Search the Community

Authors Stasiak M , Witek P, Adamska-Fita E, Lewiński A Received 27 December 2023 Accepted for publication 20 March 2024 Published 8 April 2024 Volume 2024:16 Pages 35—42 DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S453105 Checked for plagiarism Yes Review by Single anonymous peer review Peer reviewer comments 2 Editor who approved publication: Dr Hemalkumar B Mehta Download Article [PDF] Magdalena Stasiak,1 Przemysław Witek,2 Emilia Adamska-Fita,1 Andrzej Lewiński1,3 1Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital—Research Institute, Lodz, Poland; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology and Diabetes, Medical University of Warsaw; Mazovian Brodnowski Hospital, Warszawa, Poland; 3Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland Correspondence: Magdalena Stasiak, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital—Research Institute, 281/289 Rzgowska Street, Lodz, 93-338, Poland, Tel +48502049292, Fax +48422711140, Email mstasiak33@gmail.com Abstract: Cushing’s disease (CD) is the most common cause of endogenous hypercortisolism. Osilodrostat was demonstrated to be efficient in treating CD, and the mean average dose required for CD control was < 11 mg/day. Potential differences in osilodrostat treatment between cortisol-producing adenoma (CPA) and CD have not been reported. The aim of this study was to present two patients with CPA in whom significant differences in the response to therapy compared to CD were found. We demonstrated a case of inverse response of cortisol levels with adrenal tumor progression during the initial dose escalation (Case 1). Simultaneously, severe exaggeration of hypercortisolism symptoms and life-threatening hypokalemia occurred. A further rapid dose increase resulted in the first noticeable cortisol response at a dose of 20 mg/day, and a full response at a dose of 45 mg/day. We also present a case that was initially resistant to therapy (Case 2). The doses required to achieve the first response and the full response were the same as those for Case 1. Our study demonstrated that osilodrostat therapy in patients with CPA may require a different approach than that in CD, with higher doses, faster dose escalation, and a possible initial inverse response or lack of response. Keywords: osilodrostat, adrenal adenoma, hypercortisolism, ACTH-independent, adverse events, hypokalemia Introduction Chronic persistent hypercortisolism is a life-threatening condition that requires effective treatment. Untreated exposure to excessive cortisol secretion leads to severely increased morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular diseases, thromboembolic events, sepsis, visceral obesity, impairment of glucose metabolism, and dyslipidaea, as well as musculoskeletal disorders, such as myopathy, osteoporosis, and skeletal fractures. Moreover, neuropsychiatric disorders, such as impairment of cognitive function, depression, or mania, as well as impairment of reproductive function can frequently occur.1,2 Cushing’s disease (CD) – a disorder caused by a pituitary adenoma secreting adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) – is the most common cause of hypercortisolism. Cushing’s syndrome (CS) includes all other causes of cortisol excess, including ectopic ACTH production as well as direct cortisol overproduction by adrenal adenoma (cortisol-producing adenoma [CPA]) or adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). Approximately 10% of hypercortisolism cases result from CPA. The first line therapy is a surgical resection of the tumor, which is the source of hormone excess. However, in many patients surgery is not fully efficient and other therapies are required to reduce cortisol levels. Additionally, due to severe cardiovascular complications and unstable DM, the surgical approach sometimes entails unacceptable risk and it is frequently postponed until cortisol levels are lowered. Pharmacotherapy with steroidogenesis inhibitors reduces cortisol levels and improves the symptoms of hypercortisolism.1,2 As CD is the most common cause of cortisol excess, most studies have focused on the efficacy and safety of novel steroidogenesis inhibitors, including patients with CD only.3–6 This is exactly the case with osilodrostat – a new potent inhibitor of 11β-hydroxylase.3–6 More data are available for metyrapone efficacy and safety in CSA,7 as the drug has been available much longer than osilodrostat. A study by Detomas et al, which reported results of comparison of efficacy of metyrapone and osilodrostat, included 4 patients with adrenal CS, among whom one CPA patient was treated with osilodrostat.8 Osilodrostat is approved in the United States to treat CD in patients in whom pituitary surgery was not curative or is contraindicated.9 In Poland, osilodrostat therapy is available for patients with all kinds of endogenous hypercortisolism not curative with other approaches, within a national program of emergency access to drug technologies.10 Reports on osilodrostat application in CPA are highly valuable as data on potential differences in the treatment regimens between CD and CPA are scarce. Here, we present two patients with CPA in whom the response and doses of osilodrostat were different from those reported in patients with CD. The main purpose of this study was to demonstrate that the efficacy of osilodrostat in CPA is high, although initial resistance to treatment or even deterioration of hypercortisolism can occur during the application of lower doses of the drug. Materials and Methods Study Design and Patients We retrospectively analyzed medical files of two consecutive patients with CPA treated with osilodrostat. The analysis included medical history, laboratory and imaging results as well as a detailed reports of adverse events. Laboratory and Imaging Procedures Serum cortisol and ACTH levels were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) using a Cobas e601 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). UFC excretion was measured by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) using an Abbott Architect ci4100 analyzer (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA). Cross-reactivity with 11-deoxycortisol for this method is very low (2.1% according to the manufacturer’s data). Potassium levels were measured by ion-selective electrode potentiometry using a Beckman Coulter DxC 700 AU Chemistry Analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Computed tomography (CT) imaging was performed using a Philips Ingenuity Core 128 system (Philips, the Netherlands). Ethics Procedures Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this paper. The approval of Institutional Ethics Committee was obtained to publish the case details (approval code KB 33/2023). Presentation of the Cases Case 1 A 51-year-old female was referred to our department in November 2021 because of CPA, disqualified from surgery because of severe hypertension with a poor response to antihypertensive therapy and uncontrolled DM despite high doses of insulin. Additionally, the patient presented with hyperlipidemia and severe obesity (BMI=50.7 kg/m2), gastritis, depression, and osteoarthritis. On admission, she complained of a tendency to gain weight, fragile skin that bruised easily, difficulty with wound healing, susceptibility to infections, and insomnia. Physical examination revealed a moon face with plethora, a buffalo hump, central obesity with proximal muscle atrophy, and purple abdominal striae. The CPA diagnosis was initially made two years earlier, but the patient did not qualify for surgery due to a hypertensive crisis. Soon after this episode, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic began, and the patient was afraid of visiting any medical center because her son had died of COVID-19. Therefore, she was referred to our center for life-threatening hypercortisolism two years later. At the time of admission, computed tomography (CT) imaging revealed a right adrenal tumor of 34x24x37mm, with a basal density of 21 HU and a contrast washout rate typical for adenomas (83%). The size and CT characteristics were identical as they were two years earlier. High serum cortisol levels, undetectable ACTH concentrations, and a lack of physiological diurnal rhythm of cortisol secretion were observed (Table 1). Urinary free cortisol (UFC) excretion was 310 µg/24 h, with an upper normal limit (UNL) of 176 µg/24 h. No cortisol suppression was achieved in high-dose dexamethasone suppression test (DST) (Table 1). Other adrenal-related hormonal parameters were within normal ranges, with values as follows: DHEA-S 42.68 µg/dl, aldosterone 3.24 ng/mL, and renin 59.14 µIU/mL. Table 1 Laboratory Results Before Osilodrostat Therapy – Case 1 Due to multiple severe systemic complications, including uncontrolled hypertension, decompensated DM, and cardiac insufficiency, treatment with osilodrostat was introduced for life-saving pre-surgical management. Osilodrostat was started at a dose of 1 mg twice daily and gradually increased to 6 mg per day with actually an inverse response of serum cortisol level. The late-night cortisol level increased from 16 µg/dl to 25 µg/dl. As the full effect of the osilodrostat dose can occur even after a few weeks, the patient was discharged from hospital and instructed to contact her attending doctor immediately if any health deterioration was noticed. In the case of improvement in the patient’s condition, the next hospitalization was planned 3 weeks later. After three weeks of no contact with the patient, she was readmitted to our department with life-threatening escalation of hypercortisolism, severe hypokalemia, and further deterioration of hypertension, DM, cardiac insufficiency, dyspnea, and significant edemas, including facial edema. Treatments of hypertension, cardiac insufficiency, and DM were intensified, as presented in Table 2. Despite active potassium supplementation, life-threatening hypokalemia of 2.1 mmol/l occurred. Previously observed depression was exaggerated with severe anxiety and fear of death. The dose of osilodrostat was increased to 8 mg/day, and after three days of treatment a further elevation of serum cortisol was found, with an increase in UFC up to 9 × UNL (1546.2 µg/24 h). Due to an entirely unexpected inverse cortisol response, CT imaging was performed and revealed progression of the adenoma size to 39 × 36 × 40 mm, with a slight increase in density up to 27 HU as compared to the previous CT scan performed a month earlier (Figure 1). Table 2 Changes in the Most Important Parameters During Osilodrostat Therapy – Case 1 Figure 1 Progression of the adrenal adenoma size during the initial doses of osilodrostat: (a) CT scan directly before osilodrostat therapy – solid nodule 34x24x37 mm, basal density 21 HU; (b) CT scan during treatment with 8 mg of osilodrostat daily – solid nodule 39x36x40 mm, basal density of 27 HU. Considering the extremely high risk associated with such a rapid cortisol increase and related complications, decision of fast osilodrostat dose escalation was made. The dose was increased by 5 mg every other day, up to 45 mg per day, and, finally, a gradual decrease in the cortisol level (Table 2) was achieved, with UFC normalization to 168 µg/24 h. During dose escalation, no deterioration in the adverse effects (AEs) of osilodrostat was observed. Conversely, hypokalemia gradually improved despite a simultaneous reduction in potassium supplementation (Table 2). Facial edema decreased and the level of anxiety improved significantly. The course of hypertension severity as well as a summary of the main parameters controlled during treatment and the medications used are presented in Table 2. As soon as the cortisol level normalized, the patient was referred for surgery and underwent right adrenalectomy without any complications. Histopathology results confirmed a benign adenoma of the right adrenal gland (encapsulated, well-circumscribed tumor consisting of lipid-rich cells with small and uniform nuclei, mostly with eosinophilic intracytoplasmic inclusions). After surgery, hydrocortisone replacement therapy was administered. A few days after surgery, blood pressure and glucose levels gradually decreased, and the patient required reduction of antihypertensive and antidiabetic medications. After 22 months of follow-up, the patient’s general condition is good with no signs of recurrence. Antidepressant treatment is no longer required in this patient. Body mass index was significantly reduced to 40 kg/m2. The antihypertensive medication was completely discontinued, and the glucose level is controlled only with metformin. The patient still requires hydrocortisone substitution at a dose of 30 mg/day. Case 2 A 39-year-old female was referred to our department in November 2022 with a diagnosis of CPA and unstable hypertension, for which surgery was contraindicated. The patient was unsuccessfully treated with triple antihypertensive therapy (telmisartan 40 mg/day, nebivolol 5 mg/day, and lercanidipine 20 mg/day). The patient reported weight gain, muscle weakness, acne, fragile skin that bruised easily, and secondary amenorrhea. Other comorbidities included gastritis, hypercholesterolemia, and osteoporosis. Physical examination revealed typical signs of Cushing’s syndrome, such as abnormal fat distribution, particularly in the abdomen and supraclavicular fossae, proximal muscle atrophy, moon face, and multiple hematomas. A lack of a serum cortisol diurnal rhythm with high late-night serum cortisol and undetectable ACTH levels was found (Table 3). The short DST revealed no cortisol suppression (Table 3), and the UFC result was 725 µg/24 h, which exceeded the UNL more than four times. The serum levels of renin, aldosterone, and 24-h urine fractionated metanephrines were within the normal ranges. Computed tomography imaging revealed a left adrenal gland tumor measuring 25 × 26 × 22 mm, with a basal density of 32 HU and a washout rate typical for adenoma (76%). Table 3 Laboratory Results Before Osilodrostat Therapy – Case 2 Osilodrostat therapy was administered for preoperative management. The initial daily dose was 2 mg/day, increased gradually by 2 mg every day with no serum cortisol response (late night cortisol levels 15.8–18.5 µg/dl) and no AEs of the drug (Table 4). After the daily dose of osilodrostat reached 10 mg, it was escalated by 5 mg every other day, initially with no serum cortisol reduction. The dose was increased to 45 mg daily (with the lowest detected late-night serum cortisol of 9.6 µg/dl) (Table 4). Table 4 Changes in the Most Important Parameters During Osilodrostat Therapy – Case 2 After a week of administration of 45 mg daily, UFC normalization was achieved. Despite rapid dose escalation, no AEs were observed during the entire therapy period. Potassium levels were normal without any supplementation (the lowest detected serum potassium level was 3.9 mmol/l; all other results were over 4.0 mmol/l) (Table 4). After UFC normalization, left adrenalectomy was performed without complications. Histopathological examination revealed benign adrenal adenoma. Antihypertensive therapy was reduced only to 2.5 mg of nebivolol daily. The patient’s general condition improved significantly. Currently, hydrocortisone replacement therapy is administered at a dose of 15 mg/day. Discussion Osilodrostat is a novel potent steroidogenesis inhibitor whose efficacy and safety have been thoroughly analyzed in clinical trials of patients with CD, the most common cause of endogenous hypercortisolism. No clinical trial of osilodrostat therapy in CPA has been performed, as this disease constitutes only 10% of all cases of endogenous hypercortisolism. Moreover, osilodrostat is not approved by the FDA for hypercortisolism conditions other than CD.9 Therefore, data on potential differences in the treatment regimen are lacking. During the course of already reported trials in CD, osilodrostat doses were escalated slowly, every 2–3 weeks,3,5,6 with an excellent response to quite low doses of the drug.3–6 In the LINC 2 extension study the median average dose was 10.6 mg/day,5 while in the LINC 3 extension study and the LINC 4 study it was 7.4 mg/day and 6.9 mg/day, respectively.4,6 In most cases, a significant decrease of hypercortisolism was reported with the low doses of osilodrostat (4 or 10 mg/day). Moreover, some patients received 1 mg/day or even 1 mg every other day, with a good response.6 Even in rare cases of CD in whom initial short-term etomidate therapy was given at the beginning of osilodrostat therapy, due to highly severe life-threatening symptoms of hypercortisolism, the final effective dose of osilodrostat was much lower than that in our patients with CPA (25 mg/day vs 45 mg/day) and no increase of cortisol level was observed.11 It should be underlined that many cases of adrenal insufficiency during osilodrostat therapy in patients with CD have been reported,3–6,12,13 and – therefore – low initial dose with slow gradual dose escalation is recommended in patients with CD.1,6,13 In the cases presented here, CPA led to severe hypercortisolism, the complications of which constituted contraindications for surgery. Therefore, osilodrostat therapy was introduced as a presurgical treatment. In Case 1, the therapy was started at low doses according to the approved product characteristics.14 Due to the severity of hypertension, which was uncontrolled despite of active antihypertensive therapy, as well as to unstable DM, the doses were increased faster than recommended. Surprisingly, we immediately observed a gradual increase in hypercortisolism, in both serum cortisol levels and the UFC, with simultaneous burst of complications related to both hypercortisolism itself and 11β-hydroxylase inhibition. Life-threatening episodes of hypertensive crisis responded poorly to standard therapies. Severe exaggeration of cardiac insufficiency could probably be related to these episodes as well as to deep hypokalemia, which occurred despite potassium supplementation. Hypokalemia is a typical complication of treatment with 11β-hydroxylase inhibitors due to the accumulation of adrenal hormone precursors. However, Patient 1 required much higher doses of potassium supplementation, both parenteral and oral, than ever described during osilodrostat therapy.3–6,13 The dose of 20 mg/day of osilodrostat was the first one which led to noticeable cortisol reduction and a decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) to below 170 mmHg. Surprisingly, instead of the expected deterioration of hypokalemia, parenteral potassium administration could be stopped with an osilodrostat dose of 20 mg/day and oral supplementation was gradually reduced simultaneously with osilodrostat dose escalation. The reason why such severe hypokalemia occurred with low doses of osilodrostat and did not deteriorate further seems complex. One possible reason is the administration of high doses of potassium-saving antihypertensive drugs such as spironolactone and the angiotensin II receptor antagonist telmisartan. Additionally, one can consider other possible mechanisms, such as downregulation of the receptors of deoxycorticosterone (DOC) or other adrenal hormone precursors. However, this hypothesis requires further research and confirmation. Such an improvement of the potassium level during osilodrostat dose escalation was previously demonstrated in a patient with CD.11 Interestingly, in our Patient 2, no potassium supplementation was required during the whole time of osilodrostat therapy, although the doses were increased intensively up to the finally effective dose, which was the same (45 mg/day) as for Patient 1. In Patient 2, no actual response to doses lower than 20 mg/day was observed. UFC normalization was achieved after a week of administration of 45 mg/day, five weeks from the beginning of therapy. Although UFC normalization is not always required in pre-surgical treatment, clinical symptoms significantly improved in our patients only after the UFC upper normal level was achieved. The present paper is one of only a few reports focused on osilodrostat therapy in CPA, and the only one presenting a different therapy course as compared to patients with CD. No case of CPA resistance to low doses of osilodrostat has been described. It should be underlined that in our report “low doses” of osilodrostat were higher than the average mean doses of osilodrostat used in clinical trials in patients with CD.3–6 Therefore, they should not generally be considered low but only much lower than those which were effective in our patients. Malik and Ben-Shlomo presented a case of CPA treated with osilodrostat, with an immediate decrease in cortisol level at 4 mg/day and adrenal insufficiency symptoms after dose escalation to 8 mg/day.15 Similar to our two cases, their patient was a middle-aged female with normal results of all other adrenal parameters, such as renin, angiotensin, or metanephrine levels. However, a CT scan was not performed (or presented), while magnetic resonance imaging revealed an indeterminate adrenal gland mass without a typical contrast phase/out-of-phase dropout for adenoma.15 Therefore, different morphology of cortisol-secreting adrenal tumor can potentially be considered a reason of the different response to treatment. Tanaka et al performed a multicenter study on the efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in Japanese patients with non-CD Cushing’s syndrome.16 Five patients with CPA were included in the study, and none of them required osilodrostat doses higher than 10 mg/day to achieve UFC normalization. However, most of the patients presented by Tanaka et al were previously treated with metyrapone,16 whereas both of our patients were treatment-naive. Previous metyrapone therapy may be considered as a potential reason of better response to osilodrostat. This hypothesis was confirmed in the quoted study by Tanaka et al, who demonstrated that at week 12 the median percent changes in the mUFC values were higher in patients previously treated with metyrapone (–98.97%) than in treatment-naive cases (–86.65%).16 Detomas et al performed a comparison of efficacy and safety of osilodrostat and metyrapone, with one CPA patients included in a group treated with osilodrostat, however no data on a dose required for a disease control are available separately for this particular patient.8 To the best of our knowledge, no more CPA cases have been described and therefore no further comparison is available. Higher doses of osilodrostat were administered to a group of seven patients with hypercortisolism due to adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) presented by Tabarin et al.17 A full control of hypercortisolism was achieved in one patient for each dose of 4, 8, 10, and 20 mg/day, and in three patients treated with 40 mg/day.17 These patients, however received other therapies including mitotane and chemotherapy, which can significantly modify the response to osilodrostat. Several authors have reported the phenomenon of a partial or total loss of response to osilodrostat.5,16,17 In such cases, a response to treatment was initially achieved and then lost during treatment with the same dose. A further increase in osilodrostat dose usually resulted in the response resumption.5,16,17 Such a situation could not be suspected in either of our cases. The presented cases provide a novel insight into modalities of treatment with osilodrostat in patients with CPA and demonstrate for the first time that an inverse cortisol response is possible in CPA cases, especially those with a higher CT density of adrenal adenoma. Such a situation should not be considered a contraindication to dose escalation. Conversely, the dose should be increased more intensively so as to achieve the initial efficacy threshold, which was 20 mg/day in both of our patients. The fully efficient dose that allowed UFC normalization was more than twice as high (45 mg/day in both cases). A similar approach should be applied in patients who do not respond to lower doses, such as Patient 2. The safety of osilodrostat therapy is strictly individual and not dose dependent in patients with CPA. Adverse events, including hypokalemia, severe hypertension, and edema, can be of life-threatening severity or may not occur regardless of the dose. Moreover, AEs of high severity may decrease with osilodrostat dose escalation. Our study demonstrated that osilodrostat is efficient and can be used in patients with CPA as a pre-surgical therapy if surgery is contraindicated due to hypercortisolism complications. Our study presented two cases of CPA treated with osilodrostat, and a small size of our group is the main limitation of this report. Future research is required to confirm our observations. Conclusion In some patients with CPA, the doses of osilodrostat required for disease control can be much higher than those previously reported. Acceleration of the dose increase can be fast, and the risk of overdosing, adrenal insufficiency, and later necessity of dose reduction seem to be much lower than it could be expected. Low initial doses (<20 mg/day in our study) can be entirely ineffective or can even cause exacerbation of hypercortisolism, whereas high doses (45 mg/day in the present study) are efficient in pre-surgery UFC normalization. AEs associated with osilodrostat can be rapid, with severe hypokalemia despite active potassium supplementation, or may not occur even if high doses of osilodrostat are applied. Therefore, close monitoring for potential AEs is necessary. Acknowledgments The abstract included some parts of this paper was presented at the European Congress of Endocrinology ECE2023 as a rapid communication. The abstract was published in the Endocrine Abstracts Vol. 90 [https://www.endocrine-abstracts.org/ea/0090/]. Funding The publication of this report was financially supported by the statutory funds of the Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital – Research Institute, Lodz, Poland. Disclosure Professor Przemysław Witek reports personal fees from Investigator in the clinical trials paid by Novartis and Recordati Rare Diseases, outside the submitted work; lectures fees from Recordati Rare Diseases, Strongbridge, IPSEN. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work. References 1. Fleseriu M, Auchus R, Bancos I, et al. Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing’s disease: a guideline update. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9(12):847–875. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00235-7 2. Pivonello R, Isidori AM, De Martino MC, et al. Complications of Cushing’s syndrome: state of the art. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(7):611–629. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(16)00086-3 3. Pivonello R, Fleseriu M, Newell-Price J, et al. Efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in patients with Cushing’s disease (LINC 3): a multicentre Phase III study with a double-blind, randomised withdrawal phase. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8(9):48–761. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30240-0 4. Fleseriu M, Newell-Price J, Pivonello R, et al. Long-term outcomes of osilodrostat in Cushing’s disease: LINC 3 study extension. Eur J Endocrinol. 2022;187(4):531–541. doi:10.1530/EJE-22-0317 5. Fleseriu M, Biller BMK, Bertherat J, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in Cushing’s disease: final results from a Phase II study with an optional extension phase (LINC 2). Pituitary. 2022;25(6):959–970. doi:10.1007/s11102-022-01280-6 6. Gadelha M, Bex M, Feelders RA, et al. Randomized trial of osilodrostat for the treatment of Cushing disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(7):e2882–e2895. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgac178 7. Daniel E, Aylwin S, Mustafa O, et al. Effectiveness of metyrapone in treating cushing’s syndrome: a retrospective multicenter study in 195 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(11):4146–4154. doi:10.1210/jc.2015-2616 8. Detomas M, Altieri B, Deutschbein T, et al. Metyrapone versus osilodrostat in the short-term therapy of endogenous cushing’s syndrome: results from a single center cohort study. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:903545. doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.903545 9. U.S. food and drug administration home page. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-new-treatment-adults-cushings-disease. Accessed March 22, 2023. 10. Agency for health technology assessment and tariff system home page. Available from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwj6ypGbsfT9AhUMzYsKHTgAD2EQFnoECA8QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fbipold.aotm.gov.pl%2Fassets%2Ffiles%2Fwykaz_tli%2FRAPORTY%2F2020_010.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3P2Q85gwi3JcxKkW3uxfOb. Accessed March 22, 2022. 11. Dzialach L, Sobolewska J, Respondek W, et al. Cushing’s syndrome: a combined treatment with etomidate and osilodrostat in severe life-threatening hypercortisolemia. Hormones. 2022;21(4):735–742. doi:10.1007/s42000-022-00397-4 12. Ekladios C, Khoury J, Mehr S, et al. Osilodrostat-induced adrenal insufficiency in a patient with Cushing’s disease. Clin Case Rep. 2022;10(11):e6607. doi:10.1002/ccr3.6607 13. Fleseriu M, Biller BMK. Treatment of Cushing’s syndrome with osilodrostat: practical applications of recent studies with case examples. Pituitary. 2022;25(6):795–809. doi:10.1007/s11102-022-01268-2 14. Summary of product characteristics. Available from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwim1_KdsvT9AhVq-ioKHUZKAc4QFnoECA4QAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ema.europa.eu%2Fen%2Fdocuments%2Fproduct-information%2Fisturisa-epar-product-information_pl.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0S8nayCTdqNh1LsEcXVLEu. Accessed March 24, 2023. 15. Malik RB, Ben-Shlomo A. Adrenal cushing’s syndrome treated with preoperative osilodrostat and adrenalectomy. AACE Clin Case Rep. 2022;8(6):267–270. doi:10.1016/j.aace.2022.10.001 16. Tanaka T, Satoh F, Ujihara M, et al. A multicenter, Phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of osilodrostat, a new 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor, in Japanese patients with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome other than Cushing’s disease. Endocr J. 2020;67(8):841–852. doi:10.1507/endocrj.EJ19-0617 17. Tabarin A, Haissaguerre M, Lassole H, et al. Efficacy and tolerance of osilodrostat in patients with Cushing’s syndrome due to adrenocortical carcinomas. Eur J Endocrinol. 2022;186(2):K1–K4. doi:10.1530/EJE-21-1008 © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms. Download Article [PDF]

