 9 showed aldosterone excess in the right nodules, 6 showed aldosterone excess in the left nodules, and 7 showed aldosterone excess on both sides, respectively (3 cases did not show aldosterone excess on both sides). Immunohistochemical evaluation of CYP11B2 was examined for 6 resected adrenal glands, and all of them showed positive expression. Patients’ characteristicsa Patients with overt hypercortisolism (N = 21) Patients with subclinical hypercortisolism (N = 68) P Age, y 46 [38-52] 54 [47-63] 0.002 Female, n (%) 18 (85.7) 46 (67.7) 0.11 Body mass index, kg/m2 23.4 [20.6-26.2] 23.1 [21.7-25.1] 0.94 Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg 156 [140-182] 162 [151-191] 0.29 Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg 98 [92-110] 100 [90-110] 0.73 Serum potassium, mEq/Lb 3.9 [3.5-4.0] 3.8 [3.6-4.0] 0.98 eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 86.7 [77.3-123.0] 82.1 [69.8-87.7] 0.02 Tumor size by CT scan, mm 28 [25-30] 22 [17-26] 0.001 ACTH, 8:00 AM − c 6.6 [2.4-11.8] — F, 8:00 AM 16.6 [12.5-18.8] 9.5 [7.7-12.0] <0.001 PRA, 8:00 AM 0.7 [0.4-1.3] 0.5 [0.2-1.0] 0.10 PAC, 8:00 AM 8.3 [7.2-9.8] 9.2 [7.2-16.2] 0.09 ARR, 8:00 AM 10.0 [6.4-16.7] 21.0 [9.8-46.5] 0.02 F after DST 16.5 [14.4-18.7] 5.1 [3.2-7.5] <0.001 Urine cortisol 220.0 [105.0-368.0] 49.5 [37.4-78.5] <0.001 Urine aldosterone 5.7 [3.9-10.1] 7.2 [4.8-13.1] 0.16 Conversion to SI units: ACTH, pg/mL × 0.220 for pmol; F, µg/dL × 27.6 for nmol/L; PAC, ng/dL × 27.7 for pmol/L; urine aldosterone, μg/day × 2.77 for nmol/d; Urine cortisol, μg/day × 2.76 for nmol/d. Abbreviations: ARR, aldosterone-to-renin ratio; CRH, corticotropin-releasing hormone; CT, thin-section computed tomography; DST, 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; F, serum cortisol; PRA, plasma renin activity; PAC, plasma aldosterone concentration. a Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or count (proportions) unless otherwise indicated. b Serum potassium levels were controlled using potassium supplement/tablets at enrollment. c Undetected in all cases. Open in new tab Association of Demographic Characteristics and Endocrine Parameters With Systolic Blood Pressure Among patients with overt hypercortisolism, we did not find a significant association of demographic characteristics and endocrine parameters with systolic blood pressure (Table 2). However, among patients with subclinical hypercortisolism, we found that higher PACs at 8:00 AM were significantly associated with systolic blood pressure (adjusted coefficient [95% CI] = +0.59 [0.19-0.99], P = 0.008). The results did not change when we used F after DST instead of F at 8:00 AM (Supplementary Table S2) [22]. Table 2. Cross-sectional association of demographic characteristics and endocrine parameters with systolic blood pressure among patients with overt and subclinical hypercortisolism Outcome Systolic blood pressure at baseline Groups Patients with overt hypercortisolism Patients with subclinical hypercortisolism Parameters Adjusted coefficient (95% CI) P Adjusted coefficient (95% CI) P Age, y +1.73 (0.17-3.30) 0.03 +0.49 (−0.13 to 1.10) 0.12 Female −7.48 (−76.75 to 61.79) 0.81 +15.38 (−0.83 to 31.59) 0.06 Body mass index +5.47 (−2.4 to 13.33) 0.15 +1.07 (−0.49 to 2.63) 0.17 Serum potassium +11.29 (−23.42 to 45.99) 0.48 −9.61 (−26.38 to 7.15) 0.26 eGFR −0.12 (−1.00 to 0.77) 0.77 −0.44 (−0.89 to 0.01) 0.06 Tumor size −2.39 (−6.92 to 2.14) 0.26 +0.40 (−0.46 to 1.26) 0.35 F, 8:00 AMa,b +1.96 (−1.27 to 5.18) 0.20 +1.26 (−1.00 to 3.52) 0.27 PAC, 8:00 AMa −2.86 (−7.38 to 1.66) 0.18 +0.59 (0.19-0.99) 0.008 Abbreviations: DST, 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; F, serum cortisol; PRA, plasma renin activity; PAC, plasma aldosterone concentration. a ACTH and PRA were not included in the main model because they have strong correlation with F and PAC, respectively (ie, multicollinearity). The results did not change when additionally adjusting for ACTH and PRA. b The results did not change when we replaced F at 8:00 AM with F after DST (Supplementary Table S2). Open in new tab Association of Demographic Characteristics and Endocrine Parameters With Hypertension Improvement After the Adrenalectomy Among Patients With Subclinical Hypercortisolism Among 33 patients with subclinical hypercortisolism and hypertension who underwent the adrenalectomy, we found that age and higher PAC were significantly associated with a higher improvement rate of hypertension after the adrenalectomy (age, adjusted risk difference [95% CI] = +2.36% [1.08-3.64], P = 0.001; PAC, adjusted risk difference [95% CI] = +1.45% [0.35-2.55], P = 0.01; Table 3). The results did not change when we used F after DST instead of F at 8:00 AM (Supplementary Table S3) [22]. Patients with improved hypertension after the surgery showed significantly lower PACs 60 minutes after a postoperative ACTH stimulation test than those without the improvement of hypertension (P = 0.05), although F and PAC/F ratio were not significantly different between these 2 groups (Table 4). The association between lower PACs after postoperative ACTH stimulation and higher improvement rate of hypertension was also found in the multivariable regression analysis adjusting for baseline characteristics (adjusted risk difference [95% CI] = −1.08% [−1.92 to −0.25], P = 0.01; Supplementary Table S4) [22]. Table 3. Longitudinal association of demographic characteristics and endocrine parameters with hypertension improvement after the adrenalectomy among patients with subclinical hypercortisolisma Outcome Hypertension improvement after the adrenalectomy Parameters Adjusted risk difference (95% CI) P Age +2.36% (1.08-3.64) 0.001 Sex (female) −11.32% (−61.37 to 38.73) 0.64 Body mass index −5.08% (−10.29 to 0.13) 0.06 Systolic blood pressure −0.67% (−1.77 to 0.43) 0.22 Serum potassium −0.06% (−31.84 to 31.71) 1.00 eGFR +0.53% (−0.36 to 1.42) 0.23 Tumor size +0.79% (−1.35 to 2.93) 0.45 F, 8:00 AMb,c −2.81% (−7.43 to 1.81) 0.22 PAC, 8:00 AMb +1.45% (0.35-2.55) 0.01 Abbreviations: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; F, serum cortisol; PRA, plasma renin activity; PAC, plasma aldosterone concentration. a Analysis was not performed for patients with overt hypercortisolism because only 2/18 cases failed to show improved hypertension after the adrenalectomy. b ACTH and PRA were not included in the main model because they have strong correlation with F and PAC, respectively (ie, multicollinearity). The results did not change when additionally adjusting for ACTH and PRA. c The results did not change when we replaced F at 8:00 AM with F after DST (Supplementary Table S3). Open in new tab Table 4. Aldosterone and cortisol response to ACTH a year after the adrenalectomy according to hypertension improvement status among patients with subclinical hypercortisolisma Outcome: hypertension improvement status after the adrenalectomy Improvement (+) (N = 23) Improvement (−) (N = 10) Parameters Median [IQR] Median [IQR] P PAC 60 min after ACTH stimulation 13.6 [10.0-16.7] 15.5 [13.7-43.1] 0.05b F 60 min after ACTH stimulation 16.9 [13.7-20.6] 18.5 [13.5-24.7] 0.61 PAC/F ratio 60 min after ACTH stimulation 0.70 [0.52-1.39] 1.27 [0.50-5.44] 0.26 Conversion to SI units: F, µg/dL × 27.6 for nmol/L; PAC, ng/dL × 27.7 for pmol/L. Abbreviations: F, serum cortisol; PAC, plasma aldosterone concentration. a Analysis was not performed for patients with overt hypercortisolism because only 2/18 cases failed to show improved hypertension after the adrenalectomy. b The association was also observed after adjusting for baseline characteristics (eg, age, sex, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, serum potassium, estimated glomerular filtration rate, tumor size) and F 60 min after ACTH stimulation a year after the adrenalectomy (Supplementary Table S4). Open in new tab Additional Analyses Decreased PAC between before and after adrenalectomy was significantly associated with hypertension improvement (Supplementary Table S5) [22]. When we restricted samples to those without primary aldosteronism, PACs at baseline tended to be associated with systolic blood pressure but the 95% CI included the null (Supplementary Table S6) [22]. Decreased PAC after adrenalectomy was associated with hypertension improvement after the adrenalectomy, whereas PAC at baseline was not associated with that outcome (Supplementary Table S7) [22]. When we analyzed the entire sample (ie, both overt and subclinical hypercortisolism), PAC at baseline was associated with systolic blood pressure at baseline (Supplementary Table S8) [22] and hypertension improvement after the adrenalectomy (Supplementary Table S9) [22]. We also found the higher median value of PAC response to ACTH during adrenal venous sampling at the remained (ie, not resected by the adrenalectomy) side of adrenal gland among patients whose hypertension did not improve compared with those whose hypertension improved after the surgery, but the difference was not statistically significant (Supplementary Table S10) [22]. Discussion In this retrospective cohort study, we found that higher aldosterone levels were associated with higher systolic blood pressure among patients with possible autonomous cortisol secretion and without clinical signs of overt Cushing syndrome (ie, subclinical hypercortisolism). In this group, higher aldosterone before the adrenalectomy was associated with the postoperative improvement of hypertension. Moreover, we found that patients with postoperative improvement of hypertension showed lower aldosterone response to ACTH after the adrenalectomy compared with those without the improvement of hypertension. Decrease in PACs after the adrenalectomy was associated with improved hypertension even among patients with subclinical hypercortisolism who did not have primary aldosteronism at baseline, whereas baseline PAC was not associated with that outcome. We found no evidence that aldosterone is associated with systolic blood pressure among patients with overt hypercortisolism. These findings indicate that elevated aldosterone may contribute to the presence of hypertension and its improvement rate after the adrenalectomy for patients with subclinical hypercortisolism. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to assess the potential role of aldosterone in hypertension among patients with overt and subclinical hypercortisolism, during both pre- and postoperative phases. Since aldosterone- and cortisol-producing adenoma was reported in 1979 [23, 24], several studies have assessed the cortisol production in aldosterone-producing adenoma clinically and histologically [8-10, 25] and showed the correlation between the degree of glucocorticoid excess levels and metabolic markers including BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, insulin resistance, and high-density lipoprotein [12]. Prior research suggested that aldosterone-producing adenoma might produce cortisol as well as aldosterone even when serum cortisol levels after DST is less than 1.8 µg/dL (50 nmol/L) [11]. Although these studies have focused on cortisol synthesis among patients with aldosterone-producing adenoma, little is known about aldosterone synthesis among patients with cortisol-producing adenoma. Given that patients with hypercortisolism tend to have therapy-resistant hypertension and electrolyte disorders [8], our findings may generate the hypothesis that aldosterone contributes to the incidence and severity of hypertension in patients with possible autonomous cortisol secretion; this warrants further investigation. There are several mechanisms by which cortisol excess leads to hypertension, such as regulating endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression modulated by 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases [26], activating the mineralocorticoid receptor [27] and upregulating vascular endothelin-1 [28]. Moreover, hypercortisolism impairs the production of endothelial vasodilators, including prostacyclin, prostaglandins, and kallikreins [29]. Despite these potential mechanisms, the direct effect of cortisol may not be sufficient to explain hypertension in patients with hypercortisolism, particularly subclinical hypercortisolism, and the presence of cortisol and aldosterone coproducing adenoma indicates another potential pathway to induce hypertension through aldosterone excess. Aldosterone is a steroid hormone not only promoting sodium reabsorption and volume expansion but also activating the mineralocorticoid receptor in the kidney and nonepithelial tissues (eg, adipose tissue, heart, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells) [30]. It also induces oxidative stress, inflammation, fibrosis, vascular tone, and endothelial dysfunction [31]; therefore, aldosterone excess could induce hypertension even when it is slightly elevated [32]. A recent multiethnic study showed that aldosterone levels within the reference range were associated with subclinical atherosclerosis partially mediated through elevated blood pressure [33]. These mechanisms support our results indicating the potential contribution of aldosterone to hypertension among patients with subclinical hypercortisolism. This study had several limitations. First, we did not have information on the duration of cortisol excess and therefore the estimated effect of cortisol on hypertension in our study might have been underestimated. The duration of exposure to mild hypercortisolism may be one of the important drivers of cardiovascular and metabolic disorders including irreversible vasculature remodeling in patients with subclinical hypercortisolism [2]. Second, we did not have the genetic information of adrenal tumors including aldosterone-producing adenoma. Given the heterogeneity of aldosterone responsiveness to ACTH [34] and postoperative hypertension resolution rate across genetic mutations (eg, KCNJ5, ATP1A1, ATP2B3, CACNA1D, CTNNB1) [35], such information might affect our findings. Third, because of the nature of an observational study, we cannot rule out the unmeasured confounding. Fourth, because aldosterone and cortisol levels were measured at a single point, we may have a risk of mismeasurement. Moreover, when evaluating aldosterone levels, we used dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers to control hypertension based on the clinical guideline of primary aldosteronism in Japan; this might lower serum aldosterone levels. Fifth, because the present study was conducted at a single center, selection bias is inevitable [13]. Given that primary aldosteronism—one of the major causes of secondary hypertension—has still been underdiagnosed, partially because of insufficient recognition of clinical guidelines [36], our findings may indicate the importance of considering aldosterone when evaluating patients with subclinical hypercortisolism accompanied by hypertension. However, we need to carefully interpret the observed “prevalence” in this study because individuals potentially having subclinical hypercortisolism were likely to come to our hospital, which specializes the adrenal disorders, and thus the numbers do not reflect the prevalence in general population. The small number of resected adrenal glands with the evaluation of CYP11B2 expression in this study cohort also limits the prevalence estimation of primary aldosteronism. Finally, as we only followed up 1 year after the adrenalectomy, we could not evaluate the long-term resolution rate of hypertension. To overcome these limitations and generalize our findings, future molecular studies and multicenter longitudinal studies with sufficient individual datasets and longer follow-up are required. In conclusion, plasma aldosterone concentrations were associated with systolic blood pressure and improvement rate of hypertension after the adrenalectomy among patients with subclinical hypercortisolism—possible autonomous cortisol secretion without clinical signs of overt Cushing syndrome. Our findings underscore the importance of considering aldosterone when patients have an adrenal tumor with possible autonomous cortisol secretion complicated with hypertension. Future molecular and epidemiological studies are warranted to identify the potential role of aldosterone in hypertension among patients with subclinical hypercortisolism, clarify how often these patients also have primary aldosteronism, and examine the clinical effectiveness of the intervention targeting aldosterone for such patients. Funding K.I. was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS; 21K20900 and 22K17392) and The Japan Endocrine Society. Study sponsors were not involved in study design, data interpretation, writing, or the decision to submit the article for publication. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Conflicts of Interest All of authors confirm that there is no conflict of interest in relation to this work. Data Availability Restrictions apply to the availability of some data generated or analyzed during this study to preserve patient confidentiality or because they were used under license. The corresponding author will on request detail the restrictions and any conditions under which access to some data may be provided. Abbreviations ARR aldosterone-to-renin ratio BMI body mass index DST dexamethasone suppression test F serum cortisol level HPA hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal PAC plasma aldosterone concentration PRA plasma renin activity © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. From https://academic.oup.com/jes/article/7/1/bvac167/6782230?login=false

