Jump to content

CRH Stimulation Test Boosts Cushing Disease Diagnosis


MaryO

Recommended Posts

  • Chief Cushie

The study covered in this summary was published on Research Square as a preprint and has not yet been peer reviewed.

Key Takeaways

  • Adding a corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation test immediately following a 2-day low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (LDDST) ― what's known as a Dex-CRH test and was first introduced in 1993 ― identified Cushing disease in 5 of 65 people (7.7%) with a confirmed diagnosis but who had previously shown normal cortisol levels on a conventional LDDST.

  • However, the Dex-CRH test also resulted in one (2.5%) false positive case compared with an LDDST alone.

  • Measuring serum dexamethasone levels further improved the diagnostic accuracy of the Dex-CRH test.

Why This Matters

  • It can be challenging to diagnose Cushing syndrome and to differentiate Cushing disease from nonneoplastic physiologic hypercortisolism caused by conditions that can present with Cushing syndrome–like clinical features, such as diabetes and obesity.

  • The Dex-CRH test, first described in 1993, initially appeared superior to an LDDST alone for ruling out nonneoplastic hypercortisolism, with a report of 100% sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy. However, subsequent studies that used different protocols and in which dexamethasone was not measured had results that called into question the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the Dex-CRH test.

  • This study reports the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the Dex-CRH test for diagnosing Cushing disease, performed as first described, in 107 patients, including 74 for whom dexamethasone was also measured.

 

Study Design

  • The researchers analyzed data from 107 patients with suspected Cushing disease who underwent a Dex-CRH test during 2002–2014 at the Cleveland Clinic.

 

Key Results

  • Sixty-five people received a confirmed diagnosis of Cushing disease and underwent follow-up for a median of 66 months. Cushing disease was not confirmed in 42 patients who were followed for a median of 52 months.

  • The median age of the 107 patients was 40 years, and 82% to 88% were women. The median body mass index for these patients was 34–37 kg/m2.

  • Among the 65 patients with confirmed Cushing disease, five patients (7.7%) had a suppressed cortisol level no greater than 1.4 μg/dL after the LDDST but were appropriately classified as having Cushing disease with a cortisol level that surpassed 1.4 μg/dL by 15 minutes after CRH stimulation.

  • In contrast, 3 of 42 patients (7.1%) in the group without confirmed Cushing disease had an abnormal Dex-CRH test result. For one of these three patients, the LDDST result was borderline normal, with a cortisol level post-DEX of 1.4 μg/dL that increased to 3.1 μg/dL by 15 minutes after CRH stimulation, which resulted in this patient receiving a false positive diagnosis.

  • A cortisol threshold value of more than 1.4 μg/dL during the Dex-CRH test was diagnostic of Cushing disease with sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 93%, and diagnostic accuracy of 97%.

  • Among the 74 patients with dexamethasone measurements, the sensitivity of the Dex-CRH test was unchanged, but the specificity and diagnostic accuracy increased to 97% and 99%, respectively.

Limitations

  • The study was retrospective.

  • Not all patients underwent measurement of dexamethasone level.

  • No uniform protocol existed for the diagnostic work-up and follow-up of patients suspected of having Cushing disease.

Disclosures

  • The study did not receive commercial funding.

  • The authors had no financial disclosures.

 

This is a summary of a preprint research study , "The Addition of Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone to 2-Day Low Dose Dexamethasone," written by researchers primarily from the Cleveland Clinic and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, published on Research Square, and provided to you by Medscape. This study has not yet been peer reviewed. The full text of the study can be found on research square.com.

From https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/985984

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...