Abstract Ectopic adrenocorticotropin (ACTH)-secreting tumors are among the causes of ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome. When surgical resection of the primary lesion is not feasible, medications such as metyrapone, mitotane, and ketoconazole have been used to control hypercortisolism. This report presents a case treated with the novel drug osilodrostat, wherein the patient's adrenal glands exhibited shrinkage following the initiation of this drug. The case involves a 68-year-old man diagnosed with small cell lung cancer and ectopic ACTH-producing Cushing syndrome. Initially, metyrapone was administered to manage hypercortisolism, but its effect proved insufficient. Subsequently, osilodrostat was initiated while gradually decreasing metyrapone, leading to full suppression of blood cortisol levels. With continued osilodrostat treatment, the adrenal glands reduced in size, suggesting the potential to reduce the osilodrostat dosage. ectopic ACTH-producing tumor, Cushing syndrome, osilodrostat, adrenal shrinkage Issue Section: Case Report Introduction Ectopic adrenocorticotropin (ACTH)-secreting tumors represent a rare cause of Cushing syndrome, with an estimated annual incidence of 2 or 3 cases per 1 000 000 (1). Cushing syndrome is categorized into ACTH-independent and ACTH-dependent forms. Ectopic ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome arises from autonomous ACTH secretion by tumors located outside the pituitary gland, comprising approximately 15% of Cushing syndrome cases (1). Notably, small cell carcinomas of the lung are the most common cause of biochemical hypercortisolism (1). Treatment of ectopic ACTH-secreting tumors typically necessitates primary tumor removal, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and somatostatin analogues (1). Alongside surgical intervention, medications such as metyrapone, mitotane, and ketoconazole have been employed to reduce blood cortisol levels. However, metyrapone's limitations in terms of its potency and dosing frequency have prompted the search for a more effective drug. Osilodrostat has emerged as a promising option for managing Cushing syndrome. It inhibits the enzyme 11β-hydroxylase, which converts 11-deoxycorticosterone (DOC) to corticosterone and 11-deoxycortisol (11-DOF) to cortisol (2). Osilodrostat has a longer biological half-life than metyrapone, allowing for once-daily or twice-daily dosing. Evidently, osilodrostat possesses superior potency against 11β-hydroxylase (2). Case reports suggest that osilodrostat rapidly controls blood cortisol levels in patients with ectopic ACTH-producing tumors. The dosage of osilodrostat typically commences at 2 mg and is gradually adjusted based on cortisol levels and patient response. Although some cases have seen an increase to more than 10 mg initially, the dosages are eventually reduced to 1 to 5 mg. This case presents a unique scenario in which the patient's adrenal glands shrank during osilodrostat treatment, enabling dosage reduction. Case Presentation A 68-year-old man presented to our hospital with complaints of enlarged right hilar lymph nodes, fever, back pain, dizziness, and diarrhea. His height was 171.0 cm, and his weight was 63.1 kg. His vital signs were as follows: heart rate of 102 beats/min and blood pressure of 181/86 mm Hg. He did not have any cushingoid features. A comprehensive evaluation, including blood tests and a computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest and abdomen, was conducted. His blood tests showed hypokalemia and hyperglycemia. CT revealed the presence of a tumor in the right hilar region, along with swelling of the mediastinal and right supraclavicular lymph nodes and enlargement of the bilateral adrenal glands (Fig. 1A-1C). Tumor markers such as neuron specific enolase and pro–gastrin-releasing peptide were markedly elevated; thus, small cell lung cancer was suspected (details are shown in Table 1). Figure 1. Open in new tabDownload slide Progress of lung tumor and adrenal grand in computed tomography. Upper row (A, D, G): progression of small cell lung cancer. There were no changes in the progress. The density in HU of the lung cancer was 31 on day 1, 40 on day 58, and 34 on day 128. Middle row (B, E, H): progression of the size of the adrenal grand. The adrenal grand progressively shrank. Lower row (C, F, I): Each volume of the right adrenal gland was 11.7 mL on day 1, 7.5 mL on day 58, and 4.4 mL on day 128. Each volume of the left adrenal gland was 14.2 mL on day 1, 8.8 mL on day 58, and 4.9 mL on day 128. The density of the right adrenal gland was 30 HU on day 1, 13 HU on day 58, and 30 HU on day 128. The density of the left adrenal gland was 31 HU on day 1, 18 HU on day 58, and 19 HU on day 128. Table 1. Laboratory data on administration Blood tests Results Reference ranges Red blood cell 4.0 10^12/L 4.35-5.55 10^12/L 400 10^4/mcL 435-555 10^4/mcL White blood cell 8.7 10^12/L 3.3-8.6 10^12/L 87 10^4/mcL 33-86 10^4/mcL Differential count  Neutrophils 91.1%  Lymphocytes 6.0%  Eosinophils 0.0% BUN 6.8 mmol/L 2.9-7.1 mmol/L 19 mg/dL 8.0-20 mg/dL Creatinine 72.5 mcmol/L 57.5-94.6 mcmol/L 0.82 mg/dL 0.65-1.07 mg/dL eGFRCre 72 mL/min/1.73 m2 >90 mL/min/1.73 m2 Sodium 152 mmol/L 138-145 mmol/L 152 mEq/L 138-145 mEq/L Chloride 97 mmol/L 101-108 mmol/L 97 mEq/L 101-108 mEq/L Potassium 1.6 mmol/L 3.6-4.8 mmol/L 1.6 mEq/L 3.6-4.8 mEq/L Calcium 2.00 mmol/L 2.20-2.52 mmol/L 8.0 mg/dL 8.8-10.1 mg/dL Blood glucose 15.1 mmol/L 3.9-6.9 mmol/L 272 mg/dL 70-125 mg/dL HbA1c 52 mmol/mol 27-44 mmol/mol 6.9% 4.6%-6.2% ACTH 170 pmol/L 1.6-14.0 pmol/L 770 pg/mL 7.2-63.3 pg/mL Cortisol 2436 nmol/L 196-541 nmol/L 88.3 mcg/dL 7.1-19.6 mcg/dL DHEA-S 10.43 mcmol/L 0.35-7.15 mcmol/L 385 mcg/dL 13-264 mcg/dL SCC 1.7 mcg/L <2.3 mcg/L 1.7 ng/mL <2.3 ng/mL CYFRA 4.2 mcg/L <3.5 mcg/L 4.2 ng/mL <3.5 ng/mL Pro GRP 147 204 ng/L <81 ng/L 147 204 pg/mL <81 pg/mL NSE 205 mcg/L <12 mcg/L 205 ng/mL <12 ng/mL Abnormal values are shown in bold font. Values in the upper row are International System of Units (SI). Abbreviations: ACTH, adrenocorticotropin; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; CYFRA, cytokeratin 19 fragment; DHEA-S, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; eGFRCre, estimated glomerular filtration rate from creatinine; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin A1c; NSE, neuron specific enolase; Pro GRP, pro–gastrin-releasing peptide; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma antigen. Open in new tab Diagnostic Assessment Although his physical findings did not include cushingoid features, the patient's severe hypokalemia, hypertension, and hyperglycemia and the existence of small cell lung cancer indicated that he had ectopic Cushing syndrome due to small cell lung cancer. Next, we examined his plasma ACTH and serum cortisol levels. Both were markedly elevated. Based on the CT scan and blood test data, there was a strong suspicion of ectopic ACTH-producing small cell lung cancer. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging could not detect obvious tumors in the seller turcica within the visible range. Diagnostic tests for Cushing disease, such as the corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) challenge test and arginine vasopressin challenge test, are needed to definitively diagnose ectopic Cushing syndrome. However, we determined that the hypercortisolism should be corrected as soon as possible. A needle biopsy confirmed the lung tumor as small cell carcinoma on day 10. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed the tumor's negativity for chromogranin A, ACTH, and CRH but positivity for proopiomelanocortin (POMC), indicating its potential to produce pro-big ACTH and result in ectopic Cushing syndrome (Fig. 2). Figure 2. Open in new tabDownload slide Immunostaining of the small cell lung cancer. Figures show each immunostaining analysis: A, chromogranin A; B, adrenocorticotropin (ACTH); C, corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH); D, proopiomelanocortin (POMC). Chromogranin A, ACTH, and CRH are negative in small cell lung cancer, but POMC is positive. This means that small cell lung cancer produces big-ACTH and can result in ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome. Treatment Without confirming the diagnosis, we initiated the administration of metyrapone at a dose of 500 mg per day since we were familiar with metyrapone rather than osilodrostat. The dose of metyrapone was gradually increased, reaching 2000 mg per day by day 7. An overview of the clinical course is depicted in Fig. 3. Initially, the cortisol level was extremely high, so we did not consider the replacement of any steroids. Subsequently, we used hydrocortisone with metyrapone osilodrostat from day 10. Chemotherapy with etoposide and carboplatin was also started on day 10. Figure 3. Open in new tabDownload slide Changes of adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) and cortisol during metyrapone and osilodrostat, and chemotherapy. Cortisol was suppressed following an increase in the metyrapone and osilodrostat dosage. ACTH was not suppressed after chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer. As 2000 mg of metyrapone failed to sufficiently lower the patient’s serum cortisol level and metyrapone needed to be taken 6 times a day, we introduced osilodrostat at a daily dose of 1 mg starting from day 25. With close monitoring of the patient's serum cortisol and plasma ACTH levels, we gradually increased the osilodrostat dose to 20 mg per day while concurrently decreasing the metyrapone dose. This approach resulted in full suppression of the serum cortisol levels, enabling the discontinuation of metyrapone 20 days after the initiation of osilodrostat. Outcome and Follow-up Subsequently, we gradually decreased the dose of osilodrostat while following the patient's serum cortisol levels (see Fig. 3). Sixty-six days after the initiation of osilodrostat treatment, the patient was successfully maintained on a reduced daily dose of 1 mg without any increase in serum cortisol levels. A plain CT scan conducted after 33 days of osilodrostat treatment demonstrated that the primary lung tumor had somewhat decreased in size, but the density of lung cancer ranged from 30 to 40 HU, which indicated that there was no necrotic change in his lung cancer (Fig. 1D). The scan also revealed a slight reduction in the volume of the bilateral adrenal glands compared to that on day 1 (Fig. 1E and 1F). The patient was readmitted on day 91 for chemotherapy due to small cell lung cancer. Osilodrostat administration was discontinued after day 128. However, the patient's serum cortisol level remained below 4.0 mcg/dL (110 nmol/L). A plain CT scan on day 128 showed a marked reduction in the volume of the bilateral adrenal glands (Fig. 1H and 1I). The patient died of small cell lung cancer on day 143. We analyzed the adrenal steroid profile using residual serum samples on day 48 by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Serum DOC and 11-DOF levels were elevated above the normal range (Table 2). This means that bioactive ACTH was definitely present in excess in the patient's serum, and his adrenal glands were stimulated. We also measured the plasma ACTH using test kits provided by Roche and Tosoh Corporation using residual plasma samples on day 132. The Tosoh test kit has a higher detection sensitivity for pro-ACTH than that of Roche. The ACTH levels were 924 pg/mL (203 pmol/L) and 1257 pg/mL (277 pmol/L), respectively. These results indicate that while some pro-ACTH was present in the patient's plasma, mature ACTH was also present to some extent. Table 2. Hormone levels on day 48 Hormone tested Results Reference ranges ACTH 142 pmol/L 1.6-14.0 pmol/L 646 pg/mL 7.2-63.3 pg/mL Cortisol 41.4 nmol/L 196-541 nmol/L 1.5 mcg/dL 7.1-19.6 mcg/dL DOC 2.18 nmol/L 0.24-0.85 nmol/L 0.72 ng/mL 0.08-0.28 ng/mL 11-DOF 4.34 nmol/L 0.12-3.35 nmol/L 1.50 ng/mL 0.04-1.16 ng/mL Abnormal values are shown in bold font. Values in the upper row are International System of Units (SI). Abbreviations: 11-DOF, 11-deoxycortisol; ACTH, adrenocorticotropin; DOC, 11-deoxycorticosterone. Open in new tab Discussion In our case, we observed 2 significant aspects. First, the patient's adrenal glands exhibited shrinkage despite the plasma ACTH levels not decreasing. Second, the osilodrostat dose was reduced while the adrenal glands shrank. Our search for publications on osilodrostat and ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome yielded 57 relevant articles as of May 23, 2023, with 47 cases of ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome, including 38 cases of ectopic ACTH-producing tumors and 9 cases of Cushing disease (3‐10). Thirty-seven out of 47 cases with ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome were managed with osilodrostat monotherapy, while the remaining 10 patient cases received a combination of osilodrostat, ketoconazole, and cabergoline, among other drugs. In the 37 cases of osilodrostat monotherapy, 2 different strategies for initiating osilodrostat were observed: the titration strategy and the block and replacement with hydrocortisone strategy (see Fig. 4). Twenty-two of 37 cases received the titration strategy, starting with a low initial dose of 1 to 10 mg daily, with only 2 cases initially starting with a higher initial dose (20 mg daily). Twelve patients initially treated with the titration strategy transitioned to the block and replacement strategy during follow-up. On the other hand, 15 of 37 patient cases received the block and replacement strategy, with initial osilodrostat doses varying from 2 to 60 mg daily, supplemented with hydrocortisone from the outset. In our patient case, osilodrostat was initiated in combination with metyrapone but was subsequently switched to monotherapy, with the dose titrated up to 20 mg daily and then tapered to 1 mg. Figure 4. Open in new tabDownload slide Reported strategy of treatment with osilodrostat. Thirty-seven patients received osilodrostat monotherapy. Twenty-two cases had a titration strategy. Twelve of 22 patient cases with a titration strategy were switched during follow-up to a block and replacement strategy. Fifteen patient cases had a block and replacement strategy initially. Notably, none of the 47 cases of ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome obtained from PubMed mentioned changes in adrenal gland size. Although metyrapone and osilodrostat both attenuate 11β-hydroxylase enzymatic activity, metyrapone-induced adrenal shrinkage has not been reported. Therefore, the inhibition of 11β-hydroxylase by osilodrostat is unlikely to be the cause of the adrenal gland size reduction. The mechanism by which osilodrostat reduces adrenal volume remains unknown, making it imperative to closely monitor adrenal size in patients undergoing osilodrostat treatment. As indicated in previous reports, most patients attempt dose reduction or discontinue osilodrostat successfully. Thus, if the adrenal glands shrink, reducing the osilodrostat dose may be feasible without compromising blood cortisol level control. Hence, tracking adrenal size through imaging studies, such as CT and magnetic resonance imaging, in osilodrostat-treated patients becomes essential, and assessing the adrenal pathology in these individuals is equally crucial. In addition to the former hypothesis, there is another hypothesis that the hormones produced by small cell lung cancer change from ACTH to big-ACTH, which has much less potency to increase plasma cortisol levels, due to chemotherapy or progression to undifferentiated carcinomas of small cell lung cancer. However, the CT scan after osilodrostat administration showed that the density of lung cancer did not change and ranged from 30 to 40 HU, which indicated there was no necrotic change in the patient's lung cancer. In addition, the difference in ACTH measurement results between the 2 kits suggested that bioactive ACTH was present in the plasma, and the elevation of serum DOC and 11-DOF indicated that the patient's adrenal glands were stimulated by ACTH. We experienced a case of ectopic ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome treated with osilodrostat. In this case, a reduction in the osilodrostat dose was needed to maintain serum cortisol levels in the appropriate range, and a concomitant reduction in adrenal gland size was observed. It is important to follow-up not only ACTH and cortisol levels but also adrenal size on imaging studies in patients treated with osilodrostat. Evaluation of the adrenal pathology in these patients is also needed. Learning Points To treat ectopic ACTH-producing Cushing syndrome, osilodrostat is currently available. We found that osilodrostat was able to fully control the blood cortisol levels, and the dose of osilodrostat could be reduced after the patient's blood cortisol level was controlled. In our ectopic Cushing syndrome patient, the enlarged adrenal glands had shrunk in the course of treatment with osilodrostat. Through an unknown mechanism, osilodrostat decreases the size of adrenal glands; this effect enabled us to reduce the dosage of osilodrostat. Acknowledgments We thank Dr Yuki Sakai, Dr Chika Kyo, Dr Tatsuo Ogawa, Dr Masato Kotani, and Dr Tatsuhide Inoue for their extensive literature review and management of this patient. We also appreciate Dr Yuto Yamazaki and Dr Hironobu Sasano for conducting the pathological diagnosis. Contributors All authors made individual contributions to this study. F.S. was involved in the writing, submission, and preparation of tables and images. R.H. was involved in the diagnosis and management of this patient. R.K. was involved in the diagnosis and management of this patient and was responsible for overseeing the study. H.A. was responsible for the original idea and writing the first draft of the manuscript. All authors were involved in writing and reviewing the case report and approving the final draft. Funding No public or commercial funding was received. Disclosures The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Informed Patient Consent for Publication Signed informed consent obtained directly from the patient. Data Availability Statement Original data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Abbreviations 11-DOF 11-deoxycortisol ACTH adrenocorticotropin CRH corticotropin-releasing hormone CT computed tomography DOC 11-deoxycorticosterone POMC proopiomelanocortin © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com From https://academic.oup.com/jcemcr/article/2/2/luae008/7590573?login=false

In a recent study published in Hypertension Research, scientists examine the endocrine causes of hypertension (HTN) and investigate the efficacy of treatments to alleviate HTN. What is HTN? About 30% of the global population is affected by HTN. HTN is a modifiable cardiovascular (CV) risk factor that is associated with a significant number of deaths worldwide. There are two types of HTN known as primary and secondary HTN. As compared to primary HTN, secondary HTN causes greater morbidity and mortality. The most common endocrine causes of HTN include primary aldosteronism (PA), paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas (PGL), Cushing’s syndrome (CS), and acromegaly. Other causes include congenital adrenal hyperplasia, mineralocorticoid excess, cortisol resistance, Liddle syndrome, Gordon syndrome, and thyroid and parathyroid dysfunction. What is PA? PA is the most common endocrine cause of hypertension, which is associated with excessive aldosterone secretion by the adrenal gland and low renin secretion. It is difficult to estimate the true prevalence of PA due to the complexity of its diagnosis. Typically, the plasma aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) is measured to diagnose PA. The diagnosis of PA can also be confirmed using other diagnostic tools like chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassays (CLEIAs) and radio immune assay (RIA). Continuous aldosterone secretion is associated with organ damage due to chronic activation of the mineralocorticoid (MR) receptor in many organs, including fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes. An elevated level of aldosterone causes diastolic dysfunction, endothelial dysfunction, left ventricular hypertrophy, and arterial stiffness. Increased aldosterone secretion also leads to obstructive sleep apnea and increases the risk of osteoporosis. This is why individuals with PA are at a higher risk of cardiovascular events (CVDs), including heart failure, myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, and atrial fibrillation. PA is treated by focusing on normalizing potassium and optimizing HTN and aldosterone secretion. Unilateral adrenalectomy is a surgical procedure proposed to treat PA. Young patients who are willing to stop medication are recommended surgical treatment. The most common pharmaceutical treatment for PA includes mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists such as spironolactone and eplerenone. Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas PGL are tumors that develop at the thoracic-abdominal-pelvic sympathetic ganglia, which are present along the spine, as well as in the parasympathetic ganglia located at the base of the skull. The incidence rate of PGL is about 0.6 for every 100,000 individuals each year. PGL tumors synthesize excessive catecholamines (CTN), which induce HTN. Some of the common symptoms linked to HTN associated with PGL are palpitations, sweating, and headache. PGL can be diagnosed by determining metanephrines (MN) levels, which are degraded products of CTN. Bio-imaging tools also play an important role in confirming the diagnosis of PGL. Excessive secretion of CTN increases the risk of CVDs, including Takotsubo adrenergic heart disease, ventricular or supraventricular rhythm disorders, hypertrophic obstructive or ischaemic cardiomyopathy, myocarditis, and hemorrhagic stroke. Excessive CTN secretion also causes left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Typically, PGL treatment is associated with surgical procedures. Two weeks before the surgery, patients are treated with alpha-blockers. For these patients, beta-blockers are not used as the first line of treatment without prior use of alpha-adrenergic receptors. Patients with high CTN secretion are treated with metyrosine, as this can inhibit tyrosine hydroxylase. Hydroxylase converts tyrosine into dihydroxyphenylalanine, which is related to CTN synthesis. What is CS? CS, which arises due to persistent exposure to glucocorticoids, is a rare disease with an incidence rate of one in five million individuals each year. The most common symptoms of CS include weight gain, purple stretch marks, muscle weakness, acne, and hirsutism. A high cortisol level causes cardiovascular complications such as HTN, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes. CS is diagnosed based on the presence of two or more biomarkers that can be identified through pathological tests, such as salivary nocturnal cortisol, 24-hour urinary-free cortisol, and dexamethasone suppression tests. CS is treated through surgical procedures based on the detected lesions. Patients with severe CS are treated with steroidogenic inhibitors, such as metyrapone, ketoconazole, osilodrostat, and mitotane. Pituitary radiotherapy and bilateral adrenalectomy are performed when other treatments are not effective. Acromegaly Acromegaly arises due to chronic exposure to growth hormone (GH), leading to excessive insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) synthesis. This condition has a relatively higher incidence rate of 3.8 million person-years. Clinical symptoms of acromegaly include thickened lips, widened nose, a rectangular face, prominent cheekbones, soft tissue overgrowth, or skeletal deformities. Prolonged exposure to GH leads to increased water and sodium retention, insulin resistance, reduced glucose uptake, and increased systemic vascular resistance. These conditions increase the risk of HTN and diabetes in patients with acromegaly. Acromegalic patients are also at a higher risk of cancer, particularly those affecting the thyroid and colon. Acromegaly is diagnosed using the IGF1 assay, which determines IGF1 levels in serum. After confirming the presence of high IGF1 levels, a GH suppression test must be performed to confirm the diagnosis. Bioimaging is also conducted to locate adenoma. Acromegaly is commonly treated through surgical procedures. Patients who refuse this line of treatment are treated with somatostatin receptor ligands, growth hormone receptor antagonists, dopaminergic agonists, or radiotherapy. Journal reference: De Freminville, J., Amar, L., & Azizi, M. (2023) Endocrine causes of hypertension: Literature review and practical approach. Hypertension Research; 1-14. doi:10.1038/s41440-023-01461-1 From https://www.news-medical.net/news/20231015/Hormones-and-high-blood-pressure-Study-reveals-endocrine-culprits-and-targeted-treatments.aspx