Cortisol isn’t bad; you need it to help regulate your responses to life. Regulation involves a very complex interplay of feedback loops between the hypothalamus, pituitary gland, and adrenal glands, says Dr. Singh. “In general, cortisol levels tend to peak in the late morning and gradually decline throughout the day,” he explains. “When a stressful event occurs, the increased cortisol will work alongside our ‘fight or flight’ mechanisms to either upregulate or downregulate bodily functions. [Affected systems include] the central nervous system, cardiovascular system, gastrointestinal system, or immune system.” In addition to normal processes that trigger or suppress cortisol release, levels can also be affected by different medical conditions, Dr. Singh says. For example, if someone has abnormally high levels of cortisol, this is called Cushing’s syndrome, which is typically caused by a tumor affecting any of the glands that take part in the process of cortisol production. When people suffer from abnormally low levels of cortisol, it’s called Addison’s disease. It generally occurs due to adrenal gland dysfunction, but could also be the result of abnormal functioning of any of the other glands in the cortisol production process. Finally, if you use corticosteroid medications such as prednisone or dexamethasone, prolonged use will result in excessive cortisol production, Dr. Singh says. “If the medication is not adequately tapered down when discontinued, the body’s ability to create cortisol can become permanently impaired,” he says. From https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/manage-pesky-stress-hormone-cortisol-184900397.html

Abstract MiRNAs are important epigenetic players with tissue- and disease-specific effects. In this study, our aim was to investigate the putative differential expression of miRNAs in adrenal tissues from different forms of Cushing’s syndrome (CS). For this, miRNA-based next-generation sequencing was performed in adrenal tissues taken from patients with ACTH-independent cortisol-producing adrenocortical adenomas (CPA), from patients with ACTH-dependent pituitary Cushing’s disease (CD) after bilateral adrenalectomy, and from control subjects. A confirmatory QPCR was also performed in adrenals from patients with other CS subtypes, such as primary bilateral macronodular hyperplasia and ectopic CS. Sequencing revealed significant differences in the miRNA profiles of CD and CPA. QPCR revealed the upregulated expression of miR-1247-5p in CPA and PBMAH (log2 fold change > 2.5, p < 0.05). MiR-379-5p was found to be upregulated in PBMAH and CD (log2 fold change > 1.8, p < 0.05). Analyses of miR-1247-5p and miR-379-5p expression in the adrenals of mice which had been exposed to short-term ACTH stimulation showed no influence on the adrenal miRNA expression profiles. For miRNA-specific target prediction, RNA-seq data from the adrenals of CPA, PBMAH, and control samples were analyzed with different bioinformatic platforms. The analyses revealed that both miR-1247-5p and miR-379-5p target specific genes in the WNT signaling pathway. In conclusion, this study identified distinct adrenal miRNAs as being associated with CS subtypes. Keywords: cortisol; ACTH; miRNA; Cushing’s; hypercortisolism; pituitary 1. Introduction Cushing’s syndrome (CS) results from the excessive secretion of cortisol, leading to visceral obesity, resistance to insulin, osteoporosis, and altered lipid and glucose metabolism [1,2]. Excessive production of cortisol by the adrenal glands can be either ACTH-dependent or -independent. In the majority of patients, hypercortisolism is due to ACTH secretion by corticotroph adenomas of the pituitary gland (Cushing’s disease, CD) or by ectopic tumors [3]. Approximately 20% of cases are ACTH-independent, where cortisol is secreted autonomously by the adrenal cortex. The pathology of ACTH-independent cases is diverse; they are most often caused by unilateral cortisol-producing adrenocortical adenomas (CPA). Rare causes are cortisol-secreting adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC), primary bilateral macronodular adrenocortical hyperplasia (PBMAH), bilateral CPAs, and primary pigmented nodular adrenal disease (PPNAD) [4,5]. Irrespective of the subtype, prolonged exposure to cortisol in CS is associated with increased mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in its patients [6]. Treatment is based on the underlying cause of hypercortisolism, with pituitary surgery or adrenalectomy being the preferred choice. Medical therapy options in CS are few and consist of pituitary-directed drugs, steroid synthesis inhibitors, and glucocorticoid receptor antagonists [7]. For the timely diagnosis and targeted management of CS and its subtypes, a comprehensive understanding of cortisol secretion, in terms of canonical signaling pathways as well as upstream epigenetic factors, is needed. MiRNA molecules have emerged as key epigenetic players in the transcriptional regulation of cortisol production. Briefly, the deletion of Dicer in adrenals, a key miRNA processing enzyme, revealed diverse expression changes in miRNAs along with related changes in steroidogenic enzymes such as Cyp11b1 [8]. Furthermore, key enzymes in the cortisol biosynthesis pathway, namely Cyp11a1, Cyp21a1, Cyp17a1, Cyp11b1, and Cyp11b2, were also found to be regulated by various miRNAs (miRNA-24, miRNA-125a-5p, miRNA-125b-5p, and miRNA-320a-3p) in in vitro studies [9]. Consequently, various studies have also characterized miRNA expression profiles in CS subtypes. Importantly, miRNA expression in the corticotropinomas of CD patients was found to vary according to USP8 mutation status [10]. Other studies have also identified specific miRNA candidates and associated target genes in the adrenals of patients with PPNAD [11], PBMAH [12,13], and massive macronodular adrenocortical disease [14]. Interestingly, no common miRNA candidates were found among these studies, indicating the specificity of miRNAs to the different underlying pathologies in CS. There are limited studies directly comparing miRNA expression profiles of ACTH-dependent and ACTH-independent CS patients. Consequently, in our previous study, we found differences in expression profiles when comparing circulating miRNAs in CD and CPA patients [15]. We hypothesized that the presence of ACTH possibly influences the miRNA profile in serum due to the upstream differential expression in the origin tissues. In this study, we aim to further explore this hypothesis by comparing the miRNA expression profile of adrenal tissues in ACTH-dependent and ACTH-independent CS. In brief, miRNA specific sequencing was performed in two prevalent subtypes of CS: in CD, the most prevalent ACTH-dependent form; and in CPA, the most prevalent ACTH-independent form. Specific miRNA candidates related to each subtype were further validated in other forms of CS. To further investigate our hypothesis, the response of miRNA candidates following ACTH stimulation was assessed in mice, and the expression of miRNAs in murine adrenals was subsequently investigated. Finally, an extensive targeted gene analysis was performed based on in silico predictions, RNA-seq data, and luciferase assays. 2. Results 2.1. Differentially Expressed miRNAs NGS revealed differentially expressed miRNAs between the different groups analyzed (Figure 1). CD and CPA taken together as CS showed a differentially expressed profile (42 significant miRNAs) in comparison to controls. Moreover, individually, CPA and CD were found to show a significantly different expression profile in comparison to controls (n = 38 and n = 17 miRNAs, respectively). Interestingly, there were no significantly upregulated genes in the adrenals of patients with CD in comparison to the control adrenals. A comparative analysis of the top significant miRNAs (log2 fold change (log2 FC) > 1.25 & p < 0.005) between the two groups was performed and the representative Venn diagrams are given in Figure 2. Briefly, miR-1247-5p, miR-139-3p, and miR-503-5p were significantly upregulated in CPA, in comparison to both CD and controls. Furthermore, miR-150-5p was specifically upregulated in CPA as compared to CD. Several miRNAs (miR-486-5p, miR-551b-3p, miR-144-5p, miR-144-3p, and miR-363-3p) were found to be significantly downregulated in the groups of CPA and CD in comparison to controls. MiR-19a-3p and miR-873-5p were found to be commonly downregulated in CPA in comparison to both CD and controls. Principal component analyses based on miRNA sequencing did not identify any major clusters among the samples. Furthermore, the miRNA profile was not different among the CPA samples based on the mutation status of PRKACA (Supplementary Materials Figure S1). Figure 1. Differentially expressed miRNAs from sequencing. Volcano plot showing the relationship between fold change (log2 fold change) and statistical significance (−log10 p value). The red points in the plot represent significantly upregulated miRNAs, while blue points represent significantly downregulated miRNAs. CPA, cortisol producing adenoma; CD, Cushing’s disease; Cushing’s syndrome represents CPA and CD, taken together. Figure 2. Venn analyses of the common significant miRNAs from each group. The significantly expressed miRNAs from each sequencing analysis were shortlisted and compared between the groups. CPA, cortisol producing adenoma; CD, Cushing’s disease. 2.2. Validation and Selection of Candidate miRNAs For validation by QPCR, the most significant differentially expressed miRNAs (log2 FC > 1.25 & p < 0.005) among the groups were chosen (Table S1). According to the current knowledge, upregulated miRNAs are known to contribute more to pathology than downregulated miRNAs [16]. Since the total number of significantly upregulated miRNAs was six, all these miRNAs were chosen for validation. Contrarily, 25 miRNAs were significantly downregulated among the groups. In particular, miR-486-5p, miR-551b-3p, miR-144-5p, miR-144-3p, and miR-363-3p were found to be commonly downregulated in the CS group in comparison to controls; therefore, these miRNAs were chosen for validation. Among the upregulated miRNA candidates, miR-1247-5p QPCR expression confirmed the NGS data (Figure 3A, Table S1). Moreover, miR-150-5p and miR-139-3p were upregulated in CPA specifically in comparison to CD, and miR-379-5p was upregulated in CD in comparison to controls by QPCR. In the case of downregulated genes, none of the selected miRNAs could be confirmed by QPCR (Figure 3B). Thus, analysis of the six upregulated and five downregulated miRNAs from NGS yielded two significantly upregulated miRNA candidates, miR-1247-5p in CPA and miR-379-5p in CD, when compared to controls. These miRNA candidates were taken up for further QPCR validation in an independent cohort of other subtypes of CS (Figure 4), namely ACTH-dependent ectopic CS (n = 3) and ACTH-independent PBMAH (n = 10). The QPCR analysis in the other subtypes revealed miR-1247-5p to be consistently upregulated in ACTH-independent CS (PBMAH and CPA) in comparison to ACTH-dependent CS (CD and ectopic CS) and controls. On the other hand, miR-379-5p was upregulated in CD and PBMAH in comparison to controls. Figure 3. QPCR analyses of significant miRNAs from sequencing analyses. Data are represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of −dCT values: (A) Expression analysis of significantly upregulated miRNAs; (B) Expression analysis of common significantly downregulated miRNAs. Housekeeping gene: miR-16-5p. Statistics: ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction to detect significant differences between patient groups with at least a significance of p-value < 0.05 (*). Figure 4. QPCR analyses of significantly upregulated miRNAs from validation QPCR. Data are represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of −dCT values. Housekeeping gene: miR-16-5p. Statistics: ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction to detect significant differences between patient groups with at least a significance of p-value < 0.05 (*). 2.3. In Vivo Assessment of ACTH-Independent miR-1247-5p To analyze the influence of ACTH on miRNA expression, the expression of miR-1247-5p and miR-379-5p were assessed in the adrenal tissues of ACTH stimulated mice at different time points. For this analysis, miR-96-5p was taken as a positive control, as it has previously been reported to be differentially expressed in ACTH stimulated mice [17]. The analyses revealed that the expression of miR-1247-5p and miR-379-5p did not change at different timepoints of the ACTH stimulation (Figure 5). Meanwhile, the positive control of mir-96-5p showed a dynamic expression pattern with upregulation after 10 min, followed by downregulation at the subsequent 30 and 60 min time points, in concordance with previously reported findings [18]. Figure 5. Analysis of miRNA expression in ACTH stimulated mice tissue. QPCR analyses of positive controls, miR-96-5p, and candidates miR-379-5p and miR-1247-5p. Mice were injected with ACTH, and adrenals were collected at different timepoints to assess the impact of ACTH on miRNA expression. Data are represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of −dCT values. Housekeeping gene: miR-26a-5p. Statistics: ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction to detect significant differences between patient groups with at least a significance of p-value < 0.05 (*). 