FDA OKs Birth-Control for Less Periods

[Guest]

FDA OKs Birth-Control for Less Periods

 

By LAURAN NEERGAARD

.c The Associated Press

 

WASHINGTON (AP) - The government approved on Friday the first birth-control pill specially designed to reduce the frequency of women's periods - from once a month to four times a year.

 

Hence the name: Seasonale.

 

The pills aren't a new chemical. They contain the same combination of low-dose estrogen and progestin found in many oral contraceptives.

 

Nor is the idea of menstrual suppression new. For decades, many doctors have told women how they can skip a period by continually taking the active birth-control pills in each month's supply and ignoring the week of dummy pills in each packet.

 

But Seasonale promises to make the option a little more convenient, with packaging that gives women 12 straight weeks of active pills and then a week of dummy pills for their period. And the Food and Drug Administration's approval means menstrual suppression could become more common, as Seasonale's advertising alerts women to the option.

 

Seasonale isn't perfect, the FDA cautioned.

 

While women have fewer scheduled periods, studies show Seasonale users have about twice the risk of unexpected ``breakthrough'' bleeding between periods as woman taking conventional monthly cycle pills, especially in the first few cycles of use. Also, 7.7 percent of Seasonale users dropped out of studies of the drug citing unacceptable bleeding, compared with 1.8 percent of women taking conventional monthly pills. Some Seasonale users had so much breakthrough bleeding that their total days of bleeding over a year were no less with the new drug than with regular pills, FDA said.

 

So the agency ordered that Seasonale's label state that women must weigh that inconvenience against fewer regular periods.

 

``Each woman will respond to this product somewhat differently,'' said FDA's Dr. Scott Monroe. ``Some will find they respond entirely as the product was designed to function, and others will have increased intermenstrual bleeding to the extent that they choose not to continue with the product.''

 

Maker Barr Laboratories plans to have prescription-only Seasonale in pharmacies by November. Barr wouldn't reveal Seasonale's price but said it will be comparable to other brand-name oral contraceptives, which sell for roughly $1 a pill. Generic versions can cost half that amount.

 

Having fewer periods ``was absolutely fabulous,'' said Shannon Zaichenko, 27, of Chesapeake, Va., who spent three years in a study of Seasonale.

 

``It's the convenience, not being bogged down, not having to plan vacations or just lifestyle around seven days of bleeding,'' she said. A frequent traveler, Zaichenko recalled that before Seasonale her periods ``always seemed to happen when I was on a plane for 20 hours.''

 

Seasonale also may be attractive to women who experience severe cramping, heavy bleeding and other menstrual-related symptoms, a number Barr estimates at 2.5 million in the United States.

 

But the National Women's Health Network says some Seasonale proponents falsely imply that limiting menstruation is generally healthier, a message the consumer group calls particularly unwise for young girls.

 

``We already have a lot of shame and stigma in this society about menstruation,'' cautions the network's Cynthia Pearson, who has asked Barr to ensure that Seasonale ads don't convey that impression.

 

During the menstrual cycle, fluctuations in estrogen signal the uterine lining, or endometrium, to thicken in preparation for nourishing an embryo. If pregnancy doesn't occur, that excess lining is sloughed off, accompanied by bleeding.

 

The big safety question is whether four periods a year are enough to allow the uterus to shed any tissue that builds up.

 

A study by Eastern Virginia Medical School, which developed the three-month pill regimen, shows they are. It tracked 682 women taking either Seasonale or regular monthly pills for a year. Seasonale proved equally effective at preventing pregnancy. Side effects, too, were similar with the exception of breakthrough bleeding, which did decrease with each cycle of Seasonale use.

 

``There is no concern in delaying the period for three months,'' says Dr. Vanessa Cullins of Planned Parenthood.

 

In fact, she notes, women today have far more periods in their lifetime than their ancestors before the era of contraception, when women spent much more time either pregnant or breast-feeding, both of which block menstruation.

 

Not every woman will be comfortable with Seasonale, Cullins said - monthly bleeding gives some contraceptive users added reassurance that they're not pregnant.

 

09/05/03 18:05 EDT

   

Copyright 2003 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.  All active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.

[Guest]

I just posted this but not really sure what I think, I worry about this because those of us women with pituitary problems usually our periods are one of the first ways we know something isn't right with our body? Had my periods not been all out of whack, then I would probably not known there was this tumor. I still have them but they were messed up. Also, another concern by myself not having regular periods I already had to have a D&C because of this, and according to my doctor I could have to have more in the future.

 

But, I too would love this, I would love to plan vacations, without worrying when my period was going to come, would love to not have to mess with this stuff, so often. I have to admit I did love it when my periods would skip a month or so.

 

 

 

I can see pros and cons.