Objective: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in patients with Cushing’s disease. Methods: The multicenter, 48-week, Phase III LINC 4 clinical trial had an optional extension period that was initially intended to continue to week 96. Patients could continue in the extension until a managed-access program or alternative treatment became available locally, or until a protocol amendment was approved at their site that specified that patients should come for an end-of-treatment visit within 4 weeks or by week 96, whichever occurred first. Study outcomes assessed in the extension included: mean urinary free cortisol (mUFC) response rates; changes in mUFC, serum cortisol and late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC); changes in cardiovascular and metabolic-related parameters; blood pressure, waist circumference and weight; changes in physical manifestations of Cushing’s disease; changes in patient-reported outcomes for health-related quality of life; changes in tumor volume; and adverse events. Results were analyzed descriptively; no formal statistical testing was performed. Results: Of 60 patients who entered, 53 completed the extension, with 29 patients receiving osilodrostat for more than 96 weeks (median osilodrostat duration: 87.1 weeks). The proportion of patients with normalized mUFC observed in the core period was maintained throughout the extension. At their end-of-trial visit, 72.4% of patients had achieved normal mUFC. Substantial reductions in serum cortisol and LNSC were also observed. Improvements in most cardiovascular and metabolic-related parameters, as well as physical manifestations of Cushing’s disease, observed in the core period were maintained or continued to improve in the extension. Osilodrostat was generally well tolerated; the safety profile was consistent with previous reports. Conclusion: Osilodrostat provided long-term control of cortisol secretion that was associated with sustained improvements in clinical signs and physical manifestations of hypercortisolism. Osilodrostat is an effective long-term treatment for patients with Cushing’s disease. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02180217 Introduction Cushing’s disease is a rare but serious disorder resulting from an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-producing pituitary adenoma that, in turn, promotes excess adrenal cortisol (1). Chronic exposure to excess cortisol is associated with numerous comorbidities, including hypertension, muscle weakness, hirsutism, central obesity, hypercoagulability and diabetes mellitus, all of which lead to an increased risk of mortality and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (1–3). The longer the exposure to excess cortisol, the lower the chance of reversing morbidity (2). Although transsphenoidal surgery is the recommended first-line treatment, approximately one-third of patients experience persistent or recurrent disease following surgery (4), and some patients are ineligible for or refuse surgery (4–6). Steroidogenesis inhibitors are usually the first choice for medical treatment (6). The effect of medical treatment can be easily monitored by measurement of serum and urine cortisol. Owing to the unremitting nature of Cushing’s disease, patients often require continued medical therapy to maintain long-term control of cortisol excretion. To date, long-term efficacy and safety data for steroidogenesis inhibitors from prospective clinical trials are limited (7, 8). Osilodrostat is a potent oral inhibitor of 11β-hydroxylase and is approved for the treatment of adult patients with Cushing’s disease (USA) or endogenous Cushing’s syndrome (EU and Japan) who are eligible for medical therapy (9–12). The LINC 4 study was a multicenter, 48-week, Phase III clinical trial in patients with Cushing’s disease that included an upfront 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled period. Osilodrostat led to rapid normalization of mean urinary free cortisol (mUFC) excretion and was significantly superior to placebo at week 12; normal mUFC excretion was sustained in most patients throughout the 48-week core period (13). Following the 48-week core period, patients could enter an optional open-label extension period intended to run for an additional 48 weeks. Here, we report the long-term efficacy and safety data from the extension of LINC 4. These data augment the existing efficacy and safety profile of osilodrostat (7, 8, 13, 14). Methods Patients Eligibility criteria have been described previously (13). Briefly, the study enrolled adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of persistent or recurrent Cushing’s disease after pituitary surgery and/or irradiation, or de novo Cushing’s disease (if not surgical candidates), with mUFC >1.3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN; 138 nmol/24 h or 50 μg/24 h; calculated from three samples collected on three consecutive days, with ≥2 values >1.3 x ULN). Patients who continued to receive clinical benefit from osilodrostat, as assessed by the study investigator, could enter the extension phase. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, with an independent ethics committee/institutional review board at each site approving the study protocol; patients provided written informed consent to participate and consented again at week 48 to taking part in the extension phase. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02180217). Study design Data from the 48-week core period of this Phase III study, consisting of a 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind period followed by a 36-week open-label treatment period, have been published previously (13). The optional open-label extension phase was initially planned to run for an additional 48 weeks (to week 96 for the last patient enrolled). However, patients could continue in the extension only until a managed-access program or alternative treatment became available locally, or until a protocol amendment was approved at their site that specified that patients enrolled in the optional extension phase should come for an end-of-treatment (EOT) visit within 4 weeks or by week 96, whichever occurred first. Patients still receiving clinical benefit from osilodrostat at their EOT visit were eligible to join a separate long-term safety follow-up study (NCT03606408). Consequently, the extension phase ended when all patients had transitioned to the long-term safety follow-up study, if eligible, or had discontinued from the study. Patients continued to receive open-label osilodrostat at the established effective dose from the core phase (dose adjustments were permitted based on efficacy and tolerability; the maximum dose was 30 mg twice daily [bid]). Outcomes Study outcomes assessed during the extension phase were as follows: complete (mUFC ≤ULN), partial (mUFC decrease ≥50% from baseline and >ULN) and mUFC response rate at weeks 60, 72, 84, 96 and 108, then every 24 weeks until the extension EOT visit; change in mUFC, serum cortisol and late-night salivary cortisol (LNSC) at weeks 60, 72, 84, 96 and 108, then every 24 weeks until the extension EOT visit; time to loss of mUFC control, defined as the time (in weeks) from the first collection of post-baseline normal mUFC (≤ULN) to the first mUFC >1.3 x ULN on two consecutive scheduled visits on the highest tolerated dose of osilodrostat and not related to a dose interruption or reduction for safety reasons after week 26; change in cardiovascular/metabolic-related parameters associated with Cushing’s disease (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] and glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c]) at weeks 60, 72, 84, 96 and 108, then every 24 weeks until the extension EOT visit; blood pressure, waist circumference and weight every 4 weeks until week 72, then every 12 weeks until week 108, then every 24 weeks until the extension EOT visit; change from baseline in physical manifestations of hypercortisolism at weeks 72, 96 and 108, then every 24 weeks until the extension EOT visit; changes in HRQoL (determined by Cushing’s Quality of Life Questionnaire [CushingQoL] and Beck Depression Inventory II [BDI-II]) at weeks 72 and 96 and the extension EOT visit; and proportion of patients with ≥20% decrease or increase in tumor volume. mUFC (mean of two or three 24-hour urine samples), serum cortisol (measured between 08:00 and 10:00) and LNSC (measured from two samples collected between 22:00 and 23:00) were evaluated using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and assessed centrally. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging with and without gadolinium enhancement was performed locally at weeks 72 and 96 and the extension EOT visit; images were assessed centrally for change in tumor size. Safety was continually assessed from core study baseline throughout the extension for all enrolled patients by monitoring for adverse events (AEs); all AEs from first patient first visit to last patient last visit are reported. AEs of special interest (AESIs) included events related to hypocortisolism, accumulation of adrenal hormone precursors, arrhythmogenic potential and QT prolongation, and enlargement of the pituitary tumor. Statistical methods Analyses presented here are based on cumulative data generated for the full analysis set (all patients enrolled at core study start who received at least one dose of osilodrostat) up to last patient last visit. Safety analyses included all enrolled patients who received at least one dose of osilodrostat and had at least one valid post-baseline safety assessment. All analyses excluded data for patients in the placebo arm collected during the placebo-controlled period. Results were analyzed descriptively, and no formal statistical testing was performed. Correlations were evaluated using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient; extreme outliers were defined as >(Q3 + 3 x IQR) or <(Q1 − 3 x IQR), where Q1 and Q3 are the first and third quartiles and IQR is the interquartile range (Q3 − Q1). Results Patient disposition and baseline characteristics LINC 4 was conducted from October 3, 2016 to December 31, 2020. Of the 73 patients who were enrolled and received treatment in the core phase, 65 completed the core phase and 60 (82.2%) opted to enter the extension; 53 (72.6%) patients completed the extension (Figure 1). At core study baseline, most patients had undergone previous pituitary surgery (87.7%) or received prior medical therapy (61.6%; Table 1). Patients had a variety of comorbidities at core study baseline, most commonly hypertension (61.6%); physical manifestations of hypercortisolism were common (Table 1). Figure 1 Figure 1 Patient disposition. *Patient was randomly allocated to osilodrostat but did not receive any study treatment because of a serious AE (grade 4 pituitary apoplexy that required hospitalization prior to receiving any study drug) that was not considered related to treatment. Table 1 Table 1 Core study patient baseline characteristics. Exposure to osilodrostat From core baseline to study end, median (range) osilodrostat exposure was 87.1 (2.0–126.6) weeks; 29 (39.7%) patients were exposed to osilodrostat for more than 96 weeks. The median (25th–75th percentiles) average osilodrostat dose received during the overall study period was 4.6 (3.7–9.2) mg/day; during the core study, median (25th–75th percentiles) average dose was 5.0 (3.8–9.2) mg/day (13). The osilodrostat dose being taken for the longest duration was most frequently 4.0 mg/day (27.4%). Following titration, daily osilodrostat dose remained stable during long-term treatment (Figure 2). Figure 2 Figure 2 (A) Mean and (B) median osilodrostat dose over time. Shaded areas indicate the randomized, double-blind period and the open-label period of the core phase. According to the study protocol, all patients restarted the open-label period on osilodrostat 2 mg bid unless they were on a lower dose at week 12. All patients on <2 mg bid osilodrostat (or matched placebo) at week 12 continued to receive the same dose, regardless of initial treatment allocation. n is the number of patients who contributed to the mean/median. Long-term efficacy of osilodrostat treatment Of patients who had received at least one dose of osilodrostat, 68.5% (n=50/73) had mUFC ≤ULN at the end of the core period, and 54.8% (n=40/73) had mUFC ≤ULN at week 72. Of patients who opted to enter the extension, 66.7% had mUFC ≤ULN (n=40/60) and 8.3% (n=5/60) had mUFC decreased by ≥50% from baseline and >ULN at week 72 (Figure 3A). Of patients with an assessment at their extension EOT visit, 72.4% (n=42/58) had mUFC ≤ULN and 8.6% (n=5/58) had mUFC decreased by ≥50% from baseline and >ULN. Figure 3 Figure 3 (A) Proportion of patients with mUFC response over time, (B) mean mUFC over time, and (C) individual patient changes in mUFC. (A) Patients with missing mUFC at any visit, including those who had discontinued treatment, were counted as non-responders. Shaded area represents the 48-week core phase; excludes data in placebo arm collected during placebo-control period. *The proportion of patients with mUFC ≤ULN at week 48 was calculated using the full analysis set (patients who had discontinued treatment were classified as non-responders). †Discontinued, n=12; missing because of the COVID-19 pandemic, n=4; mUFC not meeting response criteria, n=3; missing (any other reason), n=1. ‡mUFC not meeting response criteria, n=8; missing because of the COVID-19 pandemic, n=2; missing (any other reason), n=1. (B) Shaded areas indicate the randomized, double-blind period and the open-label period of the core phase. n is the number of patients who contributed to the mean. Analysis includes scheduled visits only. (B, C) Dashed line is the ULN for UFC (138 nmol/24 h). Mean mUFC excretion for the 48-week core period of the study has been reported previously (13); mUFC excretion normalized in patients who received osilodrostat, either during the 12-week randomized period (osilodrostat arm) or during the subsequent 36-week open-label period (all patients) (13). Mean mUFC excretion was maintained within the normal range in the extension period (week 72 (n=48), 90.5 [SD 122.6] nmol/24 h; 0.7 [0.9] x ULN; Figure 3B). Median (range) mUFC excretion is shown in Supplementary Figure 1A. Individual patient changes in mUFC from core study baseline to their last observed visit are shown in Figure 3C. There were no escape-from-response events during the extension phase following the primary analysis cut-off (February 25, 2020) (13). During the core period, mean (SD) serum cortisol levels decreased from 538.1 (182.3) nmol/L (0.9 [0.3] x ULN) at baseline to 353.9 (124.9) nmol/L (0.6 [0.2] x ULN) at week 48. Serum cortisol levels then remained stable throughout the extension period (week 72: 319.1 [129.8] nmol/L, 0.6 [0.2] x ULN; Figure 4A). LNSC also decreased and then remained stable, although >ULN, throughout the study (baseline: 10.8 [23.5] nmol/L, 4.3 [9.4] x ULN; week 48: 3.7 [2.6] nmol/L, 1.5 [1.0] x ULN; week 72: 3.8 [3.0] nmol/L, 1.5 [1.2] x ULN; Figure 4B). Median serum cortisol and LNSC are shown in Supplementary Figures 1B, C. Of patients with baseline and last observed value (LOV) measurements, 25.0% had normal LNSC at baseline (n=6/24) and 47.8% had normal LNSC at their last visit (n=11/23). Interpretation of this result is limited by the high degree of missing data (baseline: 67.1%, n=49/73; LOV: 68.5%, n=50/73). Figure 4 Figure 4 (A) Mean serum cortisol and (B) mean LNSC from baseline to the end of treatment. Shaded areas indicate the randomized, double-blind period and the open-label period of the core phase. n is the number of patients who contributed to the mean. Dashed line in (A) indicates reference serum cortisol range for males and females ≥18 years old (127–567 nmol/L). Dashed line in (B) indicates reference LNSC (22:00–23:00) range for males and females ≥18 years old (≤2.5 nmol/L). Changes in cardiovascular and metabolic parameters, physical manifestations of Cushing’s disease and patient-reported outcomes As previously reported, improvements from baseline occurred in most cardiovascular and metabolic-related parameters in the core period following osilodrostat treatment (9). This trend continued during the extension phase and included a reduction in FPG, HbA1c, cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, waist circumference, and weight (Figure 5). Similarly, the improvements from baseline in physical features of hypercortisolism observed by week 48 were maintained for most parameters throughout the extension (Figure 6A), with either no change or improvement observed from baseline in ≥90% patients for all parameters at week 72. Facial rubor, supraclavicular fat pad, dorsal fat pad and central obesity had a favorable shift from baseline in ≥40% of patients at week 72. Few patients reported worsening from baseline of specific manifestations (Figure 6A). Figure 5 Figure 5 Changes in cardiovascular-related metabolic parameters. Shaded area indicates the core phase. n is the number of patients who contributed to the mean. Error bars indicate standard deviation. DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood pressure. Figure 6 Figure 6 Changes in (A) physical manifestations of Cushing’s disease and (B) patient-reported outcomes. Shaded area indicates the core phase. n is the number of patients who contributed to the mean. Improvements were also observed in scores for patient quality of life (QoL). Both standardized CushingQoL and BDI-II scores improved steadily during the core phase. QoL scores continued to improve further during the extension. At week 72 and EOT, mean (SD) standardized CushingQoL score was 66.4 (19.6) and 69.0 (20.9), and mean (SD) BDI-II score was 6.5 (7.0) and 6.2 (7.1), representing a mean (SD) change from baseline of 15.2 (19.0) and 17.1 (17.1) and −4.1 (9.3) and −4.5 (7.9), respectively (Figure 6B). Adverse events AEs that occurred in >20% of patients, irrespective of study-drug relationship, during the entire study period (median [range] osilodrostat exposure for all patients: 87.1 [2.0–126.6] weeks; excluding data collected in the placebo arm during the placebo-controlled period) are shown in Table 2. The most common AEs were decreased appetite (46.6%), arthralgia (45.2%) and fatigue (39.7%). Most AEs were mild or moderate; 60.3% were reported as grade 1/2 (Table 2). Table 2 Table 2 Summary of adverse events during LINC 4 core and extension periods. Overall, 10 AEs (adrenal insufficiency, n=3; hyperbilirubinemia, hypokalemia, headache, arthralgia, pituitary tumor, benign pituitary tumor, and depression, n=1 each) in nine patients (12.3%; one patient experienced both arthralgia and headache) led to treatment discontinuation. For two patients (2.7%), those AEs were reported as grade 3 (hyperbilirubinemia and hypokalemia). One patient discontinued following the primary analysis cut-off date (February 25, 2020). The most common AESIs in both the core and extension periods were those related to adrenal hormone precursors. However, the proportion of patients reporting these AESIs was lower in the extension than in the core period (Figure 7). AESIs related to hypocortisolism were most frequent during the core period but did occur throughout the remainder of the study, albeit at lower frequency (Figure 7). Hypocortisolism-related AEs were most frequently managed with temporary osilodrostat interruption (n=20) or dose adjustment (n=6), and with concomitant glucocorticoids (n=15). There were no new occurrences of AESIs related to arrhythmogenic potential and QT prolongation, or to pituitary tumor enlargement, in the extension (Figure 7). During the entire study period from core baseline to the end of the extension, AESIs led to osilodrostat discontinuation in six (8.2%) patients (n=1, related to accumulation of adrenal hormone precursors [hypokalemia]; n=3, related to hypocortisolism [all adrenal insufficiency]; n=2, related to pituitary tumor enlargement [pituitary tumor and pituitary tumor benign]). Figure 7 Figure 7 Occurrence of AESIs by time interval. The denominator for each time period only included patients who had at least one scheduled visit, or at least one observed AE, during that period. From baseline to week 12, the denominator only included patients randomized to osilodrostat. A patient with multiple occurrences of an AE within the same period is counted only once in that period. However, if an AE ends and occurs again in a different period, it is then counted in both periods. Shaded areas indicate the randomized, double-blind period and the open-label period of the core phase. *Maximum duration of follow-up was 127 weeks. Following an increase in 11-deoxycortisol and 11-deoxycorticosterone during the core study, levels tended to decrease during longer-term treatment (Figure 8). From baseline to LOV, the proportion of patients with elevated 11-deoxycorticosterone and 11-deoxycortisol levels increased from 10.0% (n=1/10) to 90.0% (n=9/10) and from 57.9% (n=33/57) to 86.7% (n=5 and 2/60), respectively. In female patients, mean (SD) testosterone levels increased from 1.1 (0.6) nmol/L at baseline to 2.5 (2.6) nmol/L at the end of the core phase, then decreased to within the normal range (0.7−2.6 nmol/L for females) by the extension phase end-of-treatment visit (1.9 [1.7] nmol/L; Figure 8). The proportion of females with an elevated testosterone level increased from 15.0% (n=9/61) at baseline to 63.2% (n=24/61) at week 72 and then reduced to 41.7% (n=25/61) at LOV. In males, testosterone levels increased and remained within the normal range throughout osilodrostat treatment (Figure 8). The proportion of male patients with testosterone levels below the lower limit of normal decreased from 58.3% (n=7/12) at baseline to 33.3% (n=4/12) at LOV. The proportion of patients experiencing AEs potentially related to increased testosterone (increased blood testosterone, acne and hirsutism) was lower during the extension than during the core study (Supplementary Figure 2). Mean serum potassium levels remained stable and within the normal range (3.5–5.3 mmol/L) throughout osilodrostat treatment (Figure 8). The proportion of patients with a normal potassium level was similar between baseline (98.6%, n=72/73) and LOV (94.4%, n=68/72). Figure 8 Figure 8 Mean (± SD) levels up to the end-of-treatment visit in the extension phase for 11-deoxycortisol, 11-deoxycorticosterone, potassium and testosterone (in males and females). Shaded area indicates the core phase. n is the number of patients who contributed to the mean. Reference ranges: 11-deoxycortisol ULN, 3.92 nmol/L in males and 3.1 nmol/L in females, or lower depending on age; 11-deoxycorticosterone ULN, 455 pmol/L in males and 696 pmol/L in females (mid-cycle); potassium, 3.5–5.3 mmol/L; testosterone, 8.4–28.7 nmol/L in males and 0.7–2.6 nmol/L in females. At baseline, median (range) tumor volume was 82.0 (12.0–2861.0) mm3; 28.8% (n=21/73) of patients had a macroadenoma (≥10 mm) and 68.5% (n=51/73) had a microadenoma (<10 mm). At week 72, median (range) tumor volume was 68.0 (10.0–3638.0) mm3 (Figure 9A). Of the 27 patients with measurements at both baseline and week 72, 29.6% (n=8/27) had a ≥20% decrease in tumor volume and 37.0% (n=10/27) had a ≥20% increase (Figure 9B). Notably, mean (SD) plasma ACTH increased steadily between baseline (17.1 [32.1] pmol/L, n=73) and week 72 (65.0 [96.9] pmol/L, n=45; Figure 9C); mean ACTH levels appeared to stabilize after week 72. All patients experienced an increase in ACTH levels from baseline to week 72 (n=45) and LOV (n=73); of these, 34/45 (75.6%) and 47/73 (64.4%) experienced an increase in ACTH of ≥2 × baseline levels to week 72 and to LOV, respectively. There was no correlation between change in tumor volume and change in ACTH from baseline to week 72 (r=0.1; calculated without two extreme outliers). Figure 9 Figure 9 (A) Mean and median tumor volume over time, (B) number of patients with a change in tumor volume from baseline, and (C) mean ACTH over time. Shaded areas indicate the core phase. n is the number of patients who contributed to the mean. Dashed lines in (C) indicate reference morning (07:00–10:00) plasma ACTH ranges for males and females ≥18 years old (1.3–11.1 pmol/L). Discussion Following transsphenoidal surgery, approximately one-third of patients experience persistence or recurrence of disease and subsequently require further treatment to control excess cortisol secretion (4). It is therefore essential that clinical studies evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of potential new treatments, such as osilodrostat, are performed. The data presented here from the LINC 4 extension reinforce previous reports demonstrating that osilodrostat is effective and well tolerated during long-term treatment of Cushing’s disease (7, 8, 13, 14). The normalization of mUFC excretion, observed from as early as week 2 in some patients (13), was sustained to the end of the optional open-label extension phase. Overall, the response rate was durable and remained ≥60% throughout the study, with 72.4% of patients maintaining mUFC ≤ULN at their extension EOT visit. Considering the range in baseline mUFC values (21.4–2607.3 nmol/24 h), this indicates that patients can benefit from osilodrostat treatment regardless of their baseline mUFC level. This also suggests that baseline mUFC is not an indicator of whether a patient will respond to osilodrostat treatment. Notably, there were no escape events during the extension period. Additionally, the improvements in most cardiovascular and metabolic parameters, physical manifestations and QoL previously reported during the 48-week core phase were maintained or further improved with long-term treatment (13). Collectively, these results demonstrate the ability of osilodrostat to reduce the burden of disease and comorbidities frequently experienced by patients with Cushing’s disease. mUFC excretion is commonly assessed in clinical trials and during routine clinical practice to evaluate response to treatment. It is also important to monitor the recovery of the circadian cortisol rhythm in response to treatment by measuring serum cortisol and LNSC (6, 15–17). Elevated LNSC levels have been linked to dysregulation in glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion (18). As such, one potential explanation for persistent comorbidities in some patients with normalized mUFC excretion is that LNSC, although reduced, remains just above the ULN. Assessment of LNSC during treatment with other medical therapies has been reported, although differences in treatment duration and patient population type and size limit meaningful comparisons between therapies (15–17). In LINC 4, mean serum cortisol levels remained within the normal range. Mean LNSC improved considerably from baseline but remained above the ULN throughout the study; 47.8% (n=11/23) of patients achieved normalized LNSC at their LOV visit. A numerically large decrease in LNSC, but with mean levels remaining above the ULN, is consistent with previous reports during long-term osilodrostat treatment (8); the mechanism underlying this observation is currently unknown. In real-life clinical practice, the osilodrostat label allows flexible dosing (9, 11), which may help achieve normalization of LNSC. Furthermore, the number of patients with available LNSC assessments was limited, particularly during the extension; therefore, the data should be interpreted with caution. Future studies should examine whether patients with normalization of both UFC and LNSC have better outcomes than patients with only normalized UFC. Overall, the safety findings reported here for the extension period were consistent with those reported in the primary analysis (13) and previous clinical trials (7, 8, 14). Osilodrostat was generally well tolerated throughout the study; most reported AEs were mild or moderate in severity and manageable. Only nine of 73 (12.3%) patients discontinued osilodrostat at any time because of an AE (3/73 [4.1%] prior to week 48; 6/60 [10.0%] after week 48). Given that osilodrostat is a potent inhibitor of 11β-hydroxylase, AEs related to hypocortisolism or increased levels of adrenal hormone precursors are expected. The frequency of these AEs was lower in the extension period than in the core period, although events did still occur, highlighting the importance of monitoring patients regularly throughout long-term osilodrostat use. AEs potentially related to arrhythmogenic potential and QT prolongation remained infrequent throughout the study. Furthermore, the clinical benefit and tolerability of osilodrostat is supported by the high proportion of patients who chose to continue into the extension period: 92.3% who completed the core phase continued into the optional extension phase, with 88.3% of those completing the extension. Although dose adjustments were allowed in the open-label phase, the dose of osilodrostat remained stable over long-term treatment, with 4 mg/day adequate for most patients to achieve and sustain control of mUFC excretion. Most AEs related to hypocortisolism occurred during the dose-escalation periods of both LINC 4 (27%) and LINC 3 (51%) (19); the lower occurrence in LINC 4 than LINC 3 may have been related to the more gradual dose-escalation schedule of LINC 4 (every 3 weeks) relative to that of LINC 3 (every 2 weeks) (13, 14, 19). As such, an increased dose-titration interval could be considered when there is a need to mitigate the potential for glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome or hypocortisolism-related AEs following a rapid decrease in cortisol. Dose-increase decisions should be informed by regular cortisol assessments, the rate of decrease in cortisol, and the individual’s clinical response and tolerability to osilodrostat. Furthermore, as with all steroidogenesis inhibitors, patients should be educated on the expected effects of treatment and dose increases, with a particular focus on the symptoms of hypocortisolism and the advice to contact their physician if they occur. As expected, levels of 11-deoxycortisol, 11-deoxycorticosterone and, in women, testosterone increased during osilodrostat treatment. These then decreased during long-term treatment; notably, testosterone levels in women returned to within the normal range and to near baseline levels. These observations are consistent with the findings of LINC 3, which also demonstrated that these increases were reversible following discontinuation of osilodrostat (14). Compared with the primary analysis, there were no new AEs of increased testosterone in the extension phase of LINC 4; these findings are consistent with both LINC 2 and LINC 3 long-term analyses (7, 8). In general, osilodrostat did not adversely affect pituitary tumor volume, with similar proportions of patients reporting either a ≥20% decrease, ≥20% increase or stable tumor volume throughout the study. Although ACTH levels increased during osilodrostat treatment, there was no apparent correlation between the change in ACTH and the change in tumor volume after 72 weeks of treatment; however, longer-term data are needed to evaluate this further. As ACTH-producing pituitary adenomas are the underlying drivers of hypercortisolism, in turn responsible for the high morbidity and poor QoL associated with the disease, tumor stability is of great clinical importance in patients with Cushing’s disease, especially those for whom surgery has failed or is not a viable option. In addition to LINC 4, other studies have assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of other medical therapies (20–24); however, there is a paucity of prospective, long-term data. For metyrapone, an oral steroidogenesis inhibitor that is given three or four times daily (25), prospective data are currently only available for 36 weeks of treatment in the Phase III/IV PROMPT study (22, 23). Normalization of mUFC excretion was observed in 48.6% (n=17/35) of patients at week 36 (23), and gastrointestinal, fatigue and adrenal insufficiency AEs were the most commonly reported during the first 12 weeks of treatment (22). Current data for levoketoconazole, an oral steroidogenesis inhibitor that is a ketoconazole stereoisomer taken twice daily, are available for 12 months (median duration of exposure 15 months, n=60) following the extended open-label extension of the Phase III SONICS study (26). Of patients with data, 40.9% (n=18/44) had normal mUFC excretion at month 12 (26). During the extension, no patient experienced alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase >3 x ULN, suggesting that the potentially clinically important events relating to liver toxicity may be more likely to occur early during treatment, although periodic monitoring during long-term treatment is advisable (26). Pasireotide is a second-generation somatostatin receptor ligand that is administered subcutaneously twice daily (27, 28) or intramuscularly once a month (29–31). In a 12-­month extension of a Phase III study evaluating the long-term efficacy of long-acting pasireotide, 53.1% of patients had normalized mUFC at study completion (median treatment duration 23.9 months), with the most common AEs being related to hyperglycemia (21). The differences in duration and design of these studies prevent a meaningful comparison of the long-term efficacy of medical treatments for Cushing’s disease. The extension period of LINC 4 was initially planned to run to week 96; however, in agreement with the FDA, a protocol amendment was approved that resulted in approximately half of the patients completing the extension phase between weeks 72 and 96. We also acknowledge the potential for selection bias for patients who experienced the greatest clinical benefit during the 48-week core study; however, over 80% of patients chose to continue osilodrostat treatment after consenting to take part in the extension. Conclusions During the LINC 4 extension period, osilodrostat provided long-term control of cortisol excretion, accompanied by sustained improvements in clinical symptoms, physical manifestations of hypercortisolism and QoL. The safety profile was favorable. These data provide further evidence of the durable clinical benefit of long-term osilodrostat treatment in patients with persistent, recurrent or de novo Cushing’s disease. Data availability statement The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Recordati Rare Diseases will share the complete de-identified patient dataset, study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and informed consent form upon request, effective immediately following publication, with no end date. Ethics statement The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by an independent ethics committee/institutional review board at each study site. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Author contributions The study steering committee (PS, AH, RF, and RA), AP, and the funder designed the study. AH, MG, MB, PW, ZB, AT, and PS enrolled patients in the study. Data were collected by investigators of the LINC 4 Study Group using the funder’s data management systems. MP and the funder’s statistical team analyzed the data. A data-sharing and kick-off meeting was held with all authors and an outline prepared by a professional medical writer based on interpretation provided by the authors. Each new draft of the manuscript subsequently prepared by the medical writer was reviewed and revised in line with direction and feedback from all authors. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. Funding This study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG; however, on July 12, 2019, osilodrostat became an asset of Recordati. Financial support for medical editorial assistance was provided by Recordati. Acknowledgments We thank all the investigators, nurses, study coordinators and patients who participated in the trial. We thank Catherine Risebro, PhD of Mudskipper Business Ltd for medical editorial assistance with this manuscript. Conflict of interest Author MG has received speaker fees from Recordati, Ipsen, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, and Novo Nordisk and attended advisory boards for Novo Nordisk, Recordati, Ipsen, and Crinetics Pharmaceuticals. Author PS reports consultancy for Teva Pharmaceuticals. Author PW reports receiving travel grants and speaker fees from Novartis, Ipsen, Recordati, Novo Nordisk, Strongbridge Biopharma now Xeris Pharmaceuticals, and Lilly. Author MB reports receiving travel grants from Novartis, Ipsen, and Pfizer and consultancy for Novartis. Author ZB has nothing to disclose. Author AT reports consultancy for CinCor and PhaseBio. Author RF reports consultancy for HRA Pharma and Recordati and a research grant from Corcept Therapeutics. Author AH reports speaker fees from Chiasma and Ipsen and has been an advisor to Strongbridge Biopharma now Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, and Lundbeck Pharma. Author MP is employed by the company Novartis Pharma AG. Author AP was employed by the company Recordati AG at the time of manuscript development. Author RA reports grants and personal fees from Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Spruce Biosciences, Neurocrine Biosciences, Corcept Therapeutics, Diurnal Ltd, Sparrow Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis and personal fees from Adrenas Therapeutics, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Quest Diagnostics, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, PhaseBio Pharmaceuticals, H Lundbeck A/S, Novo Nordisk, and Recordati Rare Diseases. Publisher’s note All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher. Supplementary material The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1236465/full#supplementary-material References 1. Lacroix A, Feelders RA, Stratakis CA, Nieman LK. Cushing's syndrome. Lancet (2015) 386:913–27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61375-1 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 2. Feelders RA, Pulgar SJ, Kempel A, Pereira AM. The burden of Cushing's disease: clinical and health-related quality of life aspects. Eur J Endocrinol (2012) 167:311–26. doi: 10.1530/eje-11-1095 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 3. Coelho MC, Santos CV, Vieira Neto L, Gadelha MR. Adverse effects of glucocorticoids: coagulopathy. Eur J Endocrinol (2015) 173:M11–21. doi: 10.1530/EJE-15-0198 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 4. Pivonello R, De Leo M, Cozzolino A, Colao A. The treatment of Cushing's disease. Endocr Rev (2015) 36:385–486. doi: 10.1210/er.2013-1048 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 5. Tritos NA, Biller BMK. Current management of Cushing's disease. J Intern Med (2019) 286:526–41. doi: 10.1111/joim.12975 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 6. Fleseriu M, Auchus R, Bancos I, Ben-Shlomo A, Bertherat J, Biermasz NR, et al. Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing's disease: a guideline update. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2021) 9:847–75. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00235-7 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 7. Fleseriu M, Biller BMK, Bertherat J, Young J, Hatipoglu B, Arnaldi G, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in Cushing's disease: final results from a Phase II study with an optional extension phase (LINC 2). Pituitary (2022) 25:959–70. doi: 10.1007/s11102-022-01280-6 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 8. Fleseriu M, Newell-Price J, Pivonello R, Shimatsu A, Auchus RJ, Scaroni C, et al. Long-term outcomes of osilodrostat in Cushing's disease: LINC 3 study extension. Eur J Endocrinol (2022) 187:531–41. doi: 10.1530/EJE-22-0317 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 9. Recordati Rare Diseases. Isturisa (osilodrostat) tablets, for oral use, prescribing information (2020). Available at: https://www.isturisa.com/pdf/isturisa-prescribing-information.pdf. (Accessed February 2021). Google Scholar 10. Recordati Rare Diseases. Isturisa® Japan prescribing information (2021). Available at: https://www.pmda.go.jp/PmdaSearch/iyakuDetail/GeneralList/24990A5/. (Accessed August 2021). Google Scholar 11. Recordati Rare Diseases. Osilodrostat summary of product characteristics (2020). Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/isturisa-epar-product-information_en.pdf. (Accessed February 2021). Google Scholar 12. Swissmedic. Isturisa®, Filmtabletten (Osilodrostatum) (2020). Available at: https://www.swissmedic.ch/swissmedic/en/home/humanarzneimittel/authorisations/new-medicines/isturisa_filmtablette_osilodrostatum.html. (Accessed October 2021). Google Scholar 13. Gadelha M, Bex M, Feelders RA, Heaney AP, Auchus RJ, Gilis-Januszewska A, et al. Randomized trial of osilodrostat for the treatment of Cushing’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2022) 107:e2882–95. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac178 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 14. Pivonello R, Fleseriu M, Newell-Price J, Bertagna X, Findling J, Shimatsu A, et al. Efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in patients with Cushing's disease (LINC 3): a multicentre Phase III study with a double-blind, randomised withdrawal phase. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2020) 8:748–61. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30240-0 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 15. Fleseriu M, Pivonello R, Elenkova A, Salvatori R, Auchus RJ, Feelders RA, et al. Efficacy and safety of levoketoconazole in the treatment of endogenous Cushing's syndrome (SONICS): a Phase 3, multicentre, open-label, single-arm trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2019) 7:855–65. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30313-4 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 16. Ceccato F, Zilio M, Barbot M, Albiger N, Antonelli G, Plebani M, et al. Metyrapone treatment in Cushing's syndrome: a real-life study. Endocrine (2018) 62:701–11. doi: 10.1007/s12020-018-1675-4 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 17. Newell-Price J, Pivonello R, Tabarin A, Fleseriu M, Witek P, Gadelha MR, et al. Use of late-night salivary cortisol to monitor response to medical treatment in Cushing's disease. Eur J Endocrinol (2020) 182:207–17. doi: 10.1530/EJE-19-0695 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 18. Plat L, Leproult R, L'Hermite-Baleriaux M, Fery F, Mockel J, Polonsky KS, et al. Metabolic effects of short-term elevations of plasma cortisol are more pronounced in the evening than in the morning. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1999) 84:3082–92. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.9.5978 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 19. Fleseriu M, Auchus RJ, Snyder PJ, Lacroix A, Heaney AP, Geer EB, et al. Effect of dosing and titration of osilodrostat on efficacy and safety in patients with Cushing's disease (CD): results from two Phase III trials (LINC3 and LINC4). Endocrine Practice (2021) 27(6 Suppl):S112 (abst 999926). doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2021.04.707 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 20. Castinetti F, Guignat L, Giraud P, Muller M, Kamenicky P, Drui D, et al. Ketoconazole in Cushing's disease: is it worth a try? J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2014) 99:1623–30. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3628 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 21. Fleseriu M, Petersenn S, Biller BMK, Kadioglu P, De Block C, T'Sjoen G, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of once-monthly pasireotide in Cushing's disease: a Phase III extension study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) (2019) 91:776–85. doi: 10.1111/cen.14081 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 22. Nieman LK, Boscaro M, Scaroni CM, Deutschbein T, Mezosi E, Driessens N, et al. Metyrapone treatment in endogenous Cushing’s syndrome: results at week 12 from PROMPT, a prospective international multicenter, open-label, Phase III/IV study. J Endocr Soc (2021) 5(Suppl 1):A515. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvab048.1053 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 23. Nieman L, Boscaro M, Carla S, Deutschbein T, Mezosi E, Driessens N, et al. Metyrapone treatment in endogenous Cushing’s syndrome. Long term efficacy and safety results of the extension of the phase III/IV study PROMPT. Endocrine Abstracts (2021) 73:OC3. doi: 10.1530/endoabs.73.OC3.3 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 24. Gadelha MR, Wildemberg LE, Shimon I. Pituitary acting drugs: cabergoline and pasireotide. Pituitary (2022) 25:722–5. doi: 10.1007/s11102-022-01238-8 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 25. HRA Pharma Rare Diseases. Metopirone® capsules 250 mg summary of product characteristics (1998). Available at: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/26460. (Accessed February 2021). Google Scholar 26. Fleseriu M, Auchus RJ, Greenman Y, Zacharieva S, Geer EB, Salvatori R, et al. Levoketoconazole treatment in endogenous Cushing's syndrome: extended evaluation of clinical, biochemical, and radiologic outcomes. Eur J Endocrinol (2022) 187:859–71. doi: 10.1530/EJE-22-0506 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar 27. Recordati Rare Diseases. Signifor® (pasireotide) injection for subcutaneous use prescribing information (2012). Available at: https://signifor.com/wp-content/themes/signifor/dist/pdf/signifor-pi.pdf. (Accessed October 2021). Google Scholar 28. Recordati Rare Diseases. Signifor summary of product characteristics (2012). Available at: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/4200/smpc. (Accessed October 2021). Google Scholar 29. Recordati Rare Diseases. Signifor LAR summary of product characteristics (2012). Available at: https://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/product/1932/smpc. (Accessed October 2021). Google Scholar 30. Recordati Rare Diseases. Signifor® LAR (pasireotide) for injectable suspension, for intramuscular use (2012). Available at: https://www.signiforlar.com/wp-content/themes/signifor-lar-theme/dist/pdf/signifor-lar-pi.pdf. (Accessed October 2021). Google Scholar 31. Lacroix A, Gu F, Gallardo W, Pivonello R, Yu Y, Witek P, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-monthly pasireotide in Cushing's disease: a 12 month clinical trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol (2018) 6:17–26. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30326-1 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Keywords: Cushing’s disease, osilodrostat, hypercortisolism, 11β-hydroxylase, long-term treatment Citation: Gadelha M, Snyder PJ, Witek P, Bex M, Belaya Z, Turcu AF, Feelders RA, Heaney AP, Paul M, Pedroncelli AM and Auchus RJ (2023) Long-term efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in patients with Cushing’s disease: results from the LINC 4 study extension. Front. Endocrinol. 14:1236465. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1236465 Received: 07 June 2023; Accepted: 28 July 2023; Published: 23 August 2023. Edited by: Fabienne Langlois, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Canada Reviewed by: Filippo Ceccato, University of Padua, Italy Kevin Choong Ji Yuen, Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI), United States Copyright © 2023 Gadelha, Snyder, Witek, Bex, Belaya, Turcu, Feelders, Heaney, Paul, Pedroncelli and Auchus. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. *Correspondence: Mônica Gadelha, mgadelha@hucff.ufrj.br †Present address: Alberto M. Pedroncelli, Camurus AB, Lund, Sweden Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher. From https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fendo.2023.1236465/full