2.4. In Silico Analyses of miRNA Targets Two diverse approaches were employed for a comprehensive in silico analysis of the miRNA targets. First, the predicted targets of miR-1247-5p and miR-379-5p were taken from the TargetScan database, which identified miRNA–mRNA target pairs based on sequence analyses [19]. The expression status of these targets was then checked in the RNA sequencing data from CPA vs. controls (miR-1247-5p) and PBMAH vs. controls (miR-379-5p). Targets that showed significant expression changes in the sequencing data were shortlisted (Figure 6A). Among the 1061 predicted miR-1247-5p targets, 28 genes were found to show significant expression changes in CPA (20 upregulated, 8 downregulated). On the other hand, for 124 predicted miR-379-5p targets, 23 genes were found to show significant expression changes in PBMAH (20 upregulated, 3 downregulated). Interestingly, the selected targets were found to be unique for each miRNA, except for FICD (FIC domain protein adenylyltransferase) (Figure 6B). Figure 6. (A) Differentially expressed target genes of miRNAs from sequencing. Data are represented as log2 fold change in comparison to the controls. Statistics: ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction to detect significant differences between patient groups with at least a significance of p-value < 0.05. (B) Venn analyses of common significant miRNA target genes and related pathways. The significantly expressed targets from each sequencing analysis were shortlisted and compared between the groups. Predicted pathways of the targets from the Panther database were shortlisted and compared between the groups. 2.5. In Vitro Analyses of miR-1247-5p Targets For in vitro analyses, we focused on downregulated targets, as we expect our upregulated miRNA candidates to cause a downregulation of the target mRNAs. For our downregulated mRNAs, only targets of miR-1247-5p were found to have published links to CS, namely Cyb5a, Gabbr2, and Gnaq (Table 1). Therefore, these three targets were then verified by QPCR in the groups of CPA, CD, PBMAH, ectopic CS, and controls (Figure 6). Only Cyb5A was found to be significantly downregulated in ACTH-dependent forms (ectopic CS and CD) as well as in ACTH-independent CS (PBMAH and CPA) in comparison to controls. Consequently, to assess whether Cyb5a is indeed regulated by miR-1247-5p, a dual luciferase assay was performed. To prove our hypothesis, treatment of Cyb5a-WT cells with miR-1247-5p mimic was expected to lead to a reduced luminescence, whereas no effects were expected in cells treated with the miR-1247-5p inhibitor or the Cyb5a-mutant (with a mutation in the miR-1247-5p binding site). As shown in Figure 7, transfection of miR-1247-5p significantly reduced luminescence from Cyb5a-WT in comparison to cells transfected with Cyb5a-WT and miR-1247-5p inhibitors. However, these predicted binding results were not found to be specific, as there were no significant differences when compared to wells transfected with Cyb5a-WT alone (Figure 8). Consecutively, when the mutated Cyb5a-Mut were transfected along with the mimics and inhibitors, no significant differences in luminescence were observed in the transfected population. Thus, direct interaction between miR-1247-5p and its predicted target gene Cyb5A could not be conclusively proven using this luciferase assay. Figure 7. QPCR analyses of the top predicted targets of miR-1247-5p. Data are represented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of −dCT values. Housekeeping gene: PPIA. Statistics: ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction to detect significant differences between patient groups with at least a significance of p-value < 0.05 (*). Figure 8. Results of dual luminescence assay on cells transfected with miR-1247-5p mimics and related controls. Cells were transfected with plasmids containing either the WT or Mut miRNA binding sequence in Cyb5a. Either miR-1247-5p mimics or miR-1247-5p inhibitors were transfected together with the respective plasmids. Data are represented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) of relative luminescence unit values. Statistics: ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction to detect significant differences between patient groups with at least a significance of p value < 0.05 (*). Table 1. Analysis of the predicted targets of miR-1247-5p and their expression levels in comparison to controls (log2 fold change). Published literature on target genes in reference to CS is highlighted in bold. 2.6. Pathway Analyses of miRNA Targets For the pathway analysis (Reactome) we used the 28 predicted miRNA-1247-5p targets and the 23 predicted miRNA-379-5p targets from TargetScan, which were significantly differently expressed in the RNA-seq (Figure 6). Concurrently, the pathways commonly enriched by both miRNAs included the WNT signaling pathway and N-acetyl-glucosamine synthesis (Figure 9A). As a complementary approach, in silico analyses were also performed based on the targets from miRTarBase. In this database, targets are shortlisted based on published experimental results. In this analysis, miR-1247-5p (n = 21) and miR-379-5p targets (n = 85) were unique. While the validated targets of miR-379-5p were found to show significant changes in expression in the RNA-seq data from PBMAH (n = 12), none of the validated miR-1247-5p targets were found to show significant expression changes in the RNA-seq data from CPA. Therefore, all the validated targets of the miRNAs were subjected to pathway analyses (Panther). Interestingly, the WNT signaling pathway was also found to be commonly regulated by both miRNAs using this approach (Figure 9B). Finally, the expression status of target genes related to WNT signaling pathways were checked in our RNA-seq data (Figure S2). Given the upregulated status of the miRNAs, a downregulated expression of its target genes was expected. However, a significantly upregulated expression was observed for DVL1 in CPA in comparison to controls and for ROR1 in PBMAH in comparison to controls. Figure 9. Pathway analyses of miRNA target genes. (A) The predicted targets were matched with the RNA-seq expression data. For miR-1247-5p, CPA vs. controls expression data; and for miR-379-5p, PBMAH vs. controls expression data. The significantly expressed target genes were then subjected to pathway analyses by Reactome. The significantly enriched pathway networks (p < 0.05) and their related genes are given. (B) The experimentally validated target genes from miRTarBase were analyzed for their role in pathways by the Panther database. The target genes and their related pathways are given. The commonly represented pathways are marked in bold. 3. Discussion MiRNAs are fine regulators of both physiology and pathology and have diverse roles as diagnostic biomarkers as well as therapeutic targets. While circulating miRNAs have been investigated as potential biomarkers for hypercortisolism in CS subtypes (36), comprehensive analyses of their pathological role in CS subtypes have not yet been performed. This study hoped to uncover the pathological role of miRNAs in different CS subtypes as well as identify unique epigenetic targets contributing to hypercortisolism in these subtypes. As such, miRNA sequencing was performed in the ACTH-independent CPA and ACTH-dependent CD, with additional QPCR validation in PBMAH and ectopic CS. As expected, miRNA expression profiles in CD and CPA were very different. 3.1. ACTH-Independent Upregulated miRNAs in CS Among the analyzed miRNAs, only miR-1247-5p and miR-379-5p showed the most prominent changes in expression levels. Briefly, miR-1247-5p was significantly upregulated in ACTH-independent forms of CS, CPA, and PBMAH (Figure 1 and Figure 3) while miR-379-5p was found to be upregulated in CD and PBMAH, in comparison to controls. Even though CD and PBMAH represent CS subtypes with different ACTH dependence, albeit both with hyperplastic tissue, it is interesting to find a shared miRNA expression status. Concurrently, miRNAs have been identified as dynamic players in regulating the acute effect of ACTH on adrenal steroidogenesis in in vivo murine studies [20,21]. Further diverse miRNAs have been characterized to regulate steroidogenesis in ACTH and dexamethasone treated rats [22] (suppressed ACTH) as well as in in vitro studies [20]. It is possible that miR-379-5p contributes to the adrenal hyperplasia present in both PBMAH and CD by targeting specific genes related to hyperplasia, and miR-1247-5p by contributing to cortisol production independent of ACTH regulation in CPA and PBMAH. Interestingly, the miRNA candidates (mir-1247-5p and miR-379-5p) in our study have not been previously characterized in any of these studies. Furthermore, the expression of mir-1247-5p and miR-379-5p were found to be independent of ACTH stimulation, underlying their role in CS independently of the HPA axis control and postulating specific regulatory processes. 3.2. Target Genes of miRNAs in CS Initially, we focused on the selection of known CS specific target genes that could be directly repressed by miRNAs, thereby contributing to pathology. The predicted target genes of miR-1247-5p and miR-379-5p were assessed for their downregulated expression status in the RNA-seq data. Among the selected target genes, only Cyb5a was found to be significantly downregulated in all forms of CS (Figure 6). Cytochrome b5 (CYB5A) is a marker of the zona reticularis and is an important regulator of androstenedione production [23,24]. Based on its role in adrenal steroidogenesis, it is possible that Cyb5a is downregulated by miR1247-5p. To prove our hypothesis, a dual luciferase assay was performed in HELA cell line to identify a direct interaction between Cyb5a and miR-1247-5p (Figure 7). Unfortunately, a direct interaction could not be proven, indicating that miR-1247-5p perhaps regulates its target genes in different ways. 3.3. Pathway Analyses of miRNA Targets To identify miRNA specific regulatory processes, comprehensive target and pathway analyses were performed. Independent pathway analyses of the respective targets with two different databases of Reactome and Panther showed the WNT signaling pathway as a common targeted pathway of both mir-1247-5p and miR-379-5p (Figure 8). The WNT signaling pathway represents a crucial regulator in diverse developmental as well as pathological processes with tissue-specific effects [25,26]. Consequently, the WNT pathway has been largely characterized as one of the dysregulated pathophysiological mechanisms in CPA. Mutations in PRKACA, one of the WNT signaling proteins, are present in approximately 40% of CPA [27]. In the case of CD, dysregulated WNT signaling has been characterized as promoting proliferation in ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas [28]. Moreover, activating mutations in beta catenin, one of the WNT signaling pathways, has been characterized as driving adrenal hyperplasia through both proliferation-dependent and -independent mechanisms [29]. Thus, it could be hypothesized that by targeting specific genes in the pathway, miRNAs drive specific pathophysiological processes in diverse CS subtypes. 3.4. MiRNA Target Genes in WNT Signaling DVL1 (TargetScan) and DVL3 (miRTar) are the shortlisted target genes of miR-1247-5p in the WNT signaling pathway. These genes are members of canonical WNT pathways and, importantly, activation of the cytoplasmic effector Dishevelled (Dvl) is a critical step in WNT/β-catenin signaling initiation [30,31]. Interestingly, no difference in DVL1 and DVL3 gene expression was found in the analyses of ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas [32]. Therefore, it could be possible that DVL1 and DVL3 are only targeted by miR-1247-5p specifically in the adrenal of CPA and PBMAH patients, leading to its characterized tumor progression. EDN1, TGFBR1 (TargetScan), and ROR1 (miRTar) were the target genes of miR-379-5p related to the WNT pathway. In epithelial ovarian cancer, Endothelin-1 (EDN-1) was found to regulate the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and a chemoresistant phenotype [33]. In the case of receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 1 (ROR1), higher expression of the gene was associated with a poor prognosis in ovarian cancer [34]. Concurrently, suppression of TGFBR1-mediated signaling by conditional knockout in mice was found to drive the pathogenesis of endometrial hyperplasia, independent of the influence of ovarian hormones [35]. Therefore, it could be hypothesized that the dysregulated expression of these factors in adrenals could trigger similar hyperplastic effects mediated by these factors, as in ovarian tissues. 3.5. Bottlenecks and Future Outlook Interestingly, among these genes, only DVL1 and ROR1 were found to be significantly upregulated in the RNA-seq data (Figure S2). The major regulatory role of miRNAs in gene expression come from their ability to repress gene expression at the level of transcription and translation. There are also reports of miRNA-mediated gene upregulation; however, the physiological evidence of the role is still unresolved [36]. Therefore, it is interesting to see the selected targets of miR-1247-5p and miR-379-5p upregulated. Moreover, it should be noted that most of the experimentally validated miRNA targets were identified by CLIP methods [37]. Crosslinking immunoprecipitation (CLIP) are binding assays that provide genome-wide maps of potential miRNA-target gene interactions based on sequencing. Moreover, these assays do not make functional predictions on the outcome of miRNA binding, and neither do upregulation or downregulation [38,39]. Therefore, in our current experimental setting, we could only identify potential miRNA target genes and speculate on their pathological role based on the published literature and in silico analyses. Furthermore, extensive mechanistic analyses based on these potential targets could help in elaborating the specific epigenetic pathways that fine-tune CS pathology in different subtypes. 4. Materials and Methods 4.1. Sample Collection and Ethics Approval All patients were registered in the German Cushing’s Registry, the ENS@T or/and NeoExNET databases (project number protocol code 379-10 and 152-10). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Munich. All experiments were performed according to relevant guidelines and protocols, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients involved. The adrenal samples used in the sequencing (miRNA and RNA) belong to the same patient. For miRNA-specific next-generation sequencing (NGS), a total of 19 adrenocortical tissue samples were used. The cohort consisted of the following patient groups: ACTH-independent CPA, n = 7; ACTH-dependent hypertrophic adrenals of CD patients after bilateral adrenalectomy, n = 8; normal adjacent adrenal tissue from patients with pheochromocytoma as controls, n = 8. For QPCR validation, the patient groups included adrenal tissue from ACTH-independent PBMAH, n = 10, and ACTH-dependent ectopic CS, n = 3. In the case of mRNA sequencing, a total of 23 adrenocortical tissue samples were used. This includes the following patient groups: CPA, n = 7; PBMAH, n = 8; normal adjacent adrenal tissue from patients with pheochromocytoma as controls, n = 8. The clinical characteristics of the patients are given in Table 2. Furthermore, of the eight CPA samples in the study, three of them carried known somatic driver mutations in the PRKACA gene and in the ten PBMAH samples, two carried germline mutations in the ARMC5 gene. Table 2. Clinical characteristics of the patient groups. Data are given as median with 25th and 75th percentiles in brackets. CPA, cortisol producing adenoma; CD, Cushing’s disease. The adrenal tissues were stored at −80 °C. Total RNA isolation was carried out from all adrenal cortex samples by an RNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The isolated RNA was kept frozen at −80 °C until further use. 4.2. MiRNA and RNA Sequencing RNA integrity and the absence of contaminating DNA were confirmed by Bioanalyzer RNA Nano (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and by Qubit DNA High sensitivity kits, respectively. Sequencing libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq Small RNA Library Preparation Kit. NGS was performed on 2 lanes of an Illumina HiSeq2500 (Illumina, CA, USA) multiplexing all samples (paired end read, 50 bp). The quality of sequencing reads was verified using FastQC0.11.5 (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc, date last accessed: 13 March 2020) before and after trimming. Adapters were trimmed using cutadapt [40]. Reads with <15 bp and >40 bp insert sequences were discarded. An alignment of reads was performed using miRBase V21 [41,42] with sRNAbench [43]. EdgeR and DeSeq in R were used for further analyses [44,45]. MiRNAs with at least 5 raw counts per library were included. RNA-seq was performed by Qiagen, Hilden, Germany. For mRNA, sequencing was performed on Illumina NextSeq (single end read, 75 bp). Adapter and quality trimming were performed by the “Trim Reads” tool from CLC Genomics Workbench. Furthermore, reads were trimmed based on quality scores. The QC reports were generated by the “QC for Sequencing Reads” tool from CLC Genomics Workbench. Read mapping and gene quantification were performed by the “RNA-seq Analysis” tool from CLC Genomics Workbench [46]. The miRNA-seq data generated in this study have been submitted to the NCBI (PRJNA847385). 4.3. Validation of Individual miRNAs MiRNAs and genes significantly differentially expressed by NGS were validated by QPCR. Reverse transcription of miRNA-specific cDNA was performed by using the TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Munich, Germany), and the reverse transcription of RNA genes was done by using the Superscript VILO cDNA synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Munich, Germany). 50 ng of RNA was used for each of the reverse transcription reactions. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using the TaqMan Fast Universal PCR Master Mix (2×) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Munich, Germany) on a Quantstudio 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Munich, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. All QPCR reactions were performed in a final reaction volume of 20 μL and with 1 μL of 1:5 diluted cDNA. Negative control reactions contained no cDNA templates. Gene expression was quantified using the relative quantification method by normalization with reference gene [47]. Statistical analysis using the bestkeeper tool was used to compare and select the best reference gene with stable expression across the human adrenal samples [48]. Reference genes with significantly different Ct values (p-value < 0.01) between the samples were excluded. Furthermore, primer efficiency and the associated correlation coefficient R2 of the selected reference gene were determined by the standard curve method in serially diluted cDNA samples [49]. In the case of miRNA reference genes, miR-16-5p [48,50,51] and RNU6B [52] previously used in similar studies were compared. MiR-16-5p was found to show the most stable expression levels across the samples with a p-value of 0.452 in comparison to RNU6B which had a p-value of 0.001. In the case of RNA reference genes, PPIA [53] and GAPDH [54] were compared. Here, PPIA was found to show the most stable expression levels across the samples with a p-value of 0.019 in comparison to GAPDH which had a p-value of 0.003. Therefore, these genes were used for the normalization of miRNA and RNA expression in human adrenal samples. 4.4. Target Screening In silico prediction of the possible miRNA targets was performed using the miRNA target database, TargetScan, and miRTarBase [19,37]. The top predicted targets were further screened based on their expression status in the RNA-seq data from the adrenocortical tissues of CPA, PBMAH, and controls (unpublished data). Pathway analyses of the targets were performed using Reactome [55] and Panther [56] online platforms. The selected downregulated targets were analyzed by QPCR in the adrenocortical samples to confirm their expression status. The successfully validated candidates were then analyzed for regulation by the miRNA using a dual luciferase assay [57]. 4.5. Dual Luciferase Assay The interaction between the predicted 3′-UTR region of Cyb5a and miR-1247-5p was detected using a luciferase activity assay. The 3′UTR sequences of Cyb5a (129 bp) containing the predicted miR-1247-5p binding sites (psiCHECK-2 Cyb5a 3′UTR WT) were cloned into the psiCHECK-2 vector (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA). A QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA) was used to mutate the miR-1247-5p binding site (psiCHECK-2 Cyb5a 3′UTR mutant) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. All the sequences were verified by Sanger sequencing. Then, 200 ng of the plasmid was used for each transfection. Synthetic miR-1247-5p mimics and specific oligonucleotides that inhibit endogenous miR-1247-5p (miR-1247-5p inhibitors) were purchased from Promega and 100 nmol of the molecules were used for each transfection according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For the assay, HeLa cells were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated for 24 h. The following day, cells were transfected using the following different conditions: (1) psiCHECK-2 Cyb5a 3′UTR WT + miR-1247-5p mimic; (2) psiCHECK-2 Cyb5a 3′UTR WT + miR-1247-5p inhibitor; (3) psiCHECK-2 Cyb5a 3′UTR WT + water; (4) psiCHECK-2 Cyb5a 3′UTR mutant + miR-1247-5p mimic; (5) psiCHECK-2 Cyb5a 3′UTR mutant + miR-1247-5p inhibitor; (6) psiCHECK-2 Cyb5a 3′UTR mutant + water. Forty-eight hours later, luciferase activity in the cells was measured using the dual luciferase assay system (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Renilla luciferase activity was normalized to firefly luciferase activity. Each treatment was performed in triplicate. Any interaction between the cloned gene, Cyb5a (WT and mutant), and miR-1247-5p mimic is accompanied by a decrease in luminescence. This decrease in luminescence would not be observed when the plasmids are transfected with the miR-1247-5p inhibitor, indicating that observed luminescence differences are caused by specific interactions between the plasmid and the miR-1247-5p mimic. Transfection of the plasmid with water corrects any background interactions between the cloned gene and endogenous miRNAs in the culture. 4.6. In Vivo ACTH Stimulation Experiments were performed on 13-week-old C57BL/6 J female mice (Janvier, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France). Mice were intraperitoneally injected with 1 mg/kg of ACTH (Sigma Aldrich, Munich, Germany) and adrenals were collected after 10, 30, and 60 min of injections. In addition, control adrenals were collected from mice at baseline conditions (0 min). Mice were killed by cervical dislocation and adrenals were isolated, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C for later RNA extraction. MiR-26a was taken as a housekeeping gene in the QPCR [58]. All mice were maintained in accordance with facility guidelines on animal welfare and approved by Landesdirektion Sachsen, Chemnitz, Germany. 4.7. Statistical Analysis and Software R version 3.6.1 was used for the statistical analyses. To identify RNAs differentially expressed, a generalized linear model (GLM, a flexible generalization of ordinary linear regression that allows for variables that have distribution patterns other than a normal distribution) in the software package edgeR (Empirical Analysis of DGE in R) was employed to calculate p-values [45,59]. p-values were adjusted using the Benjamin–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) procedure [60]. Disease groups were compared using the unpaired Mann–Whitney test, and to decrease the false discovery rate a corrected p-value was calculated using the Benjamin–Hochberg method. p adjusted < 0.05 and log2 fold change >1.25 was applied as the cut-off for significance for NGS data. GraphPad Prism Version 8 was used for the statistical analysis of QPCR. To calculate differential gene expression, the dCt method (delta Ct (cycle threshold) value equals target miRNA’s Ct minus housekeeping miRNA’s Ct) was used (Microsoft Excel 2016, Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). For QPCR, an ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction was used [61] to assess significance; p-values < 0.05 were considered significant. 5. Conclusions In conclusion, while comprehensive information regarding the role of miRNAs in acute and chronic phases of steroidogenesis is available, there is little known about the pathological independent role of miRNAs in the pathology of CS. In our study, we have described ACTH-independent miR-1247-5p and miR-379-5p expression in CS for the first time. Thus, by regulating different genes in the WNT signaling pathway, the miRNAs may individually contribute to the Cushing’s pathology in specific subtypes. Supplementary Materials The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23147676/s1. Author Contributions Conceptualization, S.V., A.C. and A.R.; methodology, S.V., R.Z. and M.E.; software, S.V. and M.E.; validation, R.Z., A.O., D.W. and B.W.; formal analysis, S.V.; investigation, S.V., R.Z., M.E., A.O. and D.W.; resources, A.C., B.W., M.R. and A.R.; data curation, S.V. and R.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, S.V., R.Z. and A.R.; writing—review and editing, S.S., M.R. and A.R.; visualization, S.V.; supervision, A.R.; project administration, A.R.; funding acquisition, A.C., S.S., M.R. and A.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding This work was supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (within the CRC/Transregio 205/1 “The Adrenal: Central Relay in Health and Disease”) to A.C., B.W., S.S., M.R. and A.R., and individual grant SB 52/1-1 to S.S. This work is part of the German Cushing’s Registry CUSTODES and has been supported by a grant from the Else Kröner-Fresenius Stiftung to MR (2012_A103 and 2015_A228). A.R. was supported by the FöFoLe Program of the Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich. We thank I. Shapiro, A. Parl, C. Kühne, and S. Zopp for their technical support. Institutional Review Board Statement The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich (protocol code 379-10, 152-10 and 20 July2021). Informed Consent Statement Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Data Availability Statement The miRNA-seq data generated in this study have been submitted to the NCBI (PRJNA847385). Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. References Kotłowska, A.; Puzyn, T.; Sworczak, K.; Stepnowski, P.; Szefer, P. Metabolomic biomarkers in urine of cushing’s syndrome pa-tients. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] Valassi, E.; Tabarin, A.; Brue, T.; Feelders, R.A.; Reincke, M.; Netea-Maier, R.; Toth, M.; Zacharieva, S.; Webb, S.M.; Tsagarakis, S.; et al. High mortality within 90 days of diagnosis in patients with Cushing’s syndrome: Results from the ERCUSYN registry. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2019, 181, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Stratakis, C. Cushing syndrome caused by adrenocortical tumors and hyperplasias (corticotropin-independent Cushing syn-drome). Endocr. Dev. 2008, 13, 117–132. [Google Scholar] Jarial, K.D.S.; Walia, R.; Nahar, U.; Bhansali, A. Primary bilateral adrenal nodular disease with Cushing’s syndrome: Varying aeti-ology. BMJ. Case. Rep. 2017, 2017, bcr2017220154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Kamilaris, C.D.C.; Stratakis, C.A.; Hannah-Shmouni, F. Molecular Genetic and Genomic Alterations in Cushing’s Syndrome and Primary Aldosteronism. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Feelders, R.A.; Pulgar, S.J.; Kempel, A.; Pereira, A.M. The burden of Cushing’s disease: Clinical and health-related quality of life aspects. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2012, 167, 311–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] Feelders, R.A.; Newell-Price, J.; Pivonello, R.; Nieman, L.K.; Hofland, L.J.; Lacroix, A. Advances in the medical treatment of Cush-ing’s syndrome. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019, 7, 300–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Krill, K.T.; Gurdziel, K.; Heaton, J.H.; Simon, D.P.; Hammer, G.D. Dicer Deficiency Reveals MicroRNAs Predicted to Control Gene Expression in the Developing Adrenal Cortex. Mol. Endocrinol. 2013, 27, 754–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Robertson, S.; Diver, L.A.; Alvarez-Madrazo, S.; Livie, C.; Ejaz, A.; Fraser, R.; Connell, J.M.; MacKenzie, S.M.; Davies, E. Regulation of Corticosteroidogenic Genes by MicroRNAs. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2017, 2017, 2021903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] Bujko, M.; Kober, P.; Boresowicz, J.; Rusetska, N.; Zeber-Lubecka, N.; Paziewska, A.; Pekul, M.; Zielinski, G.; Styk, A.; Kunicki, J.; et al. Differential microRNA Expression in USP8-Mutated and Wild-Type Corticotroph Pituitary Tumors Reflect the Difference in Protein Ubiquitination Processes. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Iliopoulos, D.; Bimpaki, E.I.; Nesterova, M.; Stratakis, C.A. MicroRNA Signature of Primary Pigmented Nodular Adrenocortical Disease: Clinical Correlations and Regulation of Wnt Signaling. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 3278–3282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] Tan, X.-G.; Zhu, J.; Cui, L. MicroRNA expression signature and target prediction in familial and sporadic primary macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (PMAH). BMC Endocr. Disord. 2022, 22, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Vaczlavik, A.; Bouys, L.; Violon, F.; Giannone, G.; Jouinot, A.; Armignacco, R.; Cavalcante, I.P.; Berthon, A.; Letouzé, E.; Vaduva, P.; et al. KDM1A inactivation causes hereditary food-dependent Cushing syndrome. Genet. Med. 2021, 24, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Bimpaki, E.I.; Iliopoulos, D.; Moraitis, A.; Stratakis, C.A. MicroRNA signature in massive macronodular adrenocortical disease and implications for adrenocortical tumorigenesis. Clin. Endocrinol. 2010, 72, 744–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Vetrivel, S.; Zhang, R.; Engel, M.; Altieri, B.; Braun, L.; Osswald, A.; Bidlingmaier, M.; Fassnacht, M.; Beuschlein, F.; Reincke, M.; et al. Circulating microRNA Expression in Cushing’s Syndrome. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] O’Brien, J.; Hayder, H.; Zayed, Y.; Peng, C. Overview of microRNA biogenesis, mechanisms of actions, and circulation. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] Butz, H.; Patócs, A. MicroRNAs in endocrine tumors. Electron. J. Int. Fed. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2019, 30, 146–164. [Google Scholar] Riester, A.; Issler, O.; Spyroglou, A.; Rodrig, S.H.; Chen, A.; Beuschlein, F. ACTH-Dependent Regulation of MicroRNA As Endogenous Modulators of Glucocorticoid Receptor Expression in the Adrenal Gland. Endocrinology 2012, 153, 212–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] Huang, X.; Zhong, R.; He, X.; Deng, Q.; Peng, X.; Li, J.; Luo, X. Investigations on the mechanism of progesterone in inhibiting endo-metrial cancer cell cycle and viability via regulation of long noncoding RNA NEAT1/microRNA-146b-5p mediated Wnt/β-catenin signaling. IUBMB Life 2019, 71, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] Azhar, S.; Dong, D.; Shen, W.-J.; Hu, Z.; Kraemer, F.B. The role of miRNAs in regulating adrenal and gonadal steroidogenesis. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2020, 64, R21–R43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Allen, M.J.; Sharma, S. Physiology, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone (ACTH). StatPearls 2021. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK500031/ (accessed on 8 December 2021). Hu, Z.; Shen, W.-J.; Cortez, Y.; Tang, X.; Liu, L.-F.; Kraemer, F.B.; Azhar, S. Hormonal Regulation of MicroRNA Expression in Steroid Producing Cells of the Ovary, Testis and Adrenal Gland. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e78040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] Ghayee, H.K.; Rege, J.; Watumull, L.M.; Nwariaku, F.E.; Carrick, K.S.; Rainey, W.E.; Miller, W.L.; Auchus, R.J. Clinical, biochemical, and molecular characterization of macronodular adrenocortical hyperplasia of the zona reticularis: A new syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, E243–E250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] Nakamura, Y.; Fujishima, F.; Hui, X.-G.; Felizola, S.J.A.; Shibahara, Y.; Akahira, J.-I.; McNamara, K.M.; Rainey, W.E.; Sasano, H. 3βHSD and CYB5A double positive adrenocortical cells during adrenal development/aging. Endocr. Res. 2015, 40, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] Ng, L.F.; Kaur, P.; Bunnag, N.; Suresh, J.; Sung, I.C.H.; Tan, Q.H.; Gruber, J.; Tolwinski, N.S. WNT Signaling in Disease. Cells 2019, 8, 826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] Song, J.L.; Nigam, P.; Tektas, S.S.; Selva, E. microRNA regulation of Wnt signaling pathways in development and disease. Cell. Signal. 2015, 27, 1380–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] Beuschlein, F.; Fassnacht, M.; Assié, G.; Calebiro, D.; Stratakis, C.A.; Osswald, A.; Ronchi, C.L.; Wieland, T.; Sbiera, S.; Faucz, F.R.; et al. Constitutive Activation of PKA Catalytic Subunit in Adrenal Cushing’s Syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 1019–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] Ren, J.; Jian, F.; Jiang, H.; Sun, Y.; Pan, S.; Gu, C.; Chen, X.; Wang, W.; Ning, G.; Bian, L.; et al. Decreased expression of SFRP2 promotes development of the pituitary corticotroph adenoma by upregulating Wnt signaling. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 52, 1934–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] Pignatti, E.; Leng, S.; Yuchi, Y.; Borges, K.S.; Guagliardo, N.A.; Shah, M.S.; Ruiz-Babot, G.; Kariyawasam, D.; Taketo, M.M.; Miao, J.; et al. Beta-Catenin Causes Adrenal Hyperplasia by Blocking Zonal Transdifferentiation. Cell Rep. 2020, 31, 107524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Grumolato, L.; Liu, G.; Mong, P.; Mudbhary, R.; Biswas, R.; Arroyave, R.; Vijayakumar, S.; Economides, A.N.; Aaronson, S.A. Canonical and noncanonical Wnts use a common mechanism to activate completely unrelated coreceptors. Genes Dev. 2010, 24, 2517–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] Tauriello, D.V.F.; Jordens, I.; Kirchner, K.; Slootstra, J.W.; Kruitwagen, T.; Bouwman, B.A.M.; Noutsou, M.; Rüdiger, S.G.D.; Schwamborn, K.; Schambony, A.; et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling requires interaction of the Dishevelled DEP domain and C terminus with a discontinuous motif in Frizzled. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E812–E820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] Colli, L.M.; Saggioro, F.; Neder Serafini, L.; Camargo, R.C.; Machado, H.; Moreira, A.C.; Antonini, S.R.; De Castro, M. Components of the Canonical and Non-Canonical Wnt Pathways Are Not Mis-Expressed in Pituitary Tumors. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] Rosanò, L.; Cianfrocca, R.; Tocci, P.; Spinella, F.; Di Castro, V.; Caprara, V.; Semprucci, E.; Ferrandina, G.; Natali, P.G.; Bagnato, A. En-dothelin A receptor/β-arrestin signaling to the Wnt pathway renders ovarian cancer cells resistant to chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 7453–7464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] Zhang, H.; Qiu, J.; Ye, C.; Yang, D.; Gao, L.; Su, Y.; Tang, X.; Xu, N.; Zhang, D.; Xiong, L.; et al. ROR1 expression correlated with poor clinical outcome in human ovarian cancer. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] Gao, Y.; Li, S.; Li, Q. Uterine epithelial cell proliferation and endometrial hyperplasia: Evidence from a mouse model. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2014, 20, 776–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Orang, A.V.; Safaralizadeh, R.; Kazemzadeh-Bavili, M. Mechanisms of miRNA-Mediated Gene Regulation from Common Downregulation to mRNA-Specific Upregulation. Int. J. Genom. 2014, 2014, 970607. [Google Scholar] Huang, H.Y.; Lin, Y.C.D.; Li, J.; Huang, K.Y.; Shrestha, S.; Hong, H.C.; Tang, Y.; Chen, Y.G.; Jin, C.N.; Yu, Y.; et al. miRTarBase 2020: Up-dates to the experimentally validated microRNA–target interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020, 48, D148–D154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] Liu, W.; Wang, X. Prediction of functional microRNA targets by integrative modeling of microRNA binding and target expres-sion data. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Wang, X. Improving microRNA target prediction by modeling with unambiguously identified microRNA-target pairs from CLIP-ligation studies. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 1316–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 2011, 17, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Kozomara, A.; Griffiths-Jones, S. miRBase: Annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D68–D73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] Griffiths-Jones, S. miRBase: The MicroRNA Sequence Database. Methods Mol. Biol. 2006, 342, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] Aparicio-Puerta, E.; Lebrón, R.; Rueda, A.; Gómez-Martín, C.; Giannoukakos, S.; Jáspez, D.; Medina, J.M.; Zubković, A.; Jurak, I.; Fromm, B.; et al. sRNAbench and sRNAtoolbox 2019: Intuitive fast small RNA profiling and differential expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W530–W535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] Anders, S.; Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010, 11, R106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] Robinson, M.D.; McCarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. EdgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] Liu, C.-H.; Di, Y.P. Analysis of RNA Sequencing Data Using CLC Genomics Workbench. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2102, 61–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Pfaffl, M.W.; Tichopad, A.; Prgomet, C.; Neuvians, T.P. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper--Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol. Lett. 2004, 26, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Yuan, J.; Wu, J.; Deng, X.; Peng, J.; Wang, S.; Yang, C.; Ge, J.; Zou, Y. Evaluation of the performance of serum miRNAs as normalizers in microRNA studies focused on cardiovascular disease. J. Thorac. Dis. 2018, 10, 2599–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Geigges, M.; Gubser, P.M.; Unterstab, G.; Lecoultre, Y.; Paro, R.; Hess, C. Reference Genes for Expression Studies in Human CD8 + Naïve and Effector Memory T Cells under Resting and Activating Conditions. Sci. Rep. 2021, 10, 9411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Song, J.; Bai, Z.; Han, W.; Zhang, J.; Meng, H.; Bi, J.; Ma, X.; Han, S.; Zhang, Z. Identification of Suitable Reference Genes for qPCR Analysis of Serum microRNA in Gastric Cancer Patients. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2011, 57, 897–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Szabó, D.R.; Luconi, M.; Szabó, P.M.; Tóth, M.; Szücs, N.; Horányi, J.; Nagy, Z.; Mannelli, M.; Patócs, A.; Rácz, K.; et al. Analysis of cir-culating microRNAs in adrenocortical tumors. Lab. Investig. 2014, 94, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] Butz, H.; Mészáros, K.; Likó, I.; Patocs, A. Wnt-Signaling Regulated by Glucocorticoid-Induced miRNAs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Muñoz, J.J.; Anauate, A.C.; Amaral, A.G.; Ferreira, F.M.; Watanabe, E.H.; Meca, R.; Ormanji, M.S.; Boim, M.A.; Onuchic, L.F.; Heilberg, I.P. Ppia is the most stable housekeeping gene for qRT-PCR normalization in kidneys of three Pkd1-deficient mouse models. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Xia, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, L.; Chen, Y.; Wang, H. Selection and verification of the combination of reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis in rat adrenal gland development. J. Steroid. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2021, 208, 105821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Gillespie, M.; Jassal, B.; Stephan, R.; Milacic, M.; Rothfels, K.; Senff-Ribeiro, A.; Griss, J.; Sevilla, C.; Matthews, L.; Gong, C.; et al. The reactome pathway knowledgebase 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, D687–D692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Mi, H.; Ebert, D.; Muruganujan, A.; Mills, C.; Albou, L.-P.; Mushayamaha, T.; Thomas, P.D. PANTHER version 16: A revised family classification, tree-based classification tool, enhancer regions and extensive API. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D394–D403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Wu, T.; Lin, Y.; Xie, Z. MicroRNA-1247 inhibits cell proliferation by directly targeting ZNF346 in childhood neuroblastoma. Biol. Res. 2018, 51, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] Muñoz, J.J.; Anauate, A.; Amaral, A.G.; Ferreira, F.M.; Meca, R.; Ormanji, M.S.; Boim, M.A.; Onuchic, L.F.; Heilberg, I.P. Identification of housekeeping genes for microRNA expression analysis in kidney tissues of Pkd1 deficient mouse models. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] Hu, Z.; Gao, S.; Lindberg, D.; Panja, D.; Wakabayashi, Y.; Li, K.; Kleinman, J.E.; Zhu, J.; Li, Z. Temporal dynamics of miRNAs in human DLPFC and its association with miRNA dysregulation in schizophrenia. Transl. Psychiatry 2019, 9, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Esteva-Socias, M.; Gómez-Romano, F.; Carrillo-Ávila, J.A.; Sánchez-Navarro, A.L.; Villena, C. Impact of different stabilization methods on RT-qPCR results using human lung tissue samples. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). From https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/14/7676/htm

The Carling Adrenal Center, a worldwide destination for the surgical treatment of adrenal tumors, becomes the first center to offer the use of amniotic membrane during adrenal surgery which saves functional adrenal tissue in patients undergoing adrenal surgery. This novel technique enables more patients to have a partial adrenalectomy thereby preserving some normal adrenal physiology, potentially eliminating life-long adrenal hormone replacement. Preliminary clinical data from the Carling Adrenal Center suggest that the use of a human amniotic membrane allograph on the adrenal gland remnant following partial adrenal surgery leads to faster recovery of normal adrenal gland function. Rather than removing the entire adrenal gland—which has been standard of care for decades—a portion of the adrenal gland is able to be salvaged with amniotic membrane placed upon the remnant as a biologic covering. The preliminary data from an ongoing clinical trial shows this technique translates into fewer patients needing steroid hormone replacement following adrenal surgery, and if they do, it is for a significantly shorter period of time. "Sometimes it is possible, and preferable, to remove the adrenal tumor without removing the entire adrenal gland. This is called partial adrenal surgery and our study shows this technique is more successful when amniotic membrane is used," said Dr. Carling. He further stresses that "removing only part of the adrenal gland is a more advanced operation and is typically only performed by expert adrenal surgeons. The goal is to leave some normal adrenal tissue so that the patient can avoid adrenal insufficiency which requires a daily dose of several adrenal hormones and steroids. Partial adrenal surgery is especially beneficial for patients with pheochromocytoma, as well as Conn's and Cushing's syndrome. Avoiding daily steroids is life-changing for these patients so this is a major breakthrough." So how does it work? The increased viability of the adrenal gland remnant is presumed to be related to the release of growth factors known to be present in amniotic tissue which is in direct contact with the adrenal gland remnant as a covering. The results are improved rates of viable adrenal cortical tissues with faster regeneration and recovery to normal endocrine physiology by the adrenal cortical cells. These findings come during Adrenal Disease Awareness Month. Adrenal gland diseases cause many debilitating symptoms like chronic headaches, anxiety, depression, fatigue, brain fog, memory loss, dangerously high blood pressure, heart arrythmia, weight gain, tremors, and more, yet they are often misdiagnosed or improperly treated. Since many doctors are inexperienced in the workup of adrenal hormone problems and only see a handful of adrenal tumors during their careers, it is important for patients to know about the symptoms of adrenal tumor disease and request their doctor measure adrenal hormones. Adrenal.com is the leading resource for adrenal gland function, tumors and cancers, and an award-winning resource for adrenal gland surgery. The diagnosis and surgical treatment of all types of adrenal tumor types are discussed. Adrenal.com is edited by Dr. Tobias Carling who has performed more adrenal surgery than any other surgeon and has published some of the most important scientific studies of adrenal disease and adrenal surgery including the understanding of the pathogenesis of pheochromocytoma and adrenal tumors causing Conn's and Cushing's syndrome. Established by Dr. Tobias Carling in 2020, the Carling Adrenal Center located at the Hospital for Endocrine Surgery in Tampa FL, is the highest volume adrenal surgical center in the world. The Center now averages nearly 20 adrenal tumor patients every week. Dr Carling was the Director of Endocrine Surgery at Yale University prior to opening the Center in Tampa. At the new Hospital for Endocrine Surgery, Dr Carling joins the Norman Parathyroid Center, the Clayman Thyroid Center and the Scarless Thyroid Surgery Center as the highest volume endocrine surgery center in the world. About the Carling Adrenal Center: Founded by Dr. Tobias Carling, one of the world's leading experts in adrenal gland surgery, the Carling Adrenal Center is a worldwide destination for the surgical treatment of adrenal tumors. Dr. Carling spent nearly 20 years at Yale University, including 7 as the Chief of Endocrine Surgery before leaving in 2020 to open to Carling Adrenal Center, which performs more adrenal operations than any other hospital in the world. (813) 972-0000. More about partial adrenalectomy for adrenal tumors can be found at the Center's website www.adrenal.com. From https://www.streetinsider.com/PRNewswire/Novel+application+of+amniotic+membrane+saves+adrenal+tissue+in+patients+undergoing+adrenal+surgery/19915274.html