In Italy it is estimated that there are about 3,000 patients suffering from Cushing’s syndrome, while in Europe the number rises to over 50,000. The Cushing’s syndrome, a disease caused by the excessive production of cortisol by the pituitary gland due to a benign tumor of the gland, has seen a breakthrough in its treatment. Thanks to a new drug called osilodrostat, approved in 2020 by the Food and Drug Administration and subsequently by Aifa in Italy, patients unfit for surgery can benefit from a treatment that offers the same effects as a scalpel. Furthermore, this drug reduced symptoms in 80% of cases. Cushing’s syndrome has been dubbed “full moon face disease” due to its most obvious visible effects, such as a rounding of the face caused by fat accumulation and visible weight gain also on the waist and back. Despite its symptomatic relevance, the disease has long been poorly understood by both healthcare professionals and the general public. To raise awareness of this syndrome, the #Thiscushing campaign has been launched, which aims to spread knowledge about the disease. The campaign recently stopped in Rome, during the Congress of the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE), where a photographic exhibition was organized which represents moments of daily life of people affected by Cushing’s syndrome and their difficulties. Despite the debilitating symptoms, Cushing’s syndrome is often underdiagnosed, resulting in delays in diagnosis of up to 5-7 years. The disease presents a wide range of symptoms, ranging from difficulty performing even simple daily activities such as tying your shoes or getting out of bed, to common manifestations such as high cholesterol, hypertension and hyperglycemia, which can be confused with symptoms of other less common pathologies. serious. It is for this reason that the EIS experts are appealing for the inclusion of Cushing’s syndrome in the list of rare pathologies recognized by the Ministry of Health, in order to facilitate timely diagnosis and faster access to the necessary treatments. From https://www.breakinglatest.news/health/cushings-syndrome-a-new-drug-allows-you-to-avoid-surgery/

Abstract (1) Background: Cushing’s disease (CD) is a serious endocrine disorder caused by an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) that stimulates the adrenal glands to overproduce cortisol. Chronic exposure to excess cortisol has detrimental effects on health, including increased stroke rates, diabetes, obesity, cognitive impairment, anxiety, depression, and death. The first-line treatment for CD is pituitary surgery. Current surgical remission rates reported in only 56% of patients depending on several criteria. The lack of specificity, poor tolerability, and low efficacy of the subsequent second-line medical therapies make CD a medical therapeutic challenge. One major limitation that hinders the development of specific medical therapies is the lack of relevant human model systems that recapitulate the cellular composition of PitNET microenvironment. (2) Methods: human pituitary tumor tissue was harvested during transsphenoidal surgery from CD patients to generate organoids (hPITOs). (3) Results: hPITOs generated from corticotroph, lactotroph, gonadotroph, and somatotroph tumors exhibited morphological diversity among the organoid lines between individual patients and amongst subtypes. The similarity in cell lineages between the organoid line and the patient’s tumor was validated by comparing the neuropathology report to the expression pattern of PitNET specific markers, using spectral flow cytometry and exome sequencing. A high-throughput drug screen demonstrated patient-specific drug responses of hPITOs amongst each tumor subtype. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from a CD patient carrying germline mutation CDH23 exhibited dysregulated cell lineage commitment. (4) Conclusions: The human pituitary neuroendocrine tumor organoids represent a novel approach in how we model complex pathologies in CD patients, which will enable effective personalized medicine for these patients. Keywords: organoids; neuroendocrine tumors; induced pluripotent stem cells; CDH23 1. Introduction Cushing’s disease (CD) is a serious endocrine disorder caused by an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) that stimulates the adrenal glands to overproduce cortisol [1,2,3,4]. The WHO renamed pituitary adenomas as PitNETs [5]. While PitNETs have been defined as benign, implying that these tumors cause a disease that is not life threatening or harmful to health, in fact chronic exposure to excess cortisol has wide-ranging and detrimental effects on health. Hypercortisolism causes increased stroke rates, diabetes, obesity, depression, anxiety, and a three-fold increase in the risk of death from cardiovascular disease and cancer [4,6,7,8]. The first-line treatment for CD is pituitary surgery, which is followed by disease recurrence in 50% of patients during the 10-year follow-up period after surgery in the hands of an experienced surgeon [9,10,11]. Studies have demonstrated that surgical failures and recurrences of CD are common, and despite multiple treatments, biochemical control is not achieved in approximately 30% of patients. This suggests that in routine clinical practice, initial and long-term disease remission is not achieved in a substantial number of CD patients [7,12]. Hence, medical therapy is often considered in the following situations: when surgery is contraindicated or fails to achieve remission, or when recurrence occurs after apparent surgical remission. While stereotactic radiosurgery treats incompletely resected or recurrent PitNETs, the main drawbacks include the longer time to remission (12–60 months) and the risk of hypopituitarism [3,13,14]. There is an inverse relationship between disease duration and reversibility of complications associated with the disease, thus emphasizing the importance of identifying an effective medical strategy to rapidly normalize cortisol production by targeting the pituitary adenoma [4,7,12]. Unfortunately, the lack of current standard of care treatments with low efficacy and tolerability makes CD a medical therapeutic challenge. The overall goal of medical therapy for CD is to target the signaling mechanisms to lower cortisol levels in the body [15,16]. The drugs offered for treatment of CD vary in the mechanism of action, safety, tolerability, route of administration, and drug–drug interactions [15,16]. In the era of precision medicine [17], where it is imperative to identify effective therapies early, there is an urgent need to accelerate the identification of therapies targeted to the ACTH-secreting pituitary tumor which are tailored for each individual patient. The absence of preclinical models that replicate the complexity of the PitNET microenvironment has prevented us from acquiring the knowledge to advance clinical care by implementing therapies specifically targeting the tumor, which would have a higher efficacy and tolerability for CD patients. In this instance, organoids can replicate much of the complexity of an tumor. An “organoid” is defined as a three-dimensional cell structure, grown from primary cells of dissociated pituitary tumors in Matrigel matrix, which proliferate, and differentiate in three dimensions, eventually replicating key biological properties of the tissue [18]. While pituitary cell lines predominantly represent hormonal lineages, these cultures do not reproduce the primary pituitary tissue because of the tumor transformation and non-physiological 2D culture conditions [19,20,21]. Pituitary tissue-derived organoids have been generated from mouse models [22,23]. While several human and rat pituitary spheroid/aggregate/tumoroid models have been reported, these cultures consist of poorly differentiated cells with high replicative potential which can affect drug response and produce data that poorly translate to the clinic [24,25]. In this study, we developed an organoid model derived from human PitNETs that replicated much of the cellular complexity and function of the patient’s tumor. Organoids derived from corticotroph PitNETs retained the genetic alterations of the patient’s primary tissue. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Generation and Culture of Human Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor (PitNET) Organoids Patients with planned transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors were identified in the outpatient neurosurgery clinics. Tissues were collected under the St. Joseph’s Hospital and Barrow Neurological Institute Biobank collection protocol PHXA-05TS038 and collection of outcomes data protocol PHXA-0004-72-29, with the approval of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and patient consent. Samples were de-identified and shipped to the Zavros laboratory (University of Arizona) for processing. Pituitary tumor tissue was collected in Serum-Free Defined Medium (SFDM) supplemented with ROCK inhibitor (Y27632, 10 µM), L-glutamine (2 mM), A83-01 (activin receptor-like kinase (Alk) 4/5/7 inhibitor, 0.5 mM), penicillin/streptavidin (1%), kanamycin (1%), amphotericin/gentamycin (0.2%), CHIR-98014 (4 mM), and thiazovivin (TZV, 2.5 mM). Tissues that contained red blood cells were incubated with Red Blood Cell (RBC) Lysis Buffer according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Fransisco, CA, USA). Tissues were dissected into small pieces, transferred to digestion buffer (DMEM/F12 supplemented with 0.4% collagenase 2, 0.1% hyaluronic acid, 0.03% trypsin-EDTA) and incubated for 5–10 min at 37 °C with gentle shaking. Tissue was further incubated with Accutase™ (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 5 min at 37 °C. Enzymatically dissociated cells were pelleted and washed in DPBS supplemented with antibiotics at a 400 relative centrifugal force (RCF) for 5 min. Dissociated adenoma cells were resuspended in Matrigel™, and Matrigel™ domes containing the cells were then plated in culture dishes and overlaid with pituitary growth media (Supplemental Table S1). The culture was maintained at 37 °C at a relative humidity of 95% and 5% CO2. Organoid growth medium was replenished every 3–4 days and passaged after 15 days in culture. 2.2. Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) Induced pluripotent stem cell lines (iPSC lines) were generated from control individuals (no reported disease) or CD patients according to published protocols by the University of Arizona iPSC Core [26]. All human iPSC lines were tested and found to be negative for mycoplasma contamination using the Mycoalert Mycoplasma testing kits (LT07-318, Lonza), and no karyotype abnormalities were found (KaryoStat+, Thermo). 2.3. Pituitary Organoids Generated from iPSCs Six well culture plates were coated with 2 mL/well 0.67% Matrigel (diluted in E8 media, UA iPSC core, 151169-01) and incubated at 37 °C at a relative humidity of 95% and 5% CO2 overnight. The iPSC lines were reprogrammed from the blood of either a healthy donor (JCAZ001) or a CD patient (iPSC7 and iPSC1063) at the University of Arizona iPSC Core. Passage 12 iPSCs were plated onto the coated plates and incubated at 37 °C at a relative humidity of 95% and 5% CO2. At 70% confluency, cells were passaged to freshly coated 24 well plates at a ratio of 1:8 and grown to 85–90% confluency before beginning the directed differentiation schedule. From days 0 to 3, cells were cultured in E6 media supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 10 μM SB431542, and 5 ng/mL BMP4. BMP4 was withdrawn from the culture at day 3. Starting on day 4, the cells were cultured in E6 media, supplemented with 10 μM SB431542, 30 ng/mL human recombinant SHH, 100 ng/mL FGF8b, 10 ng/mL FGF18, and 50 ng/mL FGF10. Fifteen days after culture, the cells were harvested in cold E6 media by pipetting and resuspended in Matrigel™ (20,000 cells/50 mL Matrigel™). Matrigel™ domes containing the cells were plated in culture dishes and overlaid with differentiation media containing E6 media which was supplemented with 10 μM Y-27632, 30 ng/mL human recombinant SHH, 100 ng/mL FGF8b, 10 ng/mL FGF18, and 50 ng/mL FGF10 (Supplemental Table S2). Organoids were cultured for a further 15 days at 37 °C at a relative humidity of 95% and 5% CO2. 2.4. Spectral Flow Cytometry (Cytek™ Aurora) The multicolor flow cytometry panel was designed using the Cytek® Full Spectrum Viewer online tool to calculate the similarity index (Supplemental Figure S1). The organoids were harvested in cold SFDM media and centrifuged at 400× g for 5 min. Supernatant was discarded and organoids were dissociated to single cells using Accutase® (Thermo Fisher Scientific 00-4555-56). The enzymatic reaction was stopped using prewarmed DPBS, and cells were then centrifuged at 400× g for 5 min and incubated with fluorochrome-conjugated/unconjugated primary surface or cytoplasmic antibodies (Supplemental Figure S1) at 4 °C for 30 min. Cells were then washed with Cell Staining Buffer (BioLegend # 420-201) and incubated with secondary antibodies (Supplemental Figure S1) at 4 °C for 30 min. Cells were fixed using Cytofix/Cytoperm™ Fixation/Permeabilization Solution (BD Biosciences # 554714) at 4 °C for 20 min, followed by washing with Fixation/Permeabilization wash buffer. Cells were labeled with fluorochrome-conjugated/unconjugated intracellular primary antibodies (Supplemental Figure S1) at 4 °C for 30 min, then washed and incubated with secondary antibodies at 4 °C for 30 min. Cells were resuspended in cell staining buffer and fluorescence and measured using the Cytek Aurora 5 Laser Spectral Flow Cytometer. An unstained cell sample was fixed and used as a reference control. UltraComp eBeads™, Compensation Beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific # 01-2222-42) were stained with the individual antibodies and used as single stain controls for compensation and gating. Data were acquired using the Cytek™ Aurora and analyzed using Cytobank software (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA). 2.5. Whole Mount Immunofluorescence Organoids were immunostained using published protocols by our laboratory [27,28,29]. Proliferation was measured by using 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation according to the Manufacturer’s protocol (Click-IT EdU Alexa Fluor 555 Imaging Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific C10338). Co-staining was performed by blocking fixed organoids with 2% donkey serum (Jackson Immuno Research, # 017-000-121) diluted in 0.01% PBST for 1hr at room temperature. Organoids were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies, followed by secondary antibodies and Hoechst (Thermo Fisher Scientific H1399, 1:1000 in 0.01% PBST) for 1 h at room temperature. Human specific primary antibodies used included: rabbit anti-ACTH (Thermo Fisher Scientific 701293, 1:250), rabbit anti-Synaptophysin (Thermo Fisher Scientific PA5-27286, 1:100), species PIT1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific PA5-98650, 1:50), rabbit anti-LH (Thermo Fisher Scientific PA5-102674, 1:100), mouse anti-FSH (Thermo Fisher Scientific MIF2709, 1:100), mouse anti-PRL (Thermo Fisher Scientific CF500720, 1:100), Alexa Flour conjugated GH (NB500-364AF647, 1:100), and mouse anti-CAM5.2 (SIGMA 452M-95, 1:250). The secondary antibodies used included Alexa Fluor 488 Donkey Anti Rabbit IgG (H+L) (Thermo Fisher Scientific A21206, 1:100) or Alexa Fluor 647 Donkey Anti Mouse IgG (H+L) (Thermo Fisher Scientific A31571, 1:100). Organoids were visualized and images were acquired by confocal microscopy using the Nikon CrestV2 Spinning Disk (Nikon, Melville, NY, USA). Fluorescence intensity and percentage of EdU positive cells of total cells, were calculated using Nikon Elements Software (Version 5.21.05, Nikon, Melville, NY, USA). 2.6. Nuclear Morphometric Analysis (NMA) Nuclear Morphometric Analysis (NMA) using treated organoids was performed based on a published protocol that measures cell viability based on the changes in nuclear morphology of the cells, using nuclear stain Hoechst or DAPI [30]. Images of organoid nuclei were analyzed using the ImageJ Nuclear Irregularity Index (NII) plugin for key parameters, which included cell area, radius ratio, area box, aspect, and roundness. Using the published spreadsheet template [30], the NII of each cell was calculated with the following formula: NII = Aspect − Area Box + Radius Ratio + Roundness. The area vs. NII of vehicle-treated cells were plotted as a scatter plot using the template, and was considered as the normal cell nuclei. The same plots were generated for each condition, and the NII and area of treated cells were compared to the normal nuclei, and classified as one of the following NMA populations: Normal (N; similar area and NII), Mitotic (S; similar area, slightly higher NII), Irregular (I; similar area, high NII), Small Regular (SR; apoptotic, low area and NII), Senescent (LR; high area, low NII), Small Irregular (SI; low area, high NII), or Large Irregular (LI; high area, high NII). Cells classified as SR exhibited early stages of apoptosis, and cells classified as either I, SI, or LI exhibited significant nuclear damage. The percentage of cells in each NII classification category were calculated and plotted as a histogram using GraphPad Prism. 2.7. ELISA Concentration of secreted ACTH in conditioned media that was collected from organoid cultures was measured using the Human ACTH ELISA Kit (Novus Biologicals, NBP2-66401), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The enzyme–substrate reaction was measured spectrophotometrically (BioTek Gen5 Micro Plate Reader Version 3.11, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at a wavelength of 450 nm, and the ACTH concentration (pg/mL) was interpolated by a standard curve with a 4-parameter logistic regression analysis, using GraphPad Prism (Version 9.2.0, San Diego, CA, USA). 2.8. Drug Assay Patient adenoma-derived pituitary organoids were grown in 96-well plates and treated with 147 small molecules taken from the NCI AOD9 compound library for 72 h. (https://dtp.cancer.gov/organization/dscb/obtaining/available_plates.html (accessed on 22 August 2021)). Drugs were diluted from 10 mM DMSO stock plates into 100 M DMSO working stocks with a final concentration of 1μM. All vehicle controls were treated with 0.1% DMSO. Organoid proliferation was measured using a CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay kit (MTS, Promega, G3582, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Organoid death was calculated based on the absorbance readings at 490 nm, collected from the MTS assay relative to the vehicle controls. Drug screens were performed with biological replicates in the same screen. Drugs were selected based on their ability to target key signaling pathways as well as clinical relevance to the treatment. Drug sensitivity is represented by cell viability, and is significant at <0.5 suppressive effect of the drugs. The percent of cell viability relative to the vehicle control was calculated. Correlation coefficients across each organoid were calculated using the Pearson method to assess confidence in replication. The variance component was detected for each drug across all organoids. A random effect model was run with a single random factor for each drug, and estimated variance was calculated by rejecting the null hypothesis that variation was not present among samples. The drug responses were grouped by variance factor, into large (vc > 100), median (100 > vc > 50), and small (vc < 50). A heatmap was used to display the differential responses in cell viability for the drugs. Drugs that clustered together and showed response within corticotrophs were investigated further based on their mode of action. Pathways (Kegg and Reactome) and gene ontology mapping were conducted for the genes that were being targeted by the drugs, in order to evaluate the key responses in cellular processes. A network was constructed in Cytoscape v 3.8.2 (San Diego, CA, USA) for the purpose of association between the drugs and genes. 2.9. Drug Dose Responses Organoids were grown in Matrigel™ domes within 96-well round-bottom culture plates. Recombinant human SHH was removed from the pituitary organoid growth media, 24 h prior to drug treatment. Organoids were treated with either vehicle (DMSO), cabergoline (Selleckchem S5842), ketoconazole (Selleckchem S1353), roscovitine (Selleckchem S1153), GANT61 (Stemcell Technologies 73692), pasireotide (TargetMol TP2207), mifeprostone (Selleckchem S2606), etomidate (Selleckchem S1329), mitotane (Selleckchem S1732), metyropane (Selleckchem S5416), or osilodrostat (Selleckchem S7456) at concentrations of 0, 1, 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000 nM, for 72 h. The percentage of cell viability was measured using an MTS assay (Promega G3580). Absorbance was measured at 490 nm and normalized to the vehicle. Concentrations were plotted in a logarithmic scale, and a nonlinear dose response curve regression was calculated using GraphPad Prism. An IC50 value for each drug treatment was determined based on the dose response curve, using GraphPad Prism analysis software. 2.10. Calculation of Area under the Curve (AUC) AUC (area under the curve) was determined by plotting the normalized % cell viability versus transformed concentration of the drugs, using a trapezoidal approximation for the area [31]. The formula was based on splitting the curve into trapezoids with bases equal to the % viability (V) and height equal to the interval length (difference in concentrations (C), and then summing the areas of each trapezoid: ∑n0(Vn+Vn−1)2∗(Cn−Cn−1) 2.11. Quantitative RT PCR (qRT-PCR) RNA was collected from patient-derived organoid cultures using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). cDNA was generated from the extracted RNA, and then pre-amplified using TaqMan PreAmp Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific 391128). The primers used were human-specific GAPDH (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Applied Biosystems Hs02786624_g1), NR5A1 (SF1) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hs00610436_m1), PIT1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hs00230821_m1), TPit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hs00193027), and POMC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hs01596743_m1). Each PCR reaction was performed using a final volume of 20 µL, composed of 20X TaqMan Expression Assay primers, 2X TaqMan Universal Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, TaqMan® Gene Expression Systems), and a cDNA template. Amplification of each PCR reaction was conducted in a StepOne™ Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), using the following PCR conditions: 2 min at 50 °C, 10 min at 95 °C, denaturing for 15 s at 95 °C, and annealing/extending for 1 min at 60 °C, for a total of 40 cycles. Relative fold change was calculated using the 2 − ∆∆Ct method [32], where CT = threshold cycle. Results were analyzed as the average fold change in gene expression compared to the control, and GAPDH served as an internal control. 2.12. Whole Exome Sequencing WES was performed by the University of Arizona Center for Applied Genetics and Genomic Medicine. Isolated DNA from patient adenoma tissue will be quantified using the Qubit quantitation system with standard curve, as per the supplier protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All samples were further tested for quality using the Fragment Analyzer (Advanced Analytical), following the manufacturer-recommended protocols. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed by array capture and approximately 60 Mb of exome target sequence, using the SureSelectXT Human All Exon V6 enrichment (Agilent) or equivalent (which one was used). All exome library builds were quantified via qPCR and subsequently sequenced to a minimum 20X coverage, using paired-end chemistry on the Illumina NovaSeq platform. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed by hybridization capture of approx. 35 Mb of the exome target sequence, using the Swift Exome Hyb Panel (Swift Biosciences 83216). All exome library builds were quantified via qPCR and subsequently sequenced to a minimum 20X coverage, using paired-end chemistry on the Illumina NextSeq500 or NovaSeq platform (Illumina). DNA reads were trimmed, filtered by quality scores and aligned to the human genome (hg38) with Burrows–Wheeler Aligner with default parameters. Picard (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard (accessed on 22 December 2021)) was used to mark duplicates. Germline single nucleotide variants (SNV) were called using the Genome Analysis Tool Kit (GATK), using the given guidelines. Mutations were annotated using ANNOVAR for coding sequences. Variants that passed the quality filter were further investigated for similarity. Concordance between tissue and organoids was calculated using Jaccard similarity index (Jij = Mij/(Mi + Mj − Mij) where Mi is the number of variants in tissues, Mj is the number of variants in organoids, and Mij is the number of identical variants in both tissue and organoid. 2.13. Single Cell RNA Sequencing (scRNA-Seq) Cultures were collected on day 15 of the pituitary directed differentiation schedule, and cells were dissociated into a single-cell suspension using Cell Dissociation Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific 13151014). Cells (15,000 cells/sample) were resuspended in the sample buffer (BD Biosciences 65000062), filtered using cell strainer (40 microns), and loaded into a BD Rhapsody cartridge (BD Biosciences 400000847) for single-cell transcriptome isolation. Based on the BD Rhapsody system whole-transcriptome analysis for single-cell whole-transcriptome analysis, microbead-captured single-cell transcriptomes were used to prepare a cDNA library. Briefly, double-stranded cDNA was first generated from the microbead-captured single-cell transcriptome in several steps, including reverse transcription, second-strand synthesis, end preparation, adapter ligation, and whole-transcriptome amplification (WTA). Then, the final cDNA library was generated from double-stranded full-length cDNA by random priming amplification using a BD Rhapsody cDNA Kit (BD Biosciences, 633773), as well as the BD Rhapsody Targeted mRNA and WTA Amplification Kit (BD Biosciences, 633801). The library was sequenced in PE150 mode (paired-end with 150-bp reads) on NovaSeq6000 System (Illumina). A total of 80,000 reads were demultiplexed, trimmed, mapped to the GRCh38 annotation, and quantified using the whole transcriptome analysis pipeline (BD Rhapsody™ WTA Analysis Pipeline v1.10 rev6, San Jose, CA, USA) on the Seven Bridges Genomics platform (https://igor.sbgenomics.com (accessed on 4 April 2022)), prior to clustering analysis in Seurat. For QC and filtration, read counting and unique molecular identifier (UMI) counting were the principal gene expression quantification schemes used in this single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis. The low-quality cells, empty droplets, cell doublets, or multiplets were excluded based on unique feature count (less than 200 or larger than 2500), as they may often exhibit either an aberrantly high gene count or very few genes. Additionally, the mitochondrial QC metrics were calculated, and the cells with >5% mitochondrial counts were filtered out, as the percentage of counts originating from a set of low-quality or dying cells often exhibit extensive mitochondrial contamination. After the removal of unwanted cells from the single cell dataset, the global-scaling normalization method LogNormalize was employed. This method normalizes the feature expression measurements for each cell by the total expression, multiplies this by a scale factor (10,000), and log-transforms the result. The molecules per gene per cell, based on RSEC error correction (RSEC_MolsPerCell file) matrix files from iPSCctrl and iPSCCDH23 samples, were imported into Seurat v4, merged, and processed (as stated above) for UMAP reduction, cluster identification, and differential marker assessment using the FindAllMarkers function within Seurat. 2.14. Statistical Analyses Sample size was based on assessment of power analysis using SigmaStat software. Data collected from each study from at least 4 in vitro technical replicates were analyzed by obtaining the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), unless otherwise stated. The significance of the results was then tested using commercially available software (GraphPad Prism, GraphPad software, San Diego, CA, USA). 3. Results 3.1. Generation and Validation of Human PitNET Tissue Derived Organoids Human PitNET tissue was harvested during endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery from 35 patients in order to generate organoids. These cultures are referred to as human PitNET tissue derived organoids (hPITOs). Supplementary Table S3 summarizes the neuropathology reports and clinical diagnosis from these cases. In summary, 12 corticotroph (functional, CD), and 3 silent corticotroph tumors (nonfunctional tumors), 9 gonadotroph tumors, 8 lactotroph tumors, and 3 somatotroph tumors (acromegaly) were used to generate hPITOs (Supplementary Table S3). Bright-field microscopy images of hPITOs that were generated from corticotroph adenomas from patients diagnosed with CD (Figure 1a–e). Silent/nonfunctioning tumors (Figure 1f,g) revealed morphological diversity among the organoid lines between individual patients and amongst subtypes. Confocal microscopy was used to capture a z-stack through the hPITO38, immunofluorescently stained for CAM5.2 (red), ACTH (green), and Hoechst (nuclear staining, blue) and emphasizes the 3D cellular structure of the hPITOs (Supplemental Video S1). Lactotroph, gonadotroph, and somatotroph adenomas were used to generate hPITOs, and showed the same morphological divergence amongst subtypes and between each patient line (Supplemental Figure S2). Proliferation was measured within the cultures using 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) uptake and showed that the percentage of EdU+ve cells/total Hoechst+ve nuclei directly correlated with the pathology MIB-1 (Ki67) score (red, R2 = 0.9256) (Figure 1a–g, Supplemental Figure S2). ACTH concentration, which was measured by ELISA using organoid conditioned culture media collected from each hPITO line, showed the highest expression in the corticotroph adenoma organoids generated from CD patients (Figure 1h). Figure 1. Morphology and function of corticotroph hPITOs. (a–g) Brightfield images, immunofluorescence staining using antibodies specific for CAM5.2 (red), ACTH (green), and EdU (magenta, inset) of organoid cultures generated from patients with Cushing’s disease (hPITOs 1, 7, 10, 33, 35) or nonfunctional corticotroph adenomas (hPITO8, 12). Quantification of %EdU positive cells/total cell number is shown and compared to the Ki67 score given in the pathology report (Supplemental Table S3). An ELISA was performed using conditioned media collected from (h) corticotroph hPITO cultures and (i) lactotroph, somatotroph, and gonadotroph hPITO cultures for the measurement of ACTH secretion (pg/mL). 3.2. Characterization of Cell Lineages in Pituitary Adenoma-Derived Organoids by Spectral Cytek™ Aurora Analysis In order to validate the similarity in cell lineages identified between the organoid line and the patient’s tumor, we compared the immunohistochemistry from the neuropathology report (Supplemental Table S3) to the expression pattern of pituitary adenoma-specific markers, which were measured using Cytek™ Aurora spectral flow cytometry (Figure 2). The location of cells that are found in each cluster based on the highly expressed antigens are shown in the representative tSNE (viSNE) maps (Figure 2a). Compared to nonfunctional adenoma-derived hPITOs, organoids derived from corticotroph adenomas of CD patients highly expressed proliferating (Ki67+) T-Pit+ ACTH cells (Figure 2a). Interestingly, there was an increase in SOX2+ cells within the total cell population, associated with Crooke’s cell adenoma hPITOs (Figure 2a). Within the total cell population, cell clusters expressing CD45 and vimentin were also measured (Figure 2a). Data for the analysis of corticotroph hPITOs, derived from CD patients and individuals with nonfunctional adenomas, were summarized in a heatmap for each subtype organoid line based on quantified cell abundance (percent of total cells) using spectral flow cytometry (Figure 2b). Figure 2. Cell heterogeneity of corticotroph hPITOs. (a) viSNE maps define spatially distinct cell populations using pituitary specific cell lineage, stem cell, and transcription factor markers. Cell populations were quantified in organoids generated from CD patients with corticotroph adenomas (sparsely granulated and Crooke’s cell adenoma) or patients with nonfunctional corticotroph adenomas. (b) Quantification of the abundance of cells expressing pituitary specific markers as a percent total. viSNE maps define spatially distinct cell populations in organoid cultures generated from CD patient with (c) corticotroph adenoma (hPITO37, Crooke’s cell adenoma) and adjacent normal tissue (hPITO37N), or (d) sparsely granulated corticotroph adenomas (hPITO38) and adjacent normal tissue (hPITO38N). Organoid cultures derived from pituitary adenomas (hPITO37 and hPITO38) were compared to organoids derived from adjacent normal pituitary tissue (hPITO37N and hPITO38N) (Figure 2c,d). While Pit1 lineages including cells expressing GH and PRL, as well as SF1 lineages expressing FSH and LH, were detected in the hPITO37N and hPITO38N organoid cultures, these cell populations were significantly reduced within the patient’s matched adenoma tissue (Figure 2c,d). Overall, hPITOs derived from CD patients expressed increased stem and progenitor cell markers, including CXCR4, SOX2, and CD133 (Figure 2). Collectively, our findings of the characterization of the hPITO cultures support our prediction that this in vitro model recapitulates much of the patient’s adenoma pathophysiology. 3.3. Inherent Patient Differences to Drug Response Is Reflected in the Organoid Culture Tumor recurrence can occur in as many as 30–50% of CD patients after successful surgical treatment [10,33,34]. Unfortunately, bilateral adrenalectomy is the chosen surgical treatment for patients with persistent CD [35]. Bilateral adrenalectomy leads to the increased risk for development of Nelson’s syndrome (progressive hyperpigmentation due to ACTH secretion and expansion of the residual pituitary tumor). Although the risk of developing Nelson’s syndrome following adrenalectomy can be reduced by 50% with stereotactic radiotherapy [35], there is a need to develop medical therapies that directly target the pituitary adenoma. Thus, we established a high-throughput drug screening assay using patient-derived PitNET organoids. After 72 h of treatment, cell viability was measured using an MTS assay, and data were represented as a heatmap whereby blue indicated higher cell death, and red suggested higher cell viability. The replicates behaved consistently with the drug response, with correlation scores of >0.8 for these samples (Figure 3a). We estimated the variance component for each drug across all organoids. Variation among samples was found to be significant (p ≤ 0.05) for each of the 83 drugs. The drug responses were grouped by variance factor into large, median, and small. The larger the variance, the more variable the drug response was across the organoids. We noted a set of drugs that showed a significant differential response across the functional corticotroph organoids. Unsupervised clustering of drug responses across organoids shows a pattern that relates to our statistically calculated results (Figure 3a,c), and the replicates for each independent organoid cluster together. The drugs with higher variance components across all the functional corticotrophs cluster together as a group (Figure 3a). These drugs show cell viability of 10% to 60% across different organoids. Analyzing the pattern more closely, we observe that, within a pathologically defined group, there was a differential organoid response to drugs as well as inherent patient differences to drugs within this group. Figure 3 demonstrates a variation in drug responsiveness amongst the organoid lines generated from individual patients. Importantly, there was further divergence in drug responsiveness amongst the individual organoid lines within each pathologically defined corticotroph subtype. These data clearly demonstrate that the inherent patient difference to drug response which is often observed among CD patients is reflected in the organoid culture. Figure 3. Drug screen using hPITOs generated from CD patients. (a) High-throughput drug screening of hPITOs reveals sensitivities to a range of therapeutic agents. Cell viability with high values (indicating resistance) are depicted in red, and low values (indicating sensitivity) are in blue in the clustered heatmap. (b,c) Clusters showing response to therapeutic agents with the most variance across the organoids. (d) Network of drugs from the clusters b and c and their gene targets, showing their participation in signaling pathways and cellular processes. Drugs that clustered together and showed correlated responses were investigated further for their mode of action based on target genes (Figure 3d). The genes were analyzed for their associations in cellular pathways and gene ontology functional processes. Identified drug–gene pairs were interconnected by cellular pathways that are known to regulate cell cycle, WNT signaling, hedgehog signaling, and neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction signaling pathways (Figure 3d). These identified genes are also known to be influenced by multiple cellular functions, such as cytokine–cytokine receptor interactions and Notch signaling. Proteosome 20S subunit genes PSMAs/PSMBs and the HDAC gene family are involved in many cellular functions. The ephrin receptors (EPHs), adrenoceptor alpha receptors (ADRs), dopamine receptors (DRDs), and the 5-hydroxytryptamine serotonin receptors (HTRs) gene families influence neuronal functions and are targeted by multiple drugs in our focused cluster. These data reveal potential therapeutic pathways for CD patients. Divergent half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values, as documented by an MTS cell viability assay, were observed in response to drug treatment among hPITOs lines 28, 33, 34, 35, and 37. Note that a shift of the curve to the right indicates a higher IC50 (i.e., more resistant to that drug). Cell viability assays were normalized to vehicle-treated controls in order to ensure that toxicity was specific to the drug effects (Figure 4). Dose response curves for organoid 33 and organoid 34 showed better responses at lower doses for cabergoline compared to Metyrapone and osilodrostat, but different for organoid 35, where Metyrapone and osilodrostat gave better responses than Cabergoline (Figure 4a–h). For the drugs mifepristone and GANT61, 33 and 34 had the same level of response to both the drugs. However, when the two organoid responses were compared, 34 had a better response than 33 (Figure 4a–h). Similar divergent drug responses were observed in hPITO lines 37 and 38 (Figure 4i,k). However, organoids generated from adjacent normal pituitary tissue from patients 37 and 38 were nonresponsive to the same standard of care of investigational drugs for CD (Figure 4j,l). These data were consistent with observation made in the drug screen (Figure 3a–c), and demonstrate that there was an inherent difference to drug response within the organoid cultures of the same corticotroph subtype. Figure 4. Drug dose responses by hPITOs generated from CD patients. Dose responses to mifepristone, GANT61, cabergoline, and osilodrostat. (a,e) hPITO28, (b,f) hPITO33, (c,g) hPITO34, and (d,h) hPITO35. Dose responses to cabergoline, ketoconazole, roscovitine, GANT61, pasireotide, mifepristone, etomidate, mitotane, metyrapone, and osilodrostat in (i) hPITO37, (j) organoids generated from adjacent normal pituitary tissue (hPITO37N), (k) hPITO38, (l) hPITO38N, and (m) hPITO39. (n) IC50 and integrated area under the curve in response to mifepristone, ketoconazole, and pasireotide using hPITO39 cultures. Nuclear morphometric analysis of hPITO39 cultures in response to (o,p) vehicle, (q,r) mifepristone, (s,t) pasireotide, and (u,v) ketoconazole. Morphometric classification of NII was based on the normal (N), small (S), small regular (SR), short irregular (SI), large regular (LR), large irregular (LI), and irregular (I) nuclear morphology. Representative Hoechst staining of organoids in response to drug treatments for the calculation of the nuclear irregularity index (NII) are shown in the insets in (p,r,t,v). In addition to cell viability, Nuclear Morphometric Analysis (NMA) using treated organoids was performed based on a published protocol that measures cell viability according to the changes in nuclear morphology of the cells, using nuclear stain Hoechst or DAPI [30]. Nuclear Irregularity Index (NII) was measured based on the quantification of the morphometric changes in the nuclei in response to the standard-of-care drugs mifepristone, pasireotide, and ketoconazole in hPITO39 (Figure 4o–v). The area vs. NII of vehicle-treated cells were plotted as a scatter plot using the template, and considered as the normal cell nuclei (Figure 4o). The same plots were generated for mifepristone (Figure 4q), pasireotide (Figure 4s), and ketoconazole (Figure 4u). The NII and area of treated cells were compared to those of the normal nuclei, and classified as one of the following NMA populations: Normal (N; similar area and NII), Mitotic (S; similar area, slightly higher NII), Irregular (I; similar area, high NII), Small Regular (SR; apoptotic, low area and NII), Senescent (LR; high area, low NII), Small Irregular (SI; low area, high NII), or Large Irregular (LI; high area, high NII) (Figure 4p,r,t,v). Cells classified as SR exhibited early stages of apoptosis, and cells classified as either I, SI, or LI exhibited significant nuclear damage. Data showed that mifepristone induced significant apoptosis in hPITO39 cultures (Figure 4r), compared to responses to pasireotide (Figure 4t) and ketoconazole (Figure 4v). These responses were consistent with the IC50 and the total area under the curve in response to drugs (Figure 4m,n). Measurement of NII is an approach which may be used to confirm potential drug targets identified from the drug screen. 3.4. Organoid Responsiveness to Pasireotide Correlates with SSTR2 and SSTR5 Expression Organoid lines hPITO28, 31, 33, 34, and 35 exhibited divergent IC50 values in response to SSTR agonist pasireotide (Figure 5a). hPITO34 was the most responsive to pasireotide, with a low IC50 value of 6.1 nM (Figure 5a). Organoid lines hPITO33 and hPITO35 were the least responsive, with IC50 values of 1.2 µM and 1 µM, respectively, in response to pasireotide (Figure 5a). The expression of SSTR subtypes 1–5 among the different organoid lines were measured by qRT-PCR and IHC (Figure 5b). One of the least responsive organoid lines, hPITO28, exhibited lower differential expression in SSTR2 and SSTR5 compared to the highly responsive hPITO34 line (Figure 5a,b). Gene expression levels of SSTR2 and SSTR5 within hPITO28 and 34 correlated with protein levels within the patient’s tumor tissue (Figure 5c–f). Given the greater binding affinity for SSTR5 compared to SSTR2 by pasireotide, these data were consistent with greater responsiveness to the drug by hPITO34 in comparison to hPITO28 (Figure 5a,c–f). The expression of SSTR subtypes 2 and 5 within the organoid cultures correlated with the expression patterns of the patient’s tumor tissues (Figure 5a,c–f). Figure 5. SSTR1-5 expression in hPITOs and patient’s PitNET tissue. (a) Dose response of hPITO28, 31, 33, 34, and 35 lines to pasireotide. (b) Differential expression of SSTR subtypes 1–5 (SSTR1, SSTR2, SSTR3, SSTR4, SSTR5) in hPITO28, hPITO31, hPITO33, hPITO34, and hPITO35. Immunohistochemistry of (c,e) SSTR2 and (d,f) SSTR5 expression in patient PitNET tissue (Pt28 and Pt34), from which hPITO28 and 34 were generated. 3.5. Organoids Derived from Pituitary Corticotroph Adenomas Retain the Genetic Alterations of the Patient’s Primary Tumor In order to identify the genetic features of the organoids derived from pituitary adenomas of CD patients, we performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) of hPITOs and the corresponding primary adenoma tissues. We performed WES analysis of each hPITO line, and compared the results with those for the corresponding primary adenoma tissues. We showed the concordance rate of exonic variants between the primary tumor tissues obtained from CD patients and the corresponding organoid line. We identified, on average, approximately 5000 mutations across each of the 14 paired samples of organoids and tissues. For the variants detected, all seven pairs showed a Jaccard index ranging from 0.5 to 0.8. Out of seven pairs, five (hPITO24, 25, 28 and 35) pairs had a Jaccard score of 0.8, while hPITO33 and 34 pairs had 0.7, and hPITO1 had 0.5. In order to investigate the similarity across the SNV (single nucleotide variation) sites, we calculated the Jaccard index of exon sites for synonymous and non-synonymous events, and found scores for all pairs ranging from 0.8 to 0.9. Furthermore, for only non-synonymous events, Jaccard scores also ranged from 0.8 to 0.9, except for hPITO1, which showed overall lower concordance, and had a score of 0.4 to 0.5. Figure 6 shows non-synonymous mutations found in organoid and tissue pairs for some of the key genes that are known to be involved in pituitary adenoma disease. Concordance indices between organoids and the matched patient’s adenoma tissues is reported in Figure 6. Therefore, WES data demonstrated that organoids derived from pituitary corticotroph adenomas retained the genetic alterations of the patient’s primary tumor tissue. Figure 6. Genomic landscape of hPITOs recapitulates genetic alterations commonly found PitNETs. Overview of single nucleotide variation events detected in hPITOs in genes commonly altered in PitNETs. The mutation frequency across the organoid population is depicted on the right. Color coding of the figure shows that organoid lines are derived from the same patient tumor tissue. ORG: organoid line, TIS: matched patient’s PitNET tissue. 3.6. IPSC Pituitary Organoids Generated from a CD Patients Expressing Familial Mutations Reveal Corticotroph Adenoma Pathology In Vitro Extensive research has revealed the role of somatic and germline mutations in the development of CD adenomas [36,37]. Pituitary organoids were developed from iPSCs generated from the PBMCs of CD patients and carrying germline mutations that were identified by WES (Supplemental Figure S4). Chromosomal aberrations were not found when comparing against the reference dataset in the iPSCs generated from the CD patients (Supplemental Figure S3a,b). PBMCs isolated from patients diagnosed with CD were analyzed by WES in order to determine the expression of germline mutations. WES revealed the expression of a more recently identified gene predisposing patients to CD, namely cadherin-related 23 [38] (Supplemental Figure S5). Pituitary organoids were then developed from iPSCs which were generated from the PBMCs of patients with CD (iPSCCDH23 and iPSCMEN1) and a healthy individual (iPSCctrl). Expression of PIT1 (pituitary-specific positive transcription factor 1), ACTH (adrenocorticotropic hormone), GH (growth hormone), FSH (follicle-stimulating hormone), LH (luteinizing hormone), PRL (prolactin), and synaptophysin (synaptophysin) with co-stain Hoechst (nuclei, blue) was measured by immunofluorescence, using chamber slides collected at 15 of the differentiation schedules (Supplemental Figure S6). While pituitary tissue that was differentiated from iPSCctrl expressed all major hormone-producing cell lineages (Supplemental Figure S6a), there was a significant increase in the expression of ACTH and synaptophysin, with a concomitant loss of PIT1, GH, FSH, LH, and PRL in iPSCsMEN1 (Supplemental Figure S6b,c). Interestingly, iPSCCDH23 cultures exhibited a significant increase in the expression of ACTH, GH, LH, and synaptophysin, with a concomitant loss of PIT1, FSH, and PRL (Supplemental Figure S6b,c). Immunofluorescence of iPSCs collected on the fourth day of the differentiation schedule revealed no expression of PIT1, ACTH, GH, FSH, LH, or PRL in (data not shown). Compared to control lines, iPSC lines expressing mutated CDH23 secreted significantly greater concentrations of ACTH earlier in the differentiation schedule (Supplemental Figure S7a). The upregulated expression of pituitary corticotroph adenoma-specific markers in iPSCCDH23 and iPSCMEN1 demonstrates that the iPSC-derived organoids represented the pathology of corticotroph adenomas in vitro. 3.7. ScRNA-seq Reveals the Existence of Unique Proliferative Cell Populations in iPSCCDH23 Cultures When Compared to iPSCsctrl Using Seurat to identify cell clusters, as well as Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection 9UMAP, clustering analysis identified 16 distinct cell populations/clusters consisting of known marker genes. Clusters 1, 5, and 7 of the iPSCsCDH23 were distinct from the iPSCctrl cultures (Figure 7a,b). Pituitary stem cells were characterized in iPSCctrl and iPSCCDH23 cultures (Figure 7b). Clusters 1 and 5 expressed markers consistent with the corticotroph subtype cell lineage (Figure 5c). Markers of dysregulated cell cycles and increased proliferation were identified in cell cluster 7 (Figure 7c). Expression of the E2 factor (E2F) family of transcription factors, which are downstream effectors of the retinoblastoma (RB) protein pathway and play a crucial role in cell division control, were identified in distinct cell cluster 7, which was identified within the iPSCCDH23 cultures (Figure 7c). Stem cell markers were also upregulated in cell cluster 7, and identified within the iPSCCDH23 cultures (Figure 7c). Using Cytobank software to analyze organoids collected 30 days post-differentiation, cells were gated on live CK20 positive singlets, and 9000 events per sample were analyzed by the viSNE algorithm. ViSNE plots are shown in two dimensions with axes identified by tSNE- 1 and tSNE-2, and each dot representing a single cell positioned in the multidimensional space (Figure 7d). Individual flow cytometry standard files were concatenated into single flow cytometry standard files, from which 12 spatially distinct populations were identified (Figure 7e). Overlaying cell populations identified by traditional gating strategies onto viSNE plots identified unique cell populations within the iPSCCDH23 cultures (Figure 7e). There were distinct cell populations between the iPSCctrl and iPSCCDH23 organoids, in addition to expression of hormone and cell lineage markers such as ACTH, TPit, PRL, and PIT1 (Figure 7e). The cell populations that exhibited high expression of Ki67 within the iPSCctrl organoid cultures included SOX2+ and PIT1+ populations (Figure 7f). The highly proliferating cell populations within the iPSCCDH23 organoid cultures included those that expressed CD90+/VIM+/CXCR4+ (mesenchymal stem cells), CXCR4+/SOX2+ (stem cells), TPit+ (corticotroph cell lineage), CD133+/CD31+ (endothelial progenitor cells), and CK20+/VIM+/CXCR4+ (hybrid epithelial-mesenchymal stem cells) (Figure 7f). Overall, the iPSCCDH23 organoids were significantly more proliferative compared to the iPSCctrl cultures (Figure 7f). Immunofluorescence staining of iPSCCDH23 organoids revealed increased mRNA expression of TPit and POMC, which correlated with increased ACTH protein compared to iPSCsctrl (Supplemental Figure S6). As shown in Supplemental Figure S6b,c, iPSCCDH23 cultures also exhibited a significant increase in the expression of GH and LH (Supplemental Figure S6b,c). Figure 7. Single cell analysis of iPSCctrl and iPSCCDH23 cultures 15 and 30 days post-directed differentiation. (a) UMAP plots showing identified cell clusters 0–16 in iPSCctrl and iPSCCDH23 cultures 15 days post-directed differentiation. (b) Violin plots of representative identified markers of the corticotroph cell lineage, where 2 subpopulations were observed among iPSCctrl and iPSCCDH23 cultures. Arrows highlight clusters 1, 5, and 7. (c) Violin plots showing expression of genes representative of stem cells, Wnt, NOTCH, Hh and SST signaling, anterior pituitary (corticotroph) cell lineage, and cell cycle in clusters 1, 5, and 7 of iPSCCDH23 cultures. Plot width: cell number, plot height: gene expression. (d) viSNE maps showing concatenated flow cytometry standard files for both samples and iPSCctrl and iPSCCDH23 organoids 30 days post-directed differentiation. (e) Overlay of manually gated cell populations onto viSNE plots. (f) Fluorescent intensity of Ki67 of viSNE maps for both samples and iPSCctrl and iPSCCDH23 organoids. iPSCctrl = 22518 events; iPSCCDH23 = 17542 events. Collectively, Figure 7 demonstrates that the development of pituitary organoids generated from iPSCs of CD patients may reveal the existence of cell populations which, potentially, contribute to the support of adenoma growth and progression, as well as an expansion of stem and progenitor cells that may be the targets for tumor recurrence. 4. Discussion Our studies demonstrate the development of organoids generated from human PitNETs (hPITOs) can potentially be used to screen for the sensitivity and efficacy of responses to targeted therapies for CD patients that either fail to achieve remission or exhibit recurrence of disease after surgery. In addition, we have documented that induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) generated from a CD patient expressing germline mutation CDH23 (iPSCCDH23) reveals the disease pathogenesis under directed differentiation. Many early in vitro experiments have used pituitary cell lines, spheroids, aggregates, and/or tumoroids that do not replicate the primary PitNET microenvironment [19,20,21], and lack a multicellular identity [39,40]. The development of PitNET tissue-generated organoids is limited to the use of transgenic mouse models as the source [22,23,41]. The recent organoid cultures reported by Nys et al. [42] have been generated from single stem cells isolated from PitNET tissue, and are claimed to be true organoids due to their clonality. However, multicellular complexity was not validated by the protein expression or hormone secretion from pituitary cell lineages in these cultures [42]. According to the National Cancer Institute (NCI, NIH), an ‘organoid’ is defined as “a tiny, 3-dimensional mass of tissue that is made by growing stem cells (cells from which other types of cells develop) in the laboratory” [43]. The hPITOs reported here begin from single and/or 3–4 cell clusters dissociated from the PitNET tissue that harbors the stem cells. Supplemental Video S2 demonstrates a process of ‘budding,’ as well as lumen formation as organoids grow and differentiate. We document differentiation and function by comprehensive spectral flow cytometry, ELISA, and response to standard of care drugs. The growth of PitNET organoids reported in the current study is consistent with that of gastrointestinal tissue derived cultures that begin from cell clusters, crypts, or glands [27,44,45]. Our studies report a PitNET tissue organoid culture with a multicellular identity consisting of differentiated cell lineages, stem/progenitor cells, and immune and stromal cell compartments, which replicates much of the patient’s own adenoma pathology, functionality, and complexity. We have also demonstrated that iPSCs, derived from the blood of a CD patient, can be directly differentiated into pituitary organoids that resemble similar characteristics to the tumor tissue. Many investigators have proposed the use of organoids in personalized medicine, but have focused these efforts on targeted treatment of cancers [27,46,47,48]. The findings reported in these studies are the first to implement this approach for the potential treatment of PitNETs. Collectively, we have developed a relevant human in vitro approach to potentially advance our knowledge as well as our approach to studies in the field of pituitary tumor research. Both the hPITOs and the iPSCCDH23 may be implemented in studies that strive to (1) define the molecular and cellular events that are crucial for the development of PitNETs leading to CD, and (2) accelerate the identification of effective targeted therapies for patients with CD. While published studies have advanced our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the pathogenesis of corticotroph adenomas and elucidated candidate therapeutic targets for CD, these reports fall short of directly informing clinical decisions for patient treatment. Using organoids to screen potential drugs and compounds can potentially improve therapeutic accuracy. Figure 3 demonstrated a variation in drug responsiveness amongst the organoid lines generated from individual patients. Importantly, there was further divergence in drug responsiveness amongst the individual organoid lines within each pathologically defined corticotroph subtype. For example, hPITOs generated from patients with sparsely granulated corticotroph adenomas (hPIT0s 10, 25, 34, 35) and Crooke’s cell adenomas (hPITOs 7, 33) showed variable responses regardless of similar pathologically defined subtypes. In addition, the response of the tumor cells within the organoids to the standard of care drugs that directly target the pituitary in the body, including mifepristone and cabergoline, was only 50% in hPITO34 and hPITO35, and almost 0% in the other lines, including hPITO7, 10, and 25. These data clearly demonstrate that the inherent patient difference to drug response that is often observed among CD patients is reflected in the organoid culture. This culture system may be an approach that will provide functional data revealing actionable treatment options for each patient. Patient-derived organoids from several tumors have served as a platform for testing the efficacy of anticancer drugs and predicting responses to targeted therapies in individual patients [27,46,48,49,50]. An example of the use of organoids in identifying drug responsiveness within an endocrine gland is that of papillary thyroid cancer [51]. Organoids developed from PTC patients were used as a preclinical model for studying responsiveness to anticancer drugs in a personalized approach [51]. However, our study is the first report of the use of hPITOs for drug screening. Connecting genetic and drug sensitivity data will further categorize corticotroph subtypes associated with CD. WES analysis of each hPITO line was compared to the results for the corresponding primary adenoma tissues. We showed the concordance rate of exonic variants between the primary tumor tissues obtained from CD patients and the corresponding organoid line. On average, approximately 80% of the variants observed in the CD patients’ adenoma tissues were retained in the corresponding hPITOs. Pituitary organoids were also developed from iPSCs generated from PBMCs of a CD patient expressing a germline genetic alteration in cadherin-related 23 CDH23 (iPSCCDH23), a CD patient expressing an MEN1 mutation (iPSCMEN1), and a healthy individual (iPSCctrl). Foundational studies performed by investigators at the genome level have revealed significant knowledge regarding the pathophysiology of CD [36,37,52,53]. In some instances, CD is a manifestation of genetic mutation syndromes that include multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA), and Carney complex [54,55]. CDH23 syndrome is clinically associated with the development of Usher syndrome, deafness, and vestibular dysfunction [56]. Several mutations in CDH23 are associated with inherited hearing loss and blindness [57]. However, none of the variants found in this study were linked to any symptoms of deafness or blindness. A possible explanation is that deafness-related CDH23 mutations are caused by either homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations [57]. In a study that linked mutations in CDH23 with familial and sporadic pituitary adenomas, it was suggested that these genetic alterations could play important roles in the pathogenesis of CD [38]. Genomic screening in a total of 12 families with familial PitNETs, 125 individuals with sporadic pituitary tumors, and 260 control individuals showed that 33% of the families with familial pituitary tumors and 12% of individuals with sporadic pituitary tumors expressed functional or pathogenic CDH23 variants [38]. Consistent with the expected pathology and function of a PitNET from a patient with CD, iPSCCDH23 organoids exhibited hypersecretion of ACTH, and expression of transcription factors and cell markers were reported in the pathology report for corticotroph PitNETs. Collectively, these findings warrant further investigation to determine whether carriers of CDH23 mutations are at a high risk of developing CD and/or hearing loss. Specifically, clinical investigation is required to determine whether pituitary MRI scans should be adopted in the screening of CDH23-related diseases, including Usher syndrome and age-related hearing loss. Pituitary organoids generated from iPSCs of a CD patient revealed the existence of cell populations that potentially contribute to the support of PitNET growth and disease progression, as well as an expansion of stem and progenitor cells that may be the targets for tumor recurrence. Organoids derived from both pituitary adenomas and iPSCs exhibited increased expression of stem cell and progenitor markers at both the protein and transcriptomic levels. Unique clusters that were proliferative in the iPSCCDH23 organoids expressed a hybrid pituitary cell population which was in an epithelial/mesenchymal state (CK20+/VIM+/CXCR4+/Ki67+). In support of our findings, a similar report of a hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal pituitary cell has been made as part of the normal developmental stages of the human fetal pituitary [58]. Previous studies have suggested that pituitary stem cells undergo an EMT-like process during cell migration and differentiation [59,60,61]. Consistent with our findings are extensive studies using single cells isolated from human pituitary adenomas to show increased expression of stem cell markers SOX2 and CXCR4 [22,23,41,62,63]. Within the clusters identified in the iPSCCDH23 culture were cell populations expressing stem cell markers, including SOX2, NESTIN, CXCR4, KLF4, and CD34. The same iPSCCDH23 cell clusters, 4, 8, 9, and 11, co-expressed upregulated genes of NOTCH, Hedgehog, WNT, and TGFβ signaling, which are pivotal not only in pituitary tumorigenesis and pituitary embryonic development, but also in ‘tumor stemness’ [22,23,41,62,63,64]. We also noted that clusters of cell populations 5 and 14 unique within the iPSCCDH23 cultures expressed upregulated genes which were indicative of high proliferation. We observed upregulated expression of the E2F family of transcription factors (E2Fs) E2F1 and E2F7. These findings are of significance, given that there is evidence to show that upregulation of E2Fs is fundamental for tumorigenesis, metastasis, drug resistance, and recurrence [65]. Within the pituitary adenoma microenvironment, whether these stem cells directly differentiate into pituitary tumors or support the growth of the adenoma is largely unknown. In addition, whether pituitary stem cell populations become activated in response to injury is also understudied. Although the role of stem cells has been identified using a mouse model through implantation of the cells within the right forebrain [66], the identification of pituitary tumor-initiating stem cells using in vivo orthotopic transplantation models is impossible in mice. Pituitary tumors harboring the stem cells may require engraftment within the environment from which the cells are derived in order to enable growth and differentiation of the tumor. However, it is technically impossible to implant cells orthotopically in the murine pituitary. The pituitary tumor organoid cultures presented in these studies may offer an approach by which isolation, identification, and characterization of this stem cell population is possible. Therefore, we would gain knowledge on the mechanisms of pituitary tumor pathogenesis and reveal potential novel targets for therapeutic interventions by using the iPSC generated pituitary organoid culture. PitNETs associated with the development of CD cause serious morbidity due to chronic cortisol exposure that dysregulates almost every organ system in the body. Overall, existing medical therapies remain suboptimal, with negative impact on health and quality of life, including considerable risk of therapy resistance and tumor recurrence. To date, little is known about the pathogenesis of PitNETs. Here, we present a human organoid-based approach that will allow us to acquire knowledge of the mechanisms underlying pituitary tumorigenesis. Such an approach is essential to identify targeted treatments and improve clinical management of patients with CD. 5. Conclusions Cushing’s disease (CD) is a serious endocrine disorder caused by an adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-secreting pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET), which stimulates the adrenal glands to overproduce cortisol. The absence of preclinical models that replicate the PitNET microenvironment has prevented us from acquiring the knowledge to identify therapies that can be targeted to the tumor with a higher efficacy and tolerability for patients. Our studies demonstrate the development of organoids generated from human PitNETs or induced pluripotent stem cells as an essential approach to identifying targeted therapy methods for CD patients. Supplementary Materials The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells11213344/s1, Figure S1: Antibodies used and Cytek® Full Spectrum Viewer showing calculated similarity indices; Figure S2: Morphology and proliferation of lactotroph, somatotroph, and gonadotroph hPITOs; Table S1: Pituitary Growth Media; Table S2: Components used for pituitary organoids generated from iPSCs; Table S3: clinical characteristics of pituitary adenoma samples used for the generation of organoids; Table S4: Average correlation of replicates reported in Figure 3; Table S5: pituitary cell lineage or stem cell markers used in the scRNA-seq analysis; Video S1: hPITO38 EdU ACTH 3. Author Contributions Conceptualization, Y.Z.; methodology, J.C., Y.Z., J.M.C., B.N.S., S.M. and K.W.P.; software, J.C., Y.Z., J.M.C., S.M., Y.C., P.M. and R.P.; validation, Y.Z., J.C., J.M.C., A.S.L., K.C.J.Y. and R.P.; formal analysis, J.C., Y.Z., J.M.C., R.P., Y.C., S.M. and P.M.; investigation, Y.Z.; resources, Y.Z., J.C., J.E., C.A.T., B.H. and A.S.L.; data curation, J.C., Y.Z., J.M.C., R.P. and S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z., J.C, S.M., J.M.C., Y.C., B.H. and R.P.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z., J.C., J.M.C., A.S.L., K.C.J.Y., S.M., J.E., C.A.T., K.W.P., B.H., Y.C., P.M., B.N.S. and R.P.; visualization, Y.Z., J.C., J.M.C., A.S.L., K.C.J.Y. and R.P.; supervision, Y.Z.; project administration, Y.Z.; funding acquisition, Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding This research was supported by the Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine (University of Arizona College of Medicine) startup funds (Zavros). This research study was also partly supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number P30 CA023074 (Sweasy). Institutional Review Board Statement The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of St. Joseph’s Hospital and Barrow Neurological Institute Biobank collection protocol PHXA-05TS038, and collection of outcomes data protocol PHXA-0004-72-29, and patient consent (protocol date of approval). Informed Consent Statement Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Data Availability Statement The datasets generated during the analysis of the present study are available in the ReDATA repository, https://doi.org/10.25422/azu.data.19755244.v1. The datasets generated in the current study are also available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information Files). Acknowledgments We acknowledge the technical support of Maga Sanchez in the Tissue Acquisition and Cellular/Molecular Analysis Shared Resource (TACMASR University of Arizona Cancer Center) for assistance with embedding and sectioning of organoids. We would also like to acknowledge Patty Jansma (Marley Imaging Core, University Arizona) and, Douglas W Cromey (TACMASR imaging, University of Arizona Cancer Center) for assistance in microscopy. The authors thank the patients who consented to donate pituitary tumor tissues and blood for the development of the organoids. Without their willingness to participate in the study, this work would not be possible. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. References Cushing, H. Posterior Pituitary Activity from an Anatomical Standpoint. Am. J. Pathol. 1933, 9, 539–548.19. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] Cushing, H. The basophil adenomas of the pituitary body and their clinical manifestations (pituitary basophilism) 1932. Obes. Res. 1994, 2, 486–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Ironside, N.; Chen, C.J.; Lee, C.C.; Trifiletti, D.M.; Vance, M.L.; Sheehan, J.P. Outcomes of Pituitary Radiation for Cushing’s Disease. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 2018, 47, 349–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Loriaux, D.L. Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Cushing’s Syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Asa, S.L.; Mete, O.; Perry, A.; Osamura, R.Y. Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Pituitary Tumors. Endocr. Pathol. 2022, 33, 6–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Nishioka, H.; Yamada, S. Cushing’s Disease. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Feelders, R.A.; Hofland, L.J. Medical treatment of Cushing’s disease. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, 425–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Limumpornpetch, P.; Morgan, A.W.; Tiganescu, A.; Baxter, P.D.; Nyawira Nyaga, V.; Pujades-Rodriguez, M.; Stewart, P.M. The Effect of Endogenous Cushing Syndrome on All-cause and Cause-specific Mortality. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022, 107, 2377–2388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Ciric, I.; Zhao, J.C.; Du, H.; Findling, J.W.; Molitch, M.E.; Weiss, R.E.; Refetoff, S.; Kerr, W.D.; Meyer, J. Transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing disease: Experience with 136 patients. Neurosurgery 2012, 70, 70–80; discussion 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Alexandraki, K.I.; Kaltsas, G.A.; Isidori, A.M.; Storr, H.L.; Afshar, F.; Sabin, I.; Akker, S.A.; Chew, S.L.; Drake, W.M.; Monson, J.P.; et al. Long-term remission and recurrence rates in Cushing’s disease: Predictive factors in a single-centre study. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2013, 168, 639–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Sonino, N.; Zielezny, M.; Fava, G.A.; Fallo, F.; Boscaro, M. Risk factors and long-term outcome in pituitary-dependent Cushing’s disease. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1996, 81, 2647–2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Van der Pas, R.; Feelders, R.A.; Gatto, F.; De Bruin, C.; Pereira, A.M.; Van Koetsveld, P.M.; Sprij-Mooij, D.M.; Waaijers, A.M.; Dogan, F.; Schulz, S.; et al. Preoperative normalization of cortisol levels in Cushing’s disease after medical treatment: Consequences for somatostatin and dopamine receptor subtype expression and in vitro response to somatostatin analogs and dopamine agonists. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, E1880–E1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Kondziolka, D. Cushing’s disease and stereotactic radiosurgery. J. Neurosurg. 2013, 119, 1484–1485; discussion 1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Mehta, G.U.; Sheehan, J.P.; Vance, M.L. Effect of stereotactic radiosurgery before bilateral adrenalectomy for Cushing’s disease on the incidence of Nelson’s syndrome. J. Neurosurg. 2013, 119, 1493–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Tritos, N.A. Adrenally Directed Medical Therapies for Cushing Syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 106, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Gheorghiu, M.L.; Negreanu, F.; Fleseriu, M. Updates in the Medical Treatment of Pituitary Adenomas. Horm. Metab. Res. 2020, 52, 8–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Kaiser, U.B. Cushing’s disease: Towards precision medicine. Cell. Res. 2015, 25, 649–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Bissell, M.S.a.M.J. Organoids: A historical perspective of thinking in three dimensions. J. Cell Biol. 2017, 216, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Danila, D.C.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Dickersin, G.R.; Fletcher, J.A.; Hedley-Whyte, E.T.; Selig, M.K.; Johnson, S.R.; Klibanski, A. A human pituitary tumor-derived folliculostellate cell line. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000, 85, 1180–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Bjoro, T.; Torjesen, P.A.; Ostberg, B.C.; Sand, O.; Iversen, J.G.; Gautvik, K.M.; Haug, E. Bombesin stimulates prolactin secretion from cultured rat pituitary tumour cells (GH4C1) via activation of phospholipase C. Regul. Pept. 1987, 19, 169–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Bjoro, T.; Sand, O.; Ostberg, B.C.; Gordeladze, J.O.; Torjesen, P.; Gautvik, K.M.; Haug, E. The mechanisms by which vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH) stimulate prolactin release from pituitary cells. Biosci. Rep. 1990, 10, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Cox, B.; Laporte, E.; Vennekens, A.; Kobayashi, H.; Nys, C.; Van Zundert, I.; Uji, I.H.; Vercauteren Drubbel, A.; Beck, B.; Roose, H.; et al. Organoids from pituitary as a novel research model toward pituitary stem cell exploration. J. Endocrinol. 2019, 240, 287–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Vennekens, A.; Laporte, E.; Hermans, F.; Cox, B.; Modave, E.; Janiszewski, A.; Nys, C.; Kobayashi, H.; Malengier-Devlies, B.; Chappell, J.; et al. Interleukin-6 is an activator of pituitary stem cells upon local damage, a competence quenched in the aging gland. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2100052118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Zhang, D.; Hugo, W.; Redublo, P.; Miao, H.; Bergsneider, M.; Wang, M.B.; Kim, W.; Yong, W.H.; Heaney, A.P. A human ACTH-secreting corticotroph tumoroid model: Novel Human ACTH-Secreting Tumor Cell in vitro Model. EBioMedicine 2021, 66, 103294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Tsukada, T.; Kouki, T.; Fujiwara, K.; Ramadhani, D.; Horiguchi, K.; Kikuchi, M.; Yashiro, T. Reassembly of anterior pituitary organization by hanging drop three-dimensional cell culture. Acta. Histochem. Cytochem. 2013, 46, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Narsinh, K.H.; Jia, F.; Robbins, R.C.; Kay, M.A.; Longaker, M.T.; Wu, J.C. Generation of adult human induced pluripotent stem cells using nonviral minicircle DNA vectors. Nat. Protoc. 2011, 6, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Steele, N.G.; Chakrabarti, J.; Wang, J.; Biesiada, J.; Holokai, L.; Chang, J.; Nowacki, L.M.; Hawkins, J.; Mahe, M.; Sundaram, N.; et al. An Organoid-Based Preclinical Model of Human Gastric Cancer. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 7, 161–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Bertaux-Skeirik, N.; Feng, R.; Schumacher, M.A.; Li, J.; Mahe, M.M.; Engevik, A.C.; Javier, J.E.; Peek, R.M.J.; Ottemann, K.; Orian-Rousseau, V.; et al. CD44 plays a functional role in Helicobacter pylori-induced epithelial cell proliferation. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Feng, R.; Aihara, E.; Kenny, S.; Yang, L.; Li, J.; Varro, A.; Montrose, M.H.; Shroyer, N.F.; Wang, T.C.; Shivdasani, R.A.; et al. Indian Hedgehog mediates gastrin-induced proliferation in stomach of adult mice. Gastroenterology 2014, 147, 655–666.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Filippi-Chiela, E.C.; Oliveira, M.M.; Jurkovski, B.; Callegari-Jacques, S.M.; da Silva, V.D.; Lenz, G. Nuclear morphometric analysis (NMA): Screening of senescence, apoptosis and nuclear irregularities. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e42522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Gagnon, R.C.; Peterson, J.J. Estimation of confidence intervals for area under the curve from destructively obtained pharmacokinetic data. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 1998, 26, 87–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Livak, K.; Schmittgen, T. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Hinojosa-Amaya, J.M.; Varlamov, E.V.; McCartney, S.; Fleseriu, M. Hypercortisolemia Recurrence in Cushing’s Disease; a Diagnostic Challenge. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Patil, C.G.; Prevedello, D.M.; Lad, S.P.; Vance, M.L.; Thorner, M.O.; Katznelson, L.; Laws, E.R., Jr. Late recurrences of Cushing’s disease after initial successful transsphenoidal surgery. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2008, 93, 358–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Katznelson, L. Bilateral adrenalectomy for Cushing’s disease. Pituitary 2015, 18, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Reincke, M.; Sbiera, S.; Hayakawa, A.; Theodoropoulou, M.; Osswald, A.; Beuschlein, F.; Meitinger, T.; Mizuno-Yamasaki, E.; Kawaguchi, K.; Saeki, Y.; et al. Mutations in the deubiquitinase gene USP8 cause Cushing’s disease. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Chen, J.; Jian, X.; Deng, S.; Ma, Z.; Shou, X.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Song, Z.; Li, Z.; Peng, H.; et al. Identification of recurrent USP48 and BRAF mutations in Cushing’s disease. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Zhang, Q.; Peng, C.; Song, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Song, Z.; Shou, X.; Ma, Z.; Peng, H.; Jian, X.; et al. Germline Mutations in CDH23, Encoding Cadherin-Related 23, Are Associated with Both Familial and Sporadic Pituitary Adenomas. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2017, 100, 817–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Ikeda, H.; Mitsuhashi, T.; Kubota, K.; Kuzuya, N.; Uchimura, H. Epidermal growth factor stimulates growth hormone secretion from superfused rat adenohypophyseal fragments. Endocrinology 1984, 115, 556–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Baek, N.; Seo, O.W.; Kim, M.; Hulme, J.; An, S.S. Monitoring the effects of doxorubicin on 3D-spheroid tumor cells in real-time. Onco. Targets 2016, 9, 7207–7218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Laporte, E.; Nys, C.; Vankelecom, H. Development of Organoids from Mouse Pituitary as In Vitro Model to Explore Pituitary Stem Cell Biology. J. Vis. Exp. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Nys, C.; Lee, Y.L.; Roose, H.; Mertens, F.; De Pauw, E.; Kobayashi, H.; Sciot, R.; Bex, M.; Versyck, G.; De Vleeschouwer, S.; et al. Exploring stem cell biology in pituitary tumors and derived organoids. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2022, 29, 427–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Available online: https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/organoid (accessed on 20 September 2022). Mahe, M.M.; Aihara, E.; Schumacher, M.A.; Zavros, Y.; Montrose, M.H.; Helmrath, M.A.; Sato, T.; Shroyer, N.F. Establishment of Gastrointestinal Epithelial Organoids. Curr. Protoc. Mouse Biol. 2013, 3, 217–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Schumacher, M.A.; Aihara, E.; Feng, R.; Engevik, A.; Shroyer, N.F.; Ottemann, K.M.; Worrell, R.T.; Montrose, M.H.; Shivdasani, R.A.; Zavros, Y. The use of murine-derived fundic organoids in studies of gastric physiology. J. Physiol. 2015, 593, 1809–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Holokai, L.; Chakrabarti, J.; Lundy, J.; Croagh, D.; Adhikary, P.; Richards, S.S.; Woodson, C.; Steele, N.; Kuester, R.; Scott, A.; et al. Murine- and Human-Derived Autologous Organoid/Immune Cell Co-Cultures as Pre-Clinical Models of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancers 2020, 12, 3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Boj, S.F.; Hwang, C.I.; Baker, L.A.; Chio, I.I.C.; Engle, D.D.; Corbo, V.; Jager, M.; Ponz-Sarvise, M.; Tiriac, H.; Spector, M.S.; et al. Organoid models of human and mouse ductal pancreatic cancer. Cell 2015, 160, 324–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Tiriac, H.; Belleau, P.; Engle, D.D.; Plenker, D.; Deschenes, A.; Somerville, T.D.D.; Froeling, F.E.M.; Burkhart, R.A.; Denroche, R.E.; Jang, G.H.; et al. Organoid Profiling Identifies Common Responders to Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2018, 8, 1112–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Driehuis, E.; van Hoeck, A.; Moore, K.; Kolders, S.; Francies, H.E.; Gulersonmez, M.C.; Stigter, E.C.A.; Burgering, B.; Geurts, V.; Gracanin, A.; et al. Pancreatic cancer organoids recapitulate disease and allow personalized drug screening. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019 116, 26580–26590. [CrossRef] Jung, Y.H.; Choi, D.H.; Park, K.; Lee, S.B.; Kim, J.; Kim, H.; Jeong, H.W.; Yang, J.H.; Kim, J.A.; Chung, S.; et al. Drug screening by uniform patient derived colorectal cancer hydro-organoids. Biomaterials 2021, 276, 121004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Chen, D.; Tan, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, W.; Yu, L.; Chen, W.; Liu, Y.; Liu, L.; Guo, L.; Huang, W.; et al. Organoid Cultures Derived From Patients With Papillary Thyroid Cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 106, 1410–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Reincke, M.; Theodoropoulou, M. Genomics in Cushing’s Disease: The Dawn of a New Era. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021, 106, e2455–e2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Ma, Z.Y.; Song, Z.J.; Chen, J.H.; Wang, Y.F.; Li, S.Q.; Zhou, L.F.; Mao, Y.; Li, Y.M.; Hu, R.G.; Zhang, Z.Y.; et al. Recurrent gain-of-function USP8 mutations in Cushing’s disease. Cell. Res. 2015, 25, 306–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Melmed, S. Pathogenesis of pituitary tumors. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2011, 7, 257–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Stratakis, C.A.; Tichomirowa, M.A.; Boikos, S.; Azevedo, M.F.; Lodish, M.; Martari, M.; Verma, S.; Daly, A.F.; Raygada, M.; Keil, M.F.; et al. The role of germline AIP, MEN1, PRKAR1A, CDKN1B and CDKN2C mutations in causing pituitary adenomas in a large cohort of children, adolescents, and patients with genetic syndromes. Clin. Genet. 2010, 78, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Mouchtouris, N.; Smit, R.D.; Piper, K.; Prashant, G.; Evans, J.J.; Karsy, M. A review of multiomics platforms in pituitary adenoma pathogenesis. Front. Biosci. 2022, 27, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Bolz, H.; von Brederlow, B.; Ramirez, A.; Bryda, E.C.; Kutsche, K.; Nothwang, H.G.; Seeliger, M.; del, C.S.C.M.; Vila, M.C.; Molina, O.P.; et al. Mutation of CDH23, encoding a new member of the cadherin gene family, causes Usher syndrome type 1D. Nat. Genet. 2001, 27, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Zhang, S.; Cui, Y.; Ma, X.; Yong, J.; Yan, L.; Yang, M.; Ren, J.; Tang, F.; Wen, L.; Qiao, J. Single-cell transcriptomics identifies divergent developmental lineage trajectories during human pituitary development. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Cheung, L.Y.; Davis, S.W.; Brinkmeier, M.L.; Camper, S.A.; Perez-Millan, M.I. Regulation of pituitary stem cells by epithelial to mesenchymal transition events and signaling pathways. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2017, 445, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Shintani, A.; Higuchi, M. Isolation of PRRX1-positive adult pituitary stem/progenitor cells from the marginal cell layer of the mouse anterior lobe. Stem Cell. Res. 2021, 52, 102223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Yoshida, S.; Nishimura, N.; Ueharu, H.; Kanno, N.; Higuchi, M.; Horiguchi, K.; Kato, T.; Kato, Y. Isolation of adult pituitary stem/progenitor cell clusters located in the parenchyma of the rat anterior lobe. Stem Cell. Res. 2016, 17, 318–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] Laporte, E.; Vennekens, A.; Vankelecom, H. Pituitary Remodeling Throughout Life: Are Resident Stem Cells Involved? Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 604519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Vankelecom, H.; Roose, H. The Stem Cell Connection of Pituitary Tumors. Front. Endocrinol. 2017, 8, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Mertens, F.; Gremeaux, L.; Chen, J.; Fu, Q.; Willems, C.; Roose, H.; Govaere, O.; Roskams, T.; Cristina, C.; Becu-Villalobos, D.; et al. Pituitary tumors contain a side population with tumor stem cell-associated characteristics. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2015, 22, 481–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Chen, H.Z.; Tsai, S.Y.; Leone, G. Emerging roles of E2Fs in cancer: An exit from cell cycle control. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9, 785–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Xu, Q.; Yuan, X.; Tunici, P.; Liu, G.; Fan, X.; Xu, M.; Hu, J.; Hwang, J.Y.; Farkas, D.L.; Black, K.L.; et al. Isolation of tumour stem-like cells from benign tumours. Br. J. Cancer 2009, 101, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). From https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/11/21/3344/htm