Highlights • Cushing syndrome (CS) is a rare disorder with a variety of underlying etiologies. • CS is expected to affect 0.2 to 5 people per million per year. • Adrenal-dependent CS is an uncommon variant of CS. • This study reports a rare occurrence of pituitary and adrenal adenoma with CS. Abstract Introduction Cushing syndrome is a rare disorder with a variety of underlying etiologies, that can be exogenous or endogenous (adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent or ACTH-independent). The current study aims to report a case of ACTH-independent Cushing syndrome with adrenal adenoma and nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma. Case report A 37–year–old female presented with amenorrhea for the last year, associated with weight gain. She had a moon face, buffalo hump, and central obesity. A 24-hour urine collection for cortisol was performed, revealing elevated cortisol. Cortisol level was non-suppressed after administering dexamethasone. MRI of the pituitary revealed a pituitary microadenoma, and the CT scan of the abdomen with adrenal protocol revealed a left adrenal adenoma. Discussion Early diagnosis may be postponed due to the variety of clinical presentations and the referral of patients to different subspecialists based on their dominant symptoms (gynecological, dermatological, cardiovascular, psychiatric); it is, therefore, critical to consider the entire clinical presentation for correct diagnosis. Conclusion Due to the diversity in the presentation of CS, an accurate clinical, physical and endocrine examination is always recommended. Keywords Cushing syndrome Cushing's disease Adrenal adenoma Pituitary adenoma Urine free cortisol 1. Introduction Cushing syndrome (CS) is a collection of clinical manifestations caused by an excess of glucocorticoids [1]. CS is a rare disorder with a variety of underlying etiologies that can be exogenous due to continuous corticosteroid therapy for any underlying inflammatory illness or endogenous due to either adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent or ACTH-independent [2], [3]. Cushing syndrome is expected to affect 0.2 to 5 people per million per year. Around 10% of such cases involve children [4], [5]. ACTH-dependent glucocorticoid excess owing to pituitary adenoma accounts for the majority (60–70%) of endogenous CS, with primary adrenal causes accounting for only 20–30% and ectopic ACTH-secreting tumors accounting for the remaining 5–10% [6]. Adrenal-dependent CS is an uncommon variant of CS caused mostly by benign (90%) or malignant (8%) adrenal tumors or, less frequently, bilateral micronodular (1%) or macronodular (1%) adrenal hyperplasia [7]. The current study aims to report a case of ACTH-independent Cushing syndrome with adrenal adenoma and nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma. The report has been arranged in line with SCARE guidelines and includes a brief literature review [8]. 2. Case report 2.1. Patient's information A 37–year–old female presented with amenorrhea for the last year, associated with weight gain. She denied having polyuria, polydipsia, headaches, visual changes, dizziness, dryness of the skin, cold intolerance, or constipation. She had no history of chronic disease and denied using steroids. She visited an internist, a general surgeon, and a gynecologist and was treated for hypothyroidism. She was put on Thyroxin 100 μg daily, and oral contraceptive pills were given for her menstrual problems. Last time, the patient was referred to an endocrinology clinic, and they reviewed the clinical and physical examinations. 2.2. Clinical examination She had a moon face, buffalo hump, central obesity, pink striae over her abdomen, and proximal weakness of the upper limbs. After reviewing the history and clinical examination, CS was suspected. 2.3. Diagnostic assessment Because the thyroid function test revealed low thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free T3, and freeT4, the patient was sent for a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pituitary, which revealed a pituitary microadenoma (7 ∗ 6 ∗ 5) mm (Fig. 1). Since the patient was taking thyroxin and oral contraceptive pills, the investigations were postponed for another six weeks due to the contraceptive pills' influence on the results of the hormonal assessment for CS. After six weeks of no medication, a 24-hour urinary free cortisol (UFC) was performed three times, revealing elevated cortisol levels (1238, 1100, and 1248) nmol (normal range, 100–400) nmol. A dexamethasone suppression test was done (after administering dexamethasone tab 1 mg at 11 p.m., serum cortisol was measured at 9 a.m.). The morning serum cortisol level was 620 nmol (non-suppressed), which normally should be less than 50 nmol. The ACTH level was below 1 pg/mL. Download : Download high-res image (103KB) Download : Download full-size image Fig. 1. Contrast enhanced T1W weighted MRI (coronal section) showing small 7 mm hypo-enhanced microadenoma (yellow arrow) in right side of pituitary gland with mild superior bulge. Based on these findings, ACTH independent CS was suspected. The computerized tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen with adrenal protocol revealed a left adrenal adenoma (33 mm × 25 mm) without features of malignancy (Fig. 2). Download : Download high-res image (168KB) Download : Download full-size image Fig. 2. Computed tomography scan of the abdomen with IV contrast, coronal section, showing 33 mm × 25 mm lobulated enhanced left adrenal tumor (yellow arrow), showing absolute washout on dynamic adrenal CT protocol, consistent with adrenal adenoma. 2.4. Therapeutic intervention The patient was referred to the urologist clinic for left adrenalectomy after preparation for surgery and perioperative hormonal management. She underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy and remained in the hospital for two days. The histopathology results supported the diagnosis of adrenal adenoma. 2.5. Follow-up She was released home after two days on oral hydrocortisone 20 mg in the morning and 10 mg in the afternoon. After one month of follow-up, serum cortisol was 36 nmol, with the resolution of some features such as weight reduction (3 kg) and skin color (pink striae became white). 3. Discussion Cushing's syndrome is a serious and well-known medical condition that results from persistent exposure of the body to excessive glucocorticoids, either from endogenous or, most frequently, exogenous sources [9]. The average age of diagnosis is 41.4 years, with a female-to-male ratio of 3:1 [10]. ACTH-dependent CS accounts for almost 80% of endogenous CS, while ACTH-independent CS accounts for nearly 20% [10]. This potentially fatal condition is accompanied by several comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes, coagulopathy, cardiovascular disease, infections, and fractures [11]. Exogenous CS, also known as iatrogenic CS, is more prevalent than endogenous CS and is caused by the injection of supraphysiologic glucocorticoid dosages [12]. ACTH-independent CS is induced by uncontrolled cortisol release from an adrenal gland lesion, most often an adenoma, adrenocortical cancer, or, in rare cases, ACTH-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia or primary pigmented nodular adrenal disease [13]. The majority of data suggests that early diagnosis is critical for reducing morbidity and mortality. Detection is based on clinical suspicion initially, followed by biochemical confirmation [14]. The clinical manifestation of CS varies depending on the severity and duration of glucocorticoid excess [14]. Some individuals may manifest varying symptoms and signs because of a rhythmic change in cortisol secretion, resulting in cyclical CS [15]. The classical symptoms of CS include weight gain, hirsutism, striae, plethora, hypertension, ecchymosis, lethargy, monthly irregularities, diminished libido, and proximal myopathy [16]. Neurobehavioral presentations include anxiety, sadness, mood swings, and memory loss [17]. Less commonly presented features include headaches, acne, edema, abdominal pain, backache, recurrent infection, female baldness, dorsal fat pad, frank diabetes, electrocardiographic abnormalities suggestive of cardiac hypertrophy, osteoporotic fractures, and cardiovascular disease from accelerated atherosclerosis [10]. The current case presented with amenorrhea, weight gain, moon face, buffalo hump, and skin discoloration of the abdomen. Similar to the current case, early diagnosis may be postponed due to the variety of clinical presentations and the referral of patients to different subspecialists based on their dominant symptoms (gynecological, dermatological, cardiovascular, psychiatric); it is, therefore, critical to consider the entire clinical presentation for correct diagnosis [18]. Weight gain may be less apparent in children, but there is frequently an arrest in growth with a fall in height percentile and a delay in puberty [19]. The diagnosis and confirmation of the etiology can be difficult and time-consuming, requiring a variety of laboratory testing and imaging studies [20]. According to endocrine society guidelines, the initial assessment of CS must include one or more of the three following tests: 24-hour UFC measurement; evaluation of the diurnal variation of cortisol secretion by assessing the midnight serum or salivary cortisol level; and a low-dose dexamethasone suppression test, typically the 1 mg overnight test [21]. Although UFC has sufficient sensitivity and specificity, it does not function well in milder cases of Cushing's syndrome [22]. In CS patients, the typical circadian rhythm of cortisol secretion is disrupted, and a high late-night cortisol serum level is the earliest and most sensitive diagnostic indicator of the condition [23]. In the current case, the UFC was elevated, and cortisol was unsuppressed after administration of dexamethasone. All patients with CS should have a high-resolution pituitary MRI with a gadolinium-based contrast agent to prove the existence or absence of a pituitary lesion and to identify the source of ACTH between pituitary adenomas and ectopic lesions [24]. Adrenal CT scan is the imaging modality of choice for preoperatively localizing and subtyping adrenocortical lesions in ACTH-independent Cushing's syndrome [9]. MRI of the pituitary gland of the current case showed a microadenoma and a CT scan of the adrenals showed left adrenal adenoma. Surgical resection of the origin of the ACTH or glucocorticoid excess (pituitary adenoma, nonpituitary tumor-secreting ACTH, or adrenal tumor) is still the first-line treatment of all forms of CS because it leaves normal adjacent structures and results in prompt remission and inevitable recovery of regular adrenal function [12], [25]. Laparoscopic (retroperitoneal or transperitoneal) adrenalectomy has become the gold standard technique for adrenal adenomas since it is associated with fewer postoperative morbidity, hospitalization, and expense when compared to open adrenalectomy [17]. In refractory cases, or when a patient is not a good candidate for surgery, cortisol-lowering medication may be employed [26]. The current case underwent left adrenalectomy. Symptoms of CS, such as central obesity, muscular wasting or weakness, acne, hirsutism, and purple striae generally improve first and may subside gradually over a few months or even a year; nevertheless, these symptoms may remain in 10–30% of patients [27]. Glucocorticoid replacement is essential after adrenal-sparing curative surgery until the pituitary-adrenal function returns, which might take up to two years, especially if adrenal adenomas have been resected [25]. Chronic glucocorticoid excess causes lots of new co-morbidities, lowering the quality of life and increasing mortality. The most common causes of mortality in CS are cardiovascular disease and infections [28]. After one month of follow-up, serum cortisol was 36 nmol, and several features, such as weight loss (3 kg) and skin color, were resolved (pink striae became white). In conclusion, the coexistence of adrenal adenoma and pituitary adenoma with CS is a rare possibility. Due to the diversity in the presentation of CS, an accurate clinical, physical and endocrine examination is always recommended. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the gold standard for treating adrenal adenoma. Consent Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's family for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed. Ethical approval Approval is not necessary for case report (till 3 cases in single report) in our locality. The family gave consent for the publication of the report. Funding None. Guarantor Fahmi Hussein Kakamad, Fahmi.hussein@univsul.edu.iq. Research registration number Not applicable. CRediT authorship contribution statement Abdulwahid M. Salh: major contribution of the idea, literature review, final approval of the manuscript. Rawa Bapir: Surgeon performing the operation, final approval of the manuscript. Fahmi H. Kakamad: Writing the manuscript, literature review, final approval of the manuscript. Soran H. Tahir, Fattah H. Fattah, Aras Gh. Mahmood, Rawezh Q. Salih, Shaho F. Ahmed: literature review, final approval of the manuscript. Declaration of competing interest None to be declared. References [1] S.M. Ahmed, S.F. Ahmed, S. Othman, B.A. Abdulla, S.H. Mohammed, A.M. Salih, et al. Topical corticosteroid-induced iatrogenic Cushing syndrome in an infant; a case report with literature review Ann.Med.Surg., 71 (2021), Article 102978 ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [2] L.H. Broersen, C.D. Andela, O.M. Dekkers, A.M. Pereira, N.R. Biermasz Improvement but no normalization of quality of life and cognitive functioning after treatment of Cushing syndrome J.Clin.Endocrinol.Metab., 104 (11) (2019), pp. 5325-5337 View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [3] R.L. Hopkins, M.C. Leinung Exogenous Cushing's syndrome and glucocorticoid withdrawal Endocrinol. Metab. Clin., 34 (2) (2005), pp. 371-384 ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [4] D. Hirsch, G. Tsvetov, Y. Manisterski, N. Aviran-Barak, V. Nadler, S. Alboim, et al. Incidence of Cushing's syndrome in patients with significant hypercortisoluria Eur. J. Endocrinol., 176 (1) (2017), pp. 41-48 View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [5] B. Bista, N. Beck Cushing syndrome Indian J.Pediatr., 81 (2) (2014 Feb), pp. 158-164 View PDF CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [6] M. Lodish, C.A. Stratakis A genetic and molecular update on adrenocortical causes of Cushing syndrome Nat. Rev. Endocrinol., 12 (5) (2016), pp. 255-262 View PDF CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [7] J.M. Swain, C.S. Grant, R.T. Schlinkert, G.B. Thompson, R.V. Lloyd, W.F. Young Corticotropin-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia: a clinicopathologic correlation Arch. Surg., 133 (5) (1998), pp. 541-546 View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [8] R.A. Agha, T. Franchi, C. Sohrabi, G. Mathew, for the SCARE Group The SCARE 2020 guideline: updating consensus Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines Int. J. Surg., 84 (2020), pp. 226-230 ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [9] K. Duan, K.G. Hernandez, O. Mete Republished: clinicopathological correlates of adrenal Cushing's syndrome Postgrad. Med. J., 91 (1076) (2015 Jun 1), pp. 331-342 View PDF CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [10] A. Lacroix, R.A. Feelders, C.A. Stratakis, L.K. Nieman Cushing's syndrome Lancet, 386 (9996) (2015), pp. 913-927 ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [11] L.K. Nieman, B.M. Biller, J.W. Findling, J. Newell-Price, M.O. Savage, P.M. Stewart, et al. The diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline J.Clin.Endocrinol.Metab., 93 (5) (2008), pp. 1526-1540 View PDF CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [12] S.T. Sharma, L.K. Nieman, R.A. Feelders Cushing's syndrome: epidemiology and developments in disease management Clin.Epidemiol., 7 (2015), p. 281 Google Scholar [13] J. Newell-Price, X. Bertagna, A.B. Grossman, L.K. Nieman Cushing's syndrome Lancet, 367 (9522) (2006), pp. 1605-1617 ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [14] L.K. Nieman Cushing's syndrome: update on signs, symptoms and biochemical screening Eur. J. Endocrinol., 173 (4) (2015), pp. M33-M38 View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [15] B. Atkinson, K.R. Mullan What is the best approach to suspected cyclical Cushing syndrome? Strategies for managing Cushing's syndrome with variable laboratory data Clin. Endocrinol., 75 (1) (2011), pp. 27-30 View PDF CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [16] F. Ferrau, M. Korbonits Metabolic comorbidities in Cushing's syndrome Eur. J. Endocrinol., 173 (4) (2015), pp. M133-M157 View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [17] V. Neychev Cushing syndrome: presentation, diagnosis, and treatment, including subclinical Cushing syndrome Management of Adrenal Masses in Children And Adults, Springer, Cham (2017), pp. 159-178 View PDF CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [18] L.K. Nieman Diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome in the modern era Endocrinol. Metab. Clin., 47 (2) (2018), pp. 259-273 ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [19] H.L. Storr, L.F. Chan, A.B. Grossman, M.O. Savage Paediatric Cushing's syndrome: epidemiology, investigation and therapeutic advances TrendsEndocrinol.Metab., 18 (4) (2007), pp. 167-174 ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [20] R. Pivonello, A.M. Isidori, M.C. De Martino, J. Newell-Price, B.M. Biller, A. Colao Complications of Cushing's syndrome: state of the art Lancet DiabetesEndocrinol., 4 (7) (2016), pp. 611-629 ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [21] C. Tatsi, C.A. Stratakis Cushing disease: diagnosis and treatment Pituitary Disorders of Childhood, Humana Press, Cham (2019), pp. 89-114 View PDF CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [22] K.I. Alexandraki, A.B. Grossman Is urinary free cortisol of value in the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome? Curr.Opin.Endocrinol.DiabetesObes., 18 (4) (2011), pp. 259-263 View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [23] E.M. Cardoso, A.L. Arregger, O.R. Tumilasci, L.N. Contreras Diagnostic value of salivary cortisol in Cushing's syndrome (CS) Clin. Endocrinol., 70 (4) (2009), pp. 516-521 View PDF CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [24] G. Arnaldi, A. Angeli, A.B. Atkinson, X. Bertagna, F. Cavagnini, G.P. Chrousos, et al. Diagnosis and complications of Cushing's syndrome: a consensus statement J.Clin.Endocrinol.Metab., 88 (12) (2003), pp. 5593-5602 View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [25] L.K. Nieman, I. Ilias Evaluation and treatment of Cushing's syndrome Am. J. Med., 118 (12) (2005), pp. 1340-1346 ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [26] N.A. Wagner-Bartak, A. Baiomy, M.A. Habra, S.V. Mukhi, A.C. Morani, B.R. Korivi, et al. Cushing syndrome: diagnostic workup and imaging features, with clinical and pathologic correlation Am. J. Roentgenol., 209 (1) (2017), pp. 19-32 View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [27] R.A. Feelders, S.J. Pulgar, A. Kempel, A.M. Pereira Management of endocrine disease: the burden of Cushing's disease: clinical and health-related quality of life aspects Eur. J. Endocrinol., 167 (3) (2012), pp. 311-326 View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar [28] A. Ferriere, A. Tabarin Cushing's syndrome: treatment and new therapeutic approaches Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 34 (2) (2020), Article 101381 ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar From https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221026122200284X

Rie Hagiwara Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki 036-8562, Japan Kazunori Kageyama Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki 036-8562, Japan Yasumasa Iwasaki Suzuka University of Medical Science, Suzuka 510-0293, Japan Kanako Niioka Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki 036-8562, Japan Makoto Daimon Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki 036-8562, Japan Keywords: Cushing’s disease, Adrenocorticotropic hormone, Proopiomelanocortin, Corticotroph tumor, Histone deacetylase https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ21-0778 Abstract Cushing’s disease is an endocrine disorder characterized by hypercortisolism, mainly caused by autonomous production of ACTH from pituitary adenomas. Autonomous ACTH secretion results in excess cortisol production from the adrenal glands, and corticotroph adenoma cells disrupt the normal cortisol feedback mechanism. Pan-histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors inhibit cell proliferation and ACTH production in AtT-20 corticotroph tumor cells. A selective HDAC6 inhibitor has been known to exert antitumor effects and reduce adverse effects related to the inhibition of other HDACs. The current study demonstrated that the potent and selective HDAC6 inhibitor tubastatin A has inhibitory effects on proopiomelanocortin (Pomc) and pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1 (Pttg1) mRNA expression, involved in cell proliferation. The phosphorylated Akt/Akt protein levels were increased after treatment with tubastatin A. Therefore, the proliferation of corticotroph cells may be regulated through the Akt-Pttg1 pathway. Dexamethasone treatment also decreased the Pomc mRNA level. Combined tubastatin A and dexamethasone treatment showed additive effects on the Pomc mRNA level. Thus, tubastatin A may have applications in the treatment of Cushing’s disease. Access the PDF at https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/endocrj/advpub/0/advpub_EJ21-0778/_pdf/-char/en

https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.5337 Abstract A 50-year-old woman with adrenal Cushing's syndrome and chronic hepatitis C developed an acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis C before adrenectomy. After administration of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was started, her transaminase levels normalized promptly and a rapid virological response also was achieved. Laparoscopic left adrenectomy was then performed safely. 1 INTRODUCTION Reports of reactivation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis C associated with immunosuppressive therapy and cancer drug therapy are rarer than for hepatitis B virus (HBV) but have been made occasionally. In HBV infection, viral reactivation and acute hepatitis caused by an excess of endogenous cortisol due to Cushing's syndrome have been reported, but no acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis C has been reported so far. Here, we report a case of acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis C during the course of adrenal Cushing's syndrome. 2 CASE REPORT A woman in her 50s underwent a CT scan at a nearby hospital to investigate treatment-resistant hypertension and was found to have a left adrenal mass. Her blood tests showed low ACTH and HCV antibody positivity, and she was referred to our hospital because she was suspected of having Cushing's syndrome and chronic hepatitis C. There is nothing special to note about her medical or family history. She had never smoked and drank very little. Her physical findings on admission were 164.5 cm tall, 92.6 kg in weight, and a BMI of 34.2 kg/m2. Her blood pressure was 179 / 73 mmHg, pulse 64 /min (rhythmic), body temperature 36.8°C, and respiratory rate 12 /min. She had findings of central obesity, moon face, buffalo hump, and red skin stretch marks. Her blood test findings (Table 1) showed an increase in ALT, HCV antibody positivity, and an HCV RNA concentration of 4.1 log IU/mL. The virus was genotype 2. Cortisol was within the reference range, but ACTH was as low, less than 1.5 pg/mL. Her bedtime cortisol level was 7.07 μg/dL, which was above her reference of 5 μg/dL, suggesting the loss of diurnal variation in cortisol secretion. Testing showed the amount of cortisol by 24-hour urine collection was 62.1 μg/day, and this level of cortisol secretion was maintained. In an overnight low-dose dexamethasone suppression test, cortisol after loading was 6.61 μg/dL, which exceeded 5 μg/dL, suggesting that cortisol was autonomously secreted. Her contrast-enhanced CT scan (Figure 1) revealed a tumor with a major axis of about 30 mm in her left adrenal gland. MRI scans showed mild hyperintensity in the “in phase” (Figure 2A) and decreased signal in the “out of phase” (Figure 2B), suggesting her adrenal mass was an adenoma. Based on the above test results, she was diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C and adrenal Cushing's syndrome. She agreed to receive treatment with direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) after resection of the left adrenal tumor. However, two months later, she had liver dysfunction with AST 116 U/L and ALT 213 U/L (Figure 3). HBV DNA was undetectable at the time of liver injury, but the HCV RNA concentration increased to 6.4 logIU/mL. Therefore, an acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis C was suspected, and a percutaneous liver biopsy was performed. The biopsy revealed an inflammatory cell infiltration, mostly composed of lymphocytes and plasma cells and mainly in the portal vein area (Figure 4). Fibrosis and interface hepatitis were also observed, and spotty necrosis was evident in the hepatic lobule. No clear fat deposits were found in the hepatocytes, ruling out NASH or NAFLD. According to the New Inuyama classification, hepatitis equivalent to A2-3/F1-2 was considered. Because HBV DNA was not detected, no new drug was used, and no cause of liver damage, such as biliary atresia, was found; the patient was diagnosed with liver damage due to reactivation of HCV, with acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis C. The treatment policy was changed, in order to treat hepatitis C before the left adrenal resection, and administration of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was started. A blood test two weeks after the start of treatment confirmed normalization of AST and ALT, and a rapid virological response was achieved (Figure 3). Subsequently, HCV RNA remained negative, no liver damage was observed, and laparoscopic left adrenectomy was safely performed nine months after the initial diagnosis. The pathological findings were adrenal adenoma, and no atrophy was observed in the attached normal adrenal cortical gland. After the operation, hypertension improved and weight loss was obtained (92.6 kg (BMI: 34.2 kg/m2) before the operation, but 77.0 kg (BMI: 28.5 kg/m2) one year after the operation). ACTH increased, and the adrenal Cushing's syndrome was considered to have been cured. Regarding HCV infection, the sustained virological response has been maintained to date, more than 2 years after the completion of DAA therapy, and the follow-up continues. TABLE 1. Laboratory data on admission Hematology Chemistry WBC 6100 /μL TP 8.2 g/dL DHEA-S 48 /μL RBC 526 x 104 /μL Alb 3.4 g/dL PRA 0.7 ng/mL/h Hb 15.8 g/dL T-Bil 0.3 mg/dL ALD 189 pg/mL Ht 49.1 % AST 33 U/L PLT 25.5 x 104 /μL ALT 46 U/L Serological tests LDH 201 U/L CRP <0.10 mg/dL ALP 292 U/L HBsAg (-) γ-GTP 77 U/L anti-HBs (-) Coagulation BUN 13 mg/dL anti-HBc (+) PT 126.1 % Cr 0.63 mg/dL HBeAg (-) APTT 27.5 sec HbA1c 6.2 % anti-HBe (+) Cortisol 7.46 μg/dL anti-HCV (+) ACTH <1.5 pg/mL FBS 82 mg/dL Genetic tests Na 138 mmol/L HBV DNA Undetectable Cl 105 mmol/L HCV RNA 4.1 LogIU/Ml K 3.6 mmol/L HCV genotype 2 Ca 9.0 mg/dL Abbreviations: Hematology: WBC, white blood cells; RBC, red blood cells; Hb, hemoglobin; Ht, hematocrit; PLT, platelets. Coagulation: PT, prothrombin time; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time. Chemistry: TP, total protein; Alb, albumin; T-Bil, total bilirubin; AST, aspartate transaminase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; γGTP, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr, creatinine; HbA1c, Hemoglobin A1c; FBS, fasting blood sugar; Na, sodium; Cl, chlorine; K, potassium; Ca, calcium; DHEA-S, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; PRA, plasma renin activity; ALD, aldosterone. Serological tests: CRP, C-reactive protein; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; anti-HBs, hepatitis B surface antibody; anti-HBc, hepatitis B core antibody; HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen; anti-HBe, hepatitis B e antibody; anti-HCV, hepatitis C virus antibody. Genetic tests: HBV DNA, hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid; HCV RNA, hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid. FIGURE 1 Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Contrast-enhanced CT examination. Contrast-enhanced CT examination revealed a tumor (arrow) with a major axis of about 30 mm in the left adrenal gland FIGURE 2 Open in figure viewerPowerPoint MRI image of the adrenal lesion. MRI showed mild hyperintensity in the "in phase" (A) and decreased signal in the "out of phase" (B), suggesting adrenocortical adenoma (arrow) FIGURE 3 Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Changes in serum transaminase and HCV RNA levels. All showed rapid improvement by administration of direct acting antivirals. ALT: alanine aminotransferase, AST: aspartate transaminase, HCV RNA: hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid FIGURE 4 Open in figure viewerPowerPoint Pathological findings of tissues obtained by percutaneous liver biopsy. Infiltration of inflammatory cells, which was mostly composed of lymphocytes and plasma cells and a small number of neutrophils, was observed mainly in the portal vein area. This was accompanied by fibrous enlargement and interface hepatitis. Although the arrangement of hepatocytes was maintained in the hepatic lobule, spotty necrosis was observed in some parts. No clear fat deposits were found in the hepatocytes, and NASH or NAFLD was a negative finding. According to the New Inuyama classification, hepatitis equivalent to A2-3/F1-2 was considered (a; ×100, b; ×200, scale bar = 500 µm) 3 DISCUSSION Reactivation of HBV can cause serious liver damage. Therefore, it is recommended to check the HBV infection status before starting anticancer chemotherapy or immunotherapy and to continue monitoring for the presence or absence of reactivation thereafter.1, 2 On the other hand, there are fewer reports of the reactivation of HCV, and many aspects of the pathophysiology of HCV reactivation remain unclear. In this case, it is possible that