Recordati's Isturisa is expected to launch in the second or third quarter. (Getty) As part of a small 2019 deal, Italian drugmaker Recordati snagged a trio of underperforming Novartis endocrinology meds, including a late-stage candidate for Cushing's disease. Less than a year later, that drug is cleared for market after an FDA green light. The FDA on Friday approved Recordati's Isturisa (osilodrostat) to treat Cushing's disease—a rare disease in which patients' adrenal glands produce too much cortisol—in those who have undergone a prior pituitary gland surgery or are not eligible for one. Isturisa, a cortisol synthesis inhibitor, will come with the FDA's orphan drug designation, providing market exclusivity for seven years, Recordati said (PDF) in a release. The drug is expected to be commercially available in the second or third quarter. The FDA based its review on phase 3 data showing 86% of patients treated with Isturisa showed normal cortisol levels in their urine after eight weeks, compared with 29% of patients treated with placebo, the drugmaker said. Recordati is "actively building its commercial, medical, and market access teams" to accommodate Isturisa's launch through its recently created U.S. endocrinology business unit, it said. The drugmaker will launch the drug with a "comprehensive distribution model" through specialty pharmacies. Novartis, once the owner of Isturisa, turned the asset over to Recordati in 2019 as part of a $390 million offload of some of the Swiss drugmaker's endocrinology portfolio. Recordati received Signifor, long-acting sister Signifor LAR and Isturisa, positioned as a successor drug to Signifor. The purchase included milestone payments tied to Isturisa. Recordati talked up the buy of the Cushing's disease trio as a boon for its rare disease portfolio, calling it a "key and historical milestone" at the time. From https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/recordati-scores-fda-nod-for-cushing-s-disease-med-isturisa

More than 80% of adults with Cushing’s disease receiving osilodrostat had normalized mean urinary free cortisol levels at 72 weeks of treatment, according to findings from the LINC 3 study extension. “Cushing’s disease is a chronic condition, and many patients require prolonged pharmacological treatment. Therefore, evaluating long-term efficacy and safety of drug therapies in clinical trials is essential,” Maria Fleseriu, MD, FACE, professor of medicine and neurological surgery and director of the Pituitary Center at Oregon Health & Science University in Portland and a Healio | Endocrine Today co-editor, told Healio. “Our findings build on the positive results of the LINC 3 study core phase, and it was reassuring to see that continued treatment with osilodrostat for over 72 weeks provided long-term normalization of cortisol levels. Furthermore, continued treatment with osilodrostat also led to sustained improvements in clinical signs and physical manifestations of hypercortisolism, as well as health-related quality of life, which are all important factors in the management of these patients.” Fleseriu and colleagues enrolled 106 adults with Cushing’s disease who were responders to osilodrostat (Isturisa, Recordati) at 48 weeks during the LINC 3 core study to enter the extension phase of the trial. Participants continued to receive open-label osilodrostat until 72 weeks or treatment discontinuation. Mean urinary free cortisol was collected every 12 weeks. Physical manifestations of hypercortisolism were rated at 48 and 72 weeks. Participants completed the Cushing’s Quality of Life questionnaire and Beck Depression Inventory II at 48 and 72 weeks. Adults were deemed to have completely responded to treatment if mean urinary free cortisol was less than the upper limit of normal and partially responded to treatment if mean urinary free cortisol was above the upper limit of normal but decreased more than 50% from baseline. The findings were published in the European Journal of Endocrinology. Of the 106 participants in the extension study, 98 completed 72 weeks of treatment. At 72 weeks, 81.1% of participants were complete responders to treatment, and reductions in mean urinary free cortisol from the core phase were maintained during the extension. Improvements in most cardiovascular and metabolic-related parameters from the core study were maintained or improved in the extension phase. The cohort also had increases in quality of life score and improvements in Beck Depression Inventory II scores. The proportion of participants with improvements in physical manifestation of hypercortisolism were maintained or improved in all areas at 72 weeks. For hirsutism in women, 86.4% had an improved or stable severe score at 72 weeks. Improved scores were observed in participants with mild, moderate and severe physical manifestations at baseline with few adults experiencing worse manifestations at the end of the extension study. There were no new safety signals reported in the extension study. Of the extension study participants, 11.3% discontinued osilodrostat due to adverse events, a similar percentage to the 10.9% discontinuation rate during the core phase of the study. Several hormone concentrations, including mean adrenocorticotropic hormone, 11-deoxycortisol and plasma aldosterone, stabilized during the extension phase after changes were observed in the core study compared with baseline. Mean testosterone in women decreased from 2.6 nmol/L at 48 weeks to 2.1 nmol/L at 72 weeks. There were no changes observed in mean testosterone levels for men. “Patients should be regularly monitored and osilodrostat dose titrated as necessary, alongside adjustment of concomitant medications, to optimize outcomes,” the researchers wrote. “Taken together, these findings support osilodrostat as an effective and well-tolerated long-term treatment option for patients with Cushing’s disease.” For more information: Maria Fleseriu, MD, FACE, can be reached at fleseriu@ohsu.edu. From https://www.healio.com/news/endocrinology/20220914/osilodrostat-normalizes-urinary-free-cortisol-in-cushings-disease-for-most-at-72-weeks

Recordati Rare Diseases, a US biopharma that forms part of the wider Italian group, has presented multiple positive data sets on Isturisa (osilodrostat) at the annual ENDO 2022 meeting in Atlanta, Georgia. Isturisa is a cortisol synthesis inhibitor indicated for the treatment of adult patients with Cushing’s disease for whom pituitary surgery is not an option or has not been curative. Among the data presented, the Phase III LINC 4 study demonstrated that Isturisa maintained normal mean urinary free cortisol long-term in patients with Cushing’s disease while the Phase III LINC 3 study found adrenal hormone levels changed during early treatment with the drug while stabilizing during long-term treatment. The ILLUSTRATE study also showed patients treated with a prolonged titration interval tended to have greater persistence with therapy. Mohamed Ladha, president and general manager for North America, Recordati Rare Diseases, said: “The data from these studies reinforces the efficacy and safety of Isturisa as a treatment for patients with Cushing’s disease. “We are pleased to share these data with the endocrine community and are excited to provide patients with a much-needed step forward in the management of this rare, debilitating, and potentially life-threatening condition.” Cushing’s disease is a rare, serious illness caused by a pituitary tumor that leads to overproduction of cortisol by the adrenal glands. Excess cortisol can contribute to an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Treatment for the condition seeks to lower cortisol levels to a normal range. Isturisa, which was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in March 2020, works by inhibiting 11-beta-hydroxylase, an enzyme responsible for the final step of cortisol biosynthesis in the adrenal gland. From https://www.thepharmaletter.com/article/results-reinforce-efficacy-of-recordati-s-isturisa-in-cushing-s-disease

Dr. Friedman uses several medications to treat Cushing’s syndrome that are summarized in this table. Dr. Friedman especially recommends ketoconazole. An in-depth article on ketoconazole can be found on goodhormonehealth.com. Drug How it works Dosing Side effects Ketoconazole (Generic, not FDA approved in US) blocks several steps in cortisol biosynthesis Start 200 mg at 8 and 10 PM, can up titrate to 1200 mg/day • Transient increase in LFTs • Decreased testosterone levels • Adrenal insufficiency Levoketoconazole (Recorlev) L-isomer of Ketoconazole Start at 150 mg at 8 and 10 PM, can uptitrate up to 1200 mg nausea, vomiting, increased blood pressure, low potassium, fatigue, headache, abdominal pain, and unusual bleeding Isturisa (osilodrostat) blocks 11-hydroxylase 2 mg at bedtime, then go up to 2 mg at 8 and 10 pm, can go up to 30 mg Dr. Friedman often gives with spironolactone or ketoconazole. • high testosterone (extra facial hair, acne, hair loss, irregular periods) • low potassium • hypertension Cabergoline (generic, not FDA approved) D2-receptor agonist 0.5 to 7 mg • nausea, • headache • dizziness Korlym (Mifepristone) glucocorticoid receptor antagonist 300-1200 mg per day • cortisol insufficiency (fatigue, nausea, vomiting, arthralgias, and headache) • increased mineralocorticoid effects (hypertension, hypokalemia, and edema • antiprogesterone effects (endometrial thickening) Pasireotide (Signafor) somatostatin receptor ligand 600 μg or 900 μg twice a day Diabetes, hyperglycemia, gallbladder issues For more information or to schedule an appointment with Dr. Friedman, go to goodhormonehealth.com

Osilodrostat is associated with improvements in physical manifestations of hypercortisolism and reductions in mean body weight and BMI in adults with Cushing’s syndrome, according to a speaker. As Healio previously reported, in findings from the LINC 4 phase 3 trial, osilodrostat (Isturisa, Recordati) normalized mean urinary free cortisol level at 12 weeks in more than 75% of adults with Cushing’s disease. In new findings presented at the AACE Annual Scientific and Clinical Conference, most adults with Cushing’s syndrome participating in the LINC 3 phase 3 trial had improvements in physical manifestations of hypercortisolism 72 weeks after initiating osilodrostat, with more than 50% having no dorsal fat pad, supraclavicular fat pad, facial rubor, proximal muscle atrophy, striae, ecchymoses and hirsutism for women at 72 weeks. Source: Adobe Stock “Many patients with Cushing’s syndrome suffer from clinical manifestations related to hypercortisolism,” Albert M. Pedroncelli, MD, PhD, head of clinical development and medical affairs for Recordati AG in Basel, Switzerland, told Healio. “The treatment with osilodrostat induced a rapid normalization of cortisol secretion, and improvements in physical manifestations associated with hypercortisolism were observed soon after initiation of osilodrostat and were sustained throughout the study.” Albert M. Pedroncelli Pedroncelli and colleagues analyzed changes in the physical manifestations of hypercortisolism in 137 adults with Cushing’s syndrome (median age, 40 years; 77.4% women) assigned osilodrostat. Dose titration took place from baseline to 12 weeks, and therapeutic doses were administered from 12 to 48 weeks, with some participants randomly assigned to withdrawal between 26 and 34 weeks. An extension phase of the trial took place from 48 to 72 weeks. Investigators subjectively rated physical manifestations of hypercortisolism in participants as none, mild, moderate or severe. Participants were evaluated at baseline and 12, 24, 34, 48 and 72 weeks. At baseline, the majority of the study cohort had mild, moderate or severe physical manifestations of hypercortisolism in most individual categories, including dorsal fat pad, central obesity, supraclavicular fat pad, facial rubor, hirsutism in women and striae. Central obesity was the most frequent physical manifestation rated as severe. The percentage of participants with improvements in physical manifestations of hypercortisolism increased from week 12 on for all individual manifestations evaluated in the study, and improvements were maintained through week 72. At 72 weeks, the percentage of participants who had no individual physical manifestations was higher than 50% for each category except central obesity, where 30.6% of participants had no physical manifestations. In addition to improvement in physical manifestations, the study cohort had decreases in body weight, BMI and waist circumference at weeks 48 and 72 compared with baseline. “The main goal of treating patients with Cushing’s syndrome is to normalize cortisol secretion,” Pedroncelli said. “The rapid reduction and normalization of cortisol levels is accompanied by improvement in the associated clinical manifestations. This represents an important objective for patients.” From https://www.healio.com/news/endocrinology/20220512/osilodrostat-improves-physical-manifestations-of-hypercortisolism-for-most-adults

— More than half of patients saw physical manifestations fully resolve by week 72 by Kristen Monaco, Staff Writer, MedPage Today May 16, 2022 SAN DIEGO -- Osilodrostat (Isturisa) improved many physical features associated with Cushing's disease, according to additional findings from the phase III LINC-3 study. Among 137 adults with Cushing's disease, a 39.5% improvement in central obesity scores was observed from baseline to week 72 with osilodrostat, reported Alberto Pedroncelli, MD, PhD, of Recordati AG in Basel, Switzerland. Not only was central obesity the most common physical manifestation associated with hypercortisolism among these Cushing's disease patients, but it was also more frequently rated as severe at baseline, Pedroncelli explained during the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology (AACE) annual meeting. Osilodrostat treatment also led to a 34.9% improvement in proximal muscle atrophy at week 72, along with a 34.4% improvement in hirsutism scores. By week 72, nearly all physical manifestations of hypercortisolism saw significant improvement -- marked by more than 50% of patients scoring these physical traits as nonexistent: Dorsal fat pat: 50.6% Central obesity: 30.6% Supraclavicular fat pad: 51.8% Facial rubor: 64.7% Hirsutism in women: 53.1% Proximal muscle atrophy: 61.2% Striae: 63.5% Ecchymoses: 87.1% Most of these physical manifestation improvements were notable soon after treatment initiation with osilodrostat, Pedroncelli pointed out. When stratified according to testosterone levels, hirsutism scores remained either stable or improved in the majority of patients who had normal or above normal testosterone levels. More women with normal testosterone levels over time experienced improvements in hirsutism versus those with levels above the upper limit of normal, who mostly remained stable. Osilodrostat is an oral agent that was first FDA approved in March 2020 for adults with Cushing's disease who either cannot undergo pituitary gland surgery or have undergone the surgery but still have the disease. Available in 1 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg film-coated tablets, the drug acts as a potent oral 11-beta-hydroxylase inhibitor -- the enzyme involved in the last step of cortisol synthesis. Osilodrostat is taken orally twice daily, once in the morning and once in the evening. Approval was based upon findings from the LINC-3 and LINC-4 trials, which found osilodrostat was able to normalize cortisol levels in 53% of patients, based on mean 24-hour urinary free cortisol (UFC) concentrations. During an initial 10-week randomization phase, 86% of patients maintained their complete cortisol response if they remained on osilodrostat versus only 29% of those who were switched to placebo. As expected, 77.4% of the 137 adults included in the trial were women. The median participant age was 40 and about 47 months had passed since their initial diagnosis. A total of 87.6% underwent previous pituitary surgery and 16.1% underwent previous pituitary irradiation. At baseline, median and mean 24-hour UFC levels were 3.5 nmol and 7.3 nmol, respectively, based on two or three urine samples. Participants had an average body weight of 176.4 lb, body mass index (BMI) of 30, and 41 in waist circumference at baseline. Throughout the trial, all measures dropped, reaching the nadir at week 72: body weight of 165 lb, BMI of 27, and 37.8 in waist circumference. The most common side effects reported with the agent include adrenal insufficiency, fatigue, nausea, headache, and edema. Kristen Monaco is a staff writer, focusing on endocrinology, psychiatry, and nephrology news. Based out of the New York City office, she’s worked at the company since 2015. Disclosures The study was supported by Recordati AG. Pedroncelli reported employment with Recordati. Primary Source American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Source Reference: Pedroncelli AM, et al "Osilodrostat therapy improves physical features associated with hypercortisolism in patients with Cushing's disease: findings from the phase III LINC 3 study" AACE 2022. From https://www.medpagetoday.com/meetingcoverage/aace/98745

Osilodrostat is associated with rapid normalization of mean urinary free cortisol (mUFC) excretion in patients with Cushing disease and has a favorable safety profile, according to the results of a study published in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. The phase 3 LINC-4 study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02697734) evaluated the safety and efficacy of osilodrostat, a potent, orally available 11β­-hydroxylase inhibitor, compared with placebo in patients with Cushing disease. The trial, which was conducted at 40 centers in 14 countries, included a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled period that was followed by a 36-week, open-label osilodrostat treatment period with an optional extension. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 75 years with a confirmed diagnosis of persistent or recurrent Cushing disease after pituitary surgery and/or irradiation or de novo disease, as well as an mUFC level greater than 1.3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). The patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to osilodrostat 2 mg twice daily or matching placebo, stratified by prior pituitary irradiation. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved mUFC ≤ULN at week 12. The key secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved mUFC ≤ULN at week 36. A total of 73 patients (median age, 39.0 years; 83.6% women) were randomly assigned to either osilodrostat (n=48) or placebo (n=25) and received at least 1 study drug dose from November 2016 to March 2019. The participants had a median (interquartile range [IQR]) time since diagnosis of Cushing disease of 67.4 (26.4-93.8) months. The median treatment duration in the randomized, placebo-controlled period was 12.0 weeks in both the osilodrostat group (IQR, 2.0-13.0 weeks) and the placebo group (IQR, 11.7-13.7 weeks). The proportion of patients who achieved mUFC ≤ULN (≤138 nmol/24 h) at week 12 was significantly increased in those who received osilodrostat (n=37, 77.1%) vs those who received placebo (n=2, 8.0%), with an estimated odds ratio of 43.4 (95% CI, 7.1-343.2) in favor of osilodrostat (P <.0001). A total of 59 patients (80.8%; 95% CI, 69.9-89.1) also achieved the key secondary endpoint of mUFC ≤ULN at week 36, after 24 weeks of open-label osilodrostat. The most frequently occurring adverse events in the placebo-controlled period in the osilodrostat and placebo groups, respectively, were decreased appetite (37.5% vs 16.0%), arthralgia (35.4% vs 8.0%), nausea (31.3% vs 12.0%), and fatigue (25.0% vs 16.0%). A potential study limitation is that although osilodrostat exposure was greater than 1 year among the participants, some adverse effects may take longer to be observed. “This randomized, placebo-controlled trial demonstrates that osilodrostat is a highly effective treatment for Cushing disease, normalizing UFC excretion in 77% of patients after 12 weeks’ treatment,” stated the investigators. “Cortisol reductions were maintained throughout 48 weeks of treatment and were accompanied by improvements in clinical signs of hypercortisolism and quality of life. The safety profile was favorable.” Disclosure: This study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG. Some of the study authors declared affiliations with biotech, pharmaceutical, and/or device companies. Please see the original reference for a full list of disclosures. Reference Gadelha M, Bex M, Feelders RA, et al. Randomized trial of osilodrostat for the treatment of Cushing’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. Published online March 23, 2022. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgac178 From https://www.endocrinologyadvisor.com/home/topics/general-endocrinology/osilodrostat-effective-for-cushing-disease/

More than three-quarters of adults with Cushing’s disease assigned osilodrostat had a normalized mean urinary free cortisol level at 12 weeks and maintained a normal level at 36 weeks, according to data from the LINC 4 phase 3 trial. In findings published in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 77% of adults with Cushing’s disease randomly assigned to osilodrostat (Isturisa, Recordati) had mean urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels reduced to below the upper limit of normal at 12 weeks compared with 8% of adults assigned to placebo. Most adults with Cushing's disease taking 2 mg twice daily osilodrostat had normalized mean UFC levels at 12 weeks compared with placebo. Data were derived from Gadelha M, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;doi:10.1210/clinem/dgac178. “Osilodrostat is a highly effective treatment for Cushing’s disease, normalizing urinary free cortisol excretion in 77% of patients after 12 weeks’ treatment,” Mônica Gadelha, MD, professor of endocrinology at The Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, and colleagues wrote. “Cortisol reductions were maintained throughout 48 weeks of treatment and were accompanied by improvements in clinical signs of hypercortisolism and quality of life.” Gadelha and colleagues enrolled 73 adults aged 18 to 75 years with Cushing’s disease from 40 centers in 14 countries into the LINC 4 phase 3 trial. Participants were randomly assigned to 2 mg osilodrostat twice daily (n = 48) or placebo (n = 25) for 12 weeks. Urinary samples were collected at weeks 2, 5 and 8 to measure mean UFC, and dosage was adjusted based on efficacy and tolerability. After 12 weeks, participants from both groups received osilodrostat in a 36-week open-label treatment period. All participants restarted the open-label portion of the trial at 2 mg osilodrostat unless they were on a lower dose at week 12. Dose adjustments in the open-label phase were made using the same guidelines in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of osilodrostat at achieving a mean UFC below the upper limit of normal of 138 nmol per 24 hours at 12 weeks vs. placebo; the key secondary endpoint was the percentage of participants achieving a normal mean UFC at 36 weeks. At 12 weeks, the percentage of adults with a normalized mean UFC level was higher in the osilodrostat group compared with placebo (77.1% vs. 8%; P < .0001). At 36 weeks, 80.8% of all participants had a normal mean UFC level. The overall response rate was 79.5% at 48 weeks. Median time to first controlled mean UFC response was 35 days for those randomly assigned to osilodrostat as well as those randomly assigned to placebo who crossed over to osilodrostat for the open-label phase. At 48 weeks, 84% of participants were receiving 10 mg or less of osilodrostat per day, including 56% receiving 4 mg or less daily. At 12 weeks, the osilodrostat group had several cardiovascular and metabolic-related improvements, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure, HbA1c, HDL cholesterol, body weight and waist circumference. No changes were observed in the placebo group. “The improvements in cardiovascular and metabolic parameters were sustained throughout osilodrostat treatment and have the potential to alleviate the burden of comorbidities in many patients with Cushing’s disease,” the researchers wrote. At 12 weeks, 52.5% of those receiving osilodrostat had a reduction in supraclavicular fat pad and 50% had a reduction in dorsal fat pad. At least 25% of participants also had improvements in facial redness, striae, proximal muscle atrophy and central obesity. Improvements were sustained through week 48. During the placebo-controlled trial, grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred for about 20% of participants in both groups. For the entire study, 38.4% of adults reported grade 3 and 4 adverse events, with the most common being hypertension. Eight participants discontinued the study due to adverse events. From https://www.healio.com/news/endocrinology/20220408/osilodrostat-normalizes-urinary-free-cortisol-in-most-adults-with-cushings-disease

Cushing’s disease is a progressive pituitary disorder in which there is an excess of cortisol in the body. While the disease can be treated surgically, this option is not possible for all patients. This is one of the approved medications that assist in controlling cortisol levels in people with Cushing’s disease. sturisa was approved in 2020 to treat adults with Cushing’s disease for whom pituitary surgery is ineffective or not an option. The oral medication works by inhibiting an enzyme called 11-beta-hydroxylase, which is involved in cortisol production. Isturisa, also known as osilodrostat or LCI699, is an approved treatment originally developed by Novartis, but now acquired by Recordati to treat people with Cushing’s disease, a condition in which a pituitary tumor causes the body to produce excessive levels of the stress hormone cortisol. In 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Isturisa to treat adults with Cushing’s disease for whom pituitary surgery was not an option, or ineffective. Earlier that same year, the European Commission (EC) approved Isturisa to treat people with endogenous Cushing’s syndrome. The medication also was approved for the same indication in Japan in 2021. How does Isturisa work? Isturisa is an oral medicine that inhibits an enzyme called 11-beta-hydroxylase, which is involved in cortisol production. Blocking the activity of this enzyme prevents excessive cortisol production, normalizing the levels of the hormone in the body and easing the symptoms of Cushing’s disease. Isturisa in clinical trials A Phase 2 clinical trial (NCT01331239) investigated the safety and efficacy of Isturisa as a Cushing’s disease treatment. The trial that concluded in October 2019 initially was named LINC-1, but, through a study protocol amendment, patients who completed the study could continue into a second phase called LINC-2. The company published findings that covered both patient groups in the journal Pituitary. Data showed that Isturisa reduced cortisol levels in the urine of all patients by week 22. Urine cortisol levels reached and remained within a normal range in 79% of the patients by then. Common adverse effects included nausea, diarrhea, lack of energy, and adrenal insufficiency — a condition in which the adrenal glands are unable to produce enough hormones. A Phase 3 clinical trial (NCT02180217) called LINC-3 also assessed the safety and efficacy of Isturisa in 137 patients with Cushing’s disease (77% female, median age 40 years). Participants were given Isturisa for 26 weeks, with efficacy-based dose adjustments during the first 12 weeks. Then, the 71 participants with a complete response (those whose urine cortisol levels were within normal limits) at week 26 and who did not require a dose increase after week 12, were assigned randomly to either continue treatment with Isturisa or switch to a placebo. After this 34-week period, 86% of Isturisa-treated patients had normal urinary cortisol levels, as compared to 29% of participants given placebo. All participants then were given Isturisa for an additional 12 weeks. At the end of the 48-week study, 66% of participants had normal urine cortisol levels. Results from LINC-3 formed the basis for regulatory approvals of Isturisa. Common adverse side effects in the trial included nausea, headache, fatigue, and adrenal insufficiency. A multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial (NCT02697734) called LINC-4 further confirmed the safety and efficacy of Isturisa as a Cushing’s disease therapy. During the trial, patients received Isturisa or a placebo through a 12-week period followed by treatment with Isturisa until week 48. Top-line results showed that 77% of patients on Isturisa experienced a complete response after the 12-week randomized period, as compared to 8% of those on placebo. No new safety data were noted. A roll-over, worldwide Phase 2 study (NCT03606408) is recruiting patients who have successfully completed any of the previous clinical trials. Patients can continue to take the dosage they received during the initial trial. The aim of this study is to assess the long-term effects of Isturisa for up to five years.

Abstract Summary Here, we describe a case of a patient presenting with adrenocorticotrophic hormone-independent Cushing’s syndrome in a context of primary bilateral macronodular adrenocortical hyperplasia. While initial levels of cortisol were not very high, we could not manage to control hypercortisolism with ketoconazole monotherapy, and could not increase the dose due to side effects. The same result was observed with another steroidogenesis inhibitor, osilodrostat. The patient was finally successfully treated with a well-tolerated synergitic combination of ketoconazole and osilodrostat. We believe this case provides timely and original insights to physicians, who should be aware that this strategy could be considered for any patients with uncontrolled hypercortisolism and delayed or unsuccessful surgery, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Learning points Ketoconazole–osilodrostat combination therapy appears to be a safe, efficient and well-tolerated strategy to supress cortisol levels in Cushing syndrome. Ketoconazole and osilodrostat appear to act in a synergistic manner. This strategy could be considered for any patient with uncontrolled hypercortisolism and delayed or unsuccessful surgery, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Considering the current cost of newly-released drugs, such a strategy could lower the financial costs for patients and/or society. Keywords: Adult; Male; White; France; Adrenal; Adrenal; Novel treatment; December; 2021 Background Untreated or inadequately treated Cushing’s syndrome (CS) is a morbid condition leading to numerous complications. The latter ultimately results in an increased mortality that is mainly due to cardiovascular events and infections. The goal of the treatment with steroidogenesis inhibitors is normalization of cortisol production allowing the improvement of comorbidities (1). Most studies dealing with currently available steroidogenesis inhibitors used as monotherapy reported an overall antisecretory efficacy of roughly 50% in CS. Steroidogenesis inhibitors can be combined to better control hypercortisolism. To the best of our knowledge, we report here for the first time a patient treated with a ketoconazole–osilodrostat combination therapy. Case presentation Here, we report the case of Mr D.M., 53-years old, diagnosed with adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH)-independent CS 6 months earlier. At diagnosis, he presented with resistant hypertension, hypokalemia, diabetes mellitus, easy bruising, purple abdominal striae and major oedema of the lower limbs. Investigations A biological assessment was performed, and the serum cortisol levels are depicted in Table 1. ACTH levels were suppressed (mean levels 1 pg/mL). Mean late-night salivary cortisol showed a four-fold increase (Table 2), and mean 24 h-urinary cortisol showed a two-fold increase. Serum cortisol was 1000 nmol/L at 08:00 h after 1 mg dexamethasone dose at 23:00 h. The rest of the adrenal hormonal workup was within normal ranges (aldosterone: 275 pmol/L and renin: 15 mIU/L). An adrenal CT was performed (Fig. 1) and exhibited a 70-mm left adrenal mass (spontaneous density: 5 HU and relative washout: 65%) and a 45-mm right adrenal mass (spontaneous density: −2 HU and relative washout: 75%). The case was discussed in a multidisciplinary team meeting, which advised to perform 18F-FDG PET-CT and 123I-Iodocholesterol scintigraphy before considering surgery. A genetic screening was performed, testing for ARMC5 and PRKAR1A pathogenic variants. View Full Size Figure 1 Adrenal CT depicting the bilateral macronodular adrenocortical hyperplasia. Citation: Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Case Reports 2021, 1; 10.1530/EDM-21-0071 Download Figure Download figure as PowerPoint slide Table 1 Serum cortisol levels at diagnosis (A), using ketoconazole monotherapy (B), using osilodrostat monotherapy (C) and using osilodrostat–ketoconazole combination therapy (D). Serum cortisol (nmol/L) 08:00 h 24:00 h 16:00 h 20:00 h 12:00 h 16:00 h A. At diagnosis 660 615 716 566 541 561 B. Ketoconazole monotherapy 741 545 502 224 242 508 C. Osilodrostat monotherapy 658 637 588 672 486 692 D. Osilodrostat–ketoconazole combination 436 172 154 103 135 274 Table 2 Salivary cortisol levels at diagnosis (A), using ketoconazole monotherapy (B), using osilodrostat monotherapy (C) and using osilodrostat-ketoconazole combination therapy (D). Salivary cortisol (nmol/L) 23:00 h 12:00 h 13:00 h Mean A. At diagnosis 47 62 38 49 B. Ketoconazole monotherapy 20 15 21 18 C. Osilodrostat monotherapy 85 90 56 77 D. Osilodrostat–ketoconazole combination 10 14 9 11 Treatment As this condition occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, it was decided to first initiate steroidogenesis inhibitors to lower the patient’s cortisol levels. Initially, ketoconazole was initiated and uptitrated up to 1000 mg per day based on close serum cortisol monitoring, with a three-fold increase of liver enzymes and poor control of cortisol levels (Table 1). In the absence of biological efficacy, ketoconazole was replaced by osilodrostat, which was gradually increased up to 30 mg per day (10 mg at 08:00 h and 20 mg at 20:00 h) without reaching normal cortisol levels (Table 1) and with slightly increased blood pressure levels. Considering the lack of efficacy of anticortisolic drugs used as monotherapy, we combined osilodrostat (30 mg per day) to ketoconazole (600 mg per day), that is, at the last maximal tolerated dose as monotherapy of each drug. Outcome This combination of steroidogenesis inhibitors achieved a good control in cortisol levels, mimicking a physiological circadian rhythm (Table 1D). The patient did not exhibit any side effect and the control of cortisol levels resulted in a rapid improvement of hypertension, kalemia, diabetes control and disappearance of lower limbs oedema. The patient underwent a 18F-FDG PET-CT that did not exhibit any increased uptake in both adrenal masses and a 123I-Iodocholesterol scintigraphy exhibiting a highly increased uptake in both adrenal masses, predominating in the left adrenal mass (70 mm). Unilateral adrenalectomy of the larger mass was then performed, and as the immediate post-operative serum cortisol level was 50 nmol/L, hydrocortisone was administered at a dose of 30 mg per day, with a stepwise decrease to 10 mg per day over 3 months. Pathological examination exhibited macronodular adrenal hyperplasia with a 70-mm adreno cortical adenoma (WEISS score: 1 and Ki67: 1%). The genetic screening exhibited a c.1908del p.(Phe637Leufs*6) variant of ARMC5 (pathogenic), located in exon 5. The patient has no offspring and is no longer in contact with the rest of his family. Discussion The goal of the treatment with steroidogenesis inhibitors is normalization of cortisol production allowing the improvement of comorbidities (1). Most studies dealing with currently available steroidogenesis inhibitors used as monotherapy reported an overall antisecretory efficacy of roughly 50% in CS. This rate of efficacy was probably underestimated in retrospective studies due to the lack of adequate uptitration of the dose; For example, the median dose reported in the French retrospective study on ketoconazole was only 800 mg/day, while 50% of the patients were uncontrolled at the last follow-up (2). Steroidogenesis inhibitors can be combined to better control hypercortisolism. Up to now, such combinations, mainly ketoconazole and metyrapone, were mainly reported in patients with severe CS (median urinary-free Cortisol (UFC) 30- to 40-fold upper-limit norm (ULN)) and life-threatening comorbidities (3, 4). Normal UFC was reported in up to 86% of these patients treated with high doses of ketoconazole and metyrapone. Expected side effects (such as increased liver enzymes for ketoconazole or worsened hypertension and hypokalemia for metyrapone) were reported in the majority of the patients. The fear of these side effects probably explains the lack of uptitration in previous reports. Combination of steroidogenesis inhibitors has previously been described by Daniel et al. in the largest study reported on the use of metyrapone in CS; 29 patients were treated with metyrapone and ketoconazole or mitotane, including 22 in whom the second drug was added to metyrapone monotherapy because of partial efficacy or adverse effects. The final median metyrapone dose in patients controlled with combination therapy was 1500 mg per day (5). Combination of adrenal steroidogenesis inhibitors should not be reserved to patients with severe hypercortisolism. In the case shown here, the association was highly effective in terms of secretion, using lower doses than those applied as a single treatment, but without the side effects previously observed with higher doses of each treatment used as a monotherapy. To our knowledge, the association of ketoconazole and osilodrostat had never been reported. Ketoconazole blocks several enzymes of the adrenal steroidogenesis such as CYP11A1, CYP17, CYP11B2 (aldosterone synthase) and CYP11B1 (11-hydroxylase), leading to decreased cortisol and occasionally testosterone concentrations. Though liver enzymes increase is not dose-dependent, it usually happens at doses exceeding 400–600 mg per day (2). Osilodrostat blocks CYP11B1 and CYP11B2; a combination should thus allow for a complete blockade of these enzymes that are necessary for cortisol secretion. Short-term side effects such as hypokalemia and hypertension are similar to those observed with metyrapone, due to increased levels of the precursor deoxycorticosterone, correlated with the dose of osilodrostat (6). As for our patient, the occurrence of side effects should not lead to immediately switch to another drug, but rather to decrease the dose and add another cortisol-lowering drug. Moreover, considering the current cost of newly-released drugs such a strategy could lower financial costs for patients and/or society. Another point to take into account is the current COVID-19 pandemic, for which, as recently detailed in experts’ opinion (7), the main aim is to reach eucortisolism, whatever the way. Indeed patients presenting with CS usually also present with comorbidities such as obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and immunodeficiency (8). Surgery, which represents the gold standard strategy in the management of CS (1, 9), might be delayed to reduce the hospital-associated risk of COVID-19, with post-surgical immunodepression and thromboembolic risks (7). Because immunosuppression and thromboembolic diathesis are common CS features (9, 10), during the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of steroidogenesis inhibitors appears of great interest. In these patients, combing steroidogenesis inhibitors at intermediate doses might allow for a rapid control of hypercortisolism without risks of major side effects if a single uptitrated treatment is not sufficient. Obviously, the management of associated comorbidities would also be crucial in this situation (11). To conclude, we report for the first time a case of CS, in the context of primary bilateral macronodular adrenocortical hyperplasia successfully treated with a well-tolerated combination of ketoconazole and osilodrostat. While initial levels of cortisol were not very high, we could not manage to control hypercortisolism with ketoconazole monotherapy, and could not increase the dose due to side effects. The same result was observed with another steroidogenesis inhibitor, osilodrostat. This strategy could be considered for any patient with uncontrolled hypercortisolism and delayed or unsuccessful surgery, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Declaration of interest F C and T B received research grants from Recordati Rare Disease and HRA Pharma Rare Diseases. Frederic Castinetti is on the editorial board of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism case reports. Frederic Castinetti was not involved in the review or editorial process for this paper, on which he is listed as an author. Funding This work did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector. Patient consent Informed written consent has been obtained from the patient for publication of the case report. Author contribution statement V A was the patient’s physician involved in the clinical care and collected the data. T B and F C supervised the management of the patient. F C proposed the original idea of this case report. V A drafted the manuscript. F C critically reviewed the manuscript. T B revised the manuscript into its final version. References 1↑ Nieman LK, Biller BMK, Findling JW, Murad MH, Newell-Price J, Savage MO, Tabarin A & Endocrine Society. Treatment of Cushing’s syndrome: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2015 100 2807–2831. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-1818) Search Google Scholar Export Citation 2↑ Castinetti F, Guignat L, Giraud P, Muller M, Kamenicky P, Drui D, Caron P, Luca F, Donadille B & Vantyghem MC et al.Ketoconazole in Cushing’s disease: is it worth a try? Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2014 99 1623–1630. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-3628) Search Google Scholar Export Citation 3↑ Corcuff JB, Young J, Masquefa-Giraud P, Chanson P, Baudin E, Tabarin A. Rapid control of severe neoplastic hypercortisolism with metyrapone and ketoconazole. European Journal of Endocrinology 2015 172 473–481. (https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-14-0913) Search Google Scholar Export Citation 4↑ Kamenický P, Droumaguet C, Salenave S, Blanchard A, Jublanc C, Gautier JF, Brailly-Tabard S, Leboulleux S, Schlumberger M & Baudin E et al.Mitotane, metyrapone, and ketoconazole combination therapy as an alternative to rescue adrenalectomy for severe ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2011 96 2796–2804. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-0536) Search Google Scholar Export Citation 5↑ Daniel E, Aylwin S, Mustafa O, Ball S, Munir A, Boelaert K, Chortis V, Cuthbertson DJ, Daousi C & Rajeev SP et al.Effectiveness of metyrapone in treating Cushing’s syndrome: a retrospective multicenter study in 195 patients. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2015 100 4146–4154. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-2616) Search Google Scholar Export Citation 6↑ Pivonello R, Fleseriu M, Newell-Price J, Bertagna X, Findling J, Shimatsu A, Gu F, Auchus R, Leelawattana R & Lee EJ et al.Efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in patients with Cushing’s disease (LINC 3): a multicentre phase III study with a double-blind, randomised withdrawal phase. Lancet: Diabetes and Endocrinology 2020 8 748–761. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(2030240-0) Search Google Scholar Export Citation 7↑ Newell-Price J, Nieman LK, Reincke M, Tabarin A. ENDOCRINOLOGY IN THE TIME OF COVID-19: Management of Cushing’s syndrome. European Journal of Endocrinology 2020 183 G1–G7. (https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-20-0352) Search Google Scholar Export Citation 8↑ Kakodkar P, Kaka N, Baig MN. A comprehensive literature review on the clinical presentation, and management of the pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Cureus 2020 12 e7560. (https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7560) Search Google Scholar Export Citation 9↑ Pivonello R, De M, Cozzolino A, Colao A. The treatment of Cushing’s disease. Endocrine Reviews 2015 36 385–486. (https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2013-1048) Search Google Scholar Export Citation 10↑ Hasenmajer V, Sbardella E, Sciarra F, Minnetti M, Isidori AM, Venneri MA. The immune system in Cushing’s syndrome. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 2020 31 655–669. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2020.04.004) Search Google Scholar Export Citation 11↑ Pivonello R, Ferrigno R, Isidori AM, Biller BMK, Grossman AB, Colao A. COVID-19 and Cushing’s syndrome: recommendations for a special population with endogenous glucocorticoid excess. Lancet: Diabetes and Endocrinology 2020 8 654–656. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(2030215-1) Search Google Scholar Export Citation From https://edm.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/edm/2021/1/EDM21-0071.xml?body=fullHtml-9967