chronic hepatitis C was acutely exacerbated due to endogenous cortisol secretion in Cushing's syndrome. Although the definition of HCV reactivation has not been defined, several studies3-5 have defined an increase of HCVRNA of 1.0 log IU/ml or more as HCV reactivation. In addition, the definition of acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis C is that ALT increases to more than three times the upper limit of the reference range.3, 4, 6 Mahale et al. reported a retrospective study in which acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis C due to cancer medication was seen in 11% of 308 patients.3 Torres et al. also reported that, in a prospective study of 100 patients with cancer medication, HCV reactivation was found in 23%.4 Given these reports, HCV reactivation potentially could occur quite frequently. However, Torres et al. reported that only 10% of all patients had acute exacerbations, none of which led to liver failure.4 Such data suggest that HCV reactivation may often be overlooked in actual cases without aggravation. Thus, the frequency of aggravation due to hepatitis virus reactivation is thought to be lower for HCV than for HBV. However, there are some reports of deaths from acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis C.7-10 In addition, if severe hepatitis develops following viral reactivation, mortality rates have been reported to be similar for HBV and HCV.8, 11 Thus, reactivation of HCV is considered to be a pathological condition that requires caution, similar to HBV. Torres et al. reported that administration of rituximab or corticosteroids is a significant independent risk factor.4 In addition, there are reports of acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis C due to corticosteroids administered as antiemetics and as immunosuppressive therapy.12-14 Therefore, excess cortisol can reactivate not only HBV but also HCV. The mechanism by which HCV is reactivated with cortisol is assumed to be decreased cell-mediated immunity due to rapid apoptosis of circulating T cells caused by glucocorticoids,4 enhancement of HCV infectivity by upregulation of viral receptor expression on the hepatocyte surface,15 and enhanced viral replication.16 In addition, there is a report that genotype 2 is more common in cases with acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis C,4, 13 which is consistent with this case. Regarding HBV reactivation due to Cushing's syndrome, three cases of acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B have been reported.17-19 It is believed that Cushing's syndrome caused a decrease in cell-mediated immunity and humoral immunity due to an endogenous excess of cortisol, resulting in an acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B.13 As described above, because an excess of cortisol can cause reactivation of HCV, it is considered that a decrease in immunocompetence due to Cushing's syndrome, which is an excess of endogenous cortisol, can also cause reactivation of HCV and acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis. However, as far as we can determine, no cases of Cushing's syndrome causing HCV reactivation or acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis C have been reported and similar cases may be latent. Among the reports of acute exacerbation of hepatitis B due to adrenal Cushing's syndrome, there is a case in which the liver damage and viral load were improved only by adrenalectomy.17 Therefore, it is also possible that hepatitis C was improved by adrenal resection in this case. However, general anesthesia associated with adrenalectomy and the use of various drugs used for postoperative physical management should be avoided, if possible, in situations where some severe liver damage is present. In addition, reactivation of immunity due to rapid depletion of glucocorticoid, following resection of an adrenal tumor, may lead to exacerbation of liver damage. In this case, the amount of HCV and hepatic transaminase levels were improved rapidly by glecaprevir/pibrentasvir treatment, and the operation could be performed safely. If Cushing's syndrome is complicated by an acute exacerbation of hepatitis C, clinicians should consider including treatment strategies such as in this case. Summarizing the above, when liver damage appears in HCV-infected patients with Cushing's syndrome, it will be necessary to distinguish the acute exacerbation and reactivation of chronic hepatitis C. Treatment with DAAs may then be considered to be effective for reactivation of HCV and acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis. 4 CONCLUSION We report a case of chronic hepatitis C with acute exacerbation during the course of Cushing's syndrome. At the time of cancer drug therapy and in the state of endogenous and extrinsic corticosteroid excess, it is necessary to pay attention not only to acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B but also to hepatitis C. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All authors would like to thank the patient and his family for allowing this case study. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The authors have no conflict of interests. AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO and KM were collected and analyzed the data and wrote and edited the manuscript. KH, ST, HO, KT, KM, and JK were involved in the patient's care and provided advice on the preparation of this case report. ETHICAL APPROVAL This study complied with the standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and the current ethical guidelines. CONSENT Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this report in accordance with the journal's patient consent policy. From https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccr3.5337

1. In patients with benign adrenal tumors, women are more likely to be diagnosed with mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS). 2. Patients with MACS have a higher prevalence and severity of cardiometabolic disease, namely hypertension and type 2 diabetes. Evidence Rating Level: 2 (Good) Study Rundown: While benign adrenal tumors are routinely incidentally discovered by imaging, not all these tumors have pathological effects, existing as nonfunctional adrenal tumors (NFAT). However, others overproduce steroids resulting in mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS) or Cushing’s syndrome (CS) if severe. The clinical impact of these diseases on cardiometabolic disease is poorly described. This study, therefore, sought to characterize the cardiometabolic disease burden and steroid excretion in this population via a cross-sectional study. Patients with benign adrenal tumors were classified with NFAT, MACS-1 (possible), MACS-2 (definite), or CS based upon clinical assessment and 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test. Results revealed that MACS-2 and CS were more prevalent among women. Compared to patients in the NFAT group, patients with MACS-2 and CS were more likely to have hypertension, require antihypertensives, type 2 diabetes, and require insulin therapy. Taken together, this study supports that women with benign adrenal tumors are more likely to be diagnosed with MACS and are consequently at greater risk for hypertension and type 2 diabetes, warranting regular cardiometabolic assessment for this population. This study was limited by its cross-sectional study design and predefined clinical outcomes biased for cardiometabolic outcomes. Click to read the study in Annals of Internal Medicine Relevant Reading: Natural History of Adrenal Incidentalomas With and Without Mild Autonomous Cortisol Excess: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis In-Depth [cross-sectional study]: In this prospective, cross-sectional study, 1305 patients diagnosed with incidental benign adrenal adrenocortical adenoma were selected across 14 participating centers. Patients with other diagnoses of cortisol excess such as primary aldosteronism or on cortisol-altering medications were excluded. Following clinical assessment and 1-mg overnight dexamethasone-suppression, patients were categorized into having a nonfunctional adrenal tumor (NFAT) (morning serum cortisol <50 nmol/L), possible mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS-1) (morning serum cortisol: 50-138 nmol/L), definite MACS (MACS-2) (morning serum cortisol: >138 nmol/L), or Cushing’s syndrome (CS) (presence of overt clinical symptoms of CS). The results found that while women made up the majority of the study cohort (67.3%), the proportion of females was more pronounced in the MACS-2 (73.6%) and CS (86.2%) groups. With respect to cardiometabolic disease, patients in the MACS-2 group were more likely to have hypertension (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.27), require three or more hypertensives (aPR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.68) and requirement for insulin therapy (aPR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.01 – 3.52) when compared to patients in the NFAT group. The same trend was found with greater significance for those in the CS group. The prevalence of dyslipidemia was not found to be significantly different between all groups. Additionally, these findings were not found to be attributed to other factors such as 1-mg DSG results, the presence of bilateral tumor, or adrenal tumor size. Finally, urinary steroid profiling found that patients with MACS and CS were more likely to have lower excretion levels of androgen metabolites and increased excretion levels of glucocorticoids. Overall, this study supports increased cardiometabolic disease burden amongst women with MACS. RELATED REPORTS Autonomous cortisol secretion correlated with mortality for adrenal incidentalomas Mutations in PKA catalytic subunit associated with Cushing’s syndrome Image: PD ©2022 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. All rights reserved. No works may be reproduced without expressed written consent from 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. Inquire about licensing here. No article should be construed as medical advice and is not intended as such by the authors or by 2 Minute Medicine, Inc. Tags: adrenal incidentalomaautonomouscardiometabolic diseasecortisol secretioncushing's syndromedexamethasone suppression From https://www.2minutemedicine.com/women-with-mild-autonomous-cortisol-secretion-are-at-greater-risk-for-cardiometabolic-disease/

Justine Herndon, PA-C, and Irina Bancos, MD, on Post-Operative Cushing Syndrome Care – Curative procedures led to widespread resolution or improvement of hyperglycemia by Scott Harris , Contributing Writer, MedPage Today January 18, 2022 In a recent study, two-thirds of people with Cushing syndrome (CS) saw resolved or improved hyperglycemia after a curative procedure, with close post-operative monitoring an important component of the process. Among 174 patients with CS included in the longitudinal cohort study (pituitary in 106, ectopic in 25, adrenal in 43), median baseline HbA1c was 6.9%. Of these, 41 patients were not on any therapy for hyperglycemia, 93 (52%) took oral medications, and 64 (37%) were on insulin. At the end of the period following CS remission (median 10.5 months), 37 (21%) patients had resolution of hyperglycemia, 82 (47%) demonstrated improvement, and 55 (32%) had no change or worsened hyperglycemia. Also at the end of follow-up, HbA1c had fallen 0.84% (P<0.0001), with daily insulin dose decreasing by a mean of 30 units (P<0.0001). Justine Herndon, PA-C, and Irina Bancos, MD, both endocrinology researchers with Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, served as co-authors of the report, which was published in the Journal of the Endocrine Society. Here they discuss the study and its findings with MedPage Today. The exchange has been edited for length and clarity. What was the study's main objective? Herndon: As both a hospital diabetes provider and clinic pituitary/gonadal/adrenal provider, I often hear questions from colleagues about how to manage a patient's diabetes post-operatively after cure from CS. While clinical experience has been helpful in guiding these discussions, the literature offered a paucity of data on diabetes/hyperglycemia specifically after surgery. There was also a lack of data on specific subgroups of CS, whether by sub-type or severity. Therefore, we felt it was important to see what our past patient experiences showed in terms of changes in laboratory data, medications, and which patients were more likely to see improvement in their diabetes/hyperglycemia. The overall goal was to help clinicians provide appropriate patient education and care following a curative procedure. In addition to its primary findings, the study also identified several factors associated with resolution or improvement of hyperglycemia. What were these factors? Bancos: Both clinical and biochemical severity of CS, as well as Cushing subtype, were associated with improvement. We calculated severity based on symptoms and presence of comorbidities, and we calculated biochemical severity based on hormonal measurements. As clinical and biochemical scores were strongly correlated, we chose only one (biochemical) for multivariable analysis. In the multivariable analysis of biochemical severity of Cushing, subtype of Cushing, and subtype of hyperglycemia, we found that patients with a severe biochemical severity score were 2.4 fold more likely to see improved hyperglycemia than people with a moderate or mild severity score (OR 2.4 (95% CI 1.1-4.9). We also found that patients with the nonadrenal CS subtype were 2.9 fold more likely to see improved hyperglycemia when compared to people with adrenal CS (OR of 2.9 (95% CI 1.3-6.4). The type of hyperglycemia (diabetes versus prediabetes) was not found to be significant. Did anything surprise you about the study results? Herndon: I was surprised to see improvement in hyperglycemia in patients who were still on steroids, as you would expect the steroids to still have an impact. This shows how much a CS curative procedure truly leads to changes in the comorbidities that were a result of the underlying disease. Also, I was surprised that the type of hyperglycemia was not a predictor of improvement after cure, although it was quite close. We also had a few patients whose hyperglycemia worsened, and we could not find a specific factor that predicted which patients did not improve. What are the study's implications for clinicians who treat people with CS? Bancos: We think our study shows the clear need for closer follow-up -- more frequently than the typical three-to-six months for diabetes. This can be accomplished through review of more than just HbA1c, such as reviewing blood glucose logbooks, asking about hypoglycemia symptoms, and so forth. Patients with severe CS who are being treated with insulin or hypoglycemic medications are especially likely to decrease their medications to avoid hypoglycemia during postoperative period. Read the study here. Bancos reported advisory board participation and/or consulting with Strongbridge, Sparrow Pharmaceutics, Adrenas Therapeutics, and HRA Pharma outside the submitted work. Herndon did not disclose any relevant financial relationships with industry. Primary Source Journal of the Endocrine Society Source Reference: Herndon J, et al "The effect of curative treatment on hyperglycemia in patients with Cushing syndrome" J Endocrine Soc 2022; 6(1): bvab169. From https://www.medpagetoday.com/reading-room/endocrine-society/adrenal-disorders/96709