Osilodrostat therapy was found to be effective in improving blood pressure parameters, health-related quality of life, depression, and other signs and symptoms in patients with Cushing disease, regardless of the degree of cortisol control, according to study results presented at the 30th Annual Scientific and Clinical Congress of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (ENVISION 2021). Investigators of the LINC 3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02180217), a phase 3, multicenter study with a double-blind, randomized withdrawal period, sought to assess the effects of twice-daily osilodrostat (2-30 mg) on signs, symptoms, and health-related quality of life in 137 patients with Cushing disease. Study endpoints included change in various parameters from baseline to week 48, including mean urinary free cortisol (mUFC) status, cardiovascular-related measures, physical features, Cushing Quality-of-Life score, and Beck Depression Inventory score. Participants were assessed every 2, 4, or 12 weeks depending on the study period, and eligible participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to withdrawal at week 24. The median age of participants was 40.0 years, and women made up 77.4% of the cohort. Of 137 participants, 132 (96%) achieved controlled mUFC at least once during the core study period. At week 24, patients with controlled or partially controlled mUFC showed improvements in blood pressure that were not seen in patients with uncontrolled mUFC; at week 48, improvement in blood pressure occurred regardless of mUFC status. Cushing Quality-of-Life and Beck Depression Inventory scores, along with other metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors, improved from baseline to week 24 and week 48 regardless of degree of mUFC control. Additionally, most participants reported improvements in physical features of hypercortisolism, including hirsutism, at week 24 and week 48. The researchers indicated that the high response rate with osilodrostat treatment was sustained during the 48 weeks of treatment, with 96% of patients achieving controlled mUFC levels; improvements in clinical signs, physical features, quality of life, and depression were reported even among patients without complete mUFC normalization. Disclosure: This study was sponsored by Novartis Pharma AG; however, as of July 12, 2019, osilodrostat is an asset of Recordati AG. Please see the original reference for a full list of authors’ disclosures. Visit Endocrinology Advisor‘s conference section for complete coverage from the AACE Annual Meeting 2021: ENVISION. Reference Pivonello R, Fleseriu M, Newell-Price J, et al. Effect of osilodrostat on clinical signs, physical features and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by degree of mUFC control in patients with Cushing’s disease (CD): results from the LINC 3 study. Presented at: 2021 AACE Virtual Annual Meeting, May 26-29, 2021. From https://www.endocrinologyadvisor.com/home/conference-highlights/aace-2021/osilodrostat-improves-blood-pressure-hrqol-and-depression-in-patients-with-cushing-disease/

Data from LINC3 and LINC4 provide insight into the impact of dosing titration schedules on risk of hypocortisolism-related adverse events associated with osilodrostat use in patients with Cushing's disease. Data from a pair of phase 3 studies presented at the American Academy of Clinical Endocrinology’s 30th Annual Meeting (AACE 2021) is providing insight into the effect of dose titration schedules with use of osilodrostat (Isturisa) in patients with Cushing’s disease. Presented by Maria Fleseriu, MD, of Oregon Health and Science University, the analysis of the LINC3 and LINC4 demonstrated the more gradual titration occurring in LINC4 resulted in a lower proportion of hypocortisolism-related adverse events, suggesting up-titration every 3 weeks rather than every 2 weeks could help lower event risk without compromising mean urinary free cortisol (mUFC) control. “For patients with Cushing’s disease, osilodrostat should be initiated at the recommended starting dose with incremental dose increases, based on individual response/tolerability aimed at normalizing cortisol levels,” concluded investigators. With approval from the US Food and Drug Administration in March 2020 for patients not eligible for pituitary surgery or have undergone the surgery but still have the disease, osilodrostat became the first FDA-approved therapy address cortisol overproduction by blocking 11β-hydroxylase. Based on results of LINC3, data from the trial, and the subsequent LINC4 trial, provide the greatest available insight into use of the agent in this patient population. The study presented at AACE 2021 sought to assess whether slow dose up titration might affect rates of hypocortisolism-related adverse events by comparing titration schedules from both phase 3 trials. Median osilodrostat exposure was 75 (IQR, 48-117) weeks and 70 (IQR, 49-87) weeks in LINC3 and LINC4, respectively. The median time to first mUFC equal to or less than ULN was 41 (IQR, 30-42) days in LINC3 and 35 (IQR, 34-52) days in LINC4. Adverse events potentially related to hypocortisolism were more common among patients in LINC3 (51%, n=70) than LINC4 (27%, n=20). Upon analysis of adverse events, investigators found the most commonly reported type of adverse event was adrenal insufficiency, which included events of glucocorticoid deficiency, adrenocortical insufficiency, steroid withdrawal syndrome, and decreased urinary free cortisol. Results incited the majority of hypocortisolism-related adverse events occurred during the dos titration periods of each trial. In LINC3, 54 of the 70 (77%) hypocortisolism-related adverse events occurred by week 26. In comparison, 58% of hypocortisolism-related adverse events occurring in LINC4 occurred prior to week 12. Investigators noted most of events that occurred were mild or moderate and managed with dose interruption or reduction of osilodrostat or concomitant medications. This study, “Effect of Dosing and Titration of Osilodrostat on Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Cushing's Disease (CD): Results from Two Phase III Trials (LINC3 and LINC4),” was presented at AACE 2021. From https://www.endocrinologynetwork.com/view/fda-panels-votes-to-support-teplizumab-potential-for-delaying-type-1-diabetes

— Gradual dose escalation had fewer adverse events, same therapeutic benefit, as quicker increases by Kristen Monaco, Staff Writer, MedPage Today May 27, 2021 A more gradual increase in oral osilodrostat (Isturisa) dosing was better tolerated among patients with Cushing's disease, compared with those who had more accelerated increases, a researcher reported. Looking at outcomes from two phase III trials assessing osilodrostat, only 27% of patients had hypocortisolism-related adverse events if dosing was gradually increased every 3 weeks, said Maria Fleseriu, MD, of Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, in a presentation at the virtual meeting of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology (AACE). On the other hand, 51% of patients experienced a hypocortisolism-related adverse event if osilodrostat dose was increased to once every 2 weeks. Acting as a potent oral 11-beta-hydroxylase inhibitor, osilodrostat was first approved by the FDA in March 2020 for adults with Cushing's disease who either cannot undergo pituitary gland surgery or have undergone the surgery but still have the disease. The drug is currently available in 1 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg film-coated tablets. The approval came based off of the positive findings from the complementary LINC3 and LINC4 trials. The LINC3 trial included 137 adults with Cushing's disease with a mean 24-hour urinary free cortisol concentration (mUFC) over 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (50 μg/24 hours), along with morning plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone above the lower limit of normal (9 pg/mL). During the open-label, dose-escalation period, all the participants were given 2 mg of osilodrostat twice per day, 12 hours apart. Over this 12-week titration phase, dose escalations were allowed once every 2 weeks if there were no tolerability issues to achieve a maximum dose of 30 mg twice a day. After this 12-week dose-escalation schedule, additional bumps up in dose were permitted every 4 weeks. The median daily osilodrostat dose was 7.1 mg. The LINC4 trial included 73 patients with Cushing's disease with an mUFC over 1.3 times the upper limit of normal. The 48 patients randomized to receive treatment were likewise started on 2 mg bid of osilodrostat. However, this trial had a more gradual dose-escalation schedule, as doses were increased only every 3 weeks to achieve a 20 mg bid dose. After the 12-week dose-escalation phase, patients on a dose over 2 mg bid were restarted on 2 mg bid at week 12, where dose escalations were permitted once every 3 weeks thereafter to achieve a maximum 30 mg bid dose during this additional 36-week extension phase. Patients in this trial achieved a median daily osilodrostat dose of 5.0 mg. In both studies, patients' median age was about 40 years, the majority of patients were female, and about 88% had undergone a previous pituitary surgery. When comparing the adverse event profiles of both trials, Fleseriu and colleagues found that more than half of patients on the 2-week dose-escalation schedule experienced any grade of hypercortisolism-related adverse events. About 10.2% of these events were considered grade 3. About 28% of these patients had adrenal insufficiency -- the most common hypercortisolism-related adverse event reported. This was a catch-all term that include events like glucocorticoid deficiency, adrenocortical insufficiency, steroid withdrawal syndrome, and decreased cortisol, Fleseriu explained. Conversely, only 27.4% of patients on a 3-week dose escalation schedule experienced a hypercortisolism-related adverse event, and only 2.7% of these were grade 3. No grade 4 events occurred in either trial, and most events were considered mild or moderate in severity. "These adverse events were not associated with any specific osilodrostat dose of mean UFC level," Fleseriu said, adding that most of these events occurred during the initial dose-escalation periods. About 60% and 58% of all hypocortisolism-related adverse events occurred during the dose titration period in the 2-week and 3-week dose-escalation schedules, respectively. These events were managed via dose reduction, a temporary interruption in medication, and/or a concomitant medication. Very few patients in either trial permanently discontinued treatment due to these adverse events, Fleseriu noted. "Despite differences in the frequency of dose escalation, the time to first mUFC normalization was similar in the LINC3 and LINC4 studies," she said, adding that "gradual increases in osilodrostat dose from a starting dose of 2 mg bid can mitigate hypocortisolism-related adverse events without affecting mUFC control." "For patients with Cushing's disease, osilodrostat should be initiated at the recommended starting dose with incremental dose increases, based on individual response and tolerability aimed at normalizing cortisol levels," Fleseriu concluded. Kristen Monaco is a staff writer, focusing on endocrinology, psychiatry, and dermatology news. Based out of the New York City office, she’s worked at the company for nearly five years. Disclosures The LINC3 and LINC4 trials were funded by Novartis. Fleseriu reported relationships with Novartis, Recordati, and Strongbridge Biopharma. Primary Source American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Source Reference: Fleseriu M, et al "Effect of dosing and titration of osilodrostat on efficacy and safety in patients with Cushing's disease (CD): Results from two phase III trials (LINC3 and LINC4)" AACE 2021. From https://www.medpagetoday.com/meetingcoverage/aace/92824?xid=nl_mpt_DHE_2021-05-28&eun=g1406328d0r&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Daily Headlines Top Cat HeC 2021-05-28&utm_term=NL_Daily_DHE_dual-gmail-definition

Osilodrostat treatment was found to be associated with a rapid and sustained reduction in mean concentration of urinary free cortisol (UFC) and improved clinical symptoms in patients with Cushing’s disease, according to the results of a prospective, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 study published in the Lancet Diabetes Endocrinology. Osilodrostat is an oral inhibitor of 11-β hydroxylase cytochrome P450. Adults aged 18 to 75 years of age with diagnosed persistent or recurrent Cushing’s disease were recruited between 2014 and 2017 at 66 hospitals in 19 countries. Cushing’s disease was defined by a mean UFC concentration over a 24-hour period >1.5 times greater than the upper limit of normal (ULN) and morning plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone level above normal limits. Participants (n=137) received 30 mg osilodrostat twice daily, dose which was adjusted every 2 weeks until week 12 on the basis of mean 24-hour UFC concentration. The determined maintenance dose was continued until week 24. At week 26, participants who had achieved 24-hour UFC concentration ≤ ULN and did not need titration after week 12 were randomly assigned in an equal ratio to maintain osilodrostat treatment or were switched to a placebo for 8 weeks. This 8-week period of the study was double-blinded. During weeks 35 to 48, all patients were returned to osilodrostat treatment. In this cohort, mean age was 40.0 years (range, 19.0-70.0 years), 77% of participants were women, the average time since diagnosis was 47.2 months (interquartile range [IQR], 19.0-88.3), 88% had previous pituitary surgery, 16% had pituitary radiation therapy, and 74% had medicinal therapy. At baseline, the mean 24-hour UFC concentration was 1006±1590 nmol/24 h. At week 24, 53% of participants achieved a mean 24-hour UFC concentration ≤ULN without increases in dose after week 12 and were eligible for randomization (osilodrostat, n=36; placebo, n=35). At week 34, more patients receiving osilodrostat vs placebo maintained a complete response (86% vs 29%, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 13.7; 95% CI, 3.7-53.4; P <.0001). Improvements in cardiovascular-related metabolic parameters associated with hypercortisolism and overall measures of well-being were observed. Levels of high-density lipoprotein decreased by week 48 (-0.3 mmol/L; 95% CI, .0.3 to -0.2), mean Cushing’s quality of life score increased by 52.4% (95% CI, 32.3-72.7), and Beck Depression Inventory score decreased by 31.8% (95% CI, -44.3 to -19.3). Adverse events were hypocortisolism (51%), adverse events related with adrenal hormone precursors (42%), nausea (42%), headache (34%), fatigue (28%), and adrenal insufficiency (28%). A total of 18% of participants dropped out of the study due to adverse events. The major limitation of this study was the short withdrawal period (8 weeks) which may not have permitted to observe symptoms of hypercortisolism. “Alongside careful dose adjustments and monitoring of known risks associated with osilodrostat, our findings indicate a positive benefit– risk consideration of treatment for most patients with Cushing’s disease,” concluded the study authors. Disclosure: Multiple authors declared affiliations with industry. Please refer to the original article for a full list of disclosures. Reference Pivonello R, Fleseriu M, Newell-Price J, et al. Efficacy and safety of osilodrostat in patients with Cushing’s disease (LINC 3): a multicentre phase III study with a doubleblind, randomised withdrawal phase. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;S2213-8587(20)30240-0. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(29)30240-0 From https://www.endocrinologyadvisor.com/home/topics/general-endocrinology/osilodrostat-sustained-reduction-mean-ufc-concentration-cushings-disease/

Hypercortisolism Quickly Reversed With Oral Tx Oral osilodrostat (Isturisa) normalized cortisol levels in Cushing's disease patients who were ineligible for or not cured with pituitary surgery, according to the phase III LINC 3 trial. After 24 weeks of open-label treatment with twice-daily osilodrostat, 53% of patients (72 of 137; 95% CI 43.9-61.1) were able to maintain a complete response -- marked by mean 24-hour urinary free cortisol concentration of the upper limit of normal or below -- without any uptitration in dosage after the initial 12-week buildup phase, reported Rosario Pivonello, MD, of the Università Federico II di Napoli in Italy, and colleagues. As they explained in their study online in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, following the 24-week open-label period these complete responders to treatment were then randomized 1:1 to either remain on osilodrostat or be switched to placebo. During this 10-week randomization phase, 86% of patients maintained their complete cortisol response if they remained on osilodrostat versus only 29% of those who were switched to placebo (odds ratio 13.7, 95% CI 3.7-53.4, P<0.0001) -- meeting the trial's primary endpoint. As for adverse events, more than half of patients experienced hypocortisolism, and the most common adverse events included nausea (42%), headache (34%), fatigue (28%), and adrenal insufficiency (28%). "Alongside careful dose adjustments and monitoring of known risks associated with osilodrostat, our findings indicate a positive benefit-risk consideration of treatment for most patients with Cushing's disease," the researchers concluded. This oral inhibitor of 11β-­hydroxylase -- the enzyme involved in the last step of cortisol synthesis -- was FDA approved in March 2020 based on these findings, and is currently available in 1 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg film-coated tablets. The prospective trial, consisting of four periods, included individuals between the ages of 18 and 75 with confirmed persistent or recurrent Cushing's disease -- marked by a mean 24-h urinary free cortisol concentration over 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (50 μg/24 hours), along with morning plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone above the lower limit of normal (9 pg/mL). All individuals had either undergone prior pituitary surgery or irradiation, were not deemed to be candidates for surgery, or had refused to have surgery. During the first open-label study period, all participants took 2 mg of oral osilodrostat twice daily, spaced 12 hours apart. This dose was then titrated up if the average of three 24-h urinary free cortisol concentration samples exceeded the upper limit of normal. During the second study period, which spanned weeks 12 through 24, all participants remained on their osilodrostat therapeutic dose. By week 24, about 62% of the participants were taking a therapeutic dose of 5 mg or less twice daily; only about 6% of patients needed a dose higher than 10 mg twice daily. In the third study period, which spanned weeks 26 through 34, "complete responders" who achieved normal cortisol levels were then randomized to continue treatment or be switched to placebo, while those who did not fully respond to treatment continued on osilodrostat. For the fourth study period, from weeks 24 through 48, all participants were switched back to active treatment with osilodrostat. Overall, 96% of participants were able to achieve a complete response at some point while on osilodrostat treatment, with two-thirds of these responders maintaining this normalized cortisol level for at least 6 months. The median time to first complete response was 41 days. Metabolic profiles also improved along with this reduction in cortisol levels. These included improvements in body weight, body mass index, fasting plasma glucose, both systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and total cholesterol levels. "Given the known clinical burden of cardiovascular risk associated with Cushing's disease, the improvement in clinical features shown here indicates important benefits of osilodrostat," the researchers said. "By improving multiple cardiovascular risk factors, our findings are likely to be clinically relevant." Along with metabolic improvements, patients also had "clinically meaningful improvements" in quality of life, as well as reductions in depressive symptoms measured by the Beck Depression Inventory score, the investigators reported. One limitation to the trial, they noted, was an inability to control for concomitant medications, since nearly all participants were taking other medications, particularly antihypertensive and antidiabetic therapies. "Further examination of the effects of osilodrostat on the clinical signs of Cushing's disease, and the reasons for changes in concomitant medications and the association between such medications and clinical outcomes would be valuable," Pivonello's group said. From https://www.medpagetoday.com/endocrinology/generalendocrinology/87827

Cushing syndrome, a rare endocrine disorder caused by abnormally excessive amounts of the hormone cortisol, has a new pharmaceutical treatment to treat cortisol overproduction. Osilodrostat (Isturisa) is the first FDA approved drug who either can’t undergo pituitary gland surgery or have undergone the surgery but still have the disease. The oral tablet functions by blocking the enzyme responsible for cortisol synthesis, 11-beta-hydroxylase. “Until now, patients in need of medications…have had few approved options, either with limited efficacy or with too many adverse effects. With this demonstrated effective oral treatment, we have a therapeutic option that will help address patients' needs in this underserved patient population," said Maria Fleseriu, MD, FACE, professor of medicine and neurological surgery and director of the Pituitary Center at Oregon Health Sciences University. Cushing disease is caused by a pituitary tumor that releases too much of the hormone that stimulates cortisol production, adrenocorticotropin. This causes excessive levels of cortisol, a hormone responsible for helping to maintain blood sugar levels, regulate metabolism, help reduce inflammation, assist in memory formulation, and support fetus development during pregnancy. The condition is most common among adults aged 30-50 and affects women 3 times more than men. Cushing disease can lead to a number of medical issues including high blood pressure, obesity, type 2 diabetes, blood clots in the arms and legs, bone loss and fractures, a weakened immune system, and depression. Patients with Cushing disease may also have thin arms and legs, a round red full face, increased fat around the neck, easy bruising, striae (purple stretch marks), or weak muscles. Side effects of osilodrostat occurring in more than 20% of patients are adrenal insufficiency, headache, nausea, fatigue, and edema. Other side effects can include vomiting, hypocortisolism (low cortisol levels), QTc prolongation (heart rhythm condition), elevations in adrenal hormone precursors (inactive substance converted into hormone), and androgens (hormone that regulated male characteristics). Osilodrostat’s safety and effectiveness was evaluated in a study consisting of 137 patients, of which about 75% were women. After a 24-week period, about half of patients had achieved normal cortisol levels; 71 successful cases then entered an 8-week, double-blind, randomized withdrawal study where 86% of patients receiving osilodrostat maintained normal cortisol levels, compared with 30% who were taking a placebo. In January 2020, the European Commission also granted marketing authorization for osilodrostat. From https://www.ajmc.com/newsroom/patients-with-cushing-have-new-nonsurgical-treatment-option

NEW ORLEANS — The investigational drug osilodrostat (Novartis) continues to show promise for treating Cushing's disease, now with new phase 3 trial data. The data from the phase 3, multicenter, double-blind randomized withdrawal study (LINC-3) of osilodrostat in 137 patients with Cushing's disease were presented here at ENDO 2019: The Endocrine Society Annual Meeting by Beverly M.K. Biller, MD, of the Neuroendocrine & Pituitary Tumor Center at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. "Osilodrostat was effective and shows promise for the treatment of patients with Cushing's disease," Biller said. Osilodrostat is an oral 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor, the enzyme that catalyzes the last step of cortisol biosynthesis in the adrenal cortex. Its mechanism of action is similar to that of the older Cushing's drug metyrapone, but osilodrostat has a longer plasma half-life and is more potent against 11β-hydroxylase. Significantly more patients randomized to osilodrostat maintained a mean urinary free cortisol (mUFC) response versus placebo at 34 weeks following a 24-week open-label period plus 8-week randomized phase, with rapid and sustained mUFC reduction in most patients. Patients also experienced improvements in clinical signs of hypercortisolism and quality of life. The drug was generally well-tolerated and had no unexpected side effects. Asked to comment, session comoderator Julia Kharlip, MD, associate medical director of the Pituitary Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, told Medscape Medical News, "This drug is incredibly exciting because over 80% of people were controlled fairly rapidly. People could get symptom relief but also a reliable response. You don't have to wonder when you're treating a severely affected patient if it's going to work. It's likely going to work." However, Kharlip cautioned that it remains to be seen whether osilodrostat continues to work long-term, given that the older drug metyrapone — which must be given four times a day versus twice daily for osilodrostat — is known to become ineffective over time because the pituitary tumor eventually overrides the enzyme blockade. "Based on how osilodrostat is so much more effective at smaller doses, there's more hope that it will be effective long term...If the effectiveness and safety profile that we're observing now continues to show the same performance years in a row, then we've got our drug." Osilodrostat Potentially Addresses an Unmet Medical Need Cushing's disease is a rare disorder of chronic hypercortisolism with significant burden, increased mortality, and decreased quality of life. Pituitary surgery is the recommended first-line treatment for most patients, but not all patients remit with surgery and some require additional treatment. Pasireotide (Signifor, Novartis), an orphan drug approved in the United States and Europe for the treatment of Cushing's disease in patients who fail or are ineligible for surgical therapy, is also only effective in a minority of patients. "There hasn't been a medicine effective for long-term treatment, so a lot of patients end up getting bilateral adrenalectomy, thereby exchanging one chronic medical disease for another," Kharlip explained. Biller commented during the question-and-answer period, "I think because not all patients are placed in remission with surgery initially and because other patients subsequently recur — a problem that is more common than we used to believe — we do need medical therapies." She continued, "I think it's important to have a large choice of medical therapies that work in different places in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. "Even though surgery is the right initial therapy for everyone, I think in terms of subsequent medical therapy we have to tailor that to the individual circumstances of the patient in terms of the goals of treatment, and perhaps what other medicines they're on, the degree of cortisol excess [and other factors]." Highly Significant Normalization in Mean UFC Versus Placebo In a prior 22-week phase 2 study (LINC-2), osilodrostat normalized mUFC in most patients. Results of the extension phase were reported by Medscape Medical News 2 years ago. The current phase 3 study, LINC-3, was conducted on the basis of that proof-of-concept study, Biller said. The trial was conducted in 19 countries across four continents in patients with persistent or recurrent Cushing's disease screened for mUFC > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal and other entry criteria. In total, 137 patients were enrolled and randomized. Participants were a median age of 40 years, 77% were female, and 88% had undergone prior pituitary surgery. Nearly all (96%) had received at least one previous treatment for Cushing's. At baseline, patients' mean mUFC (364 µg/24 hours) was 7.3 times the upper limit of normal, which is "quite significant hypercortisolemia," Biller noted. All patients initially received osilodrostat, with a rapid dose uptitration every 2 weeks from 2 to 30 mg orally twice daily until they achieved a normal UFC. They continued on open-label medication until week 24, when urine samples were collected. Patients who had an mUFC less than the upper limit of normal and had not had a dose increase in the prior 12 weeks were eligible for the double-blind phase. Those who were ineligible continued taking open-label drug. The 70 eligible patients were randomized to continue taking osilodrostat (n = 36) or were switched to placebo (n = 34) for another 8 weeks. After that, the patients taking placebo were switched back to osilodrostat until week 48. A total of 113 patients completed the 48 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was mUFC at 34 weeks (the end of the 8-week randomized phase). For those randomized to continue on the drug, mUFC remained in the normal range in 86.1% of patients versus just 29.4% of those who had been switched to placebo for the 8 weeks. The difference was highly significant (odds ratio, 13.7; P < .001), Biller reported. A key secondary endpoint, proportion of patients with an mUFC at or below the ULN at 24 weeks without up-titration after week 12, was achieved in 53%. The mean dose at 48 weeks was 11.0 mg/day, "a fairly low dose," she noted. Clinical features were also improved at week 48, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure (percentage change –6.8 and –6.6, respectively), weight (–4.6), waist circumference (–4.2), fasting plasma glucose (–7.1), and HbA1c (–5.4). Scores on the Cushing Quality of Life scale improved by 52.4 points, and Beck Depression Inventory scores dropped by 31.8 points. Most Adverse Events Temporary, Manageable The most commonly reported adverse events were nausea (41.6%), headache (33.6%), fatigue (28.5%), and adrenal insufficiency (27.7%), and 10.9% of patients overall discontinued because of an adverse event. Adverse events related to hypocortisolism occurred in 51.1% of patients overall, with 10.2% being grade 3 or 4. However, most of these were single episodes of mild-to-moderate intensity and mainly occurred during the initial 12-week titration period. Most patients responded to dose reduction or glucocorticoid supplementation. Adverse events related to accumulation of adrenal hormone precursors occurred in 42.3% of patients overall, with the most common being hypokalemia (13.1%) and hypertension (12.4%). No male patients had signs or symptoms related to increased androgens or estrogens. However, 12 female patients experienced hirsutism, most of those patients also had acne, and one had hypertrichosis. None discontinued because of those symptoms. Kharlip commented, "What's really inspiring was that even though half of the patients had symptoms related to adrenal insufficiency, it sounded as if they were quickly resolved with treatment and none discontinued because of it." "And it may have been related to study design where the medication was titrated very rapidly. There is probably a way to do this more gently and get the good results without the side effects." Kharlip also praised the international consortium that devised the protocol and collaborated in the research effort. "It's incredibly exciting and gratifying to see the world come together to get these data. It's such a rare disease. To be able to have something like that in the field is a dream, to have a working consortium. The protocol was effective in demonstrating efficacy. It's just a win on so many levels for a disease that currently doesn't have a good therapy...I struggle with these patients all the time so I'm thrilled that there is hope." An ongoing confirmatory phase 3 study, LINC-4, is evaluating patients up to 48 weeks. Biller is a consultant for and has received grants from Novartis and Strongbridge. Kharlip has reported no relevant financial relationships. For more diabetes and endocrinology news, follow us on Twitter and on Facebook. From https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/910864#vp_1

CLCI699C2302: A Phase III, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, 48 Week Study with an Initial 12 Week Placebo-controlled Period to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Osilodrostat in Patients with Cushing’s Disease Purpose In people with a disorder known as Cushing’s disease, levels of the hormone cortisol are very high in the urine and blood. Lowering cortisol levels relieves the symptoms of Cushing’s disease. Osilodrostat is an investigational drug that inhibits an enzyme needed for cortisol to be made. In this study, researchers are assessing the safety and effectiveness of osilodrostat in patients with Cushing¿s disease and observing its ability to reduce cortisol levels. In the first 12 weeks of the study, patients will receive osilodrostat or a placebo (inactive drug). After week 12 and continuing through week 48, all patients will receive osilodrostat. Patients will then have the option to continue taking osilodrostat for up to 100 weeks into the study, if they wish. Osilodrostat is taken orally (by mouth). Eligibility To be eligible for this study, patients must meet several criteria, including but not limited to the following: Patients must have Cushing¿s disease with elevated levels of cortisol in the urine. An acceptable amount of time must have passed between the completion of prior therapies and entry into the study, to allow for a sufficient “washout” period. This study is for patients ages 18 to 75. For more information about this study and to inquire about eligibility, please contact Dr. Eliza Geer at 646-888-2627. Protocol 17-351 Phase III Investigator Eliza B. Geer Co-Investigators Monica Girotra Diseases Pituitary Tumor Locations Memorial Sloan Kettering Memorial Hospital From https://www.mskcc.org/cancer-care/clinical-trials/17-351